Indian rupee under fire after US strikes on Iran jolt oil, stoke risk aversion
MUMBAI: The Indian rupee is set to open weaker on Monday, pressured by the rise in crude oil prices and risk-off sentiment following the U.S. military action against Iran.
Non-deliverable forwards indicate the currency will open around 86.75-86.80 per dollar, compared to 86.5850 in the previous session.
Oil prices jumped to their highest level since January after the U.S. joined Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend, increasing concerns over the potential impact on energy supply. Tehran vowed to defend itself.
The attack came just after U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that such a decision would come 'within the next two weeks'.
Fears that Iran may disrupt traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key conduit for about a fifth of world crude flows, lifted oil prices and weighed on risk assets.
Indian rupee gains slightly
Goldman Sachs warned that if oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz — a key chokepoint for crude shipments — were halved for a month and remained down by 10% for the following 11 months, Brent could temporarily spike to $110.
Brent crude hit a high of $81.40, before retracing a part of its rally.
The rupee, which had caught a bit of a breather on Friday, unfortunately has to contend with the U.S.-Iran news, a currency trader at a bank said, 'and we're back to watching if 87 breaks'.
An FX trader at another bank noted that the rise in oil prices was milder than expected, and attention now shifts to how Iran chooses to respond.
'While Iran may feel it needs to retaliate to US strikes, blocking the Hormuz might be a step too far,' ING Bank said in a note, and said that the price action in Asian trading suggests markets do not yet believe crude flows through Hormuz will be blocked.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
19 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Amazon's premium beauty push may be a buffer against Trump's tariffs
NEW YORK: Amazon's defense against tariffs for its coming Prime Day? Luxury goods. President Donald Trump's tariffs have spurred some Amazon sellers who source products from China and other heavily tariffed countries to bow out of the company's Prime Day, one of its biggest sales events of the year, to protect their margins. The Seattle-based e-commerce company is hoping that recent sales growth in high-margin cosmetics in its Amazon Premium Beauty category will cushion the impact of tariffs on Prime Day sales revenue and consumer sentiment. 'Beauty has become, in the past few years, more of an essential item in consumers' minds,' even in hard financial times, said Anna Mayo, vice president of NielsenIQ's Beauty Vertical unit. Amazon Premium Beauty was initially shunned by luxury cosmetic players who feared the platform would harm their image when it was launched in 2013. But those days are gone. Now, the online retailer is promoting products from top beauty and haircare brands including Estee Lauder's Clinique, Olaplex and L'Oreal's Urban Decay. During last year's Prime Day event, U.S. shoppers spent $14.2 billion, up 11% year-over-year, according to Adobe Analytics. Top cosmetics brands can charge high prices and often do not offer steep discounts on Prime Day compared with electronics, apparel and home goods. This year, Adobe Analytics expects beauty product discounts to have 'milder' discounts of 10% to 17%, whereas electronics deals are expected to range from 14% to 22% off, said Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights. That, coupled with the ease of shipping small packages of most products, means that Amazon Premium Beauty merchandise has higher margins than other products sold on Prime Day. Amazon 'doesn't make a huge margin in most of the categories of stuff that it sells online,' said Renee Parker, co-founder of consultancy firm Invinci and a former Amazon executive. 'They are making a lot of money on premium beauty products because … (they're) small and expensive, and you can ship a ton of them.' Vitamins and supplements are successful for similar reasons. Amazon Premium Beauty sales gathered steam after the e-commerce giant began clamping down on counterfeits and top beauty companies needed new ways to reach customers, said Alfonso Emanuele de Leon, a beauty industry veteran and partner at FA Hong Kong Consultancy. Amazon was previously viewed as a pariah by luxury beauty brands because of the cheap merchandise on the website, but is no longer perceived that way, said Emanuele de Leon. 'Huge acceleration' Sales at Amazon Premium Beauty rose by nearly 20% to $15 billion between April 2024 and April 2025, outpacing the 14% growth for beauty products outside the specialized e-commerce store, according to NielsenIQ. It also outpaced the year-over-year growth of 5% for online store sales in the first quarter, NielsenIQ said. L'Oreal Chief Executive Nicolas Hieronimus said during the company's annual meeting in April that having products on Amazon led to a 'huge acceleration' in expanding its U.S. market share. Estee Lauder has launched 11 brands on Amazon's U.S. site since March 2024. More than 75% of Estee's finished goods sold in the U.S. originate from the U.S. or Canada and are therefore protected by existing trade agreements, Roberto Canevari, Estee Lauder's global supply chain executive vice president, said at a conference in June. Lauren Gordon, vice president of Amazon at Estee Lauder, said that Prime Day and Amazon's other 'high-traffic shopping moments' give the company a chance to 'attract both new and existing customers.' Melis del Rey, general manager for health and beauty for Amazon U.S. stores, said her team has been 'very proactive' in working with premium brands to determine tariff impacts. 'At a high level, most of the premium brands' sourcing strategies are local, and therefore, the (tariff) impact is less imminent,' del Rey said. Amazon Premium Beauty is an invite-only program for brands shipped and sold by Amazon and third-party sellers. The department has grown to more than 10,000 products, and brands' eligibility is determined on a case-by-case basis. Brands like Dyson and Estee Lauder's Aveda pay an extra 15% commission to Amazon for every website sale, and the third-party seller approach allows major brands to control pricing and inventory. Adding prestige brands including Unilever's Dermalogica has helped the company compete with beauty retailers Ulta Beauty and Sephora, which is owned by LVMH and also attract older, higher-income shoppers at a time when TikTok Shop is scooping up younger customers.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
PSX plunges amid US-Iran tensions, KSE-100 sheds over 3,900 points
Selling pressure was observed at the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) amid escalating geopolitical tensions following the US attack on Iran, raising concerns among investors as the benchmark KSE-100 Index shed over 3,900 points during the intra-day trading on Monday. At 3:25pm, the benchmark index was hovering at 116,113.50 level, a decrease of 3,909.73 points or 3.26%. 'Stocks in Pakistan open with a fall of 1700 points or 1.4% amid ongoing Iran-related tension,' Mohammed Sohail, CEO of Topline Securities, said in a note. Across-the-board selling pressure was observed, especially in key sectors including automobile assemblers, oil and gas exploration companies, OMCs, power generation and commercial banks. Index-heavy stocks, including OGDC, PPL, POL, HUBCO, and PSO, traded in the red. During the previous week, the PSX endured turbulence as a combination of rising geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, volatile international commodity prices, and mixed domestic economic indicators rattled investor sentiment. The benchmark KSE-100 Index remained in sharp retreat from its recent highs. On a week-on-week basis, the benchmark settled at 120,023.23 points, reflecting a 1.7% decline compared to the previous week's close at 122,143.57 points. Internationally, shares slipped in Asia on Monday and oil prices briefly hit five-month highs as investors anxiously waited to see if Iran would retaliate against US attacks on its nuclear sites, with resulting risks to global activity and inflation. Early moves were contained, with the dollar getting only a minor safe-haven bid and no sign of panic selling across markets. Oil prices were up around 2.8%, but off their initial peaks. Optimists are hoping Iran may back down now that its nuclear ambitions have been curtailed, or that regime change might bring a less hostile government to power there. Stocks slide, oil and gold jump after Israel strikes Iran One key factor will be access through the Strait of Hormuz, which is only about 33 km (21 miles) wide at its narrowest point and through which around a quarter of global oil trade and 20% of liquefied natural gas supply passes. For now, Brent was up a relatively restrained 2.7% at $79.12 a barrel, while U.S. crude rose 2.8% to $75.98. Elsewhere in commodity markets, gold edged down 0.1% to $3,363 an ounce. Share markets were proving resilient so far, with S&P 500 futures off a moderate 0.5% and Nasdaq futures down 0.6%. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan fell 0.5, and Japan's Nikkei eased 0.9%. Europe and Japan are heavily reliant on imported oil and LNG, whereas the United States is a net exporter. This is an intra-day update
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Oil prices stable as investors await Iranian response to US strikes
LONDON: Oil prices jumped on Monday to their highest since January as the United States' weekend move to join Israel in attacking Iran's nuclear facilities stoked supply concerns. Brent crude futures were up just 8 cents to $77.09 a barrel as of 0904 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude rose by 3 cents to $73.87. Price volatility continued in Monday's session. Both contracts touched fresh five-month highs earlier in the session of $81.40 and $78.40 respectively, before giving up their gains and even turning negative during the European morning session. Brent has risen around 11% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained approximately 9%. Prices flattened out on Monday as investors weighed the geopolitical risk premium in oil markets without any impact on supply yet from the Middle Eastern crisis. 'The geopolitical risk premium is fading, as so far there has been no supply disruptions. But as it's unclear how the conflict might evolve, market participants are likely to maintain a risk premium for now. So prices are set to stay volatile in the near term,' UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said. Prices rose at the open after US President Donald Trump said he had 'obliterated' Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer. Iran said on Monday that the US attack on its nuclear sites expanded the range of legitimate targets for its armed forces and called US President Donald Trump a 'gambler' for joining Israel's military campaign against the Islamic Republic. Oil prices settle lower The geopolitical risk premium includes fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows. 'All eyes remain on the Strait of Hormuz … and whether Iran will seek to disrupt tanker traffic,' Saxo Bank analyst Ole Hansen said. Prices could spike in the short term even without full-scale disruption, if the threat of interference alone is enough to delay shipments through the Strait, Hansen added. Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months. The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, citing global incentives to try to prevent a sustained and very large disruption. Given the Strait of Hormuz is indispensable for Iran's own oil exports, which are a vital source of its national revenues, a sustained closure would inflict severe economic damage on Iran itself, making it a double-edged sword, said Sugandha Sachdeva, from research firm SS WealthStreet.
