Vance says difference between this Middle East attack and others is that previous presidents were ‘dumb'

Vice President JD Vance has attempted to draw a distinction between Donald Trump 's attack on Iran and George W Bush 's War on Terror by arguing that 'back then, we had dumb presidents.'
Speaking to Kristen Welker on NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday morning, hours after the U.S. launched airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear sites in support of Israel 's Operation Rising Lion offensive, Vance attacked Bush's administration and those of Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden without directly naming them.
'I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,' he said.
'I understand the concern, but the difference is that, back then, we had dumb presidents and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. So this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing.
'We've gone in, we've done the job of setting their nuclear program back, we're going to now work to permanently dismantle that nuclear program over the coming years, and that is what the president has set out to do.'
The Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq and topple Saddam Hussein in the aftermath of 9/11 was based on what proved to be the false premise that the dictator was harboring weapons of mass destruction.
The war coincided with a period in which the U.S. was also involved in removing the Taliban in Afghanistan, which proved to be an even longer commitment that only ended, chaotically, in 2021, helping inspire an aversion to 'forever wars' to which Trump himself has previously given voice.
Vance himself enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps after graduating from high school in 2003. He was sent to Iraq in a non-combat role for six months, an experience that is understood to have left him disillusioned and influenced his non-interventionist stance on foreign policy ever since.
Trump's actions on Saturday night have already drawn comparisons with the defining blunder of the Bush era.
The vice president's critique of those earlier administrations has, in turn, invited an angry response.
'This is one of the dumbest arguments I have heard any top U.S. official make,' said Michael McFaul, the former American ambassador to Russia under Obama. 'Embarrassing.'
Vance's claim in the same interview that 'We're not at war with Iran, we're at war with Iran's nuclear program' was also met with incredulity.
'As war heats up, the propaganda always gets progressively dumber,' said journalist Michael Tracey.
'Imagine if some other country bombed nuclear installations in the U.S., and then tried to claim they were 'not at war with the U.S.''
On Sunday, U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the bombing raids on Iran's Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan sites an 'incredible and overwhelming success' that had 'devastated the Iranian nuclear programme.'
Tehran has vowed to retaliate and could do so by closing the Strait of Hormuz, driving up global oil prices, or by targeting American military bases on its doorstep in the Gulf.
Trump has since thrown fuel on the flames by declaring on Truth Social: 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Sky News

18 minutes ago

• Sky News

Israel-Iran live: Blast 'destroys prison gates' as Israeli strikes target 'heart of Tehran'; Iran's supreme leader sends letter to Putin

Israel has targeted Iran's Fordow nuclear site, after the US bombed the facility at the weekend, while also apparently striking the entrance of an Iranian prison. Iran has asked Russia for help, while vowing revenge against the US. Follow the latest and listen to The World podcast below.

Evening Standard

27 minutes ago

• Evening Standard

Saturation attacks, dirty nuclear bombs and the bind for Britain: Starmer's Israel-Iran dilemma

Reports of granular intelligence analysis by the Israeli Air Force on the Israeli Ynet website gives the clearest clue why Benjamin Netanyahu and Donald Trump decided to strike now. Agreed, Netanyahu has been obsessed with striking against Iran's nuclear sites since 2011. A senior air force commander intentionally revealed to the Ynet commentator, though, the chilling intelligence that the Khamenei regime had ordered the production of 10,000 missiles to prepare in short order a 'saturation attack' on Israel – bombardment by hundreds of missiles and drones at to overwhelm the most sophisticated air defences like Israel's Iron Dome and the US THAAD batteries. The missiles would include hypersonic weapons, detectable in only the last few moments of flight. The fear is that prototype hypersonics have been trialed in last week's attacks on Haifa and Tel Aviv.

The Guardian

29 minutes ago

• The Guardian

British man says he fears for family trapped in Iran by Home Office appeal

A British man has told of his fears for his family who are trapped in Iran after winning the right to reunite in the UK, because the Home Office have appealed against the decision. After news broke in the early hours of Sunday morning that the US had bombed three nuclear sites in Iran, fears for the safety of the man's parents and sister, currently stranded in Tehran, are mounting. The man, who the Guardian is not naming to protect his family, said: 'It breaks my heart knowing the difficulties that my parents and sister are having. The daily worry and coordination to support them all add to a sense of helplessness. 'Since escaping from Afghanistan after the arrival of the Taliban in 2021 my parents have lost their home and community, all their belongings and their careers.' The man, who has dual Afghan and British citizenship, said he was frantic with worry after his parents said bombs have been exploding around them in the neighbourhood where they are sheltering. The family tried to come to the UK legally, and were initially refused, but an immigration tribunal ruled that the parents and daughter had a right to family life in the UK with their British son and brother. However the Home Office has appealed against the judge's ruling to a higher court in an attempt to keep the family out of the UK. It is not known when the case will finally be determined and the family fear they are running out of time. The family cannot be named because the lives of the parents and daughter, currently in Tehran, are in extreme danger. The parents, both in their 60s, opposed the Taliban regime both times it has been in control of Afghanistan. The father was a doctor who worked with international NGOs and the mother was a teacher who continued to teach Afghan girls in secret during the Taliban's first rule, which banned girls' education. She was also a women's rights activist. The daughter was close to completing a university degree when the Taliban took over for the second time and was forced to abandon her studies. She is trying to help her parents stay alive in Tehran. Both have serious physical health problems and her mother uses a wheelchair. Both parents suffer from PTSD. The family had initially escaped from Afghanistan to Russia where they were granted temporary protection, but when the daughter was given an ultimatum to join Russian forces fighting against Ukraine or face deportation to Afghanistan the family fled again, this time to Iran, one of the few countries granting entry visas to Afghans. Shortly after they arrived, hostilities between Iran and Israel increased. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion According to government data in 2024, Afghans were the largest nationality group crossing the Channel, making up 17% of the 35,359, more than 6,000 people. The next biggest nationality groups were Syrians, Iranians, Vietnamese and Eritreans. The UK government granted entry to more than 30,000 Afghans in two resettlement schemes set up after the Taliban takeover in August 2021 but the schemes have been criticised for their narrow scope and slow pace of decision-making. The family's solicitor Diana Baxter at Wesley Gryk said: 'This is a stark example of what happens when refugees try to seek 'safe and legal routes' to come to the UK. This family have ended up living in dire conditions initially in Russia and now in Iran. The Home Office has the power to grant the family entry to the UK but it is choosing not to do so.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'It is our longstanding policy not to comment on individual cases.' Home Office sources said that between 2010 and December 2024, the UK resettled more than 35,000 individuals under UNHCR resettlement schemes, the sixth largest number in the world after the US, Canada, Australia, Germany and Sweden.