2003 vs 2025: Why Americans Aren't Rallying Behind War Against Iran
New Delhi:
It was March 2003 when the United States invaded Iraq with the backing of a largely supportive public. Images of "shock and awe" lit up TV screens as American patriotism surged in the wake of 9/11. Polls showed broad approval for the war.
President George W Bush's administration had sold the public a clear narrative: Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and posed an imminent threat. For millions of Americans, still raw from the trauma of the attack on the twin towers, war felt justified and overdue.
Two decades later, the world is watching a different kind of war, and a very different American reaction.
On Sunday, President Donald Trump announced that the US had launched precision airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. The strikes marked a sharp escalation in a volatile region, but the American public didn't rally behind its president. Instead, social media platforms were flooded with criticism, fear, and rage.
A user wrote on X, "Trump calls Iran the 'bully of the Middle East...' Israel has bombed 5 countries and invaded 3 in the past two years alone. But IRAN is the bully...This man is a pathetic fraud."
Trump calls Iran the 'bully of the Middle East…'
Israel has bombed 5 countries and invaded 3 in the past two years alone.
But IRAN is the bully…
This man is a pathetic fraud. pic.twitter.com/7ES2wQOeV7
— ADAM (@AdameMedia) June 22, 2025
Another wrote, "Trump announces attack on Iran. No congressional approval. At the hands of the self-proclaimed 'anti-war' president."
Trump announces attack on Iran. No congressional approval. At the hands of the self-proclaimed "anti-war" president. pic.twitter.com/SgeJgwrusZ
— Brian Tyler Cohen (@briantylercohen) June 21, 2025
"This man is insane. With what authorization did the US bomb Iran? What evidence? Trump says the US completed an attack on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Now all is us need to be on alert it high priority US cities like NYC." another said.
This man is insane. With what authorization did the US bomb Iran? What evidence? Trump says the US completed an attack on Iran's nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan. Now all is us need to be on alert it high priority US cities like NYC. pic.twitter.com/pK2KPB1ecK
— Fly Sistah ???? (@Fly_Sistah) June 22, 2025
Someone said, "America is officially at war with Iran. F**k Donald Trump."
America is officially at war with Iran.
Fuck Donald Trump.
— Dean Withers (@itsdeaann) June 22, 2025
The Polarity
The contrast with 2003 could not be more stark. Back then, more than two-thirds of Americans supported military action in Iraq. President Bush's speechwriters carefully echoed fears of terrorism and national vulnerability. The mainstream media, from cable news to major newspapers, often echoed the administration's talking points. Protests against the war only gained momentum months later, when the initial optimism faded into the grim reality of casualties and chaos.
In 2025, the opposite is playing out. According to a YouGov/Economist poll conducted just before the strikes, 60 per cent of Americans said they opposed military action against Iran. A separate Washington Post survey found similar trends: 45 per cent opposed, only 25 per cent supported, and 30 per cent remained undecided.
Even Trump's traditionally loyal base is showing signs of fracture. MAGA-aligned figures such as Steve Bannon have publicly warned that a war with Iran would "tear the US apart." On X, Trump's once-staunch defenders questioned his "America First" credentials and criticised the lack of congressional approval.
The scepticism crosses party lines. Democrats remain firmly anti-war, independents lean heavily against it, and even among Republicans, support is tepid. For many, the move to bomb Iran feels like a breach of the very anti-interventionist doctrine Trump once championed.
The Libya Litmus Test
This isn't the first time Americans reacted cautiously to foreign intervention. During the 2011 US-led campaign in Libya to oust Muammar Gaddafi, public support was tentative at best.
A Pew poll found 63 per cent believed the US had no responsibility to intervene, and only 27 per cent supported action. Only 16 per cent backed bombing Libyan air defences, while 82 per cent opposed sending troops.
Support rose slightly after airstrikes began, with a Gallup poll showing 47 per cent approval. Though 79 per cent later told Ipsos/Reuters they supported Muammar Gaddafi's removal, a Pew survey showed only 44 per cent still backed the airstrikes.
From 2003 To 2025
Back in 2003, the post-9/11 landscape made dissent difficult. To question the war was to risk being labelled unpatriotic. The Bush administration's claims about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction went largely unchallenged in mainstream media. According to Gallup, approval for the Iraq invasion surged to 76 per cent immediately after it began.
By contrast, today's information environment is decentralised, fast, and unforgiving. Misinformation spreads quickly, but so does dissent. Social media allows people to voice outrage in real time, organise rapidly, and question official narratives before they solidify.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US cities beef up security after Trump launched airstrikes on Iran
Major US cities are tightening security after President Donald Trump unleashed airstrikes on Iran, a direct military intervention that's deepened Washington's role in Israel's war with Tehran and raised concerns about potential retaliation. In Los Angeles, mayor Karen Bass said that officials in the second largest US city are closely monitoring the situation.(AFP/ representational) Iran early Sunday warned that the US attack, dubbed 'Operation Midnight Hammer' by the Pentagon, will trigger 'everlasting consequences' and said it 'reserves all options' to respond. Police in New York, Washington, DC, and Los Angeles have since increased patrols at religious institutions, diplomatic facilities and public spaces. Officials cited no credible threats at this time but highlighted the need for vigilance. In the capital, the Metropolitan Police Department said it's closely monitoring the events in Iran and is coordinating with local, state, and federal law enforcement partners to share information and monitor intelligence. The New York Police Department said it's deployed additional officers across the city and is coordinating with the US Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies to monitor for any potential threats. Additional resources have been allocated to religious, cultural, and diplomatic sites across the city. The Greater New York area is home to the largest Jewish population outside of Israel, with about 1.4 million people. Since 2001, the NYPD and its federal partners have disrupted about 30 plots targeting the city, the department said. Officials said those efforts reflect a broad strategy that combines intelligence gathering, overseas partnerships and rapid response capabilities — tools they're now using to assess any fallout from the US strikes on Iran. The department's Intelligence Bureau operates an international liaison program with embedded personnel in 13 countries, including in Israel, where an officer is providing real-time assessments from the region. The NYPD also maintains a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, where meetings can take place without fear of listening devices. Three DHS intelligence analysts are assigned to the department, facilitating the flow of classified information and supporting joint threat analyses. Additional capabilities include a foreign linguist program with more than 1,200 registered speakers across 85 languages, and the Domain Awareness System, a real-time surveillance and analytics platform developed in partnership with Microsoft. In Los Angeles, Mayor Karen Bass said that officials in the second largest US city are closely monitoring the situation. 'Out of an abundance of caution, LAPD is stepping up patrols near places of worship, community gathering spaces and other sensitive sites,' Bass said. 'We will remain vigilant.'
Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
UN Security Council to meet on Iran as Russia, China push for a ceasefire
Live Events The U.N. Security Council will meet Sunday to discuss U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites as Russia, China and Pakistan proposed the 15-member body adopt a resolution calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in the Middle was not immediately clear when it could be put to a vote. The three countries circulated the draft text, said diplomats, and asked members to share their comments by Monday evening. A resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the United States, France, Britain, Russia or China to U.S. is likely to oppose the draft resolution, seen by Reuters, which also condemns attacks on Iran's nuclear sites and facilities. The text does not name the United States or world awaited Iran's response on Sunday after President Donald Trump said the U.S. had "obliterated" Tehran's key nuclear sites, joining Israel in the biggest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 requested the U.N. Security Council meeting, calling on the 15-member body "to address this blatant and unlawful act of aggression, to condemn it in the strongest possible terms."Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said in a statement on Sunday that the U.S. and Israel "do not deserve any condemnation, but rather an expression of appreciation and gratitude for making the world a safer place."U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Saturday branded the U.S. strikes on Iran as a "dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge - and a direct threat to international peace and security .""At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace," Guterres said in a statement.
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
Pakistan finally breaks silence over US strikes on Iran nuclear sites, leaves everyone in shock, says...
New Delhi: America's entry in the war between Israel and Iran has increased the stir in the Middle East. America carried out rapid attacks on three major nuclear bases of Iran. Meanwhile, Pakistan has strongly condemned the US attack on Iran's nuclear bases. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry posted on its official social media account that America has violated all the rules of international law by carrying out airstrikes. Under the United Nations Charter, Iran has full right to defend itself. The statement said that we have expressed deep concern about the current tense situation in the Middle East. The situation arising from this is very worrying because it will have dire effects in the Middle East and beyond. These attacks are a violation of international law and Iran has full right to defend itself. Let us tell you that Pakistan shares its border with Iran. Pakistan shares a 900 km long border with Iran. Pakistan had also called upon Israel and Iran to end this war as soon as possible. Pakistan had said that diplomacy is the only way to peace, not military conflict. Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Prize for Trump Pakistan had lobbied for the Nobel Peace Prize for US President Donald Trump a day earlier. The Pakistan government had formally proposed Trump's name for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize. The Pakistan government had said that the way Trump resolved the war with India in 2025 through diplomatic intervention and important leadership, it has been decided to propose Trump's name for the Nobel Peace Prize. The neighbouring country had said that it was because of Trump's efforts that a ceasefire took place between India and Pakistan, which averted the major threat of war. For this reason, Trump is the most deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. After the Pahalgam terrorist attack, Islamabad started Operation Bunyan Un Marsoos in response to India's Operation Sindoor.
