Court hears chilling details of pastor's grooming methods in bail hearing
Sitham Baram Michael Andrew Chetty at his bail hearing on Wednesday
Image: Yoshini Perumal
THE modus operandi of a convicted 'sex pest pastor' appealing for bail indicated that he 'strategically positioned himself in the lives of families, gaining their trust and that of their children, before he sexually groomed and eventually sexually assaulted them'.
These were the closing arguments from the State in the bail application of Bayview pastor Sitham Baram Michael Andrew Chetty, 54, at the Chatsworth Magistrate's Court yesterday.
Chetty is accused of the sexual assault and the rape of a boy, 11, from his congregation, on multiple occasions since September 2024. He was arrested and charged in March this year.
In a fresh bail bid, which started last Thursday, Chetty told the court that he could afford bail of R5 000, and would safely reside in Phoenix, should he be granted bail.
Chetty had a previous conviction of sexual assault of a minor from his congregation in 2018.
State prosecutor, Dayantha Subrayadu, said after perusing the docket from Chetty's previous conviction and the new charges, there was a 'clear modus operandi.'
'Chetty strategically positions himself in the lives of the families of the victims gaining their trust and the trust of their children. The second phase of this modus operandi is to suggest that the child come with him for the purposes of church services and preaching at church or Sunday school.
'Because he is in a position of trust, the family allowed him to do so, and that is when he was able to isolate his victim he then attempted to test their boundaries and skillfully groom them before eventually sexually assaulting them.
'Both victims reached a point during the course of the sexual assault that they had enough and they are finally able to muster up the strength to confide in their family,' she added.
Subrayadu said in respect of the previous conviction, the charge was sexual assault, but in this case, charges include rape.
She said this brings the State to an inference that charges against Chetty hac escalated since the last criminal matter, which was his previous conviction, which only included a charge of sexual assault.
Highlighting the public outrage, Subrayadu said it was clear that the public was outraged regarding the matter.
'Without us even having to leave the court building we are able to feel the outrage of the community. On March 27, Chetty was supposed to apply for bail.
'There was a big crowd of people, which included community members and leaders present before court and they continued to come to court. The State sees community members coming to court, and we think the fact that these are people who have jobs, children, and their own lives, yet they have taken the time out of their day to come to court and stand with the victim.
'This is to tell the court there is no space in society for a sexual predator and we echo the sentiments of the community,' Subrayadu added.
She said should Chetty be released on bail there was a 'high likelihood' that his life would be in danger.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Eyewitness News
21 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Investigating Directorate to submit fresh extradition application for Guptas
Cape TOWN - The Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) says it will submit a fresh extradition application to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for the Gupta brothers for additional State capture matters. This is despite the lack of success to date, in trying to get the brothers to face trial in South Africa in the Estina dairy farm and Nulane cases. On Wednesday, IDAC head Andrea Johnson told Parliament in the interest of justice and given the public interest in these matters, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) won't give up, even though diplomatic efforts to understand the shortcomings have been ignored. The failure of the State to successfully extradite Gupta brothers Atul and Rajesh has been a blight on the NPA's progress in prosecuting State capture matters. But Johnson told Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) that despite not knowing where it's gone wrong in previous attempts, it will once again be submitting an extradition application. 'We have now, however, taken a decision to submit new applications with additional matters.' She says 12 diplomatic notes (notes verbales) to the UAE government to understand why previous applications have failed, have been met with silence. 'How do you resubmit, when you've submitted a full set of papers, properly checked by themselves? So, it does put you in somewhat of a predicament. Do you now send these papers to be a so-called failed attempt again?' NPA head Shamila Batohi says by and large the authority is successful in extradition applications in other countries, but the UAE has proven particularly difficult.

IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Pietermaritzburg High Court upholds life sentence for rapist of eight-year-old
life sentence has been upheld for rapist man by the Pietermaritzburg High Court Image: File The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed an appeal on conviction and life imprisonment sentence for a man who raped an eight-year-old girl multiple times in 2010, gave her R1, and threatened to kill her. The appeal was heard before Judge Robin Mossop and Judge Mahendra Chetty. The rapist was described as the brother-in-law of the young girl's mother. During the trial, the State led evidence and relied on minor children. The Ulundi Regional Court found the evidence of the victim and other minor children corroborative. Hence; the rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim told the regional court that she was raped on five separate occasions in 2010. The first rape happened in daylight hours when she visited the homestead of the rapist accompanied by two other young children. She said they went to visit the rapist's child but instead found him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said that at some stage, the man sent one of her companions to the shop to buy a loose cigarette for him. While the other child had gone to the shop, the man told the victim to brush her hair inside the house and he followed her in, locked the door and raped her. When she cried, he threatened to kill her. After that, he gave her R1 to buy ice lollies. When the companion came back from the shop, she testified that she had slightly pushed the door, but the man told her not to get in. She testified that she saw him on top of his victim naked. This was also corroborated by another child who had peed into the window of the room. Moreover, at night, the victim was raped again. One child who had peed through the window said he saw the man again. He said he entered the bedroom where all four children slept. He said that despite being dark, he saw him as he was wearing a white T-shirt. The child also stated that he was the only adult in the house. The victim did not report the incident until a year later, as she was fearful. She and other children were watching a digital versatile disc (DVD) movie where the issue of sex was alluded to. The children mentioned loudly that the victim knew something about sex, her mother overheard this, and inquired more. The victim was taken to Dr Salona Prahladh, who stated that the victim had been raped and the last sexual assault was more than a year ago. The High Court found that the magistrate who sentenced the man did not make any error in finding him guilty. Judge Mossop said there was no doubt that the magistrate applied the cautionary rule used when dealing with evidence of children. 'The person who she was entitled to believe that she would be safe with, the appellant (rapist), turned out to be a predator intent on abusing her,' he said.


Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Judge in Mapisa-Nqakula's corruption matter unhappy with progress of case
JOHANNESBURG - The judge presiding over the corruption case of former Defence Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula is unhappy with the progress of the case, following yet another appeared at the Pretoria High Court on Friday, where she faces 12 counts of corruption and one of money alleged that as defence minister, she solicited and received kickbacks, amounting to R4.5 million from a defence April, Judge Mokhine Mosopa made a ruling that Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers should be given access to a Dequar Military Police docket. ALSO READ: Court denies corruption-accused Mapisa-Nqakula access to investigation diary This is the docket of the State's star witness, Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu, where she is charged with corruption in a separate case was eventually struck off the court roll due to persistent delays, leading to Mapisa-Nqakula's lawyers suspecting she may have made a quid pro quo deal with the State. READ: High Court says State isn't infringing on Mapisa-Nqakula's right to a fair trial Prosecutor Paul Louw said that since the docket was from another court, he could not disclose it."I only received confirmation from my colleagues in the SCCU (Specialised Commercial Crimes Court), where the military matter was being held yesterday afternoon, that the docket is available to me as a member of the investigating director. I cannot disclose it, it must formally happen via the office of the national director of public prosecutions." Judge Mosopa adjourned the matter to 18 August for a progress report on the disclosure process.