Spot the mane clause: Equine phrases are hiding where you'd least expect them
Take a horse to water, horse-trading, hold your horses… given the interdependence we once had with these majestic beasts, it is no surprise that ourlanguage embraced them too. In more recent times, a stellar show starring Will Arnett as BoJack gave the term horseman a new meaning.
There are, in fact, horses hidden in a number of phrases where one wouldn't expect them to be.
Let's start with a simple one. Riding and the age of chivalry (roughly the medieval period, from the 12th to 15th centuries) gave us 'full tilt'. Tilting was an early name for jousting while on horseback. The aim was not so much to pierce the opponent's armour as to spook his horse so that he would be unsaddled.
Knights would joust 'at full tilt' when their honour, or the honour of a woman in their circle, had been questioned. They would also joust in jest, or as something akin to a war game or practice session ahead of actual battle.
There is also 'high and mighty', meaning 'to act with a self-importance one likely hasn't earned'. This one dates all the way back to the 1400s, a time when only the wealthiest and most powerful rode on horses. They were literally and figuratively more highly placed than the poor, who had to walk. This gave them an unfounded arrogance, based not on character or even achievement but merely on status. And so it is still frowned upon to act 'high and mighty'.
Fast-forward several centuries and one arrives at 'shoo-in', which comes to us from the world of horse-racing, in the 1930s. Amid scandals over rigged races, this became the term for a horse that was shooed or ushered towards victory in dubious ways. Over time, the implication of dubiousness was lost and it became a term used simply to indicate the candidate most likely to win.
'Hands-down' is an interesting one. We'd never associate it with horses, and yet most of us don't really think about what it means: perhaps surrender, an absence of effort, someone really good at cards?
It is none of those things. It comes to us, instead, from horse-racing. Towards the end of a race, when a jockey was certain of victory, he lowered his hands, relaxing his grip on the reins. It was a power move that said: 'I don't even have to try'. And so, today too, one wins 'hands-down'.
Some equine phrases serve as a tribute to the pain these beasts suffered, in the years when they helped power our world. In a simple example, 'to give someone gyp' means to cause deep pain, 'gyp' being a contraction of 'gee-up', the command to urge a horse to move faster. In a more evocative example, we have 'against the collar'. This phrase immortalises the image of a horse dragging a heavy load uphill, causing its collar to greatly distress its neck. To this day, 'against the collar' indicates a person who is exhausted or having a difficult time, but is still striving.
I'd like to end on a slightly happier note, with my two favourites: 'to ride roughshod over' and 'Big Apple'.
'Ride roughshod' sounds like it might involve simply running a cart or carriage over someone's plans or dreams, but really it has to do with horses' hooves. This phrase, indicating utter disregard for another person, comes from a practice of shoeing horses roughly, leaving the nail heads of their horseshoes jutting out, so that they could be ridden anywhere without slipping. Imagine being trampled by an animal shod in this way. Ghastly!
Big Apple, meanwhile, has been dated to a newspaper column from the 1920s. 'Apple', in horse-racing, was slang for a major cash prize (the apple being the stereotypical treat for horses). A 'big apple' was a significant prize. And so the city that gave out the most prizes became 'the Big Apple'. And that city, of course, was New York.
(Adam Jacot de Boinod is the author of The Meaning of Tingo)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
13 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Spot the mane clause: Equine phrases are hiding where you'd least expect them
Take a horse to water, horse-trading, hold your horses… given the interdependence we once had with these majestic beasts, it is no surprise that ourlanguage embraced them too. In more recent times, a stellar show starring Will Arnett as BoJack gave the term horseman a new meaning. There are, in fact, horses hidden in a number of phrases where one wouldn't expect them to be. Let's start with a simple one. Riding and the age of chivalry (roughly the medieval period, from the 12th to 15th centuries) gave us 'full tilt'. Tilting was an early name for jousting while on horseback. The aim was not so much to pierce the opponent's armour as to spook his horse so that he would be unsaddled. Knights would joust 'at full tilt' when their honour, or the honour of a woman in their circle, had been questioned. They would also joust in jest, or as something akin to a war game or practice session ahead of actual battle. There is also 'high and mighty', meaning 'to act with a self-importance one likely hasn't earned'. This one dates all the way back to the 1400s, a time when only the wealthiest and most powerful rode on horses. They were literally and figuratively more highly placed than the poor, who had to walk. This gave them an unfounded arrogance, based not on character or even achievement but merely on status. And so it is still frowned upon to act 'high and mighty'. Fast-forward several centuries and one arrives at 'shoo-in', which comes to us from the world of horse-racing, in the 1930s. Amid scandals over rigged races, this became the term for a horse that was shooed or ushered towards victory in dubious ways. Over time, the implication of dubiousness was lost and it became a term used simply to indicate the candidate most likely to win. 'Hands-down' is an interesting one. We'd never associate it with horses, and yet most of us don't really think about what it means: perhaps surrender, an absence of effort, someone really good at cards? It is none of those things. It comes to us, instead, from horse-racing. Towards the end of a race, when a jockey was certain of victory, he lowered his hands, relaxing his grip on the reins. It was a power move that said: 'I don't even have to try'. And so, today too, one wins 'hands-down'. Some equine phrases serve as a tribute to the pain these beasts suffered, in the years when they helped power our world. In a simple example, 'to give someone gyp' means to cause deep pain, 'gyp' being a contraction of 'gee-up', the command to urge a horse to move faster. In a more evocative example, we have 'against the collar'. This phrase immortalises the image of a horse dragging a heavy load uphill, causing its collar to greatly distress its neck. To this day, 'against the collar' indicates a person who is exhausted or having a difficult time, but is still striving. I'd like to end on a slightly happier note, with my two favourites: 'to ride roughshod over' and 'Big Apple'. 'Ride roughshod' sounds like it might involve simply running a cart or carriage over someone's plans or dreams, but really it has to do with horses' hooves. This phrase, indicating utter disregard for another person, comes from a practice of shoeing horses roughly, leaving the nail heads of their horseshoes jutting out, so that they could be ridden anywhere without slipping. Imagine being trampled by an animal shod in this way. Ghastly! Big Apple, meanwhile, has been dated to a newspaper column from the 1920s. 'Apple', in horse-racing, was slang for a major cash prize (the apple being the stereotypical treat for horses). A 'big apple' was a significant prize. And so the city that gave out the most prizes became 'the Big Apple'. And that city, of course, was New York. (Adam Jacot de Boinod is the author of The Meaning of Tingo)
Hindustan Times
12-06-2025
- Hindustan Times
Sean Hayes, Will Arnett and Jason Bateman net worths: ‘SmartLess' podcast hosts are starting a phone company
SmartLess, the interview podcast hosted by celebrity trio Sean Hayes, Will Arnett, and Jason Bateman, has just received its first spinoff launch- a mobile service carrier. The service will use the T-Mobile network fiber and is built on the idea that customers will no longer have to pay for data they don't use. Plans range from $15 to $30 a month and are available to users across the United States and Puerto Rico, free of the need to switch contact numbers. 'We're a new kind of mobile company. We'll help you cut your bill, cut screen time, and cut the B.S. You won't hear that from Verizon or AT&T,' the company's official website reads. Also Read: What is USCIS's new policy for green card applicants starting from 11 June? Here's a rundown In light of this business venture, here's a look at the personal fortunes of the three creators of this service: Sean Hayes is an American actor and comedian who, as of February 18, 2025, has amassed a fortune of $30 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth. This funding comes from his performance as Jack McFarland on the NBC sitcom Will & Grace, alongside other popular movies. Hayes was awarded a Tony in 2023 for his performance in 'Good Night, Oscar' and runs a production company called Hazy Mills Productions. Owing to his work as an actor, voice-over artist, producer, and mainly as a podcaster for SmartLess, Will Arnett has $50 million to his name as of March 11, according to Celebrity Net Worth. In acting credentials, Arnett is known for his role as Gob Bluth on 'Arrested Development', along with movies like 'Blades of Glory' and 'Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. He is also behind the voice of Batman in the LEGO world. Also Read: Ananda Lewis dies at 52: What was former MTV VJ's net worth? Jason Bateman owes his $50 million fortune (as reported by Celebrity Net Worth) to his previous lucrative acting, directing, and producing roles. He first shot to fame as Michael Bluth opposite Arnett in 'Arrested Development' and has since gone on to feature in multiple other roles. Known for his sharp wit and incredible comedic timing, Bateman further expanded on his skills by directing a few episodes of the hit Netflix series 'Ozark'.
Time of India
29-04-2025
- Time of India
Long Story Short OTT Release Date: When and where to watch Raphael Bob-Waksberg's adult animated comedy series
Long Story Short OTT Release Date: Get ready for a fresh animated adventure! Raphael Bob-Waksberg, the creator of the much-loved BoJack Horseman, is back with a brand-new series called Long Story Short. According to What's on Netflix, the show is set to release on Netflix on June 12, 2025. What is Long Story Short about? Long Story Short is an animated comedy that explores typical family life - the good, the bad, and the hilarious. The logline for the series reads: 'Long Story Short is an animated comedy about a family over time. It's about the shared history, the inside jokes, the old wounds. If you've ever had a mother, father, sibling, partner, or child, this is the show for you and by the way, would it kill you to call them?' Who's behind Long Story Short? Raphael Bob-Waksberg, who made a huge mark in the world of adult animation with BoJack Horseman, is leading the project. He will serve as the writer, showrunner, and executive producer of Long Story Short. The old BoJack team is reuniting, too. Lisa Hanawalt (the mind behind BoJack's visual style and Tuca & Bertie) will design the original art and act as supervising producer. Noel Bright and Steven A. Cohen will also executive produce for The Tornante Company. ShadowMachine, the studio behind BoJack Horseman and Pinocchio, will produce the animation. Corey Campodonico and Alex Bulkley will be co-executive producers. This means the same creative spirit that made BoJack a classic will be behind Long Story Short, too. First look at LONG STORY SHORT - the new series from the creator of Bojack in 2025. In a typical Bob-Waksberg tongue-in-cheek style, Raphael said in a press release: 'It is legitimately a thrill and an honour to be back doing what I love most: drafting enthusiastic pull quotes for press releases to Hollywood trade publications. Who says you can't go home again?!' Why is there so much buzz? Ten years ago, BoJack Horseman changed the way people looked at adult animated shows. Instead of just jokes, BoJack gave audiences a mix of humour, sadness, emotional honesty, and clever social commentary. It was Netflix's first original adult animated series when it debuted on August 22, 2014, and it paved the way for hits like Big Mouth, Arcane, and Blue Eye Samurai.
