Smoking rates ‘increasing' in some parts of England, study suggests

Progress in slashing smoking rates across England has 'stalled' in recent years, with apparent increases in some areas, researchers have warned.
It comes as a study found rates in the North fell faster than the national average, with regional differences narrowing 'considerably' in the last 18 years.
Academics from University College London (UCL) analysed Smoking Toolkit Study data from 368,057 adults in England between 2006 and 2024.
The study, published in the journal Addiction, suggests the national average for smoking prevalence fell from 25.3% to 16.5% during the period.
The largest and fastest fall was in the north of England, where rates almost halved from 28.8% to 15.8%.
Rates in the North West went from 28.3% in 2006 to 15.7% in 2024, with rates in Yorkshire and the Humber falling from 30.0% to 16.0%, and 27.4% to 16.0% in the North East in the same period.
The fall in the North was faster than the national average and helped narrow 'geographic inequalities in smoking prevalence', academics said.
They added: 'Regional tobacco control programmes appeared to contribute to this progress.'
However, researchers warned progress in reducing smoking rates nationally in recent years has 'stalled', with apparent increases in some regions.
The analysis found that between 2020 and 2024, there was an increase in smoking rates in the South West, which climbed from 16.0% to 18.7%.
There were also small increases in the South East (15.4% to 16.8%) and London (15.8% to 17.0%), according to the findings.
Lead author Dr Sarah Jackson, of UCL's Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, said: 'Until recently, smoking rates were highest in the north of England, but our study shows that regional differences have narrowed considerably over the past 18 years.
'Smoking rates fell most in northern regions, where dedicated regional tobacco control programmes have been largely concentrated.
'But across England progress has stalled in recent years, and in some regions smoking rates appear to be increasing.
'It's vital that stop smoking services are made easily and equally available across the country, so that everyone – wherever they live – can access the right tools to quit for good.'
In October, the Office for National Statistics' Annual Population Survey estimated about six million adults smoked cigarettes in the UK in 2023, the lowest proportion since records began in 2011.
Dr Ian Walker, executive director of policy and information at Cancer Research UK, which funded the study, said: 'A future free from the harms of tobacco is in sight, but we can't afford to lose any momentum.
'Budget pressures and changes to NHS England can't compromise funding for programmes that help people quit – tackling smoking must be a key priority as our health services evolve.'
If the Tobacco and Vapes Bill becomes law, anyone born after January 1 2009 will be prevented from legally smoking by gradually raising the age at which tobacco can be bought.
The Bill also includes a total ban on vape advertising and sponsorship, including displays seen by children and young people such as on buses, in cinemas and in shop windows, bringing them in line with tobacco restrictions.
Disposable vapes will be banned from June 2025 under separate environmental legislation.
Dr Walker added: 'The world-leading Tobacco and Vapes Bill is a crucial opportunity for the UK Government to shield society from the devastating effects of smoking.
'We urge all MPs and Lords to vote to protect the health of the nation, or more lives will be at stake.'
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'The landmark Tobacco and Vapes Bill will create the first smoke-free generation and put us on track to a smoke-free UK.
'We are also committed to supporting current smokers to quit. We're investing an additional £70 million for local Stop Smoking Services this year, and we are working to ensure that all NHS hospitals offer 'opt-out' smoking cessation services.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Scottish Sun

16 hours ago

• Scottish Sun

DWP offering three month lifeline for 150,000 carer's set to lose benefits – will you be impacted?

DUTY CARES DWP offering three month lifeline for 150,000 carer's set to lose benefits – will you be impacted? Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) OVER 150,000 households receiving carer's allowance will start losing their payments from November 2026. Carer's allowance is a benefit for those who provide at least 35 hours of unpaid care each week, usually for a disabled or sick relative. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Around 150,000 carers will no longer qualify for carer's allowance due to stricter PIP eligibility rules Credit: Getty It is currently paid at £83.30 per week, and carers can earn a second income from a job. However, if they earn more than £196 a week, they lose the allowance entirely. One of the main ways to qualify for carer's allowance is by caring for someone who receives the daily living component of personal independence payments (PIP). In March, the government announced plans to tighten the rules for claiming PIP in an effort to save £5billion a year on welfare spending and encourage more people to return to work. On Wednesday, the government introduced the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill to Parliament. This proposed law outlines plans to make PIP eligibility rules stricter. Currently, people qualify for PIP by earning enough points across various tasks, such as cooking, cleaning, or managing money. Under the new rules, applicants will need to score at least four points on one specific daily living activity to qualify. This change means that having minor difficulties across several areas may no longer be enough to qualify for PIP. This change could see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year, according to government's own impact assessment. As a knock-on effect, around 150,000 carers will no longer qualify for carer's allowance due to the stricter eligibility rules. Understanding carer's allowance However, the Bill also introduces measures to protect existing claimants who might lose their payments. If someone loses their PIP under the new rules, they will continue to receive payments for 13 weeks as a safety net. This 13-week grace period also applies to those receiving carer's allowance. The 13-week transition period is longer than the four weeks originally planned by the government. What is carer's allowance? CARER'S allowance is a UK benefit designed to help people who have caring responsibilities for more than 35 hours each week. Those eligible get £83.30 a week paid directly into bank accounts. To qualify, the person you care for must already get one of these benefits: Personal independence payment (PIP) - daily living component Disability living allowance - the middle or highest care rate Attendance allowance Constant attendance allowance at or above the normal maximum rate with an Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Constant attendance allowance at the basic (full day) rate with a war disablement pension Armed forces independence payment You don't have to be related to the person or live with them to apply. But if you share caring responsibilities with someone else, only one of you can make a claim. The type of care you provide can vary, but includes things such as helping with washing or cooking, taking the person to medical appointments or helping out with household tasks such as shopping or organising bills. To get the benefit, you must also meet a certain set of criteria: You must be 16 or over You have to spend at least 35 hours a week caring for someone You need to have been in England, Scotland or Wales for at least two of the last three years (this does not apply if you're a refugee or have humanitarian protection status) You must normally live in England, Scotland or Wales or live abroad as a member of the armed forces (you might still be eligible if you're moving to or already living in an EEA country or Switzerland) You cannot be in full-time education You must not be studying for 21 hours a week or more You cannot be subject to immigration control You will also have to meet certain earnings criteria in order to get the benefit. Your earnings must also be £196 or less a week after tax, National Insurance and expenses. You can apply for the carer's allowance online by visiting Despite the longer grace period, campaigners, including the disability equality charity Scope, have warned that this extended period is only a temporary fix. They argue that once the payments stop, disabled people will still face the same extra costs of living. Food bank network Trussell said: "The last-minute details on protections offer something for a small proportion of people, but even they will still see a real-terms cut. The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill has also set out how the government proposes to slash incapacity benefits offered to those on Universal Credit. It also includes a proposal to hike the Universal Credit standard allowance above inflation over the next four years.

Daily Mirror

21 hours ago

• Daily Mirror

Wes Streeting says there 'isn't a budget' in NHS for assisted dying law

The Health Secretary - one of the top opponents of the legislation - said assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the health service Wes Streeting has claimed there "isn't a budget" in the NHS for assisted dying services after a historic Commons vote on the issue. The Health Secretary - one of the most senior opponents of the legislation - said it would take "time and money" away from other parts of the health service. On Friday the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill was passed by MPs with a majority of 23 in a move championed by campaigners. ‌ Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves voted for the legislation, which would allow terminally ill adults with six months left to live the option to end their life early. The application would be approved by two doctors and an expert panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. ‌ But Mr Streeting was among several Cabinet ministers, including Deputy PM Angela Rayner and Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood, to vote against the bill. In a post on his Facebook page over the weekend, said he had "no doubt that this is a major and profound social change for our NHS and our country". READ MORE: Assisted dying law PASSES Commons in historic moment - see how your MP voted He said the Department of Health and Social Care "will continue to work constructively with Parliament to assist on technical aspects of the Bill" as it goes through the House of Lords. But he warned: "Even with the savings that might come from assisted dying if people take up the service - and it feels uncomfortable talking about savings in this context to be honest - setting up this service will also take time and money that is in short supply. "There isn't a budget for this. Politics is about prioritising. It is a daily series of choices and trade-offs. I fear we've made the wrong one." Assisted dying campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen also urged peers not to block the landmark legislation. Dame Esther told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: "I don't need to teach the House of Lords how to do their job. ‌ "They know it very well, and they know that laws are produced by the elected chamber. Their job is to scrutinise, to ask questions, but not to oppose. "So yes, people who are adamantly opposed to this Bill, and they have a perfect right to oppose it, will try and stop it going through the Lords, but the Lords themselves, their duty is to make sure that law is actually created by the elected chamber, which is the House of Commons who have voted this through." Dame Esther, who has terminal cancer, acknowledged the legislation would probably not become law in time for her to use it and she would have to "buzz off to Zurich" to use the Dignitas clinic.

Metro

a day ago

• Metro

This is why it seems like everyone has ADHD right now — including you

It might seem like 'everyone has ADHD right now' – but that couldn't be further from the truth (Picture: Metro) Opening up to a friend after I was diagnosed with ADHD, I voiced my struggles with time blindness, lateness, general disorganisation, and emotional dysregulation. 'But isn't it normal to get a little bit distracted sometimes? I probably have ADHD too, if that's the case' she said to me. My heart sank, feeling both rejected and my life experiences diminished in one simple interaction. I doubt she meant to upset me, but her words stung. There's an increasing perception that having ADHD is becoming a 'trend' or a 'personality quirk.' Just like OCD has been carelessly thrown about as being neat and tidy, ADHD is starting to become synonymous with making seemingly normal, harmless mistakes like misplacing a purse, or being 10 minutes late to a coffee date. As soon as I first read about ADHD in women, I knew that I had it. I once lost my house keys and paid my landlord for another set, only to find them wedged down the back of the sofa when I moved out. I also impulsively switched subjects during my GCSEs, A Levels and university; I had my library card revoked at the age of 10 after I failed to return the books I'd borrowed, and I'd spent my whole life feeling that my brain was simply a little bit different. So, does everyone really have ADHD now? Or are we just being equipped with the tools to navigate our own brains, and connecting with a like-minded community in the process? Have ADHD diagnoses increased in the last few years? In 2023, a study from UCL found that the number of people being diagnosed with ADHD has increased over the last 20 years, but this doesn't mean that 'everyone' has it now. Between 2000 and 2018, there was a twenty-fold increase in ADHD diagnoses, rising to almost fifty-fold in ADHD prescriptions issued to men aged 18-29. Largely owing to medical misogyny that favours research into symptoms in men and boys, women are still largely going undetected: the ADHD Foundation estimates that between 50 and 70% of the 1,000,000 women in the UK living with ADHD are undiagnosed. There might've been an increase in people seeking help for ADHD in recent years, but that doesn't mean that the condition is becoming more common. It still only impacts between 2% and 6% of the world's population. ADHD impacts between 2% and 6% of the population (Picture: Getty Images) Likewise, a 2025 review from King's College London looked at 40 studies across 17 countries and concluded that the prevalence of ADHD (AKA, the number of people living with a condition within a specific timeframe) hasn't increased since 2020. The author, Dr Alex Martin, noted that while much of the media has been concerned about a 'surge' in ADHD diagnoses, both 'assessments and help-seeking' are snowballing – which goes some way towards explaining why it might feel like more people have it now. There are also multiple barriers to diagnosis, including excessive NHS waiting times (as long as eight years in some parts of the UK), and the hefty cost of a private diagnosis, which averages out at £1,200 for adults. For many, self-diagnosis is their only option – and that's valid. Meeting the threshold for diagnosis Getting an ADHD diagnosis isn't an easy task, and psychiatrists certainly aren't handing them out like they're lollipops. To qualify, adults need to align with at least five symptoms on the DSM-5, the framework that's used to detect it. As psychologist and clinical director Dr Angela Pickering tells Metro, various symptoms of ADHD might seem relatable to the general non-neurodivergent public. But what differentiates these symptoms between being a normal part of life and being suggestive of neurodiversity is the frequency with which they happen and how debilitating they are. 'The key difference is that for someone with ADHD, these symptoms are persistent, pervasive and significantly impact their ability to function in daily life, across multiple settings such as work, school and relationships,' Dr Angela explains. ADHD isn't just being 'scatterbrained' or 'disorganised': in Angela's words, it's a 'neurodevelopmental condition rooted in differences in brain structure and function.' And so, a diagnosis doesn't just require checking off a few traits, but a 'detailed evaluation to understand the full context of a person's life and challenges.' As part of an ADHD assessment, psychiatrists will look at the pattern, intensity, and consistency of symptoms over time, even going as far as to ask a parent or family member to testify that their loved one's symptoms have longevity and started before the age of 12. When I was diagnosed in November 2021, I asked my mum to fill out the forms for me. Thankfully, she was able to recall with colour the school reports that were constantly telling me I was bright but needed to pay attention to detail and listen more; the eye tics that saw me blinking multiple times in a row, and my persistently hyperactive nature. I used to enjoy talking so much that I'd ask my parents if I could read my book aloud to them; my room was almost never tidy, and I had trouble paying attention in the classroom, often doodling into the line margins of my exercise books. So at the age of 23, I almost cried when I heard the words: 'you have combined ADHD' from my psychiatrist, as in one short moment, years of suffering were validated. Thankfully, I'd been able to skip the lengthy NHS waiting queue and had the cost of my private diagnosis funded through Right to Choose, so I was diagnosed within a matter of months, rather than years. Do you have ADHD, or is modern life just overwhelming? The reality is that, in the modern world, many of us will be feeling burnt out and overwhelmed by information. So, is it any surprise that we're increasingly distractible? As Dr Andrea explains: 'There's certainly growing evidence that people feel their environment – especially constant exposure to digital devices, social media and multitasking – can reduce attention spans and increase distractibility, even in people without ADHD.' With this in mind, the 'human brain simply didn't evolve to handle the level of information and stimulation we now face daily.' 'But while modern life can make anyone feel distracted, ADHD is a neurodevelopmental condition with symptoms that are consistent, long-standing and impairing across multiple areas of life,' she reminds us. So, whenever I hear people trivialising ADHD, I can't help but feel angry. It's not a quirky personality trait: it's an incredibly debilitating condition, and it's exhausting navigating a world designed by and for neurotypical people. ADHD isn't just losing your wallet or being a little bit 'scatty': it's so much more than that. Neurodiversity is finally in the limelight, and with awareness increasing, so many more people are sharing their stories. No doubt, it's saving lives. But the truth is that awareness without understanding is useless, and to suggest that 'everyone has it' diminishes the experiences of those who actually live with it. And no, it's not a 'superpower.' You don't have ADHD if you just forget your keys sometimes; you're probably just a regular human being living in an increasingly hectic world. Do you have a story to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@ Arrow MORE: I'm desperate to lose my virginity but have a panic attack whenever I come close Arrow MORE: Video games are great for my mental and physical wellbeing – Reader's Feature Arrow MORE: Heston Blumenthal reveals touching wish after emotional moment with son