Embden rejects proposal to explore leaving school district
On Tuesday, Embden residents shot down a measure to formally explore leaving the town's school district, Regional School Unit 74.
The 148-107 vote comes after months of tension in the small town. School costs were at the center of the debate: critics of withdrawal believed such a move would undercut the district's budget and be detrimental to local education, while advocates saw it as a way to explore potential tax savings for the town amid rising education costs.
Residents collected over 60 signatures to get the issue on the ballot. Tuesday's nay vote means that the town will stop at step two of the 22-step withdrawal process and Embden will remain in its school district.
Had residents voted in favor of moving forward, Embden would have formed a withdrawal committee under the state's guidance and begun negotiating an exit from RSU 74 before holding a second vote to decide whether or not to withdraw.
'I'm relieved that they have chosen not to proceed with the withdrawal process,' said RSU 74 Superintendent Mark Campbell. 'And I do understand that there were some messages sent by that. As the leadership team, we need to take a hard look at what we can do to further lessen the tax burden on all of our families in RSU 74.'
RSU 74 serves four towns — Anson, Embden, New Portland and Solon — and has four schools. If Embden had gone through the withdrawal process and voted to leave, the schools could have faced drastic cuts, Campbell recently told The Maine Monitor.
Regardless of their stance on the issue of withdrawal, many residents pointed to issues in the state's school funding model.
Paul Fortin, who spearheaded Embden's withdrawal exploratory committee earlier this year, previously told The Maine Monitor that debate between neighbors was misguided, and that the issue lay with the state.
The state's funding formula — known as Essential Programs and Services (EPS) — can place more financial responsibility of education on towns if property valuations are high or student enrollment is low. School districts also tend to raise beyond what the EPS model requires to cover other costs not covered by the state formula.
Valuation in Embden has more than doubled since 2015.
On Tuesday, residents in RSU 74 also voted on whether to approve a $12.9 million school budget, about a $350,000 increase from last year. Embden will be responsible for about $2.2 million of these funds. Residents across the district passed the school budget in a 238-181 vote, an outcome that heads to the school board for final approval Wednesday night.
School enrollment across the district has been declining, according to state data. However, the district reported that Embden's student count has risen slightly since the 2020-21 school year.
This is not the first time Embden has explored withdrawal. The town went through the formal process in 2015 but the measure ultimately failed. The nearby towns of Strong and Phillips recently voted in favor of beginning the withdrawal process from MSAD 58, which saw its $12.6 million school budget fail at the polls on Tuesday.
The move follows a decades-long trend of rural communities exploring withdrawal to tackle budget woes and take control of local education.
Embden resident Kayla Starr, who has been a strong critic of withdrawal and won a bid for a selectman position on Tuesday, said that she felt 'proud' that residents chose to 'stand behind education, community and the next generation.' Still, she pointed to a looming need to address the underlying issue: how schools are funded in Maine.
'What we're seeing across the state hopefully serves as a wake-up call to state officials — it's time to reexamine the funding formula for public education and find real solutions,' Starr said. 'Towns shouldn't be left to figure it out on their own, especially when doing so could unintentionally cause more harm than good.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
A ‘concerned' Mainer's tip got an immigrant wrongly detained for 65 days
This story appears as part of a collaboration between The Maine Monitor and Maine Focus, the investigative team of the Bangor Daily News, a partnership to strengthen investigative journalism in Maine. You can show your support for this effort with a donation to The Monitor. Read more about the partnership. Border agents in Calais wrongfully arrested a Venezuelan man with lawful documentation to work and reside in the U.S. earlier this spring after a 'concerned citizen' reported his construction crew's van at a local gas station, according to court documents. Jeanfranco Alejandro Flores Salazar went on to spend 65 days behind bars in federal detention centers around New England without any legal basis for imprisonment, a period of detention that federal officials later acknowledged was an 'error' and 'oversight.' The details of his case demonstrate the kind of mistakes that some say are happening more around the country with immigration officials under pressure from President Donald Trump's administration to deliver on his campaign promise of record deportations. April apprehensions here hit a 24-year high, and the government has promoted arrests of alleged gang members. This very different type of case was detailed in filings in a U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, where Flores Salazar filed a petition seeking to be released from custody. He was freed May 10. This week, a judge issued a ruling outlining the errors and ordering the government to remove an ankle monitor and supervision provisions imposed when he was released. 'Put simply, the evidence overwhelmingly establishes, including through concessions by and , that Flores Salazar was detained without any lawful basis,' U.S. District Court Judge Leo Sorokin wrote in Wednesday's strongly worded decision. Spokespeople for CBP and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the case. Flores Salazar's Massachusetts-based attorney, Claire Maguire, declined comment. Last July, Flores Salazar arranged for an interview with border agents in Texas after fleeing political persecution in Venezuela, hoping to seek asylum in the U.S., court documents say. Due to a lack of criminal history or previous immigration violations, the agents granted him parole, meaning he could remain free in the country for two years so long as he formally applied for asylum within a year. He later obtained authorization to work and got a job with a construction company that took him to job sites around the country. That job took him to Down East Maine. On March 4, a Calais resident called the U.S. Customs and Border Protection and reported a black van with out-of-state plates 'transporting approximately seven possible illegal aliens,' according to the judge's decision. Two agents found the van the following morning at the Calais Motor Inn, encountering six men loading into a truck on their way to a job site, including Flores Salazar. Flores Salazar and three others produced valid work permits. Even so, he and others were brought to the Calais station, where court records show the agents performed a records check revealing Flores Salazar's previous meeting with agents in Texas. An official at the Calais station authorized an arrest warrant for the man anyway, according to the filing. In federal court, the agency would later say the agents were not aware the parole granted to Flores Salazar was still in effect, calling the mistake an 'administrative oversight.' The judge in Massachusetts did not buy that: 'It is undisputed that Flores Salazar had permission to be in the United States on March 5, that he had committed no crime, and that CBP knew these things when it detained him,' Sorokin wrote this week. Flores Salazar then spent more than two months in detention in Vermont and Massachusetts in the custody of ICE. During that period, he received a notice that his parole had been revoked, though the judge who reviewed his detention would later acknowledge that federal officials were unable to later provide a reason for the revocation and cannot revoke it without one. An ICE official only conducted a review of his case after Flores Salazar filed a petition on April 29 challenging the legality of his imprisonment. In that petition, he claimed that the border agents who arrested him in Maine told him they were detaining him to see if his work permit and Social Security number were fake. An ICE official later attributed the man's detention to 'human error,' according to the judge's decision this week.
New York Post
13-06-2025
- New York Post
CNN analyst defends Kristi Noem, federal agents for removing Padilla
CNN national security analyst Josh Campbell defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the actions of federal agents who forcibly removed Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) from a press conference in Los Angeles on Thursday, saying their response followed standard security protocol. Speaking during an appearance on CNN's 'The Arena' with Kasie Hunt, Campbell, a former FBI special agent, broke down the incident and said the agents were justified in their initial efforts to escort Padilla out of the room after he loudly interrupted Noem. 'From a law enforcement perspective, we're really looking at three separate incidents that happened within a short period of time,' Campbell said. 4 Josh Campbell (seen second from left) defended the actions of DHS Sec. Kristi Noem and federal agents who removed Sen. Alex Padilla from a briefing in Los Angeles on Thursday. CNN 'First, you have the DHS secretary who was addressing the press. This was not a Q&A period, and she was interrupted. She was interrupted by someone who was speaking very loudly,' the CNN analyst told Hunt. 'And so her security detail confronts what we obviously now know to be the senator. And at that point, he is now going to be escorted out. You can't interrupt something like that that's already in progress without having those consequences.' Campbell added that when Padilla resisted and turned back toward agents, the situation escalated. 'The second incident, in my view, happens the moment — as officers are trying to lead him out — he then turns and walks back towards kind of into those agents,' Campbell said. 'At that point, from a security detail perspective, we're taking this person out against their will… they realize this is not someone who is going to comply.' However, Campbell did raise concerns about what happened next — when officers forced Padilla to the ground and handcuffed him outside the press room. 'There will be big questions raised about those kinds of tactics,' Campbell noted. 'Were there other options that were available to the federal agents… What they do is they actually order him to his knees and then quickly shove him down to the ground where he is then handcuffed. So again, you're in a federal building, people are screened for weapons — him having a gun or some type of device like that would not be a concern… So there will be a big question about the tactics that were used.' 4 Campbell added that when Padilla (far right) resisted and turned back toward agents, the situation escalated. AP 4 Campbell said that the incident was 'neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem (pictured above).' AFP via Getty Images Still, Campbell defended Noem, who has come under fire for the incident. 'This was neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem,' he said. 'She's in the middle of a press conference… I don't think any of that was her responsibility.' Padilla was removed after interrupting Noem's remarks on ongoing anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. As Noem accused California leaders of enabling lawlessness, Padilla stood up and shouted questions about her rhetoric. 4 Padilla is seen as he is wrestled to the ground and handcuffed. via REUTERS 'Hands off!' he shouted as security moved in. Video shows him resisting, identifying himself as a senator, and continuing to argue before being pushed outside and subdued. Padilla later criticized the aggressive response, saying, 'If this is how the DHS responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers… throughout the country.' Noem countered on Fox News, saying Padilla 'burst into the room,' 'did not identify himself,' and was 'lunging toward the podium' before being detained. The Post has sought comment from DHS and Padilla.
Yahoo
13-06-2025
- Yahoo
CNN security analyst defends Kristi Noem, agents who restrained Sen. Padilla
CNN security analyst and former FBI agent Josh Campbell defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the agents Thursday who forcibly removed Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., during his viral outburst. Video of the incident showed Padilla trying to walk up to Noem while she was speaking at a podium during a press conference in Los Angeles about the riots. Padilla simultaneously attempted to shout over Noem, but law enforcement stepped in and forcefully stopped Padilla's advance. Padilla was eventually taken to the ground and handcuffed, the video showed. Fox News reporters who were present said Padilla appeared to be detained for a period of time. Padilla identified himself in the midst of the altercation. "I know we are in a politically charged climate, but from a law enforcement perspective, this was neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem," Campbell argued. "She's in the middle of a press conference. There's someone who interrupts and then makes it clear by his movements that he is not going to comply. He's taken out. Again, I don't think any of that was her responsibility." Padilla Hopes People Feel 'Outrage' Over His Forcible Removal And Detainment Earlier, he explained how the story could be divided into three distinct moments that will be scrutinized in the days to come. Read On The Fox News App "First, you have the DHS secretary who was addressing the press," he said. "This was not a Q&A period, and she was interrupted. She was interrupted by someone who was speaking very loudly. And so her security detail confronts what we obviously now know to be the senator. And at that point, he is now going to be escorted out. You can't interrupt something like that that's already in progress without having those consequences." Campbell explained one key moment when security agents at the event realized Padilla would refuse to comply. "But the second incident, in my view, happens the moment — as officers are trying to lead him out — he then turns and walks back towards kind of into those agents," Campbell said. "At that point, from a security detail perspective, we're taking this person out against their will. We've asked the person — and again, this is all happening very quickly — but the moment he then turns into them, they realize this is not someone who is going to comply." 'Spectacle Of Himself': Senate Republicans Blast Alex Padilla After His Forcible Removal From Dhs Presser The third incident, he noted, was when the agents had the senator handcuffed on the ground. "Now there will be big questions raised about those kinds of tactics," Campbell said. "Were there other options that were available to the federal agents as well — as the FBI police officer there — who is responsible for security in that FBI building? What they do is they actually order him to his knees and then quickly shove him down to the ground where he is then handcuffed." This incident, which has drawn outrage from Padilla's fellow Democrats, will face some scrutiny, he warned. Campbell also noted that Padilla's status as a senator did not make any difference in that particular room and to those agents. "In fact, that would have been special treatment for him if they had allowed him to continue to interrupt, you know, very loudly, this press conference," he said. An FBI spokesperson said Padilla was detained after being "disruptive." "During a press conference today held at the FBI's Los Angeles Field Office, Senator Alex Padilla was detained by members of the U.S. Secret Service assigned to Secretary Noem's detail when he became disruptive while formal remarks were being delivered," the spokesperson said Thursday. "Secret Service Agents were assisted by FBI Police who are in Los Angeles at this time. Senator Padilla was not wearing his senate security pin; however, was subsequently positively identified and released." A DHS spokesperson said Padilla was told "repeatedly" to back away, and "did not comply" with officers' commands. "[Secret Service] thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately," the spokesperson article source: CNN security analyst defends Kristi Noem, agents who restrained Sen. Padilla
