Controversies surface over BSNL's ₹1.39 lakh crore BharatNet 3 program
NEW DELHI: The Centre's ambitious digital connectivity program,
BharatNet
3—now revamped with an outlay of ₹1.39 lakh crore—is facing serious allegations of 'selective action' by local companies. These claims threaten to drag the initiative, aimed at connecting 6.5 lakh villages, into courtroom battles.
State-run
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
(
BSNL
) said that the tender evaluation was done transparently, and the initiative is on track, while defending the recent developments.
The discontented bidders, however, are accusing BSNL otherwise.
Several complaints were made to the Ministry of Communications over the course of the last few months, including a few shared anonymously.
In a five-page letter, dated February 24, 2025, addressed to the Minister of Communications Jyothiraditya Scindia, a complainant said, 'it appears that BSNL has failed to check the lack of primary basic eligibility of bidding parties in accordance with standard procedural norms.'
Queries to the Ministry of Communications did not elicit any response.
BharatNet 3, a follow-on phase of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's prestigious program, is fully funded by the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) erstwhile Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF).
BSNL, as a part of pre-bid discussions, had to issue as many as 4,400 clarifications to queries from bidders in May 2024. It also prompted scepticism leaving behind legal loopholes wide open.
PSU bias
Sources say that while a Bangaluru-based ITI Limited won a package making a relatively smaller firm as a consortium partner, while on the other hand, Assam package awarded to another state-run Telecommunication Consultants India Limited (TCIL), based on 'suo moto' action, citing vendor-selection deviation, is withheld.
Interestingly, the ITI-led consortium received a go-ahead from the DoT's Chief Vigilance Office (CVO) within 48 hours when irregularities in selecting consortium partners were brought to its notice.
Meanwhile, the vigilance officer in its remarks said that upon examination, it 'did not find prime facie allegations true and due diligence seems to have done" in the process of selection of consortium partner.
Query to ITI did not receive any response.
Of the overall 16 packages, six were released in the first tranche, including lucrative ones - Uttar Pradesh East and West - won by a public sector Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL).
Legal tangle
On March 10, a Delhi-based company sought cancellation of Haryana package awarded to a lowest bidder citing misrepresentation. It escalated into a bitter spat, with the other side blaming technical flaws on BSNL's part while evaluating the former's bid.
State-owned telco, to steer away controversy, sought a 'legal view' from the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) of India N Venkataraman who on March 12, opined cancelling three packages — Rajasthan, Haryana and Northeast region.
The matter took a twist when a legal heavyweight and former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and a former Supreme Court justice AK Sikri weighed in, and strongly contradicted ASG views that put BSNL in a fix. The matter is now under Venkataraman's review.
While the state-owned telco is yet to take a considered view upon receiving a revised opinion, BSNL insiders say that they 'have instructions from the top to cancel at least four packages.'
Clarifications to 'an extent of substantial modification in eligibility requirement,' enabling disqualification of an otherwise lowest bidder, is not acceptable, said legal experts.
Query to ASG of India remained unanswered.
'Despite this clarity, some PSUs continue to take cognisance of anonymous complaints selectively, raising concerns about arbitrary application of vigilance norms. This selective approach defeats the very purpose of the DoPT and CVC notifications, as it allows certain complaints to be used to stall projects or target individuals while ignoring similar issues elsewhere. Such inconsistent action contradicts the principles of transparency and fairness enshrined under Article 14 of the Constitution of India,' Sonam Chandwani, Managing Partner, KS Legal & Associates said.
BSNL defense
Those who received purchase orders (PO) from state-driven telco includes NCC Limited, ITI-Tera Software, RVNL-HFCL, Polycab and Sterlite Technologies.
'The complaints received during the evaluation stage were examined thoroughly. In a few cases, complaints were escalated to secondary review Committees for an additional layer of scrutiny. Wherever necessary, the documents submitted by the bidder, and were also verified directly from the source. Financial bids were opened only after all technical evaluations were completed and supporting documents were duly verified. The entire bid evaluation process was carried out in a transparent manner, fully in line with applicable rules and procedures,' BSNL chairman A
Robert J Ravi
told ETTelecom.
Further, Ravi said that the telco adopted a rigorous and transparent evaluation methodology, by instituting sixteen committees—each responsible for one specific package. 'All the committees had at least one external member from academia. The committees assessed the bids strictly as per the eligibility criteria defined in the tender and the documents submitted by bidders.'
BharatNet's troubled history
The project, executed by state-owned telco under the 'administrative control' of the Ministry of Communications, was relaunched in January 2024 with a ring topology design. Initially envisioned in 2011 under the UPA-II regime as the National Optical Fibre Network (NOFN), it was rebranded as BharatNet in 2015. Despite multiple extensions, it continues to face execution hurdles.
In July 2022, the Cabinet approved the merger of Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) with BSNL to accelerate project rollout. In August 2023, the Centre approved the Amended BharatNet Program (ABP) to expand fibre connectivity to the remaining 3.8 lakh non-Gram Panchayat villages on a demand basis.
Bidders are mandated to deploy an IP-MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) network, with hot-swappable routers at the block level. They are also responsible for 10 years of operations and maintenance, including monitoring uptime through a centralized Network Operating Centre (CNOC), as per strict Service Level Agreements (SLAs).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
Announcement on defence equipment factory in Salem soon, says union minister H D Kumaraswamy
Salem: Union steel and heavy industries minister H D Kumaraswamy on Saturday said an announcement regarding the establishment of a defence equipment manufacturing factory on the premises of Salem Steel Plant would be made soon. "The proposal is currently in the early stages of discussion. A formal announcement in this regard will be made in the next four to five months," he said after attending the International Yoga Day celebrations at the Salem Steel Plant, where he did various yoga asanas along with the plant officials, members of trade unions and employees. Addressing the media, he commended Prime Minister Narendra Modi for promoting yoga across the globe and inspiring people. He said efforts were on to revitalize the Salem Steel Plant on the technical and marketing fronts. "In the 2003-2004 financial year, the plant was profitable. However, the profitability has since declined. The primary goal is to redevelop the plant and restore its profitability by developing various new products." Referring to the one nation, one election policy, Kumaraswamy said the BJP was not fostering division, but promoting unity within the country. "The BJP's goal is to strengthen its presence in Tamil Nadu, and the party is actively working to achieve this goal. Hence, some regional parties are criticizing the BJP." On Friday, the Union minister had planted a sapling on the Salem Steel Plant premises and toured the entire facility. He had also met the representatives of labour unions and promised to address their concerns.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Opium farmers demand policy overhaul, fair pricing
Jaipur: The opium farmers' association of Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh has strongly urged the Centre to rethink its opium cultivation policy for 2025-26. They have demanded fair treatment of farmers, higher prices, and an end to what they call 'exploitative practices'. In a statement released Friday, the association clarified that "opium is a medicinal crop, not a drug" and blamed corrupt officials rather than the crop itself for mismanagement. "Opium is not inferior — it is the system and some officials that failed the farmers," the association asserted. Key demands include issuing traditional cultivation licences to all farmers and families who grew opium since Independence and revising the price of raw opium to at least Rs 50,000 per kg to align with global standards. "Farmers have faced years of exploitation under the guise of regulation while their production costs skyrocketed," the association said. The group also criticised the govt-imposed Concentrated Poppy Straw (CPS) system, describing it as an attempt to "enslave farmers to private companies." They called for its discontinuation, arguing that if CPS was genuinely effective, parallel traditional farming wouldn't still exist. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo "If CPS is truly superior, make its performance data public. Stop forcing it on traditional farmers," the association has demanded. The association suggests that the govt should directly buy and fairly compensate for all by-products like doda chura, comparing it to how no one expects farmers to manage cow dung after consuming the milk. The Central Bureau of Narcotics issues licences to farmers for opium cultivation and is the sole authority responsible for its procurement. They have also urged the govt to prevent opium cultivation from falling into the hands of private companies and called for a CBI probe into the operations of the narcotics department between 2015 and 2025. The farmers stressed that adopting their suggestions would "ensure economic freedom for the country, prosperity for farmers, and affordable medicines for patients, in line with the PM's 'Make in India, Made by Farmers' vision."
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Tour operator told to refund elderly couple for cancelled tour in Covid times
Ahmedabad: A consumer commission here has ordered a tour operator to refund the full amount with interest, along with Rs 55,000 compensation, to an elderly couple whose tours to Japan and Europe could not take place due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The couple was reluctant to go to the UK, Ireland, and Scotland upon the operator's insistence three years later. This case involved Asha and Yogesh Doshi, residents of the Ambawadi area, who paid Rs 5.30 lakh in 2019 to Mumbai-based Neem Holidays Pvt Ltd for two tours — Japan and Europe in 2020. Due to the Covid pandemic, the tours were cancelled. When normalcy returned, they requested the same tour package, but the operator could not arrange it. Considering that people were still reeling under financial stress due to Covid, the couple did not demand their money back. In 2022, the tour operator offered them a 13-day package for Australia. They agreed and paid Rs 10,000 extra, but this did not take place. A year later, the operator offered the couple a tour to the United Kingdom. The couple refused this trip, yet their tickets were booked. They requested the company not to force them to accept this package tour and demanded their money back. As the operator did not respond, the couple sued it with the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Ahmedabad City to get the refund. The operator's lawyer appeared, but the reply was not filed. The commission said that since the money was lying with the operator, the complainants did not have any choice but to agree to the unreasonable request. However, compelling them for another tour against their wish was harassment. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "The complainant's money has been wrongfully withheld by the opponent, and therefore the complainants are entitled to receive the full money of the package tour from the opponent," it said. The commission ordered the operator to return Rs 5.40 lakh with 8% interest, along with Rs 55,000 extra towards compensation for causing "physical harassment and mental agony" and towards the expenditure the couple incurred on litigation.
