Pule Mabe's corruption case postponed to July as final charge sheet is still pending
The corruption case involving former ANC national spokesperson Pule Mabe and six co-accused individuals has been postponed to July 7 as the State works to finalise the charge sheet.
The decision was announced during court proceedings on Tuesday at the Palm Ridge Specialised Commercial Crime Court in Ekurhuleni.
Mabe, 44, his wife Mmatlhekelo Elsie Mabe, 46, and five others — Loyiso Mkwana, Thandeka Mbassa, Matilda Gasela, Abdullah Mohamed Ismail, and Mabe's business associate Tinyiko Mahuntsi — appeared briefly before Magistrate Brian Nemavhidi.
All seven accused are currently out on bail of R30 000 each. State prosecutor Magdeline Montwedi Mclean told the court that the defence and prosecution had agreed to postpone proceedings to allow the State time to provide the final charge sheet by June 30. If delivered on time, the accused may be issued a trial date at their next court appearance on July 7.
Mabe, once a prominent figure in the ruling African National Congress, is at the centre of a case stemming from a controversial R27 million tender awarded in 2017 to his company, Enviro Mobi.
The company was contracted by the Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development to supply 200 three-wheeled motorised waste collection vehicles — known as tuk-tuks — intended to support 58 waste pickers in the Ekurhuleni municipality.
According to the state, the contract was awarded under irregular and fraudulent circumstances. Investigations by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) and the Hawks revealed that Enviro Mobi received R27 231 750 in payments 'without any service rendered.'
In addition, over R6 million was allegedly paid out to cover storage expenses for the tuk-tuks, despite no record of the vehicles being deployed for their intended purpose.
Phindi Mjonondwane, spokesperson for the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA), said that the charges against the accused include theft, fraud, and violations of both the Public Finance Management Act and the Prevention of Organised Crime Act.
Mjonondwane further detailed how the procurement process was manipulated. A public tender was advertised on February 10, 2017, calling for proposals to support the integration of small and medium waste enterprises into Gauteng's waste management economy.
Ten companies responded, including Enviro Mobi, which allegedly lacked the necessary experience and technical capacity to fulfil the tender's requirements.'Enviro Mobi was awarded the tender despite serious shortcomings,' Mjonondwane explained.
'The State alleges that Makwana, Mbassa, and Ismail facilitated the unlawful appointment of Enviro Mobi, represented by Pule Mabe. At the time, the company reportedly denied any links to government officials or members of Parliament.'
Mabe had served as director of Enviro Mobi from 2010 to 2014 and was a signatory on the business account of KGP Media Holdings, one of the companies charged in the case.
Both Star Mass Direct and KGP Media Holdings — formerly known as Kariki Media Holdings and Groen Mintirho, respectively — are also facing charges. The SIU and Hawks allege that from March 2017 onwards, Enviro Mobi submitted invoices exceeding R26 million with no accompanying documentation to verify the completion of work or delivery of services.
Prominent defence attorney Zola Majavu is representing Mabe, his wife, and their companies.
Neither the accused nor their legal representatives made public comments following the postponement on Tuesday.
The next court appearance on July 7 is expected to bring further clarity, with the potential for a trial date to be set depending on the State's readiness and finalisation of charges.
The case has drawn significant attention given Mabe's previous high-profile role in South African politics and the growing scrutiny over government procurement processes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Pietermaritzburg High Court upholds life sentence for rapist of eight-year-old
life sentence has been upheld for rapist man by the Pietermaritzburg High Court Image: File The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed an appeal on conviction and life imprisonment sentence for a man who raped an eight-year-old girl multiple times in 2010, gave her R1, and threatened to kill her. The appeal was heard before Judge Robin Mossop and Judge Mahendra Chetty. The rapist was described as the brother-in-law of the young girl's mother. During the trial, the State led evidence and relied on minor children. The Ulundi Regional Court found the evidence of the victim and other minor children corroborative. Hence; the rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim told the regional court that she was raped on five separate occasions in 2010. The first rape happened in daylight hours when she visited the homestead of the rapist accompanied by two other young children. She said they went to visit the rapist's child but instead found him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said that at some stage, the man sent one of her companions to the shop to buy a loose cigarette for him. While the other child had gone to the shop, the man told the victim to brush her hair inside the house and he followed her in, locked the door and raped her. When she cried, he threatened to kill her. After that, he gave her R1 to buy ice lollies. When the companion came back from the shop, she testified that she had slightly pushed the door, but the man told her not to get in. She testified that she saw him on top of his victim naked. This was also corroborated by another child who had peed into the window of the room. Moreover, at night, the victim was raped again. One child who had peed through the window said he saw the man again. He said he entered the bedroom where all four children slept. He said that despite being dark, he saw him as he was wearing a white T-shirt. The child also stated that he was the only adult in the house. The victim did not report the incident until a year later, as she was fearful. She and other children were watching a digital versatile disc (DVD) movie where the issue of sex was alluded to. The children mentioned loudly that the victim knew something about sex, her mother overheard this, and inquired more. The victim was taken to Dr Salona Prahladh, who stated that the victim had been raped and the last sexual assault was more than a year ago. The High Court found that the magistrate who sentenced the man did not make any error in finding him guilty. Judge Mossop said there was no doubt that the magistrate applied the cautionary rule used when dealing with evidence of children. 'The person who she was entitled to believe that she would be safe with, the appellant (rapist), turned out to be a predator intent on abusing her,' he said.
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Judge in Mapisa-Nqakula's corruption matter unhappy with progress of case
JOHANNESBURG - The judge presiding over the corruption case of former Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula is unhappy with the progress of the case, following yet another appeared at the Pretoria High Court on Friday, where she faces 12 counts of corruption and one of money alleged that as defence minister, she solicited and received kickbacks, amounting to R4.5 million from a defence April, Judge Mokhine Mosopa made a ruling that Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers should be given access to a Dequar Military Police docket. ALSO READ: Court denies corruption-accused Mapisa-Nqakula access to investigation diary This is the docket of the State's star witness, Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, where she is charged with corruption in a separate case was eventually struck off the court roll due to persistent delays, leading to Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers suspecting she may have made a quid pro quo deal with the State. READ: High Court says State isn't infringing on Mapisa-Nqakula's right to a fair trial Prosecutor Paul Louw said that since the docket was from another court, he could not disclose it."I only received confirmation from my colleagues in the SCCU (Specialised Commercial Crimes Court), where the military matter was being held yesterday afternoon, that the docket is available to me as a member of the investigating director. I cannot disclose it, it must formally happen via the office of the national director of public prosecutions." Judge Mosopa adjourned the matter to 18 August for a progress report on the disclosure process.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Nafiz Modack seeks judge's recusal in tax fraud trial
Nafiz Modack, right, with his counsel, Advocate Bash Sibda. Modack is accused, along with others, of defrauding the South African Revenue Service of R146 million. The State alleges that a host of businesses and trusts registered by the 'Modack Family Business' were set up merely to claim tax returns. Alleged underworld kingpin Nafiz Modack is pushing for the recusal of a judge who is expected to preside over his 'Tax Matter' trial. This, after the judge had already dealt with a previous bail appeal in the Western Cape High Court. Advocate Bash Sibda, representing Modack in the trial following his arrest by the Hawks in 2020 on charges of defrauding the South African Revenue Service (SARS) out of R46 million with other co-accused, told the court yesterday that in order for his client to have a fair trial, Judge Mark Sher would need to step down from the matter.
