Macron visits Greenland to signal European resolve after Trump annexation threats
French President Emmanuel Macron will visit Greenland on Sunday (June 15, 2025), in a show of solidarity with Denmark meant to send a signal of European resolve after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to take over the island.
Greenland is a self-governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark with the right to declare independence. Both the Greenland and Danish governments say it is not for sale and only Greenlanders can determine their future.
President Donald Trump has said he wants the United States to take over the mineral-rich, strategically located Arctic island, and has not ruled out force. His vice president, JD Vance, visited a U.S. military base there in March.
Trump's threat to Greenland
Mr. Macron, the first foreign leader to visit Greenland since Trump's explicit threats to "get" the island, was invited by the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark. He has said his visit is meant to prevent any "preying" on the territory.
"France has stood by us since the first statements about taking our land emerged. This support is both necessary and gratifying," Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen wrote on Facebook days ahead of Macron's visit.
Asked if Macron would deliver an explicit message to the United States during his visit, an adviser to Macron told reporters: "The trip is a signal in itself," without mentioning Trump.
Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told RTL radio on Sunday: "Greenland is a European territory and it is normal that Europe and notably France show their interest."
According to an IFOP poll for NYC.eu published on Saturday, 77% of the French and 56% of Americans disapprove of an annexation of Greenland by the U.S. and 43% of the French would approve using French military power to prevent a U.S. invasion.
Macron will visit the capital Nuuk, as well as a hydropower station funded by the EU and a glacier, and discuss Arctic security and climate change with his hosts.
Though Denmark is an EU member, Greenland is outside the bloc. The French adviser said the visit would be an opportunity to discuss how to give Greenland's association partnership with the EU a "new dimension".
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made several visits to Paris after Trump's threats to seek French and European backing, and has placed orders for French-made surface-to-air missiles, in a shift of focus for Copenhagen.
Enlisting the EU's only nuclear power is a way for Denmark, long one of Washington's most loyal allies in Europe, to project a form of hard power towards a suddenly more aggressive United States, said Florian Vidal of the Paris-based IFRI think tank.
"The Trump administration's more aggressive posture is a shock that makes the French vision of Europe, one that is more autonomous, appear more reasonable for Denmark," he said. "From a Nordic point of view, France is a military power that counts." (Reporting by Michel Rose in Paris and Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen; additional reporting by Andreas Rinke in Berlin and Dominique Vidalon in Paris; editing by Sophie Walker)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Israel-Iran conflict: Trump open to regime change in Tehran after his administration said that wasn't the goal
Following the US military strikes on three key nuclear sites in Iran, President Donald Trump on Sunday called into question the future of Iran's ruling theocracy. While Washington maintains that it is not seeking regime change in the Islamic Republic, Trump's more ambiguous remarks have fuelled speculation. On Sunday, the US military launched strikes on three key sites in Iran, raising urgent questions about the status of Tehran's nuclear programme and how its weakened military might respond. The strikes marked a significant escalation, coming after over a week of Israeli attacks aimed at systematically dismantling Iran's air defences, offensive missile systems, and nuclear infrastructure. The US and Israeli officials said American stealth bombers and the 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker-buster bomb - capable of reaching Iran's deeply buried nuclear facilities - offered the best chance of neutralising fortified sites. Trump announced the strikes, and Iran's state-run IRNA confirmed that the targets included Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear sites. The Pentagon claimed the strikes had 'devastated' Iran's nuclear programme, aligning the US with Israel's ongoing military campaign. Meanwhile, Iran's foreign minister declared that the country reserves the right to retaliate, as tensions mount and the international community urges restraint to prevent a wider regional conflict. According to the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists, Israeli strikes across Iran have killed at least 950 people and wounded 3,450 others. Of the dead, the group identified 380 civilians and 253 members of the security forces.
India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
News Menu, June 23: Iran threatens Strait of Hormuz closure, rain alert for Delhi
Good morning. On June 23, 1980, Sanjay Gandhi died in a plane crash in New Delhi. A trained pilot and instructor, he was piloting a new aircraft, a Pitts S-2A, when it lost control and crashed shortly after takeoff from the Safdarjung Airport. The accident occurred around 8 AM, and Sanjay, who was 33 years old, was killed instantly. The crash was a significant event, given Sanjay's prominent role as a political figure and son of then-Prime Minister Indira Today presents a news menu dominated by fighter planes, bloodshed and fears of global geopolitical and oil crises amid escalating tension in the Middle Raita: Iran Threatens Strait of Hormuz ClosureIran's parliament approved closing the Strait of Hormuz, a critical choke point handling 20% of global oil consumption, following US strikes codenamed 'Operation Midnight Hammer' on its nuclear sites. The closure awaits final approval from Iran's top security authority. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, heading to Moscow to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin, called the US and Israel's actions a 'big red line.' The US, through Pentagon chief Hegseth, described the strikes as 'intentionally limited' and not aimed at regime change, involving over 125 aircraft and 75 munitions. UN Secretary General Antnio Guterres warned, 'Humanity has opened gates to hell.' EU Foreign Ministers will discuss the crisis on Monday, while the US has asked China to Take: Iran's defiance and US aggression mark a pivotal moment in the conflict. If Iran goes ahead with its plan to block the Strait of Hormuz, it will force the US to initiate steps to open up the choke dependent on imported oil, faces potential supply risks, though it placed bigger orders with Russia in June. The Nifty and Sensex will be under scrutiny for reactions to escalating tensions, while global indices like S&P 500 and Nasdaq brace for PM Narendra Modi spoke with Iranian President Pezeshkian, expressing deep concern over US airstrikes and urging immediate de-escalation through dialogue. Modi reiterated India's commitment to regional peace, stating, 'India is on the side of peace and humanity.'Political Spice: Bihar's Election Battle Heats UpThe BJP declared Nitish Kumar as its Chief Minister face for the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections, aiming to quell speculation over leadership. RJD's Tejashwi Yadav called Nitish 'tired' and a 'burden,' ruling out his return to the Lalu Prasad Yadav is poised to become the party's national president for another term on other political news, by-election results for Kadi, Visavadar, Kaliganj, and Ludhiana West are due Sizzler: Karnataka's Corruption AllegationsadvertisementCongress MLA BR Patil's leaked audio sparked a storm, alleging corruption in Karnataka's house allotments. He stood by his claims, while Minister HK Patil criticised the government over illegal mining, citing a Rs 1.5 lakh crore loss due to 'systematic loot.'Celebrity Soup: Vijay Deverakonda's Legal TroubleActor Vijay Deverakonda faces a case under the SC/ST Act at Rayadurgam Police Station, following complaints from tribal associations over his remarks on the CBFC demanded a title change for the film JSK - Janaki Vs State of Kerala, starring Union Minister Suresh Mix: Weather AlertsDelhi: IMD issues a 'yellow' warning for rain and thunderstorms on Monday, with monsoons expected in Delhi and Chandigarh within two States: Orange alert for heavy rainfall and widespread thunderstorms, per Bite: The June TragediesA cruel quirk of fate turned June into a tragic month for former PM Indira Gandhi. On June 25, 1975, she declared a nationwide emergency, leading to her downfall. Five years later, she lost Sanjay, her son and political heir, in the same month. And on June 5, 1984, she ordered Operation Bluestar in Amritsar's Golden Temple. The decision to send the Indian army into the shrine ultimately led to her assassination the same InMust Watch
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fordoward Thinking
Iran may still negotiate with US, taking a long view, while skirmishing with Israel. Even if its nuclear infra is damaged, its knowhow isn't. But if the conflict spreads, welfare of 9mn Indians in the region will be New Delhi's first concern For two decades every United States administration said it might someday bomb Iran's enrichment plants. On Saturday night that 'someday' arrived. B-2 stealth bombers dropped 30,000-pound 'bunker buster' bombs while submarines and aircraft launched Tomahawks at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, the three most consequential nodes in Iran's IAEA monitored nuclear network. Trump declared that 'Fordow is gone', and that Tehran must 'agree to end this war'. The flourish was vintage Trump – muscular and headline grabbing. But behind the applause lines lies a strategic gamble whose downsides may echo far beyond Qom. Trump crossed a threshold earlier presidents tiptoed around, turning an Israel-Iran slugfest into a US-Iran confrontation. He insists the raid was a 'one-off', intended to cripple enrichment. Although neither US nor Israel has produced evidence that Iran was on the brink of building a bomb, the Pentagon's quick look report claims the strikes set the programme back by years at minimal cost. Physics, however, counsels humility. Centrifuges are hardware while enrichment expertise is software lodged in scientists' heads. Bombs can destroy cylinders but not knowledge. Hardliners in Tehran will now argue that only a nuclear weapon can deter the next bunker buster. Did the raid delay a bomb or make it inevitable? Iran accused US of a grave violation of the UN Charter, NPT and international law and vowed that it will not go unanswered. The easiest escalation is to menace the Strait of Hormuz through which about a fifth of global oil passes every day. Next may come missile salvos on Gulf energy infra or on US installations, and then the possible activation of proxies from Lebanon to Yemen. With Iran's parliament reportedly approving the closure of the strait, Brent could easily move past $100 a barrel. Oxford Economics projects $130 if flows are disrupted, a level that would push world inflation back toward 6%. Traders are already paying a war premium in afterhours quotes. Jerusalem meanwhile is jubilant. Netanyahu called the strike a bold decision. Strategically Israel has shifted part of the fight and the risk to Washington. If Iran retaliates, Americans rather than Israelis will calibrate the counterpunch. That is deterrence by entanglement in the short run. Over time it hands Iran a larger menu of US targets and risks dragging America into a war it does not want. Russia immediately cited the bombing as proof of US recklessness while Beijing called it a serious violation of international norms. Any condemning move at the Security Council will face a US veto. However, in the General Assembly the Global South is expected to side with Iran in significant numbers. For India the strike lands like a thunderclap at a cricket match. New Delhi has tried to balance a growing partnership with Washington, deep defence ties with Israel and consequential arrangements with Tehran, from the Chabahar port to International North-South Transit Corridor and once-robust crude imports. That balancing act has lately been criticised by the main opposition party. ● The immediate anxiety is economic. The Gulf supplies 54% of India's oil, generates about 40% of its remittances and accounts for more than $170bn in two-way trade. India imports more than 80% of its crude; every ten dollar rise in Brent adds about one billion dollars a month to the import bill and pressures the rupee. Consumer inflation just slipped below 5%; a Hormuz scare could undo that gain and complicate RBI's plan to cut rates. GOI is already moving to secure supplies, eyeing the strategic petroleum reserve and talking to several producers to ensure continuity. ● A second priority is the safety of nearly nine million Indians working in the region. Evacuation from Iran and Israel is underway. Operation Sankalp ships in the region can be helpful, if required. Diplomatically India has open channels with Washington, Tehran and Jerusalem, but leverage is thin while missiles fly. Still New Delhi may be able to offer discreet messages that help each side edge away from the brink, just like back-channel efforts by Qatar and Muscat. Meanwhile others such as Saudi Arabia and UAE are actively counselling restraint. The key actors need face-saving options. That also means Washington spelling out what de-escalation looks like. Would it accept enrichment capped below weapons grade? Does it envisage returning to the JCPOA framework with phased sanctions relief? Absent clarity Tehran will read 'time for peace' as code for surrender. In US, supporters have praised decisive action; critics have warned that the President had bypassed Congress and demanded a War Powers vote. Trump's boast that the mission was historic and limited is politically smart yet strategically ambiguous. If Iran swallows the blow and returns to talks the White House can claim victory. If Tehran retaliates Washington can strike again and say it had no choice. Either way the attack chips away at the nonproliferation regime and bets that humiliation will not ignite a wider war. The US entry into another West Asian conflict recalls 1991 and 2003, but this round involves nuclear facilities, peer power pushback and an energy hungry Global South. Fordow's tunnels may indeed be rubble, yet geopolitics rarely collapses neatly. US strikes may be tactically brilliant. Strategically they kick a radioactive can down a much steeper road. That road needs to be kept from becoming a cratered battlefield. The test is whether diplomacy can move faster than the bunker busters. The writer is former permanent representative of India to UN and served as an international civil servant at IAEA Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
