Pop singer Jessie J reveals early-stage breast cancer diagnosis at 37; is it curable? Here's what experts say
Jessie J, a.k.a. Jessica Ellen Cornish, the 'Flashlight' singer, on Wednesday announced that she has been diagnosed with the earliest stage of breast cancer, where the disease has spread outside of its original location. The 37-year-old UK singer took to her Instagram to announce the news. But is the early stage of breast cancer curable?
The singer was diagnosed with cancer just before her latest single release in April. The Grammy-nominated artist shared the information with her fans on her social media, where she also revealed that she will undergo surgery following her performance at Summertime Ball on June 15.
This is an annual music festival in Lon, she added. However, talking about the cancer, she said, "Cancer sucks in any form, but I'm holding onto the word 'early."
Rise in borderline or early-stage breast cancer cases
Breast cancer cases are rapidly increasing across the globe, including in India. Recent projections indicate that the cases will further increase in the coming time.
Globally, breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women, with over 2.3 million new cases and 670,000 deaths reported in 2020. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, there is a significant increase in breast cancer cases, suggesting over 3 million new cases and 1 million deaths will be reported by 2040.
Is early breast cancer curable?
Breast cancer has five main stages, ranging from Stage 0 to Stage 4. Experts say that breast cancer in its early stages is "highly treatable and survivable," yet Jessie has not shared any other information regarding her diagnosis.
But is early breast cancer curable? 'Early-stage breast cancer is often curable with appropriate treatment. Treatment typically involves surgery, such as lumpectomy or mastectomy, often followed by radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or targeted therapy, depending on the cancer's characteristics,' says Dr. Vivek B. K., Additional Director, Medical Oncology, Fortis Hospital, Bannerghatta Road.
'Prognosis and treatment options vary based on cancer stage, tumour size, hormone receptor status, and overall health. Regular follow-up care is crucial to monitor for recurrence and manage side effects,' he adds.
What is the survival rate in early-stage breast cancer?
The five-year survival rate for stage 0 to stage III breast cancer is over 90% according to the American Cancer Society. 'Treatment typically involves surgery, such as lumpectomy ( organ conservation as often as possible), often followed by radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or targeted therapy, depending on the cancer's characteristics,' says Dr. Niti Raizada, Principal Director Medical Oncology, Fortis Hospital Bannerghatta Road.
Can breast cancer development be prevented?
According to Dr. Chaitra Deshpande, a radiation oncologist at Onco Life Cancer Centre in Satara, "Breast cancer can be diagnosed in women between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Moreover, the breast cancer in 45-year-olds is quite aggressive and is difficult to treat."
However, it can be prevented by involving a combination of lifestyle choices and awareness.
1. Obesity, especially after menopause, is linked to a higher risk of breast cancer. Please choose a balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins.
2. Regular exercise can help maintain a healthy weight and lower hormone levels associated with breast cancer. at least 150 minutes of moderate aerobic activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity each week.
3. Limiting alcohol to no more than one drink per day can help reduce your risk.
4. Early detection through mammograms can lead to better outcomes. Discuss with your healthcare provider the right screening schedule based on your age and risk factors.
5. A family history of breast cancer can increase your risk. Consider genetic counselling if you have concerns.
6. Smoking is linked to various cancers, including breast cancer. Quitting can improve your overall health.
To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
New interactive data modelling tool shows economic, health gains of raising tobacco taxes
A new, interactive modelling tool demonstrates how countries can use tobacco taxes to quickly generate millions in new revenue, reduce smoking, increase economic productivity and recover millions in healthcare expenses on treatment of smoking-related illnesses. The Cost Recovery and Revenue Estimator (CoRRE) uses recent data from more than 100 countries to estimate the tax revenue gain possible depending on different potential tax scenarios. At a webinar held on Tuesday, Jeffrey Drope, director of the Economics for Health team at Johns Hopkins University, and Nigar Nargis, senior scientific director, American Cancer Society provided an overview of current trends in tobacco control and a demonstration of the interactive modelling tool. Developed by Vital Strategies, American Cancer Society and the Economics for Health team at Johns Hopkins University, CoRRE is designed for the public health community, advocates and policymakers to assess the economic and health gains possible by raising tax on tobacco products. 'Decades of research shows that these tax reforms consistently raise considerable new tax revenues while saving lives and generally making societies healthier, including driving down the incidence of multiple cancers, among many other noncommunicable diseases,' Nargis said while responding to queries. CoRRE was developed as part of the latest edition of The Tobacco Atlas, which also provides in-depth analysis on tobacco use prevalence, taxes and many other tobacco control policies and programmes around the world. Experts also strongly advocated for tobacco taxes as one of the most effective—yet underutilised—strategies to prevent tobacco initiation, encourage cessation, and reduce overall tobacco use. Drope observed that the annual cost of tobacco use is staggering. 'Eight million lives are lost each year globally and around $2 trillion in economic damage – much of that from the average of 11 years of life that smokers lose. This means lower economic productivity,' he said during the webinar. As per The Tobacco Atlas, 8.9 per cent of all deaths in India are caused by tobacco use. The economic cost of smoking and tobacco use in India is approximately Rs 1.97 lakh crore each year. This includes direct costs related to healthcare expenditures and indirect costs related to lost productivity caused by illness and premature death. Anuradha Mascarenhas is a journalist with The Indian Express and is based in Pune. A senior editor, Anuradha writes on health, research developments in the field of science and environment and takes keen interest in covering women's issues. With a career spanning over 25 years, Anuradha has also led teams and often coordinated the edition. ... Read More
The Hindu
14-06-2025
- The Hindu
In a first, arc therapy beats tricky cancer while sparing nearby tissue
A team of experts in the U.S. has successfully used a technique called step-and-shoot spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) to treat a patient's adenoid cystic carcinoma for the first time. SPArc works by targeting tumours with protons while sparing surrounding tissue. The findings of the team, at the Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, were published in the June 2025 issue of the International Journal of Particle Therapy. The team compared the results of three techniques: SFO-IMPT (the current standard of care), step-and-shoot SPArc, and fully dynamic SPArc (simulated with computers). The SPArc methods reduced radiation delivered to the brainstem (by 10%), optical chiasm (56%), oral cavity (72%), and spinal canal (90%) over SFO-IMPT. 'This is definitely significant,' Narayana Subramanian, lead consultant, Head and Neck Surgical Oncology at Aster International Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, said. 'In tumours of the head and neck, limiting dose delivery to organs at risk is a major consideration of treatment planning. When these organs receive a higher dose of radiation than they can tolerate, they undergo irreparable damage.' While fully-dynamic SPArc performed better, the difference between the two arc styles was small, the team wrote. In dynamic SPArc, the dose's energy and point of delivery is constantly adjusted, whereas in step-and-shoot the machine follows a pre-programmed pattern. The researchers wrote that dynamic SPArc is still under development and awaits regulatory clearance and integration with existing oncology information systems. Multi-technique protocol The first person to receive step-and-shoot SPArc was a 46-year-old woman whose parotid-gland cancer had spread along her facial nerve towards the base of her skull. In June-August 2024, the team said she completed 33 sessions with step-and-shoot SPArc. During this, the woman reportedly had 'minor skin irritation' and no issues eating or continuing working. According to the American Cancer Society, conventional side-effects of radiation therapy for head and neck cancers include fatigue, nausea, trouble swallowing, etc. Dr. Subramaniam said the technology is 'likely to be valuable in tumours that are located in anatomically complex areas like the skull base … where dose delivery has to be precise with reduced spillage to surrounding critical areas. It's also likely to be valuable in large or extensive tumours, where the tumour can be targeted accurately with limited collateral damage to the surrounding tissues.' The treatment protocol included a computer programme that scanned through all possible spots and energy layers where the proton beams could be delivered. An energy layer is a slice of tissue that receives proton beams of a specific energy. The energy determines the beam's range: how far it is able to penetrate the tissue. When the machine fixes one energy level, its scanning nozzle sweeps dozens of suitable spots and deposits the radiation dose in that energy layer. Then the machine switches to the next energy level and repeats the process, this time delivering a beam with a little more range. This way the whole tumour is 'painted' with radiation. In each session, once the woman was in position, the team performed a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. A machine-learning model converted the CBCT data into a synthetic CT with which the team could track the doses to be delivered. Over the first two weeks, synthetic CT revealed the woman had lost weight and the tumour dose coverage had thus slipped 3-5%. The team adjusted for this from the 13th day. The gantry was set up to have nine beam angles covering a 180° arc around the woman. It delivered one dose, moved 20°, delivered the second, moved 20°, delivered the third, and so on. The paper said each session took 15-18 minutes and the treatment benefited from the near-continuous radiation delivery. The SFO-IMPT and (simulated) dynamic SPArc methods used the same target plan and had the same goals: deliver a fixed total dose in 33 daily treatments and ensure the proton range isn't off by more than 3.5%. 'With very precise radiotherapy delivery, the concern is that small tumours can be missed, referred to as geographical miss, as movements as subtle as breathing can change their position, and they can shrink in size over the course of treatment and result in inferior cancer cure rates,' Dr. Subramaniam said. 'Another significant concern is cost,' he added. 'These technologies are very expensive and are often suitable for a small patient population. This results in a significant financial burden on the healthcare system and the risk that it may be used in situations where it is not indicated.'
News18
12-06-2025
- News18
6 Everyday Foods Linked to Cancer And What to Eat Instead, According to Harvard Experts
Last Updated: A cancer-preventive diet doesn't mean cutting out every indulgence, but it does involve making conscious, consistent choices We often hear the phrase 'you are what you eat," and according to many medical experts, it holds more truth than we realize. In recent studies and interviews, several Harvard-affiliated doctors and nutrition researchers have pointed to common foods in our everyday diet that may increase the risk of cancer when consumed in excess. The good news? Healthier alternatives exist and making the switch could significantly reduce your long-term health risks. Here's a look at six foods flagged for potential cancer links, and what you can swap them with to make your plate safer and smarter. Why they're risky: Processed meats are classified as Group 1 carcinogens by the World Health Organization. That means there's strong evidence they can cause colorectal and stomach cancer due to compounds like nitrates, nitrites, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) formed during processing. Better alternatives: Opt for lean poultry, fresh fish, or plant-based proteins like lentils, beans, and tofu. If you're craving a sandwich, try grilled chicken or hummus and veggies instead of ham or salami. 2. Red Meat (especially charred or grilled) Why they're risky: Better alternatives: Go for plant-forward meals more often — think quinoa bowls, legumes, and hearty salads. When eating meat, bake or roast instead of grilling, and keep portion sizes in check. 3. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (sodas, energy drinks) Why they're risky: While sugar itself doesn't cause cancer directly, consistently high sugar intake can lead to obesity, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation — all of which increase the risk of several cancers, including breast and colorectal. Better alternatives: Hydrate with water, sparkling water with lemon, or unsweetened herbal teas. If you need a sweet fix, try fruit-infused water or natural coconut water in moderation. 4. Refined Carbohydrates (white bread, white rice, sugary cereals) Why they're risky: These foods spike blood sugar levels rapidly, contributing to chronic inflammation and insulin spikes — conditions linked to cancer development, especially breast and prostate cancer. Better alternatives: Switch to whole grains like brown rice, quinoa, whole wheat bread, oats, and millets. They're fiber-rich and help regulate blood sugar more steadily. 5. Alcohol Why it's risky: According to the American Cancer Society, even moderate drinking can increase the risk of breast, liver, esophageal, and colorectal cancers. Alcohol is broken down into acetaldehyde, a chemical that can damage DNA and prevent cells from repairing damage. Better alternatives: Try mocktails made from fresh juices, sparkling water with herbs, or kombucha. Reducing alcohol intake — or cutting it out entirely — has wide-reaching health benefits beyond cancer risk reduction. 6. Ultra-Processed Packaged Foods (instant noodles, chips, ready-to-eat meals) Why they're risky: These are high in additives, preservatives, sodium, and trans fats — ingredients that, in excess, may contribute to inflammation, gut microbiome disruption, and a higher risk of gastrointestinal and other cancers. Better alternatives: Choose homemade or minimally processed snacks — such as roasted chickpeas, nuts, yogurt with fruits, or baked sweet potato fries. Look for food labels with fewer ingredients and words you can actually recognize. A cancer-preventive diet doesn't mean cutting out every indulgence, but it does involve making conscious, consistent choices. Dr. David Ludwig, a Harvard endocrinologist and professor of nutrition, emphasizes that lifestyle including diet plays a major role in long-term cancer risk. While no single food guarantees health or disease, small changes over time can have a big impact. So, next time you reach for a quick snack or plan your weekly meals, consider the long-term investment you're making in your body. Food isn't just fuel it's information that tells your body how to function, heal, and thrive. First Published: June 12, 2025, 14:20 IST News lifestyle » health-and-fitness 6 Everyday Foods Linked to Cancer And What to Eat Instead, According to Harvard Experts
