Burke School District awarded $225K to build new CTE facility
May 14—BURKE, S.D. — The Burke School District has been awarded a $225,000 Workforce Education Grant to support construction of a new Agriculture Shop and Classroom, part of a broader effort to expand its career and technical education (CTE) offerings.
The facility, scheduled for completion by May 2026, will feature an 800-square-foot classroom and a 1,300-square-foot welding shop, providing students greater access to hands-on training in agriculture, welding and other high-demand trades.
"This is a transformative moment for our district," said Burke Superintendent Tim Sanderson. "We've been part of a rotating mobile CTE program for over a decade, and while that served us well, we've outgrown it. This new facility will give students access to the space, tools, and environment they need to succeed."
The idea for a permanent CTE facility in Burke was first brainstormed more than six years ago, growing from the district's long-standing participation in a four-school consortium. Originally, Burke, Gregory, Colome and South Central (Bonesteel) shared a rotating mobile CTE classroom system. Each school hosted different courses — including welding, house construction, engineering and biomedical sciences — and rotated them annually using a trailer outfitted with specialized equipment. Eventually, Bonesteel exited the partnership, leaving Burke, Gregory and Colome to continue with the shared model.
Burke's mobile CTE classroom — essentially a trailer outfitted with welding tools and other equipment — was shared among the districts. With limited space and amenities (students had to walk outside in the winter and there were no bathrooms), the format had clear drawbacks. Course offerings were limited, and class sizes capped at 10 to 12 students, often making it difficult for younger students to gain access.
"That setup wasn't ideal," Sanderson said. "With this new space, we'll be able to accommodate more students, bring in new equipment we simply didn't have room for before, and provide a much better learning experience overall."
The grant is part of over $600,000 distributed across six South Dakota school districts through two Workforce Education Grants and four Perkins Reserve Grants. These funds are meant to modernize CTE programs and align them with high-demand careers.
"These grants are more than investments in equipment," said South Dakota Secretary of Education Joe Graves. "They're investments in the future of our students, our economy, and our communities. By supporting hands-on learning and industry-aligned training, we're preparing South Dakota students to thrive in high-skill, high-wage, and high-demand careers."
Burke's facility will focus on agriculture, food, and natural resources (AFNR), an area of growing interest for students and employers alike. In addition to the classroom and shop, the building will also include new spaces for wrestling and band, further centralizing student opportunities.
The project officially broke ground on April 28 — before the grant was even awarded. It's funded through $2.75 million in capital outlay certificates, with the grant easing pressure on local taxpayers. The school board's capital outlay levy will cover interest payments.
"This grant allows us to deliver a top-notch facility while preserving our capital reserves," Sanderson explained. "It's a win for our students and our community."
Community support played a key role in securing the grant. The district submitted numerous letters from larger local companies to demonstrate industry backing for the project.
"Seeing that level of support really helped make our case," Sanderson said. "It showed the state that this wasn't just a school project — it was a community effort."
Interest in CTE programs has been steadily growing, a trend Sanderson attributes to changing perceptions around trade careers, state initiatives like the Build Dakota scholarship and outreach from industry professionals.
"I've seen a real resurgence in kids being interested in the trades," he said. "Students are starting to realize they can attend a tech school for 18 months or two years, have their education paid for, and walk into a high-paying career — or even start their own business."
Although there are no immediate plans to expand course offerings beyond the current scope, the increased space and resources will allow for deeper engagement in the existing curriculum. The additional room means more welding stations, better equipment and more students able to enroll in classes that previously had to turn them away.
"Our goal is to give our students the tools they need to succeed — whether they're headed to college, a technical institute, or straight into the workforce," Sanderson said. "This new facility is going to help us do just that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12-06-2025
- Yahoo
‘Pure emotion' frequently drives debates on sports stadium deals
An aerial view shows Kauffman Stadium and Arrowhead Stadium in Missouri, home to MLB's Kansas City Royals and the NFL's Kansas City Chiefs, respectively. Lawmakers in both Kansas and Missouri have pursued legislation to make hundreds of millions of dollars available for sports stadiums. (Photo by DutcherAerials via Getty Images) In promoting his bill to fund professional sports stadiums, Missouri Republican state Sen. Kurtis Gregory warned about the potential hit to jobs and tax revenues if the state were to lose a team. But on the floor of the Senate last week, he acknowledged that pride was also a prime motivator in his efforts to make hundreds of millions of dollars available to the NFL's Kansas City Chiefs and MLB's Kansas City Royals, both of which are being courted to move several miles away into neighboring Kansas. A former University of Missouri football player, Gregory pointed to the Missouri-Kansas rivalry that dates back to the Civil War and characterized Kansas as 'kind of an archrival.' 'We just let the state of Kansas poach, you know, really the pride and joy of the western side of the state, and I would say the entire state of Missouri?' he said in his floor speech. 'And then I would also say, what's next? What's the next thing the state of Kansas is going to try and take from us?' Days after the 2025 legislative session ended in May, Missouri Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe called a special session for lawmakers to consider stadium funding and disaster relief bills. Last week, the state Senate approved Gregory's stadium incentives bill in the middle of the night by a 19-13 vote. On Wednesday afternoon, the state House approved the measure by a 90-58 vote, sending it to the governor's desk. The bill would fund up to 50% of construction or renovation costs and is estimated to cost about $1.5 billion over 30 years, the Missouri Independent reported. Stateline was unable to reach Gregory for comment. Economists have panned the ongoing stadium bidding war between Missouri and Kansas — which has offered to pay up to 70% of new stadium costs — as a waste of taxpayer dollars. But Gregory's comments highlight the emotional undercurrents frequently at play in sports stadium funding debates across the country. Experts nearly unanimously agree that public subsidies for stadiums are a poor investment, but that hasn't slowed a wave of local and state spending for billionaire team owners. More taxpayer money benefits pro sports owners amid 'stadium construction wave' Washington, D.C., could spend more than $1 billion to move the Washington Commanders some seven miles from a suburb in Maryland to a new facility planned for the old RFK Stadium site, described by the team's controlling owner as the 'spiritual home' of the NFL franchise. Geoffrey Propheter, an associate professor in the School of Public Affairs at the University of Colorado Denver who studies stadium deals, said these kinds of arguments ignore the economic reality of stadium subsidies. 'You're not talking economics. You're talking pure emotion,' he said. Despite mounds of evidence showing the public does not fare well on stadium investments, he said lawmakers and mayors still tout the potential for jobs and new tax revenues with stadiums and arenas. Oftentimes, teams and politicians stir fears about the possibility of losing franchises to another market to increase pressure, he said. But three of the most prominent stadium subsidy deals under consideration now — in Chicago, Kansas City and the district — involve teams looking to move within the same metro area. 'I would appreciate it if lawmakers were that transparent, and they're like, 'I don't care how much this costs, there's no price that's too high for us to pay to keep them here,'' Propheter said. But cities and states have more at stake than raw economics, said Irwin Kishner, a New York attorney who has represented pro teams in multiple stadium deals. He likened the stadium debate to those surrounding the Olympics: Research has found that host cities generally spend well in excess of the revenue generated by the games. But cities and nations still fiercely compete for the chance to host the high-profile event. 'It elevates the status of venues,' Kishner said. 'And I think it's very much the same thing with stadiums and arenas.' He said cities also face potential economic consequences of lost jobs and tax revenues if teams leave altogether. Oakland, California, for example, lost both its pro football and baseball teams to Nevada after local stadium talks fell apart. The NFL's Raiders now play in Las Vegas and MLB's A's are playing temporarily in West Sacramento, California, before moving into their under-construction stadium on the Vegas strip. 'What happened in Oakland is a classic example of what happens when a team doesn't get their building in the way they want it,' Kishner said. And those sorts of relocations can leave lasting marks, he said, pointing to the sour feelings that still persist in Brooklyn decades after MLB's Dodgers left for Los Angeles. Other cities have similarly iconic teams, such as the NFL's Chicago Bears. 'When push comes to shove, municipalities would be embarrassed to lose a team. I mean, could you imagine the Bears playing in St. Louis as an argument?' Kishner said. 'I think Chicago would have something to say about that in a very emotional way. And by the way, these things take generations to get past.' Currently, Chicago's stadium discussions are more localized. After first sharing plans to build a new stadium along Lake Michigan's shore in Chicago, the Bears are now pursuing a massive football stadium development in suburban Arlington Heights. Despite introducing various tax measures aimed to benefit megaprojects such as stadiums, Illinois lawmakers ended their session on May 31 with no action on the matter. My brain tells me it's not that big of a deal, but my heart and soul as a Chicagoan doesn't want them to leave. – Illinois Democratic state Rep. Kam Buckner Democratic state Rep. Kam Buckner, whose district includes parts of Chicago's South Side, said lawmakers have little appetite to invest heavily in stadiums. The MLS' Chicago Fire just announced plans to privately finance a new $650 million professional soccer stadium in the city's South Loop — the same area the MLB's White Sox are also eyeing as they explore a new baseball stadium. 'The days of widespread public money for private stadiums without public benefit — those days are over, and that is not just a sentiment in the state of Illinois. I think this is a sentiment across the country,' Buckner said. Still, he acknowledged the sway emotions can have in the matter. While the Bears leaving the city limits likely would not affect the region's economy, he said, it would still prove a blow to morale. 'My brain tells me it's not that big of a deal,' he said, 'but my heart and soul as a Chicagoan doesn't want them to leave.' Missouri's stadium debate has been simmering for years now: The Royals first announced plans in 2022 to move downtown from their stadium on the outskirts of the city. And the Chiefs — who share the sprawling stadium complex with the Royals — quickly followed with talks of wanting a new or renovated stadium. After voters in a county election last year soundly rejected extending a stadium sales tax to fund those plans, lawmakers across the border in Kansas passed legislation that would fund up to 70% of the costs of new stadiums. That measure expires at the end of June, pushing Missouri legislators to act. Neil deMause, a journalist who has written extensively about stadium subsidies, said such deadlines are arbitrary and meant to exact political pressure. While politicians once had plausible deniability about the pitfalls of stadium subsidies, the research is now overwhelmingly clear and well covered in the media, he said. (It's been nearly a decade since HBO's John Oliver dedicated an episode of his satirical news show to the folly of stadium finance.) Kansas v. Missouri stadium battle shows how states are reigniting border wars But politicians on both sides of the aisle continue to push stadium subsidies — whether they're touting the potential for wider real estate development or intangibles such as team pride and fears of losing franchises. 'It's this prescribed dance, where everybody sort of pretends to be doing due diligence, but at the same time, everybody knows it's going to happen,' deMause said. He said that appears to be the case in the nation's capital. In April, city and team officials for the Washington Commanders announced plans for a 65,000-seat stadium. The proposed deal, which must be approved by the full city council, would cost taxpayers some $1.1 billion over eight years. But deMause's analysis of the plan determined the public will be spending well in excess of that figure because of billions in free rent and hundreds of millions in property tax breaks. He estimates taxpayers will pay or forgo at least $7.5 billion on the deal. 'Everybody in and around the D.C. Council seems to be saying, 'Yeah, it sure is a lot of money, but the mayor really wants it, so it's going to happen. It's just a matter of whether or not we can improve it some,'' he said. 'It's a little bit like saying, 'World War II is going to happen — just try and keep the death toll down.'' Last week, Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser's office released a report it commissioned that projected the stadium would create billions in new economic output and local tax revenue in the coming decades — figures that were quickly disputed by skeptical economists and academics. Still, much of the district's stadium conversation has centered on intangibles such as hometown pride and nostalgia. Even NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell waxed about his childhood memories attending games at the old RFK Stadium at an April event announcing the deal. Sitting in front of a 'WELCOME HOME' banner at that event, the mayor said the RFK site was 'where they belong.' 'I want to start by saying welcome home,' she said. Stateline reporter Kevin Hardy can be reached at khardy@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Will the UK spending review lead to autumn tax rises? Have your say
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is due to deliver the outcome of the UK government's spending review on Wednesday, 11 May, setting out departmental budgets for the next few years. The review will set out the day-to-day spending on public services, such as the NHS and schools, as well as planned areas of investment, including infrastructure and research. Health and defence are expected to be among the "winners" from Wednesday's spending review. In addition, the government said on Sunday that Reeves would unveil an £86bn boost for funding research and development in her announcement on Wednesday. Read more: Stocks to watch this week: TSMC, Adobe, Tesco, Bellway and Inditex However, the government faces a tough fiscal situation and the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned last week that "sharp trade-offs are unavoidable". "A more generous NHS settlement, or going further and faster on defence spending, would make cuts to other public services even more likely," the think-tank said. "Within the category of 'unprotected' departments, larger increases for some areas – prisons, say, which face well-publicised challenges – would mean less (i.e. bigger cuts) for others." In a note on Friday, Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics, said that the spending review would "shine a light on the tight fiscal position. And Reeves' problems are far from over. U-turns on benefit spending and higher borrowing costs may mean to maintain the current buffer against her fiscal rules Reeves has to raise £18-46bn in the autumn budget." Gregory said in a separate note that those U-turns on benefit and welfare spending, along with increased pressure to ramp up defence spending and higher borrowing costs, had left Reeves in a "sticky position". "If she wishes to avoid a political backlash and/or an adverse reaction in the financial markets, she probably has little choice but to raise taxes in the autumn budget," Gregory said. In addition, Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "If a potential funding gap emerges [from the spending review], there's going to be speculation that taxes could be hiked to close it. "The government very broadly has two options when it comes to fund raising from taxes. It could make a whole host of smaller tax tweaks – all of which could cause their own problems, or it could tackle a major tax, which would be politically risky." Do you think the spending review could open the door to tax rises being announced in the autumn budget? Vote in the poll below. Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. Read more: How school fees can affect your mortgage borrowing The cost of caring for a loved one What is the Pension Investment Review?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
09-06-2025
- Yahoo
Will the UK spending review lead to autumn tax rises? Have your say
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is due to deliver the outcome of the UK government's spending review on Wednesday, 11 May, setting out departmental budgets for the next few years. The review will set out the day-to-day spending on public services, such as the NHS and schools, as well as planned areas of investment, including infrastructure and research. Health and defence are expected to be among the "winners" from Wednesday's spending review. In addition, the government said on Sunday that Reeves would unveil an £86bn boost for funding research and development in her announcement on Wednesday. Read more: Stocks to watch this week: TSMC, Adobe, Tesco, Bellway and Inditex However, the government faces a tough fiscal situation and the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) warned last week that "sharp trade-offs are unavoidable". "A more generous NHS settlement, or going further and faster on defence spending, would make cuts to other public services even more likely," the think-tank said. "Within the category of 'unprotected' departments, larger increases for some areas – prisons, say, which face well-publicised challenges – would mean less (i.e. bigger cuts) for others." In a note on Friday, Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics, said that the spending review would "shine a light on the tight fiscal position. And Reeves' problems are far from over. U-turns on benefit spending and higher borrowing costs may mean to maintain the current buffer against her fiscal rules Reeves has to raise £18-46bn in the autumn budget." Gregory said in a separate note that those U-turns on benefit and welfare spending, along with increased pressure to ramp up defence spending and higher borrowing costs, had left Reeves in a "sticky position". "If she wishes to avoid a political backlash and/or an adverse reaction in the financial markets, she probably has little choice but to raise taxes in the autumn budget," Gregory said. In addition, Sarah Coles, head of personal finance at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "If a potential funding gap emerges [from the spending review], there's going to be speculation that taxes could be hiked to close it. "The government very broadly has two options when it comes to fund raising from taxes. It could make a whole host of smaller tax tweaks – all of which could cause their own problems, or it could tackle a major tax, which would be politically risky." Do you think the spending review could open the door to tax rises being announced in the autumn budget? Vote in the poll below. Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK readers. Read more: How school fees can affect your mortgage borrowing The cost of caring for a loved one What is the Pension Investment Review?
