I was charged £4.5k for 2-hour stay in shopping centre car park after payment machine glitch… would YOU spot the error?
A MUM was left "shocked" after a shopping centre car park charged her more than £4,500 for a two-hour stay.
Yaditi Kava, 39, visited Queensmere Observatory Shopping Centre in Slough with her two young daughters to pick up some dinner after work on Friday May 16.
5
5
5
As she returned to the multi-storey car park, the area with the payment machines was closed.
Instead the mum used her contactless card to pay at the exit barrier as she left.
After she tapped, a message told her she needed to enter her pin - a step not normally needed for purchases of £100 or under.
However, bank security protocols do require customers enter their numeric passcode from time-to-time even for transactions under that amount.
Regardless, Yaditi was in a rush and failed to spot that she was being charged a colossal £4,586 for her brief stay.
"I was in a rush, the girls were getting tired, and I did not see the number on the small card machine," she told the BBC.
She saw the display said '4,5' and mistakenly believed the fee was going to be £4.50.
Instead, she was horrified after receiving a text notification from her bank showing the size of the charge.
"To my shock, I saw that they had deducted not £4.50 but £4,586 from my account," she said.
"It was surreal - I just couldn't fathom that they had taken that money."
Car owners face instant driving ban under new registration law plan – it's all based on '$500 rule'
Yaditi her to wait until Monday May 19 to try and reclaim the money, eventually speaking to a manager who she says blamed a "faulty machine".
The manager provided her with a receipt and told her the money would be repaid within 2-3 working days.
But three weeks on, the money had still not materialised.
The accidental charge was repaid shortly after an intervention by the BBC's consumer rights programme The JVS Show, hosted by Jonathan Vernon-Smith on Three Counties Radio.
Yaditi received her full refund on Saturday June 7 - a whole 22 days after the money was first taken.
Real state company Savills, who manage the shopping centre, called it an "isolated incident" and said it was investigating to avoid other customers being inconvenienced by similar problems in the future.
Yaditi is currently in the midst of a divorce and claims the money that was taken by the car park was cash she had set aside to cover legal fees.
She also considered calling off her daughter's birthday party over the stress.
A spokesperson for Savills said: "As the appointed managing agent at Queensmere Observatory Shopping Centre, Savills can confirm that it is aware of an isolated incident concerning an anomaly parking charge at the scheme.
"The matter has now been rectified with a full refund issued.
"This was a very unusual occurrence, and we are investigating the car park system to prevent this from happening in the future."
5
5
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Chris Brown pleads not guilty to ‘bottle attack' charge
R&B singer Chris Brown has pleaded not guilty to attempting to cause grievous bodily harm in an alleged bottle attack at a London nightclub. The American musician, 36, is accused of attempting to unlawfully and maliciously cause grievous bodily harm with intent to Abraham Diaw at the Tape venue in Hanover Square, Mayfair, on February 19 2023. His co-defendant, US national Omololu Akinlolu, denied the same charge in a plea and trial preparation hearing at Southwark Crown Court on Friday morning. Both defendants are further charged with assaulting Mr Diaw occasioning him actual bodily harm, with Brown also facing one count of having an offensive weapon – a bottle – in a public place. They were not asked to enter pleas to those charges with a further court hearing set for July 11. Around 20 people sat in the public gallery behind the dock for Friday's hearing, many of them fans of Brown. A date for a five to seven-day trial was set for October 26 2026. Brown had arrived at around 9am to a large group of photographers outside court, and walked in silence to the building's entrance. The Go Crazy singer, who was able to continue with his scheduled international tour after he was freed on conditional bail last month, performed in Cardiff on Thursday night. He had to pay a £5 million security fee to the court as part of the bail agreement, which is a financial guarantee to ensure a defendant returns to court and may be forfeited if they breach bail conditions.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Personal insolvencies 5% higher in May than same month of 2024, figures show
The number of people going financially insolvent across England and Wales in May was 5% higher than the same month in 2024, according to Insolvency Service figures. In May 2025, 10,014 people entered insolvency, including bankruptcies, debt relief orders (DROs) and individual voluntary arrangements (IVAs), a total which was broadly unchanged compared with 10,060 insolvencies in April 2025. The Insolvency Service said DRO numbers have remained similar to the record high levels seen over the past 12 months, with 3,783 cases recorded in May. The report said: 'DRO numbers have been at record high monthly numbers since the abolition of the upfront £90 fee in April 2024, with the 45,802 DROs in the past 12 months being nearly twice as high as the long-term annual average.' In June 2024, DRO eligibility was expanded. The debt threshold was increased from £30,000 to £50,000 and the allowable value of an exempt motor vehicle was increased from £2,000 to £4,000. IVA numbers this year so far have remained in line with monthly averages seen last year. The report added: 'The 5,583 IVAs registered in May 2025 was similar to April 2025 and 13% higher than in May 2024.' With 648 cases recorded, bankruptcy numbers were 4% higher than in May 2024, but remained at less than half of pre-2020 levels. In addition to the formal insolvencies, there were 7,805 'breathing space' registrations recorded under the Debt Respite Scheme in May 2025 – 2% higher than in May 2024. Of the breathing space registrations, 7,684 were standard breathing space registrations and 121 were mental health breathing space registrations. The scheme gives people with problem debt a period of protection from their creditors, enabling them to access professional debt advice, without the stress caused by spiralling debt and looming enforcement action. A standard breathing space gives people with problem debt legal protections from creditor action for up to 60 days. A mental health crisis breathing space is available to those receiving mental health crisis treatment. It lasts as long as the person's mental health crisis treatment, plus 30 days. Households faced various bill increases in April, putting an additional strain on some people's finances. The number of company insolvencies in England and Wales was 2,238 in May 2025 – a 15% jump compared with May 2024. Monthly company insolvency numbers in the first five months of 2025 were slightly higher than in 2024 and at a similar level to 2023, which saw a 30-year high annual number of insolvencies, the Insolvency Service said. The company insolvency rate remains much lower than the peak of 113.1 per 10,000 companies seen during the 2008-09 financial downturn, the report said, adding: 'This is because the number of companies on the effective register has more than doubled over this period.'
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Could a BMW garage remotely trigger a fault just after my warranty expired?
I bought my BMW X1 in April 2022 so the three-year warranty has just expired. I had decided not to extend it, given the car had only done 23,000 miles, had full BMW servicing and sailed through its first MOT. However, within two months, a catalytic converter warning light came on. My BMW garage performed a remote diagnostic check and suggested a sensor failure as the cause. However, the cynical side of me wonders whether, if my garage can conduct a remote check, it could also have brought about the failure? – MC Dear MC, I feel as though this question warrants a reference to Hanlon's razor, a rule which states that one should never attribute to malice that which is more easily explained by incompetence. Or more accurately, in this case, simply a broken-down part. It's easy to see conspiracy when you think you're being taken for a ride, but in this case I reckon your cynical side is getting the better of you. True, it's theoretically possible that a manufacturer may have developed a system that would allow them to remotely generate faults in order to force you to take your car to their garage. In reality, though, we can be pretty certain no such system exists. For one thing, how would the manufacturer guarantee it would benefit? You might just as easily take your car elsewhere for repair work. For another, any such system's discovery would be catastrophic for the brand's reputation – after dieselgate, I'm confident most manufacturers aren't willing to risk their very existence simply to bring in a bit of extra aftersales revenue for their dealers. The fact of the matter is that cars go wrong sometimes. And, sometimes, they go wrong just after the warranty has expired (the result of another rule: sod's law). Fortunately, your car has been serviced by a main dealer so you have a good chance of getting some of the cost of the repair covered by BMW. I suggest asking the dealer to contact BMW and request a gesture of goodwill – or take it up with BMW customer support yourself – given that the warranty has only just expired. The chances are you will get some money off the cost of the repair.
