Trump administration proposes scrapping UN peacekeeping funding
WASHINGTON, April 15 (Reuters) - The White House budget office has proposed eliminating funding for United Nations peacekeeping missions, citing failures by operations in Mali, Lebanon and Democratic Republic of Congo, according to internal planning documents seen by Reuters.
Washington is the U.N.'s largest contributor - with China second - accounting for 22% of the $3.7 billion core regular U.N. budget and 27% of the $5.6 billion peacekeeping budget. These payments are mandatory.
The proposed peacekeeping cuts are included in a so-called "Passback," the response by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to State Department funding requests for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins on October 1. The overall plan wants to slash the State Department budget by about half.
The new budget must be approved by Congress, and lawmakers could decide to restore some or all of the funding the administration has proposed cutting.
The State Department was due to respond to the OMB proposal on Tuesday. During U.S. President Donald Trump's first term he proposed cutting about a third of diplomacy and aid budgets. But Congress, which sets the federal government budget, pushed back on Trump's proposal.
"There is no final plan, final budget," State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters on Tuesday when asked about the OMB proposals.
The OMB has proposed ending Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA).
"For example, Passback provides no funding for CIPA, ending contributions for international peacekeeping due to the recent failures in peacekeeping, such as with MINUSMA, UNIFIL, and MONUSCO, and the disproportionately high level of assessments," according to an excerpt from the Passback.
U.S. IN ARREARS
The United Nations peacekeeping budget funds nine missions in Mali, Lebanon, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, Western Sahara, Cyprus, Kosovo, between Syria and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights and Abyei, an administrative area that is jointly run by South Sudan and Sudan.
The OMB Passback also proposed the creation of a $2.1 billion America First Opportunities Fund (A1OF), which it said would be used to cover a limited set of foreign economic and development assistance priorities.
"Should the Administration seek to pay any assessments for the United Nations Regular Budget or peacekeeping assessments, we would look to provide that funding from the A1OF," read the OMB Passback.
U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric on Tuesday declined to comment on "what appears to be a leaked memo that is part of an internal debate within the U.S. government."
The U.S. owes - for arrears and the current fiscal year - nearly $1.5 billion for the regular U.N. budget and nearly $1.2 billion for the peacekeeping budget. A country can be up to two years in arrears before facing the possible repercussion of losing its vote in the 193-member General Assembly.
U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres last month said he is seeking ways to improve efficiency and cut costs as the world body turns 80 this year amid a cash crisis.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
UK gives chilling two-word warning to Iran over nuclear site retaliation
David Lammy warned Iran it would be a 'catastrophic mistake' to strike back at US bases and said Iran must be stopped from getting its hands on a nuclear weapon David Lammy has warned Iran it would be a "catastrophic mistake" to fire at US bases in the Middle East in revenge for strikes on its nuclear sites. The Foreign Secretary urged Tehran to step from the brink, "get serious, and calm this thing down" after Donald Trump's weekend bombings fanned the flames in the region. Mr Lammy said he was "crystal clear" to Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, "it would be a huge catastrophic mistake to fire at US bases in the region at this time". The Foreign Secreary stressed that the UK played no role in the US or Israeli bombings, and repeatedly refused to be drawn on whether the US action was legal. Mr Lammy said: " I can tell you, as Foreign Secretary that we were not involved. It is for the Americans to discuss those legal issues. "What we are involved in alongside the Americans, alongside Europe, alongside our Arab partners, is attempting to get the Iranians to take seriously our longstanding concerns about their nuclear program and their nuclear ambition." Mr Lammy urged Iran against launching its own missiles or blockading the crucial Strait of Hormuz shipping route - a move that would send oil price soaring. He added: "We have forces in the region at this time... it would be a mistake to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, I think he gets that and understands that. But clearly the Supreme Leader is somewhere in Iran in a bunker, messaging to him cannot be easy. I would urge them to step back at this time." The US and Israel have struck Iranian nuclear sites amid fears the regime is enriching uranium with a view to building a weapon. Mr Lammy said there was "no credible civilian justification" for Iran to be enriching to 60%. He told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: "Every single one of your listeners will understand that if Iran gets nuclear weapons, others will follow in the region. "And as night follows day, we will be living in a more dangerous world. On behalf of, the planet. It is our obligation to do all we can to get that compliance, and that is why we're engaged in intense diplomacy." The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) found that at the Fordow site, Iran had enriched uranium to 83.7% - close to the 90% needed to make nuclear weapons. The Foreign Secretary's comments came just hours after the erratic US President Donald Trump floated the prospect of regime change in Tehran to "make Iran great again". He attempted to play this down, stating: "Well, I had extensive discussion with Secretary of State (Marco) Rubio yesterday and the day before I listened to the press conference that was given by him and JD Vance. "It's clear that the acts on Saturday were targeted solely at the nuclear facilities. It's clear from both Israel and the United States that they're not going after the civilian leadership. I recognise that there's a discussion. about regime change, but that is not what's under consideration. Keir Starmer meanwhile is scrambling with European allies to de-escalate the situation and get the Islamic Republic around the negotiating table. Iran reportedly warned Mr Trump that it would activate sleeper cell attacks within America if the United States launched an attack on their country.
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump says he should get Nobel Peace Prize - hours before US bombs Iran
Donald Trump reignited his claim for the Nobel Peace Prize, asserting his pivotal role in resolving various global conflicts. Hours before the US bombed nuclear sites in Iran's Furdow, a reporter questioned the US President about a suggestion from Matt Gaetz regarding peace efforts between Israel and Iran. Mr Trump highlighted his involvement in the India - Pakistan conflict, saying, 'I mean the big one is India and Pakistan. You could, I should have gotten it four or five times.' While Pakistan has publicly thanked Trump for his intervention in the ceasefire, India has consistently maintained its stance, affirming it would 'never accept third-party negotiation.'
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Vance says difference between this Middle East attack and others is that previous presidents were ‘dumb'
Vice President JD Vance has attempted to draw a distinction between Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and George W Bush 's War on Terror by arguing that 'back then, we had dumb presidents.' Speaking to Kristen Welker on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday morning, hours after the U.S. launched airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel 's Operation Rising Lion offensive, Vance attacked Bush's administration and those of Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden without directly naming them. 'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said. 'I understand the concern, but the difference is that, back then, we had dumb presidents and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. So this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing. 'We've gone in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back, we're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.' The Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein in the aftermath of 9/11 was based on what proved to be the false premise that the dictator was harboring weapons of mass destruction. The war coincided with a period in which the U.S. was also involved in removing the Taliban in Afghanistan, which proved to be an even longer commitment that only ended, chaotically, in 2021, helping inspire an aversion to 'forever wars' to which Trump himself has previously given voice. Vance himself enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from high school in 2003. He was sent to Iraq in a non-combat role for six months, an experience that is understood to have left him disillusioned and influenced his non-interventionist stance on foreign policy ever since. Trump's actions on Saturday night have already drawn comparisons with the defining blunder of the Bush era. The vice president's critique of those earlier administrations has, in turn, invited an angry response. 'This is one of the dumbest arguments I have heard any top U.S. official make,' said Michael McFaul, the former American ambassador to Russia under Obama. 'Embarrassing.' Vance's claim in the same interview that 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear program' was also met with incredulity. 'As war heats up, the propaganda always gets progressively dumber,' said journalist Michael Tracey. 'Imagine if some other country bombed nuclear installations in the U.S., and then tried to claim they were 'not at war with the U.S.'' On Sunday, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the bombing raids on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan sites an 'incredible and overwhelming success' that had 'devastated the Iranian nuclear programme.' Tehran has vowed to retaliate and could do so by closing the Strait of Hormuz, driving up global oil prices, or by targeting American military bases on its doorstep in the Gulf. Trump has since thrown fuel on the flames by declaring on Truth Social: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'
