Iran-Israel conflict may spill into Pakistan: Masood Khan
Former President of Azad Jammu and Kashmir and senior diplomat Sardar Masood Khan warned that the intensifying conflict between Iran and Israel could have severe consequences for Pakistan's security, stability, and regional standing.
In a series of interviews, He said that a prolonged war could prompt an influx of Iranian refugees into Pakistan, comparable to the fallout of the Afghan conflict.
He cautioned that Pakistan's already stretched resources would come under further strain if hostilities in the Middle East persist.
If the war drags on, there is a strong possibility of a mass exodus of Iranian refugees towards Pakistan,' Khan said. 'Such a scenario would create economic, political, and social pressure.'
Khan also warned that instability on the western border could provide a gateway for infiltration by anti-state groups allegedly backed by hostile foreign powers, especially India.
He named outfits like the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) as potential threats.
'A weakened border with Iran could be exploited by proxies seeking to destabilise Pakistan,' Khan stated.
Discussing Israel's strategic aims, Khan noted that Tel Aviv had already targeted Iranian nuclear infrastructure at Fordow, Natanz, Isfahan, and other critical sites. According to Khan, Israel claims to have neutralised nearly 40% of Iran's air defence network.
He further alleged that Israel is pushing the United States either to intervene militarily or to grant approval for the limited use of tactical nuclear weapons.
'They're proposing subterranean nuclear strikes, which they argue would limit fallout,' Khan explained. 'But experts believe such thinking is dangerously naïve.'
On international reactions, Khan said that while Russia and China have voiced support for Iran, Tehran has not formally sought military assistance.
He added that Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate, a gesture welcomed by Iran but dismissed by Israel.
Khan also highlighted ongoing diplomatic efforts, noting that the United States has allowed a 15-day window to decide its course.
'This has opened room for backchannel diplomacy,' he said. 'The British Foreign Secretary has been active in Washington, and even some of President Trump's advisors are calling for restraint.'
Despite diplomatic movements, Khan warned that US military deployments in Europe, the Middle East, and at Diego Garcia signal preparation for escalation.
'The world stands at a perilous crossroads,' he concluded. 'We must prepare for all outcomes, even as we hope diplomacy prevails.'
Meanwhile, Iran has condemned US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities as a grave breach of international law, warning of dangerous consequences and vowing to defend its sovereignty by all means.
Read more: Tehran vows self-defence with 'all force' after US strikes three nuclear installations
The strikes, carried out on June 21 and announced by US President Donald Trump, targeted Iran's main nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.
Trump declared the mission a success and warned Tehran of further attacks if it retaliates or refuses peace.
The attack, launched in coordination with Israel amid its ongoing military attacks against Iran, marked a major escalation in regional tensions.
Trump, flanked by senior US officials, said the strikes aimed to destroy Iran's nuclear capability and prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon. He later claimed all US aircraft had exited Iranian airspace safely.
Iran denounced the strikes as criminal aggression and called on the United Nations and the IAEA to hold Washington accountable.
Iranian officials accused both the US and Israel of undermining diplomacy, and criticised Western nations for demanding Iran return to talks it says it never left.
Global reaction was mixed. Israel praised Trump's decision as historic, while UN Secretary-General António Guterres called it a dangerous escalation that threatens global security.
The EU, UK, and several other nations urged de-escalation and a return to diplomacy. Countries including Venezuela, Cuba, and Qatar condemned the US action, warning of regional instability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Iran-Israel conflict: what it means for Pakistan
Listen to article The ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel has taken a heavy human toll in Iran and some in the Israel. How could this conflict affect Pakistan? Iran, after all, is one of the four neighbors of Pakistan. The other three are Afghanistan, China and India. It is only with China that Pakistan has good relations. It is cooperating with Beijing in several areas, including defence production. Pakistan is also partnering with China to build a regional communication network. That Israel was well informed about the targets that it hit resulted in the deaths of Mohammad Bagheri, the chief Iranian military staff and three other top military generals. Israel has also assassinated two top nuclear scientists. It is obvious that the Jewish state was helped by those Iranian who oppose the clerics' regime in their country. As one observer put it, when the senior people in Tehran meet, you can't be sure whether the person sitting next to you works as a spy for Israel. When the Israelis began their campaign against Tehran on June 13, it was obvious that the targets hit were well selected, with information coming from those who worked as spies for the Jewish state. Video footage from Tehran confirmed the precision of the attacks – showing one floor of an apartment building hit, for example, but not others. The hit apartment housed the person the Israelis wished to kill. Even after the devastating attacks in Lebanon on Hezbollah – a Tehran ally that had a large supply of armaments meant to be used against Israel – Tehran has not lost all of its allies. The Al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen may pose a special danger for those who are supporting Israel and the latter's activities in the Middle East. It is likely to pose a special danger to Israeli supporters. The group is headed by Assa bin Saad bin Atef al-Awlaki, who posted a chilling video. The video named several people who should be targeted for assassination. These included President Donald Trump, Vic President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and former DOGE chief Elon Musk. "There are no red lines after all that has been happening to our people in Gaza," he said in the message. According to The Jerusalem Post, an Israeli newspaper, Awlaki urged all Muslims in America and Europe to make sure there is "not a single safe place in the world for Jews". David Ignatius, who contributes to The Washington Post, wrote in his column published by the newspaper on June 14, 2025, "Israel's tactical mastery is unquestionable. But in this latest assault on Iran – as in earlier campaigns in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen – Israel appears to have given relatively little thought to 'its day after' ambitions. Does Israel seek regime change in Iran, to permanently bend Iran away from its revolutionary course? That appears to be Netanyahu's message in a June 13, 2025, televised pitch to the Iranian people. 'This is your opportunity to stand and let your voices be heard,' he said. But there is a danger of overreach. Netanyahu may have to settle for a strike that will neuter the Iranian nuclear threat for a few more years but set up a future conflagration." Gerry Shih and Susannah George, who also cover the Middle East for the Post, wrote that "the Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear and military sites, along with the targeted killing of at least a dozen senior military officials and scientists, represents the latest sign of Israel's shift away from a decades-old policy favoring containment, restraint and short wars." They continued with their analysis by highlighting that "in the past 20 months, the Israeli Defense Force has occupied territory and carried out frequent airstrikes in neighboring Lebanon and Syria, reflecting what Israeli military officials say is a new border security doctrine. Netanyahu has vowed not to cease the military campaign in Gaza until he achieves total victory over Hamas, displaying tolerance for prolonged conflicts that runs against traditional Israeli strategic thinking." Aaron David Miller, who has advised seven US secretaries of state on the Middle East, said there has been a shift within the Israeli security establishment which now appears comfortable with leading Israel as a "regional hegemon". In 2020, for instance, Netanyahu declined to participate in a US operation that resulted in the assassination of Maj Gen Qasem Soleimani, Iran's top military commander. Netanyahu "was very risk averse, very reluctant to use force," said Miller who dealt with Netanyahu over a long career at the State Department. "He was always one step forward, two steps to the side, one step back. Now he's become risk ready." Since Netanyahu lunched the operation known as the 'Rising Lion', he is not in favour of the Trump administration and Iran to return to the negotiating table. After carrying out operations in Gaza and Lebanon, Israel has blocked the new government in Syria which assumed control in December 2024 from establishing itself as a military power. It has launched hundreds of airstrikes on strategic stockpiles and demanded that Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa demilitarise an entire region running south of Damascus to the Israeli border. According to Danny Citrinowicz, a former military Israeli military intelligence official who specialises in Iran and the regional allies, "when you don't have Syria, when Hamas is nonexistent, and without Hezbollah, you can do almost whatever you want." But he warned that Israel had not done enough long-term planning beyond the immediate use of force. "So we expand attacks into Iran's energy sector, so we fight a war of attrition that never ends. And then what?" Miller, the former State Department official, said that Netanyahu had demonstrated Israel's military superiority and his willingness to use it, but his Arab neighbours wanted to see him turn that into lasting stability. "The more Netanyahu is on a course in which he's not going to translate his escalation dominance into more stable arrangements or peace deals, the more wary the neighbors will become." China is working with Pakistan to develop plans to expand CPEC, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, into Afghanistan and Iran. Eventually the road network would extend to the countries of Central Asia that were once part of the dissolved Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the USSR. This would make it possible for China to tap and transport minerals from the area to feed its rapidly expanding industrial system. With the possible participation of the United States in the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict, these plans would be disrupted.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Opposition leaders in Iran call on Khamenei to step down after US strikes
The leaders of two prominent Iranian opposition factions on Sunday urged supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to step down and spare more bloodshed, in the wake of unprecedented American attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities. Reza Pahlavi, the son of the shah ousted by the 1979 Islamic revolution, and Maryam Rajavi, the leader of the People's Mujahedin (MEK), which is outlawed in Iran, said in separate statements that Khamenei must quit after over a week of war between Iran and Israel. The whereabouts of Khamenei, who has led the country since 1989, are unclear after Israel refused to rule out killing him. The strikes on the Islamic Republic's three nuclear sites are the result of the regime's catastrophic pursuit of nuclear weapons at the expense of the Iranian people. Ali Khamenei and his crumbling terrorist regime have failed the nation. As Khamenei considers how to respond… — Reza Pahlavi (@PahlaviReza) June 22, 2025 Opposition groups claim he is deep underground in a bunker and incommunicado except with a group of his closest aides. "Now Khamenei must go," said Rajavi, saying that Khamenei's "unpatriotic project" had now "all gone up in smoke". "No to appeasement, no to war and yes to regime change -- changing the religious dictatorship by the Iranian people and the Iranian resistance," she said. Pahlavi, who is the figurehead for supporters of the ousted Iranian monarchy, said "the only sure way to achieve peace is for this regime to now end". "As Khamenei considers how to respond from his underground bunker, I say to him: For the sake of the Iranian people, respond by stepping down," he said. In another statement, 2023 Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, who remains inside Iran on leave from a prison sentence, called Iran's government a "religious, authoritarian, and misogynistic regime". Bur she said she strongly opposed the "devastating and ruthless war" and urged both sides to accept an "immediate ceasefire". "I firmly believe that democracy and peace will not emerge from the dark and terrifying corridors of war and violence," she said. The series of US strikes against Iran "devastated" its nuclear programme, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Sunday, while insisting that Washington was not seeking to oust the clerical leadership.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan rejects reports of US strikes via its airspace
Listen to article Pakistani authorities strongly rejected claims circulating on social media suggesting that the country had permitted the United States to use its airspace or territorial waters for military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling the reports "completely false and baseless." The denial comes amid rising tensions in the Middle East following US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The strikes targeted three key Iranian nuclear sites — Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan — according to US President Donald Trump, who announced the operation on his Truth Social platform. According to the state television PTV, some Indian media outlets have amplified allegations that US B-2 bombers and warships passed through Pakistani territory to reach Iranian targets—claims officials in Islamabad dismiss as deliberate disinformation. 'These reports are part of a broader pattern of false narratives, particularly pushed by certain quarters in Indian media,' a senior government source told Reuters. اسرائیل ایران جنگ سے متعلق چند اہم فیکٹ چیک؛ حقائق اور پاکستان کا اصولی موقف کیا ہے؟ — PTV News (@PTVNewsOfficial) June 22, 2025 In a statement, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) condemned the US attack, labelling it 'a serious violation of international law' and expressing concern about further regional escalation. 'Iran has the legitimate right to defend itself under the UN Charter,' the MOFA said, urging all parties to respect international law and protect civilian lives and infrastructure. The government reiterated its longstanding position of neutrality in regional conflicts and called for restraint and diplomacy. Officials confirmed that Pakistan has not entered into any new military cooperation related to the Iran-US conflict and no request for operational access has been made by Washington. 'Pakistan maintains a policy of non-involvement and supports dialogue as the only sustainable path to peace,' the statement added. Authorities urged both the media and the public to verify all information through credible and official channels, cautioning against the spread of unverified and potentially dangerous misinformation. In contrast, US B-2 stealth bombers reportedly used Indian airspace to carry out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to regional sources cited in multiple reports on Sunday. Read: US B-2 bombers used Indian airspace to attack Iran's nuclear facilities Sources claimed the US Air Force's strategic bombers departed from Guam Island in the western Pacific, passed over the Andaman Sea, and then traversed central Indian airspace before reaching their strike zone near Iran via the Arabian Sea. The route reportedly covered coordinates including 15°N, 145°E (Guam), through 10°N, 95°–100°E (Andaman Sea), crossing 20°N, 75°–80°E (central India), and reaching the vicinity of 25°–30°N, 60°–65°E (near Iran's borders). Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif also strongly condemned the recent US military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, calling them a serious violation of international law. He conveyed Pakistan's position during a telephone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. The US strikes followed eight days of what Pakistan termed as Israel's "unprovoked and unjustified aggression." 'The Prime Minister expressed deep concern that the US attacks had targeted facilities under the safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),' the statement said. 'These attacks constituted a serious violation of international law and the IAEA Statute,' he was quoted as saying. Washington enters Iran conflict US forces struck Iran's three main nuclear sites, President Donald Trump said in a televised speech late on June 21 and he warned Tehran it would face more devastating attacks if it does not agree to peace. The US strikes included 14 bunker-buster bombs, more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles and over 125 military aircraft, in an operation the top US general, General Dan Caine, said was named "Operation Midnight." After days of deliberation and long before his self-imposed two-week deadline, Trump's decision to join Israel's military invasion against its major rival Iran is a major escalation of the assault and risks opening a new era of instability in the Middle East. "A short time ago, we carried out massive precision strikes on three nuclear facilities in the Iranian regime," he announced. Also Read: Tehran vows self-defence with 'all force' after US strikes three nuclear installations The strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said in the White House televised address. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated." Iran's Foreign Ministry has strongly condemned the US military strike on its nuclear facilities, calling the action an unprecedented breach of international law and a grave violation of the UN Charter. In a statement, the Islamic Republic of Iran accused the United States of a 'brutal military aggression' against its peaceful nuclear infrastructure. Tehran held Washington fully responsible for what it called a 'heinous crime' and warned of 'dangerous consequences' stemming from the attack.
