Murray asks who Scots voters ‘trust to spend' £9.1bn rise in funding
Next year's Holyrood election will be focused on who voters trust more to spend a £9.1 billion increase in funding for Scotland, Ian Murray has said.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out her spending plans for the next three years on Wednesday, pledging to increase funding for housing and the NHS south of the border – which will have an impact on Scotland.
She also announced development funding for the long-awaited Acorn carbon capture and storage facility in Aberdeenshire, as well as the reinstatement of up to £750 million to build the UK's most powerful supercomputer at Edinburgh University.
A Spending Review that invests in Britain's renewal.
✅ A record cash investment in our NHS
✅ Free School Meals to lift 100,000 kids out of poverty
✅ Defence spending to rise to 2.6% of GDP by April 2027 to protect us in a changing world
Click the video to find out more.
— HM Treasury (@hmtreasury) June 11, 2025
According to the Treasury, the Scottish Government will see an increase of £9.1 billion over the next three years.
In a briefing for Scottish journalists, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones said on average, the increase will mean £2.9 billion extra for Scotland each year – £2.4 billion of which will be revenue spending up to 2028-29 and around £510 million in capital for the slightly longer period of four years.
The funding will take effect from April next year, just weeks before Scots go to the polls in the Holyrood election.
In the same briefing, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray asked: 'The question then becomes, who do you trust to spend that?
'The record of the SNP Government of the last 18 years has not been beneficial in terms of how they would spend it.
'In fact, I think there'll be broad support for the view that the £4.9 billion that they got in the budget last year has not been spent wisely either.'
He said Wednesday's spending review was 'great' for Scotland.
One of the key announcements was confirmation of development funding for the Acorn project.
The project – which will store carbon emissions from across Scotland under the North Sea – was repeatedly overlooked by successive UK governments for funding.
But asked for clarity on how much cash the project will receive, Mr Jones was unable to say.
The 136-page document also said that while the Government supports Acorn, 'a final investment decision will be taken later this Parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'.
Mr Murray said: 'We're working with the Acorn partners and have been for some time now about what they need for the development of it and that's what this commitment is for.'
The SNP pushed for more detail on Acorn following the announcement.
Accusing successive UK governments of having 'dragged their heels' on the project, Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said: 'The glaring omission in today's announcement was any detail on the scale of funding and the timescales for delivery, which stands in stark contrast to the £22 billion commitment the Labour Government has already given to carbon capture projects in England.
'Westminster has had 20 years to hammer out the detail on Scottish carbon capture, so it must now deliver meaningful funding and concrete support at pace.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said the overall funding increase does not match that of Whitehall departments, claiming Scotland has missed out on more than £1 billion.
'Today's settlement for Scotland is particularly disappointing, with real-terms growth of 0.8% a year for our overall block grant, which is lower than the average for UK departments,' she said.
'Had our resource funding for day-to-day priorities grown in line with the UK Government's overall spending, we would have £1.1 billion more to spend on our priorities over the next three years. In effect, Scotland has been short-changed by more than £1 billion pounds.
'It is also disappointing that despite apparent briefing to media in advance, we are still awaiting clarity on funding for the vital Acorn project in the north-east of Scotland.
'We made extensive representations to the UK Government on our priorities for the spending review, including calls for an end to spending that bypasses devolution, but there has been limited opportunity to engage with them.
'It appears that the continuation of local growth funding – which fails to match the European Structural Funds it was supposed to replace – will come directly from Whitehall, yet again bypassing devolved governments.'
The Scottish Government will respond to the announcement in the medium-term financial strategy on June 25, the Finance Secretary said.
But Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar praised the spending review as 'game-changing', adding: 'The plans set out today will bring billions of pounds of investment to Scotland, on top of the record budget settlement delivered in the budget.
'From the Acorn Project to a national supercomputer in Edinburgh to our defence industry, this Labour Government is investing in Scotland's future while the SNP carps from the sidelines.'
Scottish Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy described the spending review as a 'spend-now-tax-later statement' which will result in the Chancellor 'almost certainly' having to raise taxes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
30 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Romania Heads for Broad Ruling Coalition After Months of Turmoil
Romania is heading toward a broad coalition government to tackle the European Union's biggest budget shortfall after the largest pro-European party voted to join the cabinet of Prime Minister-designate Ilie Bolojan. The Social Democrats, which control most seats in parliament, overwhelmingly voted on Saturday to form a new majority with Bolojan's Liberals and two other smaller parties. The new coalition will control more than 60% of the legislature, leaving far-right parties as the main opposition.
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
How the stablecoin bill gives Treasury Secretary Bessent a new tool to fund the U.S. deficit
The crypto industry is on the verge of a major regulatory milestone, and it could lead to digital assets being a significant source of funding for the U.S. government. On Tuesday, the Senate passed the GENIUS Act , which lays out a regulatory framework for stablecoins, sending it on to the House of Representatives with bipartisan support. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent praised the bill in a post on X , saying that a regulated and growing stablecoin market could create new buyers for U.S. government debt. "A thriving stablecoin ecosystem will drive demand from the private sector for US Treasuries, which back stablecoins. This newfound demand could lower government borrowing costs and help rein in the national debt. It could also onramp millions of new users — across the globe — to the dollar-based digital asset economy," Bessent said. "It's a win-win-win for everyone involved" The exact size the stablecoin market can reach in the future is unclear, but it does appear that the U.S. government will have plenty of debt to sell to it. The Congressional Budget Office's dynamic score — which takes into account the legislation's potential changes to factors like economic growth — said the tax and spending bill that recently passed the House would increase the total deficit by $3.4 trillion from 2025 to 2034, including interest costs. The current size of the U.S. dollar-denominated stablecoin market is around $230 billion to $250 billion, according to Robbert van Batenburg, strategist at The Bear Traps Report, and there is a theory that a clearer regulatory framework can help lead to wider adoption. Several major tech and consumer companies are reportedly exploring issuing their own stablecoins or using existing coins more frequently. Bessent previously told the House Financial Services Committee in May that there is "speculation" the stablecoin market could be "up to $2 trillion of demand over the next few years for U.S. government securities from digital assets." The market could in theory surpass that $2 trillion figure if stablecoins start to take market share from traditional credit card payment networks, van Batenburg said. The stablecoin bill also comes at a time when Wall Street has started to fret about foreign investors and governments turning away from U.S. assets. Katie Haun, founder and CEO of Haun Ventures and former Coinbase board member, said Friday on " Squawk Box " that the stablecoin industry is already 14th largest holder in the world of U.S. Treasurys, ahead of nations like Germany and Norway, and that the new legislation should help it continue to grow. "I've been asking for regulatory clarity and more rules of the road, and I think the GENIUS Act is exactly that," Haun said. How stablecoins work Stablecoins are a type of digital currency that is often used to facilitate crypto trading but can also work for other types of transactions. They are designed to be "stable" at a set value. Some stablecoins have drawn scrutiny in the past over concerns that their reserves were insufficient or relied on mechanisms that would unreliable in times of market stress. The Senate bill calls for stablecoins to be backed on at least a 1-to-1 basis by highly liquid assets, including U.S. currency, U.S. Treasury bills, repurchase agreements — or "repos" — backed by Treasury securities, government money market funds and central bank reserve deposits. An example of a stablecoin's reserves can be found in the disclosures from Circle , which went public earlier this month and has seen its stock soar . CRCL 1M mountain Shares of Circle have soared since the IPO. Circle's IPO prospectus shows that the vast majority of its stablecoin reserves are held in a BlackRock vehicle called the Circle Reserve Fund . That fund's holdings are split roughly 50-50 between short-term U.S. Treasury Debt and Treasury repurchase agreements. If the GENIUS Act is enacted as currently written, stablecoin companies will be required to certify they have these holdings on a monthly basis, with the oversight of registered public accounting companies. Risks A growing stablecoin industry in the U.S. is not likely to completely fix the government's debt funding problem, and it could introduce additional risks. Nonprofit group Better Markets opposes the GENIUS Act, and its policy director Amanda Fischer said in a statement that the bill ignores "the susceptibility of stablecoin companies to runs, bankruptcies, and taxpayer-funded bailouts." Counting on the industry as a funding source for the Treasury market could also be tricky. Lawrence McDonald, founder of the Bear Traps Report, cautioned that additional demand from stablecoins will take time to develop while the U.S. Treasury will likely need to issue significant amounts of debt securities over the next year. McDonald also said that, while interest costs of short-term debt are cheaper than that of 30-year Treasurys, relying so heavily on the short-end of the bond market can be a problem for countries. "If something ever went wrong, in terms of say oil, and that prevented the [Federal Reserve] from cutting, then you're going to have a high bill rate for a long-time and the deficit is going to spiral out of control," McDonald said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Starmer Faces Brewing Rebellion Over £5 Billion Benefit Cut
(Bloomberg) -- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is less than 10 days away from the biggest parliamentary challenge to his authority in his not-yet year-long tenure. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' One Architect's Quest to Save Mumbai's Heritage From Disappearing JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown Unpopular cuts to disability benefits unveiled earlier this year as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' efforts to balance the country's books are due before the House of Commons for their first vote on July 1, with a large-scale rebellion brewing on the Labour back benches. So far, at least 150 of the governing party's Members of Parliament have indicated concerns about the cuts in two letters to the government. Other non-signatories have told Bloomberg they also intend to vote against the bill. While Starmer's attention this week was centered on the escalating tensions in the Middle East, the domestic threat was laid bare on Thursday when Vicky Foxcroft, a government whip who would have been tasked with helping quell the revolt, quit, citing her own objections. The rebellion threatens to bruise Starmer's and Reeves' credibility and further damage their stock with the left of their party. In order to avoid falling to what would be an unprecedented defeat for a government enjoying such a large majority so early in its tenure, ministers could at worst be forced into major concessions that reduce the bill's expected cost savings, forcing the Treasury to conjure up money from other cuts or tax rises at the budget in the fall. 'It's a test of Starmer's authority and the way he and Rachel Reeves are running the economy,' Tim Bale, professor of politics at Queen Mary University London, said in a phone interview. 'If the rebellion is too big, you start to run into questions about the loyalty of your backbenchers and even perhaps the future of your leadership.' The welfare reforms allowed Reeves to save about £5 billion ($6.5 billion) a year by 2030 by making it harder for disabled people to claim a benefit called the personal independence payment, or PIP. The chancellor factored them into a spring statement as part of spending cuts designed to help meet her self-imposed fiscal rules. Reeves says the changes are necessary because an extra thousand people a day have been signing on for PIP, creating an 'unsustainable' impact on the public finances. PIP payments had been projected to almost double to £41 billion by the end of the decade, within overall spending on disability and incapacity benefits that the Office for Budget Responsibility — the government's fiscal watchdog — sees rising to £100 billion from £65 billion last year. The government has also says there is a moral case for supporting people back into work. But Labour lawmakers are concerned the government announced changes in a rush to deliver savings, without thinking through the impact on vulnerable people. 'There are alternative and more compassionate ways to balance the books, rather than on the backs of disabled people,' one Labour backbencher, Debbie Abrahams, told the House of Commons. There are particular concerns about a new requirement for claimants to score four or above in one of the daily living components of the PIP assessment, meaning people who can't wash half their body or cook a meal will be denied the payments if they have no other impairments. One Labour MP describing the process as letting the OBR tail wag the government dog. Some 45 Labour MPs signed a public letter objecting to the measures, while another letter — arranged in secrecy so that even signatories couldn't see who they were joining — garnered 105 signatures and was sent to the chief whip. While some of the would-be rebels have indicated they could be swayed by the government whips, one of them told Bloomberg they are confident that more than 80 MPs will commit to voting against the government. Given Starmer's working majority is 165, if all opposition parties vote against the bill, it would take 83 Labour rebels to defeat the government. The main opposition Conservative Party is planning to vote against the changes, Danny Kruger, one of the party's work and pensions spokespeople, told parliament in May. Its reasons are different: the Tories argue the measures don't go far enough. One Labour MP told Bloomberg that concerned lawmakers plan to put forward a procedural challenge to the bill. While they don't expect the speaker to select that amendment for debate, the aim is to force further changes from the government, and organize would-be Labour rebels into a coherent group which could eventually vote down the bill. Many in Labour had been waiting to see the bill before making up their minds. When the text was published on Wednesday, the concessions to their concerns were minimal, largely amounting to a 13-week transition period for those losing their PIP. Foxcroft — the whip who had previously served for four years as Starmer's shadow disability minister in opposition — quit within hours of the publication, saying she didn't believe cutting the disability benefits should be part of the solution to tackling ballooning welfare costs. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said Friday that Foxcroft's resignation wasn't a sign of a major rebellion, while conceding that 'of course' there are dissenting voices on such a big reform. 'Vicky is the only front-bencher that I've had a conversation with about resigning,' she said. Nevertheless, many so-called 'red wall' Labour MPs in northern and central England face a tough decision. Health Equity North, a public health institute, found that all the places most affected financially by the PIP reforms are Labour constituencies in northern England. In several areas, the number of people affected by the welfare changes exceeds the Labour majority, meaning those MPs could see a crucial drop in support. The government is gearing up for a fight, indicating it will make no further concessions. On Wednesday, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner failed to rule out stripping the whip from Labour rebels, while government enforcers are warning MPs that their political career prospects will be ruined if they oppose the bill. Whips and wannabe rebels alike expect the potential revolt to be whittled down as July 1 approaches. Some opponents are weighing whether to abstain at the second reading and wait until the third reading to take a more decisive vote, as whips are encouraging them to do. 'I'd be amazed if he were defeated here,' Anand Menon, director of the UK in a Changing Europe think-tank, said. 'If the whips got a whiff they were going to get defeated, they'd give some concessions. The worst of all outcomes is to lose this.' Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
