Kerala High Court questions selection mode for teachers in aided schools
KOCHI: Expressing concern over the selection process for appointing teachers in government-aided schools, the Kerala High Court has observed that prima facie, it appears there is a significant nexus between the managements and the educational authorities regarding teacher appointments, which are not based on merit but rather on considerations other than merit.
Justice D K Singh noted that it seems the manager has absolute discretion to appoint anyone qualified as a teacher at the school without following any selection process or advertising the posts. Furthermore, how these appointments are approved by the educational authorities when the due process of selection is not ensured raises questions.
The court directed the Director General of Education to file an affidavit explaining the steps taken to establish a fair selection process for teachers in government-aided schools, aiming to stop the malpractice prevalent in these appointments. If the affidavit is not submitted by June 20, the court has instructed the Director General of Education to appear in person before the court.
The order was issued while considering a petition filed by a group of teachers challenging the levy of contributory pension in the NPS Scheme from their salaries.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Kolkata HC stays Didi's relief to SSC staff sacked by SC
Mamata Banerjee KOLKATA: Calcutta HC Friday stayed till Sept 26 WB govt's interim relief for Group-C and Group-D employees of state-run schools who lost their jobs following a Supreme Court order on April 3. The state had announced monthly interim relief of Rs 25,000 for Group-C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group-D staff. Another section of candidates, who were waitlisted, moved HC for a stay on the scheme, arguing it "frustrated" the SC order. Justice Amrita Sinha held that the people whose jobs were terminated by the SC order could not be provided such support after the apex court had decided the issue of illegal appointments conclusively and opined that the appointments were a result of "fraud". Getting refund of money already disbursed to the beneficiaries would be a problem if the scheme was found to be in violation of law after the final hearing on a state review petition, she reasoned. HC also took note of the fact that the state welfare scheme was announced for a particular group who would not be doing any work. "Paying persons gratuitously, who are not serving the state but are either sitting at home or are engaged elsewhere, does not appeal to the court," Justice Sinha held. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pennsylvania: These Walk In Tubs Are Cheap (See Prices) Walk In Tub Discounts Learn More Undo HC stressed that the state had applied a "pick and choose" method for determining the beneficiaries of the welfare scheme. "There are two sets of candidates. One set comprises appointed candidates whose jobs were terminated and the other waitlisted candidates. Both sets are jobless now," Justice Sinha said, holding that the scheme for a particular group "intended to provide succour to the tainted terminated candidates". Justice Sinha acknowledged the state's legislative competence to draft a welfare scheme but said it should apply equally. "Whether it is proper for the state to create a class of favoured candidates out of a bigger class of unemployed candidates is a matter to be decided after hearing (all) parties."
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
HC stays state relief for Group-C & D jobless school staff
Kolkata: Calcutta High Court on Friday stayed till Sept 26 the state's interim relief for Group C and Group D employees of state-run schools who lost their jobs following a Supreme Court order on April 3. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The state had announced a monthly interim relief of Rs 25,000 for Group C employees and Rs 20,000 for Group D employees. Another section of candidates, who were wait-listed, moved the HC praying for a stay on the state scheme as it "frustrated" the SC order. Justice Amrita Sinha held that people whose jobs were terminated by the SC order could not be provided such a support after the apex court had decided the issue of illegal appointments conclusively and opined that the appointments were a result of "fraud". Getting refund of the money already disbursed to the beneficiaries would be a problem if the state scheme was found to be in violation of law after the final hearing, she reasoned. The court also took note of the fact that the state welfare scheme was announced for a particular group who would not be doing any work for the state. "Paying persons gratuitously, who are not serving the state but are either sitting at home or are engaged elsewhere, does not appeal to the court," Justice Sinha held, adding that the state had applied a "pick and choose" method for determining the beneficiaries of the welfare scheme. "There are two sets of candidates. One set comprises appointed candidates whose jobs were terminated and the other set comprises the wait-listed candidates. Both sets are jobless now," Justice Sinha said, holding that the state scheme for a particular group "intended to provide succour to the tainted terminated candidates". Justice Sinha acknowledged the state's legislative competence to formulate a welfare scheme but held that such a scheme should be applied equally. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Whether it is proper for the state to create a class of favoured candidates out of a bigger class of unemployed candidates is a matter to be decided after hearing (all) parties," she said. The court did not buy the state's argument that the petitioners should not have approached the HC when a review petition by the state was pending before the SC. It recalled that the state had proceeded to publish the scheme when its own review petition was pending before the apex court. Justice Sinha directed the petitioners to file affidavits within four weeks and the state to file an affidavit in reply within a fortnight after that before the petition would come up for hearing next.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Local train deaths are alarming, auto closing doors needed: HC
Mumbai. Observing that it is "alarming" that thereare daily deaths due to commuters falling from trains, Bombay High Court on Friday suggested that Mumbai local trains have doors that automatically close to avoid overcrowding. It mentioned the June 9 Mumbra train-fall incident in which five persons died. "You (the railways) have to take action so that this should not happen again," said Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne. They were hearing a PIL filed last year by Yatin Jadhav, a regular commuter, to direct the railways to submit a plan to reduce or eliminate fatalities due to untoward incidents. Asked by the judges what measures were taken by the railways, additional solicitor general Anil Singh said a high-level monitoring committee (HLMC) was already constituted to suggest safety and security measures. After the Mumbra incident, a multi-disciplinary committee was set up. It is examining the causes of the incident and shall soon suggest remedial measures. The judges referred to the railways' reply and said what "disturbs" is that in 2024 there were 3,588 deaths in Central Railway and Western Railway, which averages to 10 deaths per day. "So every day 10 Mumbaikars die by falling. And these numbers of deaths are due to falling down from trains, being hit by poles, or gaps between the footboard and the platform," said Justice Marne, adding, "This is an alarming situation. This is your own data, though you projected that there is a reduction by 46% as compared to 2009." Singh said HLMC suggested the construction of partitions or walls near tracks to avoid trespass and for fencing between tracks so there is no crossing. "As platforms are becoming overcrowded, we have shifted certain stalls from the stations. There are many measures which we are taking," he added. Justice Marne said, "Fencing and all is to take care of deaths because of crossing etc." Justice Marne asked, "What about people falling? Commuters who are on the train are falling." The judges said trains should not be open so that there is no scope for overcrowding. "You should provide automatic doors which close. This is one of the suggestions as a layman. We are not experts in rail safety," the Chief Justice said. Senior advocate Rohan Shah, for Jadhav, said the June 9 incident happened due to overcrowding. While the railways' reply said trains cannot have closed doors, after the incident the railway minister said trains will have closed doors and "we are owrking towards it". Adjourning the hearing to July 14, the judges directed the railways to submit suggestions of both committees "to avoid untoward incidents in future" and "clearly indicate the timelines with which measures recommended by the committee shall be implemented".
