Changes coming this weekend to Columbia Co. Spring Fair
COLUMBIA COUNTY, Ga. (WJBF) – Due to the disruptions at the Columbia County Spring Fair last weekend, organizers decided to make some changes.
In a statement they said, 'Fair families, our goal in producing the Columbia County Fair is to provide a fun, family-friendly, safe experience for everyone. With that being said, we are implementing some changes to ensure we remain committed to achieving that goal. Due to the number of unattended youths last Saturday that seemed intent on disrupting the fair, we feel these changes are necessary to continue to provide a family friendly atmosphere and safe environment for all. On Friday and Saturday at 6:00PM, all guests 17 and under must be accompanied by a parent. One parent will be allowed to bring a maximum of 4 children. Purchase of admission and ride tickets will be required at the gate to allow entry to guests ages 11-17. IDs for youths 18 and above will be required to enter the fair.'
Attendees who were there last weekend told NewsChannel 6 that they saw a gun or heard gunshots, but investigators say they have no proof that weapons were shown or fired at the Fair.
The Columbia County Sheriff's office said they plan to provide more officers this weekend to ensure the safety of people who want to attend the Fair.
The Spring Fair runs through Sunday, April 27th. For more information on Spring Fair go to https://columbiacountyfair.net/.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Counterfeit Xanax, firearms seized during search of Bay Area home
A Vallejo man was arrested after deputies seized a large quantity of counterfeit Xanax pills and firearms during a search of his home, according to the Solano County Sheriff's Office. Ricardo Caro, 32, was booked into Solano County Jail after deputies executing a search warrant Friday morning discovered the counterfeit prescription pills and illegal firearms, the sheriff's office said.
Los Angeles Times
3 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
Should irresponsible hikers be forced to pay for their rescue? This sheriff says yes
The number of rescues in the wilderness areas around Mt. St. Helens keep going up — and the actions of some of those before they call for help have drawn criticism as reckless. One man, 21, kayaked over a waterfall, suffering a spinal injury. A 54-year-old woman glissaded down Mt. St. Helens — sliding down a snow-covered slope — and suffered a head injury when she struck a rock. Each of those rescues in May, in a remote, mountainous county, required six-hour efforts. And one West Coast sheriff is now pondering sending the most egregious victims a bill. The idea would involve a new county ordinance where a person could be cited 'if they are found to be reckless or negligent in their actions where search and rescue is requested to respond,' according to the Sheriff's Office in Skamania County, the remote, sparsely populated county in Washington that is home to Mt. St. Helens. 'I need to find a creative way to deter the current behavior we are witnessing while attempting to recoup the financial burden placed on our county,' Sheriff Summer Scheyer said in a statement. 'This ordinance is still in the planning phase, but I believe it would be an added deterrent for those who take exceptional risks.' The number of search-and-rescue missions soared in May in Skamania County compared to the same month last year, the Sheriff's Office said, with a number of missions taking four to nine hours to complete the rescue. Skamania County isn't alone. In southern Utah, the Garfield County Sheriff's Office on Tuesday announced it was requiring permits for some of the most remote and challenging slot canyons, noting 'a significant increase in search and rescue operations.' Nationwide, the number of national park search-and-rescue operations is in the thousands — 3,308 in 2023 — which can entail anything from a child who is separated from their parents to a hiker who is lost in the backcountry. The idea of forcing irresponsible hikers to pay for their rescue has come up before. In New Hampshire, the state says people may be required to pay back the costs to rescue them. One way to avoid such charges is buying 'Hike Safe Cards' — $25 per person and $35 per family — that supports the state's search-and-rescue efforts. One recent rescue that gained attention involved a pair of hikers who had to be rescued after they hiked despite a forecast of rain, sleet and snow in the middle of January, went off a marked trail and feared they were hypothermic. Rescuers had to break a trail — for three-quarters of a mile in steep terrain — to get to the hikers. 'The pair were found to be inadequately prepared for the conditions that were forecasted,' the Fish and Game Department said in a news release, and neither had Hike Safe Cards. In 2013 in California, a massive search-and-rescue operation was launched in Orange County for two hikers, Nicolas Cendoya, 19, and Kyndall Jack, 18. They called for help after going on an Easter Sunday hike in Trabuco Canyon and became lost. The cellphone they used to make the call stopped working before authorities could identify their location. Cendoya was found three days later, shoeless and disoriented half a mile from their car, and Jack, the day after, in shoulder-high brush. After authorities found methamphetamine in the vehicle, which the pair had parked before the hike, some government officials called for the $160,000 rescue bill to be paid back. Cendoya pleaded guilty to one felony count of drug possession but was eligible for a drug-diversion program, which if completed successfully would mean he could have the case against him dismissed. Court records indicated the case was dismissed in 2015. A judge, however, denied the Orange County Fire Authority's request that the agency get back the $55,000 it spent on the search for the pair, saying the fire agency was not a victim of a crime and couldn't seek restitution. In response, California lawmakers changed the law to allow government officials to seek reimbursement for future rescues, with certain conditions. Signed into law in 2015, the law allows a county or city to seek reimbursement for the costs of a rescue if it required 'the use of extraordinary methods,' and 'was caused by an intentional act in knowing violation' of any law 'that resulted in a criminal conviction of that person for that act.' But a county can't collect if the person rescued can't afford to pay. The county also can't collect more than $12,000 unless the person rescued was convicted of a felony. Although Orange County did not recoup its costs, the hikers did face other legal action to hold them financially accountable. Jack was sued by a volunteer rescuer who was injured during the search, falling more than 100 feet, according to the rescuer's attorneys. The volunteer, who accused Jack of negligently putting rescuers in danger, received $100,000 as part of a legal settlement, paid from a homeowner's insurance policy held by Jack's mother. The rescuer's attorney said Cendoya also settled with the rescuer for an undisclosed amount of money. Some search-and-rescue organizations don't support the idea of charging people needing rescue. 'No one should ever be made to feel they must delay in notifying the proper authorities of a search or rescue incident out of fear of possible charges,' the Mountain Rescue Assn. says. In a position paper in 2009, the association said that most services that rescue people in the mountains in the U.S. 'are provided by teams of unpaid professional rescue mountaineers who give up their own time to participate in search and rescue activities.' 'The typical search and rescue mission is over within a matter of a few hours, and with the vast majority of the work performed by unpaid professional volunteers, the costs are generally very low,' Charley Shimanski, then the president of the Mountain Rescue Assn., said in a statement. 'It's true that teams are sometimes over-taxed, and that newcomers to the backcountry call 911 in questionable circumstances,' the Colorado Search and Rescue Assn. said. 'Yet we still don't believe charging for services is the answer. We know from experience that when people think they're going to be charged, they often delay calling, or even intentionally evade, rescuers.' Times staff writer Alex Wigglesworth contributed to this report.
New York Post
6 days ago
- New York Post
An attorney general who HELPS bad guys and targets cops? Yep: Meet NY's Letitia James
You'd think the job of a state attorney general is to hunt down bad guys, or at least help other law-enforcement nab them, but just try telling that to New York AG Letitia James — who's now busy targeting good guys, i.e, local law-enforcement officials who (heaven forfend!) even think about helping the feds detain illegal immigrants. As The Post exclusively reported, James has demanded that Oswego County's Sheriff's Office hand over documents that may show cooperation with federal agencies such as ICE and Homeland Security. Advertisement This follows her similar bullying of Nassau County's Sheriff's Office in the wake of reports that it has the nerve to help the feds enforce immigration law. Sources say she's likely to target more counties. To James, it seems, aiding immigration enforcement is the crime of the century, so she'll use all her power to stop it. Advertisement Please. Doesn't her office have anything better to do? Yes, we know: New York's wacko statutes and executive orders by Govs. Andrew Cuomo and Kathy Hochul purport to restrict local cops' efforts to help federal agents enforce immigration law. Yet surely there's enough other work for her staff to focus on. Crime statewide, for starters, rose 31% from 2019 to 2023, and 46% in the city. Where's James & Co. been? Advertisement Besides, 80% of New Yorkers want the feds to boot illegal migrants who've been convicted of crimes, a Siena poll found. Then again, James also used her office to war on President Donald Trump — and anyone who does his bidding — for years; rarely a day goes by without her taking some legal action against him or his team. Just last week, she sued Trump for moving to overturn California's EV mandates; the day before, for deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Not to mention her attempt to bankrupt Trump to keep him from running in 2024. Of course, James spent her years as NYC's public advocate filing endless Hail-Mary lawsuits, too; none of it did much for regular New Yorkers, but it raised her profile enough to let her grab the AG job after scandal forced out Eric Schneiderman. But, sorry: Endless pandering to the Democratic Party's left-wing base isn't a serious statewide winner even in New York; the press corps (most of which is part of that base) may eat it up, but most voters won't. They still think public servants are supposed to . . . serve the public.
