Don't click that link: DMV warns of fake registration discount on social media

(FOX40.COM) — Many California residents have reported seeing scam social media advertisements offering to help them renew vehicle registrations at discounted rates.
According to the Department of Motor Vehicles, the state prohibits DMV from offering discounted vehicle registration renewals. Officials are warning Californians to avoid advertisements that claim to provide discounted DMV services.
Davis PD seeks help in identifying man who tore down Israeli flag
'The DMV does not offer discounts on vehicle registration renewals and will never ask for payment or personal information through unofficial channels,' DMV authorities said.
Officials stated that the recent scam was on a social media post that was offering 50% off vehicle registration renewal fees. The post was requesting payment through an online payment app and asked customers to send their license plate numbers.
'The safest way to renew your vehicle registration is directly through the official DMV website,' said DMV Director Steve Gordon. 'We do not offer discounts, and we never conduct official business through social media or other unofficial channels.'
DMV officials want to remind the public to always use the DMV business online at the official DMV website or through an authorized business that is listed in the official Business Partner Automation program for vehicle registration and title services.
The DMV is offering some steps to reduce the chances of falling victim to online scams:
Avoid offers for discounted DMV services: The DMV does not offer special deals through unauthorized third parties or on social media.
Never respond to unsolicited or suspicious texts: If you receive a message asking for personal or financial information, do not reply.
Verify the source: If you are unsure, always contact the DMV through official channels.
Call the DMV if you have concerns: The DMV customer service team is available to help you at 800-777-0133.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

CNBC

7 hours ago

• CNBC

How regime change in Iran could affect global oil prices

Senior Israeli officials said this week that their military campaign against Iran could trigger the fall of the regime, an event that would have enormous implications for the global oil market. The oil market has reacted with remarkable restraint as Israel has bombed the third-largest crude producer in OPEC for eight straight days, with no clear sign the conflict will end anytime soon. Oil prices are up about 10% since Israel launched its attack on Iran a week ago, but with oil supplies so far undisturbed, both U.S. crude oil and the global benchmark Brent remain below $80 per barrel. Still, the risk of a supply disruption that triggers a big spike in prices is growing the longer the conflict rages on, according to energy analysts. President Donald Trump has threatened the life of Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and is considering helping Israel destroy the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. For its part, Iran's leadership is more likely to target regional oil facilities if it feels its very existence is at stake, the analysts said. Israel's primary aim is to degrade Iran's nuclear program, said Scott Modell, CEO of the consulting firm Rapidan Energy Group. But Jerusalem also appears to have a secondary goal of damaging Iran's security establishment to such an extent that the country's domestic opposition can rise up against the regime, Modell said. "They're not calling it regime change from without, they're calling it regime change from within," said Modell, a former CIA officer and Iran expert who served in the Middle East. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denies that regime change is Israel's official goal, telling a public broadcaster on Thursday that domestic governance is an internal Iranian decision. But the prime minister ascknowledged Khamenei's regime could fall as a consequence of the conflict. Defense Minister Israel Katz on Friday ordered Israel's military to intensify strikes on Iran with a goal to "destabilize the regime" by attacking the "foundations of its power." Israel reportedly sought to kill Khamenei in the opening days of its campaign, but Trump vetoed the plan. There are no signs that the regime in Iran is on the verge of collapse, Modell said. But further political destabilization in Iran "could lead to significantly higher oil prices sustained over extended periods," said Natasha Kaneva, head of global commodities research at JPMorgan, in a note to clients this week. There have been eight cases of regime change in major oil producing countries since 1979, according to JPMorgan. Oil prices spiked 76% on average at their peak in the wake of these changes, before pulling back to stabilize at a price about 30% higher compared to pre-crisis levels, according to the bank. For example, oil prices nearly tripled from mid-1979 to mid-1980 after the Iranian revolution deposed the Shah and brought the Islamic Republic to power, according to JPMorgan. That triggered a worldwide economic recession. More recently, the revolution in Libya that overthrew Muammar Gaddafi jolted oil prices from $93 per barrel in January 2011 to $130 per barrel by April that year, according to JPMorgan. That price spike coincided with the European debt crisis and nearly caused a global recession, according to the bank. Regime change in Iran would have a much bigger impact on the global oil market than the 2011 revolution in Libya because Iran is far bigger producer, Modell said. "We would need to see some strong indicators that the state is coming to a halt, that regime change is starting to look real before the market would really start pricing in three plus million barrels a day going offline," Modell said. If the regime in Iran believes it is facing an existential crisis, it could use its stockpile of short-range missiles to target energy facilities in the region and oil tankers in the Persian Gulf, said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets. Tehran could also try to mine the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow body of water between Iran and Oman through which about 20% of the world's oil flows, Croft said. "We're already getting reports that Iran is jamming ship transponders very, very aggressively," Croft told CNBC's "Fast Money" on Wednesday. QatarEnergy and the Greek Shipping Ministry have already warned their vessels to avoid the strait as much as possible, Croft said. "These are not calm waters even though we have not had missiles flying in the straits," she said. Rapidan sees a 70% chance the U.S. will join Israeli airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities. Oil prices would probably rally $4 to $6 per barrel if Iran's key uranium enrichment facility at Fordow is hit, Modell said. Iran will likely respond in a limited fashion to ensure the regime's survival, he said. But there is also a 30% risk of Iran disrupting energy supplies by retaliating against infrastructure in the Gulf or vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, according to Rapidan. Oil prices could surge above $100 per barrel if Iran fully mobilizes to disrupt shipping in the strait, according to the firm. "They could disrupt, in our view, shipping through Hormuz by a lot longer than the market thinks," said Bob Bob McNally, Rapidan's founder and former energy advisor to President George W. Bush. Shipping could be interrupted for weeks or months, McNally said, rather than the oil market's view that the United States Fifth Fleet, based in Bahrain, would resolve the situation in hours or days. "It would not be a cakewalk," he said.

Yahoo

8 hours ago

• Yahoo

Iran hasn't yet made the Strait of Hormuz central in its fight with Israel. Here's how that could change.

Iranian threats to block energy shipments through the Straight of Hormuz and the fate of the nation's own oil and natural gas production efforts have been anxiously watched since the beginning of its conflict with Israel. So far, both fronts have been on the sidelines, with observers closely monitoring what changing war dynamics could signal about the ultimate economic consequences of this conflict. Oil futures have risen over 10% since the fighting started; the sense among analysts is that price pressures could ease if the war remains contained. But things could quickly go sideways — for oil markets and the global economy — if the coming weeks bring concrete signs of escalation around the Strait of Hormuz. "Should this key economic chokepoint be closed, that kind of disruption would send the price of oil toward $100 per barrel, or even above that," wrote Joe Brusuelas, the chief economist for RSM US, in a Friday note. Analysts at JPMorgan Chase have echoed these worries, calling a blocking of the Strait the "worst-case scenario" and suggesting the result could be to push inflation in the US to 5%. That's because this narrow waterway is where about 20% of the world's oil and seaborne natural gas shipments pass between oil-producing Gulf states — not just Iran, but Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, and others — and the rest of the world. Iran has only made noise so far about closing the Strait, but at least one Iranian leader has reportedly said the US military getting involved could increase the odds. Ali Yazdikhah, an Iranian lawmaker, was quoted by the country's semi-official Mehr news agency as saying, "If the United States officially and operationally enters the war ... it is the legitimate right of Iran in view of pressuring the US and Western countries to disrupt their oil trade's ease of transit." Meanwhile, President Trump offered a move toward diplomacy in recent days, saying he will decide in the next two weeks about US action but also pushing back on notions he's taking threats of force off the table. As he told reporters recently, "I may do it, I may not do it. Nobody knows what I'm going to do." Noam Raydan, who studies energy and maritime risks at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, notes that plenty of Iranian oil moves through the Hormuz passageway, so "there's no reason for Tehran at the moment to block the Strait unless it really wants to shoot itself in the foot." How that changes, she notes, is if Iran's oil infrastructure is severely damaged. "Iran will shut the Strait once it cannot export — this is my simple answer," Raydan said. But that scenario is a long way off for now, with Israel apparently focusing most of its attacks away from fossil fuel facilities. Indeed, oil disruptions in Iran have been minimal despite fears that followed one Israeli strike on an oil refinery in Tehran. This has left the world, including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, in a sort of wait-and-see mode. "We're watching like everybody else is," the central banker told reporters this past week, though Powell suggested an easing of economic pressure is likely unless tensions in the region spike to levels not seen in nearly 50 years. What also could emerge to rattle markets — though perhaps less dramatically — are other measures Iran has at its disposal. These range from terrorist attacks to the seizing of some commercial ships. Experts note that Iran has a variety of other means to disrupt the world economy if its military situation gets more desperate. Suzanne Maloney, the director of the foreign policy program at the Brookings Institution, noted in a recent analysis that Iran could run out of existing countermeasures soon and that a further escalation may include things like small-scale terrorist attacks and cyberattacks in addition to threats to the Strait of Hormuz. But, she noted, these are options that "all entail risky tradeoffs, especially the prospect of precipitating US military intervention, which Tehran would prefer to avoid." The Washington Institute's Raydan offered another possible disruption to watch, noting that "Iran is known for seizing commercial ships in the region in retaliation to US actions ... so I'd say ship seizures are something to watch, and Iran has experience in that." Possible attacks on shipping were also brought up in a recent Capital Economics analysis that laid out the effects of four potential scenarios in the weeks ahead, ranging from a short conflict to regime change. Perhaps the most economic uncertainty could come with a scenario of "long-lasting conflict with no off-ramp," which, the group noted, could include regular attacks in the months ahead on shipping and energy transit from both Iran and its proxies. That's a scenario, they wrote, that "might result in a long-lasting higher oil price in the range of $130-$150 [per barrel], lift inflation in advanced economies by 2-2.5%-pts by end-2025 and would be a major risk-off event in markets." But the bottom line, the economists added, is that "we may not know the endgame for some time." Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices

Miami Herald

11 hours ago

• Miami Herald

Large oil producers around the Persian Gulf ramp up exports

LONDON -- As fighting between Israel and Iran intensifies, the major oil producers around the Persian Gulf, including Saudi Arabia, have been racing to load tankers with exports, possibly as a hedge against future disruption. These increases are occurring despite jumps in insurance costs and shipping rates and hazards like jamming of navigation systems. Analysts say these producers are preparing for the possibility that fighting could spread to oil export installations, which have been largely spared so far, or that shipping could be disrupted through the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow passageway from the Persian Gulf through which a large portion of both oil and liquefied natural gas travel. 'They want to make sure that they reduce the risks,' said Homayoun Falakshahi, head of crude oil analysis at Kpler, a research firm. 'That means export as much as possible, as soon as possible.' Kpler estimated that Saudi Arabia's oil exports had increased 16% through mid-June from the same period in May. Other producers in the region including the United Arab Emirates and Iraq have boosted shipments around 10%, Falakshahi said. The intent appears to be to put as much oil as possible on tankers and send it out of the Persian Gulf, mostly to Asian countries such as China, which are, increasingly, the main customers for the oil producers. Although countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have improved their ties to Iran in recent years, having oil on tankers provides a buffer in case fighting spreads to their lifeblood industry. Even Iran, despite being the target of intense bombing by Israeli jets, appears to have managed a modest recent increase in exports, Kpler said. Because of U.S. sanctions on Iran, nearly all of its exports go to China. Prices for Brent crude, the international benchmark, have risen about 10% since June 13, when the conflict between Israel and Iran escalated. They dropped more than 3% Friday, to about $76 a barrel, after President Donald Trump said he would delay his decision on U.S. involvement for two weeks. There have been no serious disruptions to oil exports from the Gulf, but there are signs of increased concern about operating there. The number of empty tankers in the Persian Gulf ready to take on new cargoes has declined sharply, Falakshahi said, potentially indicating a future fall in exports. Marcus Baker, global head of marine and cargo at insurance broker Marsh McLennan in London, said war risk insurance for shipowners that did business in areas like the Persian Gulf had risen about 60% since the conflict started last week. Before, rates had been at modest levels. 'People are just a little bit nervous,' Baker said. Freight rates on large tankers from the Gulf to China have also risen about 50%, Kpler reported. So far, these added costs are not enough to deter shipping by themselves, Baker said, but there are increasing concerns about the welfare of ships' crews, who have been under stress from conflicts and other disruption in this decade, including monumental port delays during the pandemic. 'Crew welfare, crew safety, mental health of crew has become a big issue in the last few years,' he said. Shipping experts also report an increase in interference in the area with the satellite navigation systems used by ships to report their positions. This jamming, which has been unusually intense, is potentially dangerous because it can cause ships to appear in false locations on tracking systems and make it more difficult for owners to follow them. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025