SIS Forum appeal not concerned with substantive beliefs, doctrine of Islamic faith, says Federal Court
PUTRAJAYA: The appeal by Sisters in Islam (SIS) Forum (Malaysia) does not concern the substantive beliefs in the religion of Islam, its mandates or doctrines relating to the Islamic faith but relates to the exercise of legal powers by certain state authorities, says the Federal Court in its judgment.
Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat said the challenge only concerned the review of the Selangor State Fatwa Committee, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) and the Selangor government's exercise of certain powers under the law, which is distinct from the substance and contents of their decisions.
'While it concerns a certain fatwa (religious edict), the case has neither to do with the substantive beliefs held in the religion of Islam nor does it have anything to do with the administration of the substantive aspects of the religion of Islam,' she said in the 40-page majority judgment.
The top judge said in all civilised democracies with independent judiciaries, it is routine for the executive's decisions to be subjected to judicial review and in most cases, the subject matter of the exercise of discretion in the plaint is not the main issue rather the manner in which the decision was made.
On Thursday, the Federal Court bench, in a 3-1 majority ruling, held that the 2014 fatwa issued by the Selangor State Fatwa Committee and gazetted by the Selangor state government is valid, but only insofar as it applies to individuals, not companies.
The court ruled that a fatwa cannot be imposed on an organisation like SIS Forum as it is not capable of professing a religion.
The ruling partially allowed the appeal by SIS Forum and its co-founder Zainah Mahfoozah Anwar to quash the 2014 fatwa, which had declared the group as deviating from Islamic teachings.
In the written judgment released on the judiciary's website, Justice Tengku Maimun explained that the Selangor state government and the religious bodies are part of the executive branch and are empowered by the Federal Constitution and laws passed by the Selangor State Legislative Assembly (SLA).
'The fact that they deal with matters pertaining to Islamic faith, dogma and doctrine – are beside the point and these matters are, in any event, not within our purview (of the Civil Court),' she said.
Justice Tengku Maimun said that under Article 121 (1A) of the Federal Constitution, the Shariah Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over matters within their scope. However, if the Shariah Courts act beyond their jurisdiction, they remain subject to judicial review by the Superior Courts.
She reiterated that SIS Forum's legal challenge did not question the contents of the fatwa but the way it affected them.
This, she said, involved constitutional importance and administrative law, which is for the Superior Courts to determine.
The Chief Justice also reminded all judges that judgments of the Federal Court, unless overruled by a later decision of the same court, are binding and failure to abide by them is an affront to the administration of the justice system.
In the judgment, Tengku Maimun also said a fatwa, once gazetted, carries the force of law and is not mere suggestion, and it is binding on all Muslims in the state and the Shariah Courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
24 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lower courts must follow apex court precedents, says CJ
Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat elaborated on the Federal Court's 40-page judgment which held that a fatwa could not be imposed on an organisation like Sisters in Islam as such entities cannot 'profess' a religion. PUTRAJAYA : Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat has reminded judges in the lower courts that they must adhere to legal precedents set by the Federal Court unless overruled by a subsequent decision from the same court. 'These precedents are binding, and failure to follow them is an affront to the administration of our justice system,' she said in a majority judgment delivered yesterday. The judgment held that a fatwa could not be imposed on an organisation like Sisters in Islam (SIS) as such entities cannot 'profess' a religion. Women's rights group SIS yesterday succeeded in its appeal to the Federal Court to quash a 2014 fatwa issued against it by the Selangor religious authorities. SIS had sought to quash a 2014 fatwa by the Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) that it had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. In allowing SIS's appeal, Tengku Maimun said, the majority accepted the appellants' argument that the Court of Appeal had failed to apply the principle of stare decisis by wrongly attempting to distinguish the case from an earlier decision in SIS Forum (1) without any sound legal basis. Three years ago, a nine-member Federal Court bench led by Tengku Maimun unanimously ruled that it was unconstitutional for the Selangor legislative assembly to grant judicial review powers to the state's shariah high court. In that ruling, the bench also reaffirmed a 1998 apex court decision (Kesultanan Pahang v Sathask Realty Sdn Bhd) which held that corporations cannot profess a religion. 'Consistent with our guidance to the lower courts, we are fully inclined to uphold stare decisis and to follow the precedent established in SIS Forum (1) and Kesultanan Pahang,' she said in the 40-page judgment. Two years ago, the Court of Appeal dismissed SIS's challenge to the fatwa, which claimed that the women's group espoused liberalism and religious pluralism and had deviated from Islamic teachings. In a 2-1 decision, the appellate court concluded that the legal principle established in SIS Forum (1) was merely obiter dicta – a passing judicial remark not binding as precedent. However, Tengku Maimun refuted this, saying that the Federal Court's reasoning in SIS Forum (1) was not obiter dicta, but formed a core part of the court's legal reasoning. The court had held that Section 66A of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 was unconstitutional. She further noted that the earlier nine-member bench had ruled that shariah courts cannot conceptually exercise judicial review over artificial persons, such as corporate entities, even if they identify with Islam. Tengku Maimun, Court of Appeal president Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim and Justice Nallini Pathmanathan formed the majority in yesterday's ruling while Justice Abu Bakar Jais dissented. SIS, a company limited by guarantee and incorporated under the Companies Act 1965, argued that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be applied to a corporate entity governed by civil law.
Malaysiakini
25 minutes ago
- Malaysiakini
Selangor sultan urges SIS to drop 'Sisters in Islam' from publications
The Selangor sultan has expressed disappointment and regret over part of the Federal Court's ruling in favour of rights group Sisters in Islam (SIS), urging the NGO to stop using 'Sisters in Islam' in its publications. In a statement posted on his official Facebook page, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah said that the 'misuse' of the word 'Islam' in the name and publications of SIS Forum (Malaysia) could cause confusion among the Muslim community.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump says he will decide on US involvement in Iran within two weeks
US President Donald Trump has announced that he would make a decision about US military involvement in Iran within two weeks, offering a timeframe for a possible intervention into a conflict that flared last week and has so far remained limited to Israel and the Islamic Republic. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision on whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' Trump said via White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who asserted that Tehran might be 'a couple of weeks' away from being able to deploy a nuclear weapon. 'As for correspondence between the United States and the Iranians, I can confirm that correspondence has continued as you know we were engaged with six rounds of negotiations with them in both indirect and direct ways,' Leavitt said in a briefing. Leavitt delivered Trump's statement and discussed the president's thinking as he faced defiance from many in his own party over his comments on Wednesday, in which he said that he 'may' or 'may not' order US forces to participate in Israel's strikes against the Islamic republic. Steve Bannon, one of the most influential voices from Trump's 'America First' coalition, has warned against any US military operations supporting Israel's bid to destroy Iran's nuclear programme absent a diplomatic deal. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon said in a discussion hosted on Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor, referring to the war started in 2003, which is estimated to have killed some 4,700 US and allied troops. 'The Israelis have to finish what they started. They started this. They should finish it,' Bannon said. Other political figures, who have staunchly supported Trump over many years – including Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, and far-right pundit Tucker Carlson – have also come out against US military intervention. They are clashing with other Republicans who parrot Trump's insistence that Iran is likely developing nuclear weapons or already has one, which they call an outcome that must be stopped by any means necessary. Republicans supporting US military action against Tehran seem to include Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, whose military background carries weight with her colleagues. 'Maybe our public is not aware that 43 Americans lost their lives on October 7 [2023] at the hands of Hamas, which is an Iran-backed terrorist organisation,' Ernst said in a contentious Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Wednesday. Leavitt said that Iran only needed approval from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and two weeks to complete production of a weapon that would pose 'an existential threat ... to the entire world'. 'Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' she said. 'All they need is a decision from the Supreme Leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course, pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world. 'That is something that the entire world, including countries like Russia, is in agreement with: that Iran should not and cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' Leavitt added. The press secretary was also asked whether Trump might want to involve Beijing in possible negotiations, just hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping held a call in which they urged Israel and Iran to stop fighting. Asked whether Trump administration officials were concerned about China supporting Tehran, Leavitt said: 'I don't believe we're seeing any signs of that at this moment in time.' When pushed on whether a decision not to strike Iran might send a message to Beijing on Taiwan, Leavitt pointed to the 'very respectful' and 'cordial relationship' between Trump and Xi. She noted that Trump had 'long maintained' this relationship, even during his first term, emphasizing that the US and China 'share many strategic interests, not only in economics but also in global affairs and foreign policy'. Asked about the division among Republicans and the Trump base's reluctance to engage in a foreign war, Leavitt urged his supporters to 'trust' the president, citing his 'incredible instincts' and describing him as a 'peacemaker in chief' who preferred diplomacy but was not 'afraid to use strength as well'.
