‘How did this ever get made?' Gen Z is falling in love (and hate) with Glee

The year is 2009, and Glee has hit like a cultural earthquake. Every week, millions of people around the world tune in to watch a group of American high school misfits belt out musical theatre and pop hits, turning show choir into mainstream entertainment. The cast's cover of Journey's Don't Stop Believin' becomes an anthem, spending 37 weeks in the UK charts, catapulting its young stars to overnight fame. Glee clubs start in schools across the US and beyond, and Ryan Murphy's show develops a devoted fanbase – myself included – who proudly call ourselves Gleeks. Online, we dissect every episode on Tumblr, trade theories and wear our fandom, plus the merch we bought to prove it, as a badge of honour.
But by the time Glee came to a close in 2015, all its magic had faded. The Guardian reported that 'few will mourn its passing' as the show's last season premiered. A string of increasingly absurd storylines and poor song choices left a dwindling viewership and even the most diehard fans drifting away. Or so we thought – because 10 years after its finale, the show is back with a vengeance.
Glee is going viral, mainly because of gen Z – who watch the show on Disney+ and Hulu, or buy it on Amazon. On TikTok, clips of the show's most outrageous moments repeatedly resurface in an endless stream of nostalgia, while new Reddit threads constantly pop up. Last year, the show's version of Rose's Turn from the Broadway musical Gypsy debuted at No 3 in the US Top 50 chart, while more recently, the 'Glee dance' to Say a Little Prayer has seen thousands of people learn the choreography and upload videos of them performing it. And that's not all. On YouTube, Mike's Mic Glee recap videos have been watched by millions. Even some of the original stars have begun to capitalise on Glee's renewed popularity. The 2022 podcast And That's What You REALLY Missed, hosted by actors Jenna Ushkowitz and Kevin McHale (who played Tina Cohen-Chang and Artie Abrams), recapped every episode from the show's six seasons. But why, in 2025, are we still so hungry for Glee?
Much of the conversation about Glee today pivots around one question: 'How did this ever get made?' Parts of it have not aged well. How could we forget the musical episode inspired by the mass school shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school in Connecticut in 2012? Or when Kurt dismissed Blaine's bisexuality by telling him 'it didn't exist'? And that's before we've even got to Mr Schue – a teacher whose inappropriate behaviour included blackmailing Finn into joining the glee club by planting marijuana on him, teaching his students to twerk and suspending Marley for not wanting to wear a revealing costume.
Unsurprisingly, the response to TikTok recaps of Mr Schue's worst bits often have several comments like 'I just couldn't watch it' underneath. But Glee's cringeworthy nature is also precisely why many new and old fans find the series so enticing. Not only does an episode have all the nostalgia of the 2010s – an era gen Z are romanticising – but it also provides endless 'WTF' moments that keep us talking.
The modern-day consensus is that Glee is actually so bad, it's good, with many hate-watching the series. But, it is easy to forget that when it first hit our screens in 2009, it was groundbreaking. Murphy and his co-writers took us inside a normal school: William McKinley high school in Ohio, which was ruled by jocks and cheerleaders. However, the themes, people and stories the show covered were anything but bog-standard. Christopher Baffa, the director of photography on the first three seasons, recalls feeling as if they were making something 'boundary-pushing'. At a time when 58% of Americans did not support gay marriage, Glee put queer stories front and centre. As its final series aired, one review said it 'did more to normalise homosexuality than any other show in TV history, perhaps more than any other mainstream work of art'. Baffa certainly feels that it had a positive impact: 'I've had a lot of people tell me both now and then that watching Glee was helpful for whatever they were going through in their own lives.'
Ali Adler, a writer on Glee, remembers that every episode, whatever the subject matter, had comedy at its core: 'We knew the topics we were dealing with were serious, but we were always approaching them in a way that was funny.' The characters, she explains, each 'had their own point of view' about whatever the episode's theme was – whether that be homophobia, religion or mental health – 'and their opinions were so specific' to give the show a range of different, real-life perspectives.
Adler describes the whole experience of working on Glee as like getting 'a golden ticket'. And for viewers, too, the show was revolutionary. Elis Shotten, 29, who ran a Glee fan account on Twitter dedicated to Darren Criss, the actor who played Blaine, remembers the series as his 'big sexual awakening'. 'It quickly became a whole world in which I was able to exist away from the real world – where I didn't feel like I was able to express my queer identity openly,' he says of Glee fandom. 'The character of Kurt was a revelation, and it can't be understated how much good he did for so many people like me.'
Dominic McGovern, a comedian who uses Glee as the basis for many of his sets, even calls the show 'an education'. 'We talk about Glee being funny and silly and campy, but it was also rooted in an appreciation for popular culture,' he says. Shotten adds: 'It will always find a way to resonate with people who are high school-aged. Even if its politics have become incredibly dated, the struggles of adolescence will always be the same.'
But the thing about Glee is that it wasn't another American high-school drama; the music was essential. Unlike recent screen musicals such as Wicked or Wonka, which removed all songs from their trailers, Glee always revelled in its camp and flamboyant numbers. Still, Baffa is certain that its focus was always on its stories: 'The songs were intrinsically linked to the emotional levels of one, if not all of the characters … they were just another device we used to tell stories,' he says. Musical TV shows that came after, such as Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, never quite reached Glee's levels of outlandish comedy or over-the-top performance.
Of course, the tragedy that surrounds Glee is now inextricable from its legacy, specifically the deaths of three prominent cast members; Cory Monteith and Mark Salling, who both died by suicide, and Naya Rivera, who drowned in 2020, as well as several crew who died during production, including assistant director Jim Fuller, who had a heart attack. 'Statistically, to have three cast members and crew members have the deaths that we've experienced is odd,' says Baffa. On TikTok, they're often remembered in compilation videos, while And That's What You REALLY Missed dedicated a special episode to memorialising Monteith. A series of accusations from cast members that Lea Michele's behaviour made working on the show a 'living hell' now haunt Glee too – with videos resurfacing month after month aiming to both prove and disprove the claims and stars still being asked about what really happened on set, 10 years after the show ended. But, although the drama of Glee continues to fuel headlines, Baffa likes to believe 'it isn't the focus of the new fanbase I don't want the legacy of Glee to be that – I hope that people can see the positive side.'
Adler is confident that nothing like the programme has been made since. 'Glee was the ultimate in terms of representation – I think kids are still drawn to that.' Does she think they'd do things differently if Glee was being made today? 'Maybe different choices would have been made,' she says. 'But I don't think you can ever apologise for history because history is what creates the future.' And by the looks of things, the future for Glee is still bright – because now, fans just won't stop believin'.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Guardian

39 minutes ago

• The Guardian

‘It's thieving': impersonators steal elderly people's TikToks to hawk mass-produced goods

In April of this year, Daisy Yelichek was scrolling TikTok when something unusual appeared in her feed: a video of her 84-year-old father, George Tsaftarides, who runs an account sharing sewing videos from his small tailoring business in Ohio. But the video Yelichek was seeing was not from Tsaftarides' actual page, which has nearly 41,000 followers – but instead originated from a profile of someone claiming to be a 'sad old man' whose cat sanctuary was at risk of shutting down. 'Please stay 8 seconds so I don't have to shut down my cat shelter I poured my love into,' the text on the video said, adding that the sanctuary would be selling slippers to raise additional funds. The bid for sympathy worked on many viewers, garnering millions of views and tens of thousands of users leaving concerned comments. 'Just ordered two! Sending love to these kittens,' wrote one. Another commenter said: 'thank you for all you do for these babies.' Others even asked if there was a GoFundMe link to donate directly to the cat shelter. Yelichek and her father were shocked. Tsaftarides does not run a shelter. The account posting the plea for funds appears to be a front for a scheme seeking to sell mass-produced slippers. Several of Tsaftarides' followers who actually ordered slippers complained that the fuzzy footwear came with 'made in China' tags and did not, in fact, appear to be handmade by an elderly man with a struggling cat sanctuary. 'These people are using my identity to make money and I don't understand why,' Tsaftarides said. 'It's thieving, it's stealing, and it's not right.' Tsaftarides is not the only TikTok user who has had his likeness hijacked by such accounts. Charles Ray, an 85-year-old retiree based in Michigan, has also been targeted by accounts using doctored videos of his likeness. He started his actual TikTok account in January and uses it to share jokes with his followers. 'Earlier this year, my pastor told me a joke about a frog, and I thought, 'that ought to make people smile,' so I figured out how to make an account and told the joke, and it took off from there,' he said. Ray's videos all follow a similar template: filmed in selfie mode, he tells a short joke. He was frustrated to learn his content, which he makes only to 'share joy' and not to earn money, was being lifted and edited to scam people. In one video, Ray is rubbing his eye, and the repost seems to imply he is crying. Another video uses a clip from a woman crying on TikTok about an unrelated issue, and another includes a user in a hospital bed. Since she first discovered the proliferation and manipulation of her father's face, Yelichek has identified more than 100 accounts splicing his videos with other, unrelated users to sell mass-produced goods including slippers, headphone cases and blankets – all under the guise of independent sellers that need help. Some two dozen Instagram accounts and YouTube as well as a handful were pulling the same trick, according to a list compiled by Yelichek and a review of the accounts by the Guardian. At one point, Yelichek even made contact with the account manipulating her father's likeness over direct message and pleaded with its owner to stop. The person behind the account claimed to be a poor 17-year-old boy based in Greece trying to make money for his family. 'I totally understand your situation but I also want you to understand mine,' he said, proceeding to post more stolen videos. The con replicates a recurring genre of video on TikTok that has boosted sales for some small businesses: user makes a heartfelt post about a local store or restaurant that is struggling, and online followers are moved to support it. One typical post mimicking a local plea for help reads: 'Please just stay 15 seconds to save my pawpaw's slipper small business.' In the case of videos Yelichek is seeing, many commenters who are moved by the fake story try to boost it by commenting names of celebrities and creating other engagement they believe TikTok prioritizes. 'Fun fact,' a comment on one video of the type reads, this one using the same formula but claiming to be a struggling cow sanctuary. 'Liking and replying to comments boosts more! Referencing popular things like Chappell Roan and Taylor Swift puts this video on the [for you page] of more people.' The video pulled in 1.4 million likes and 26,000 comments before being taken down. Yelichek says these accounts lift videos from other TikTok users as well and recontextualize them to create a false narrative. Tsaftarides said his content being used to sell mass-produced goods is particularly frustrating, as he started his account to promote small businesses, including his own, and to encourage people to shop locally. 'All we want to do is show people our store and teach them about sewing,' he said. 'We don't make money off of our TikTok account.' Yelichek said she and her father filed a police report to Jackson township police in Ohio, where their store is based, for identity theft and have made great efforts to get social networks to take the stolen content down – often to no avail. Yelichek said that while Instagram has removed a few of the profiles she reported, TikTok – the platform where the issue is more widespread – has been less responsive. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion 'If we comment on [these videos] saying they're spam, our comments often get deleted right away, with TikTok saying it's against their community guidelines,' Yelichek said, sharing screenshots of the messages. 'They've actually put strikes on my dad's account for me commenting on these videos to say that they are spam and scamming people.' TikTok users who have gotten wise to the scheme have commented on videos calling out the scam. Like Yelichek, some comments say that TikTok responds to their reports of a video by saying it does not violate its community guidelines. TikTok said in a statement that its community guidelines do, in fact, prohibit impersonation accounts and content that violates others' intellectual property rights. Reports of copyright infringement concerns may require proof of ownership, including links to the original content and links to infringing content. Meta similarly stated its Instagram terms of use do not allow posting content that violates someone else's intellectual property rights, including copyright and trademarks, and that violations can be reported on Instagram's help page. Ray, the 85-year-old jokester, said he tried reporting the videos to TikTok but got responses that the content he had flagged did not violate TikTok's community standards. Like Yelichek, he said his comments on the videos alerting followers to the scam were frequently removed, and that he gets 'no help from TikTok' and does not know how to further communicate with the company. TikTok said in a statement that it continuously takes action against such copyright violations. It added that 94% of all content removed for violating community guidelines on fake engagement in the fourth quarter of last year was removed proactively rather than in response to reports. Meanwhile, some users are catching on to this particular kind of sadness bait – with recent videos going viral alerting people to the fact that the posts begging for help with failing cat shelters, cow farms and other heart-wrenching fictions are not real. Though awareness may spread, the impersonating videos remain available. In lieu of takedowns, Ray said he has decided to continue to make his videos because many of his 13,000 followers have told him they look forward to his posts each day. 'With everything that's going on nowadays, people need to smile,' he said. 'If my followers smile, even for a minute, they've forgotten their troubles for a minute. So that's all I try to do – to make people smile. This is not going to stop me.'

Scottish Sun

an hour ago

• Scottish Sun

Chess grandmaster's glamorous wife is ‘more attracted to him' after he reaches incredible feat

The chess guru tied the knot with his long-term girlfriend earlier this year CHECK MATE Chess grandmaster's glamorous wife is 'more attracted to him' after he reaches incredible feat CHESS Grand Master Magnus Carlsen has claimed his wife now finds him MORE ATTRACTIVE after he achieved a major career milestone The 34-year-old recently made freestyle chess history by breaking the previously elusive 2900 rating. 6 Magnus Carlsen recently made freestyle chess history Credit: REX 6 The 34-year-old recently broke the previously elusive 2900 rating Credit: INSTAGRAM@ELLABANGBANG 6 And he claims his wife now finds him more attractive after breaking the record Credit: INSTAGRAM@ELLABANGBANG The Norwegian achieved the mammoth milestone in the freestyle rankings recently released by the Freestyle Chess Organisation. Carlsen is proud as punch with his achievement, although he's seemingly happier by the potential effect it'll have on his intimacy with his other half, Ella Victoria. Carslen, who is better known on the chess circuit as Fischer Chess, said: "A new standard has been set." The five-time world champion then joked: "My wife is way more attracted to me now that I've achieved 2900." READ MORE IN SPORT JEN PARTY Brooks Koepka's wife Jena Sims goes braless in see-through outfit in weird video Carlsen tied the knot with his long-time girlfriend in January in a beautiful ceremony with their friends and family. Ella has been supportive of her hubby's passion for chess from the moment they met. So much so that she's a regular at his events. Carlsen will likely soon be joined in the over-2900 club by at least three of his rivals. JOIN SUN VEGAS: GET £50 BONUS 6 Ella Victoria Carlsen has been a big supporter of her hubsand's career Credit: INSTAGRAM@ELLABELLABANGBANG 6 The couple tied the knot in January Credit: REUTERS 6 They have been the picture of happiness ever since tying the knot Credit: INSTAGRAM@ELLABANGBANG American Grand Master Hikaru Nakamura currently has a rating of 2818, while Fabiano Caruana sits third on the list with 2804. Indian phenom Praggnanandhaa comes in at number four with a rating of 2773. New app creator predicts Madison Square Garden to sell out for live chess match And the top five of the prestigious rankings is rounded out by Ian Nepomniachtchi. Carlsen has been in fine form this year, winning the Freestyle Chess Grand Slam title in Paris and the 2025 Grenke Freestyle Chess Open.

Daily Mirror

an hour ago

• Daily Mirror

Olivia Attwood hits out at Kardashians after Kylie Jenner's surgery admission

Former Love Islander Olivia Attwood fronts a new series that delves into the world of aesthetic enhancements, but believes honesty is the best policy when it comes to celebrities and their cosmetic procedures Former Love Island star Olivia Attwood has hit out at the Kardashians for being selective with their honesty about cosmetic surgery, as she slammed celebrities for being "disingenuous". The 34-year-old hosts ITV documentary series The Price of Perfection, in which she discusses the issues around cosmetic surgery and aesthetic enhancements. Olivia herself paid £3,000 for a boob job at the age of 20, but later paid around £10,000 to have them removed and smaller ones implanted. Her comments about the Kardashians come after Kylie Jenner, 27, finally gave details to a follower on TikTok that she had a breast enhancement when she was 19. ‌ The star was questioned about her cleavage, to which she replied with the size, profile and even the name of her surgeon. It came after her mum, Kris Jenner, admitted she'd had a facelift. ‌ But Olivia said Kylie's confession was "too little, too late." She believes Kylie should be honest about the rest of her cosmetic procedures. She added that Kylie and her sisters' bodies "are not created in the gym." Olivia told the Sun: "Kylie came out and said about her boobs, and I was like: 'I've been talking about my breasts for the past 10 years.' I like the Kardashians, this is not me bashing them, but it's too little, too late for me." She went on to say how she feels the Kardashians should be transparent about all their procedures, because it's 'disingenuous' to pretend their looks aren't down to surgery. She continued: "We know Kylie's breasts are fake. "We knew she had lip fillers when she was selling those lip kits. What about talking about lipo and BBLs?," before saying she believes the Kardashians have had more work done. But although she has had breast augmentation more than once, Olivia revealed that a BBL is the one procedure she would steer clear of. Joking that she has a 'pancake bum', the presenter said: "BBL is the only one I wouldn't do, because the risk is too much. It's one of the surgeries that has the highest revision rate." ‌ A BBL, or Brazilian Butt Lift, is a procedure undertaken to change the size of their buttocks. Fat is removed to from other parts of the patient's body, including the belly, hops and back, then injected back into the buttocks. It's one of the surgeries Olivia covers in an episode in the first series of The Price of Perfection. She said of the second season: 'We touched on brand new subjects. There's just so many different avenues that you can cover, and each one is an education in itself.' During the BBL episode, she wants to film a 360 liposuction and BBL procedure, which is performed on a woman named Scarlett. But Olivia feared the worst during the scenes in Turkey, when the crew were told they weren't allowed to record the full treatment after all. ‌ Speaking about the decision, Olivia said: "They did change their mind at the absolute final hour, so we just told that story and it's in its truthfulness." She added: "It was awful. A lot goes into planning these shoots for my team and I. But I was thinking, 'this is a massive red flag. Why have they suddenly changed their mind?'" Series one and two of The Price of Perfection are available now to watch on ITVX.