Financial services company picks Charlotte for new HQ, bringing nearly 300 jobs
CHARLOTTE (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — Daimler Truck Financial Services USA (DTFS) is moving its headquarters to Charlotte, bringing 276 new jobs to Mecklenburg County.
Governor Josh Stein announced the move on Tuesday, celebrating the company's decision to invest over $7.8 million in a new 60,000-square-foot facility.
Officials said the new headquarters will house administrative, human resources, and financial operations, combining offices previously located in Michigan and Texas.
Gastonia man dies in industrial accident at Kings Mountain manufacturing facility
DTFS provides financing, leasing, and insurance services for Daimler Truck North America, the company behind familiar names like Freightliner trucks and Thomas Built Buses.
The new jobs will offer an average salary of nearly $134,000 and are expected to create an annual payroll impact of almost $37 million.
The move is supported by a state Job Development Investment Grant, which could reimburse the company up to $4.2 million over 12 years if DTFS meets job creation and investment goals.
The state expects to see a strong return, estimating a $1.08 billion boost to North Carolina's economy over the life of the project.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
3 days ago
- Associated Press
Jamf unveils 2025 Security 360 Report: A strategic look at Mac and mobile security risks
Report identifies phishing, infostealers, and OS vulnerabilities as top concerns for organizations HONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire - 19 June 2025 -Jamf (NASDAQ: JAMF), the standard in managing and securing Apple at work, today released its Security 360 Report, separated into analyses for mobile and macOS environments. The report spotlights the risks organizations are facing and offers insights for security leaders to consider when protecting their organizations at the user, device, application and network levels. 'Our goal with this research is to inform security leaders about the risks impacting their organizations – whether those risks impact Mac or mobile – and provide tangible recommendations for safeguarding their organizations against increasingly sophisticated attacks,' said Josh Stein, VP of Product Strategy at Jamf. 'Age-old threats like phishing remain extremely prevalent and cannot be can threats skyrocketing in popularity like infostealers. Jamf remains deeply committed to continuous threat research to not only protect our customers but also contribute valuable insights to the broader security community.' Threat trends facing mobile environments For many employees, mobile devices are the sole devices used at work. Regardless of occupation, the modern workplace is about empowering employees to connect from anywhere, at any time and on any device. This requires raising awareness about the most pervasive threats facing mobile devices and taking tangible steps to keep bad actors at bay. Jamf's mobile device threat analysis is structured into four categories found to be the highest priorities for organizations worldwide. Mobile phishing With mobile devices keeping us connected everywhere, attackers' reach continues to expand. Over 12 months, Jamf identified approximately 10 million phishing attacks, discovered that 25% of organizations were impacted by a social engineering attack, and 1 in 10 users clicked on a malicious phishing link. Training programs can be extremely valuable in mitigating phishing attacks, as can adopting a layered approach with zero-trust methodology. Vulnerability management Jamf discovered that 32% of organizations operate at least one device with critical vulnerabilities and 55.1% of mobile devices used at work are running on a vulnerable operating system (OS). Both Apple and Google routinely provide security updates to patch known vulnerabilities, and the best way to mitigate damage is to update devices accordingly. Application risk and malware Earlier this year, Jamf published research on a Transparency, Consent and Control (TCC) bypass vulnerability affecting iOS devices and published a demonstration of how a 'sideloaded' app (an app from a third-party app store) can infringe on users' privacy. The harsh reality is that using the latest OS is still not enough to protect your organization – good security practices must extend to the application layer as well. Malware and spyware High-profile users such as journalists, politicians and diplomats are often targeted by mercenary spyware attacks. Just last year, Apple sent notices of spyware compromise to users in approximately 100 countries. While malware is not as pervasive on mobile devices, when discovered, it is found to be extremely advanced and targeted. Organizations must treat mobile like every other endpoint and avoid getting complacent about the threat of mobile malware. Threat trends facing macOS environments What began as a machine for executives and creatives is becoming increasingly ingrained into the daily operations of enterprises across all industries worldwide. The threat landscape for Mac is more diverse than ever, and bad actors are only getting more creative with their attack methodologies. Jamf's Mac threat report analyzes the threat landscape affecting Macs and organizes the findings into three main categories: Application risk and malware Jamf discovered that infostealers accounted for 28.36% of all Mac malware Jamf examined, skyrocketing from accounting for just 0.25% in last year's report. Jamf's research is aligned with these findings. Employees of organizations in high-profile industries (like crypto), must remain vigilant from both a training and security tool standpoint. Vulnerability management Jamf Threat Labs has dispelled the myth that Mac is invincible multiple times, including just last year when the team discovered a vulnerability inGatekeeper, a crucial component blocking apps downloaded from the internet that don't have a valid developer ID. Having the right controls and training is crucial for mitigating risks caused by vulnerabilities on macOS. Social engineering With Macs becoming more common at work, the attack surface continues to expand. Phishing is typically thought of as email-specific, which is far from the truth. In fact, Jamf Threat Labs published research discussing a campaign from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) that uses LinkedIn messaging as an initial lure. Training employees in the various forms of phishing that can impact the Mac environment is critical for avoiding fallout. Methodology Jamf examined 1.4 million devices protected by Jamf. The analysis was carried out in the first quarter of 2025, revisiting the prior 12-month period and spanning globally across 90 countries and multiple platforms – specifically, iOS and iPadOS and Android devices for mobile as well as Macs. The analysis in this report is informed by Jamf's Threat Intelligence, a broad collection of insights that are derived from original threat research, real-world usage metrics, along with news analysis and data feeds. Hashtag: #Jamf The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement. About Jamf Jamf's purpose is to simplify work by helping organizations manage and secure an Apple experience that end users love and organizations trust. Jamf is the only company in the world that provides a complete management and security solution for an Apple-first environment that is enterprise secure, consumer simple and protects personal privacy. To learn more, visit


Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
Support for regulating psychoactive hemp gains momentum in NC
Bipartisan support for restricting hemp in North Carolina is gaining steam, with GOP lawmakers unveiling yet another proposal Tuesday that would regulate intoxicating weed-like products in the state. Why it matters: The new legislation, backed by the state's most powerful Republican, is one of several bills proposed in recent months that would crack down on psychoactive hemp products in North Carolina. Though marijuana remains illegal in any form, the state is among the most lenient in the country in its regulation of hemp-derived consumables, but a bipartisan movement to change that has been building. What they're saying: "Stores selling these hemp products are popping up in towns across North Carolina, and children are getting ahold of these products," Senate Leader Phil Berger said in a press release about the bill Monday night. "Without these regulations, the availability of these dangerous products is only going to get worse." Driving the news: On Tuesday morning, Republican lawmakers in North Carolina's state Senate rolled out the most restrictive yet viable proposal yet to regulate hemp while moving to ban products made with any hemp-derived cannabinoids other than delta-9, the psychoactive component of marijuana. The bill would also set age and dosage limits and licensing and testing standards for sellers and manufacturers. Yes, but: It would not legalize marijuana, however — a proposal that has been floated in previous sessions but has yet to surface this year. Flashback: "It's really ironic that in some ways, the most liberal, pro-marijuana adult-use state in the country is North Carolina," Democratic Gov. Josh Stein told WRAL in an exclusive interview earlier this month, in which he also announced he was launching a task force to explore regulations on THC products and marijuana legalization "It's not Colorado, it's not Massachusetts, it's not these states that legalized it and then created a regulatory structure to sell it. It's North Carolina, where we have no rules whatsoever." State of play: As of now, the state has no limits — or age restrictions — on any cannabinoids with psychoactive effects much like those of THC, including delta-9. The new bill unveiled Tuesday, however, would outright ban "synthetic" high-inducing hemp products that can be found on shelves just a few blocks from the state legislature, including delta-8, THC-A, delta-7 and delta-10. The bill also appears to ban CBD, another hemp-derived cannabinoid. The cannabis plant has more than 100 cannabinoids. Some of them produce a weed-like high, while others, like CBD, are not. The other side: House Rules Chairman Rep. John Bell, who is the president of CBD and hemp manufacturer Asterra Labs, is "disappointed in the bill," he told Axios in a text message Tuesday. "This bill will destroy the hemp industry and move it out of state. Not one stakeholder was involved." He had not expressed the same opposition to another bill proposed earlier this session that would regulate his industry, though he told Axios at the time that the legislation wouldn't necessarily be a slam dunk for his company because it would implement new licensing fees and require changes to how it packages its products, for example. Democrats and Republicans alike expressed support for the new legislation, however, when it was unveiled in a committee hearing Tuesday morning. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson also attended the committee meeting. "This is long overdue," Jackson, a Democrat, told lawmakers. "One of the major themes in terms of feedback that I've gotten from law enforcement and from families over the last six months has been about this issue — and usually happens when a family learns that it is truly the Wild West, at least with respect to what children are allowed to buy in these places."


Axios
5 days ago
- Axios
A major energy bill would change Duke Energy's carbon reduction goals
A major energy bill being debated by the Republican-led General Assembly could soon make its way to the desk of North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein. Why it matters: Senate Bill 266, if passed, would eliminate an interim goal that mandates Duke Energy reach a 70% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030, while keeping in place a longer-term goal of being carbon neutral in 2050. It would also change how Duke Energy can set its rates and recover costs from its under-construction plants. State of play: The Senate could vote on the energy bill as soon as this week, and Republicans in the chamber have yet to pose any major objections to it. Gov. Josh Stein's office did not respond to a request for comment about whether he planned to sign or veto the legislation. Earlier this year, Stein criticized the initial version of the proposal the Senate passed. House Republicans, however, did convince 11 Democratic representatives to join them in voting for the bill, meaning it could potentially have enough votes to override any veto. A previous version of the bill was co-sponsored by Paul Newton, a former Duke Energy executive who resigned from the state senate in March. What's in the bill: The bill would eliminate Duke Energy's 2030 carbon reduction goals, which were set in a bipartisan 2021 law. Supporters say scrapping the interim goal would give Duke flexibility to meet rising energy demand and save a projected $15 billion over the next two decades. The bill would also give Duke Energy more flexibility in charging customers for construction costs of new plants, like a nuclear energy or natural gas facility, before the plants begin producing energy. Further, the bill would also change how Duke Energy divides costs among customers for energy it purchases to supplement its own plants, Canary Media reports. The change, one study found, would raise costs for residential users while cutting them for industrial users — though it does not take into account savings from scrapping the 2030 carbon goal. Between the lines: Duke Energy appears to be in favor of the bill. "Policies which build on our state's strong customer protections while helping meet growing energy demands from population growth, business expansion and a resurgence of manufacturing can play a critical role in supporting North Carolina's thriving economy," a company spokesperson said. What they're saying: Several environmental groups, including the NC Sustainable Energy Association and League of Conservation Voters, have pushed back on the bill, saying it will slow down Duke's transition to clean energy sources and put more risk onto the shoulders of residents. Dan Crawford, director of governmental relations of the N.C. League of Conservation Voters, told Axios that he doesn't believe scrapping the carbon emissions goals will lead to $15 billion in savings. "There are a lot of assumptions being made," he said, adding that the legislation ignores that clean energy technology continues to get cheaper. Crawford added that eliminating the 2030 goals will make it harder for Duke Energy to be carbon neutral by 2050 — likening the situation to trying to get in shape for the beach a week before your vacation.