Former Alabama basketball player says New York Times should reveal source who falsely identified him in 2023 deadly shooting
ALABAMA (WHNT) — A former Alabama Basketball player believes the New York Times should have to reveal its source that falsely identified him at the scene of a deadly shooting in 2023. The Northern District of Alabama now has a decision to make.
A federal judge says the Alabama Supreme Court has to decide if the Shield Statute applies to information published online by a corporation that publishes a newspaper.
CLICK HERE for News 19's Interactive Radar 🌩️🌦️☔
Former UA basketball player Darius Miles and Michael Davis were charged with capital murder in a January 2023 shooting that led to the death of 23-year-old Jamea Harris. On May 9, Davis was found guilty of capital murder while Miles awaits his trial, which has yet to be set.
On March 15, 2023, federal court documents say that The New York Times Company published an article on its website relating to this incident. The story itself garnered national interest because of the reported involvement of two Alabama basketball players, Miles and Brandon Miller. Miller was never charged in the incident.
'News reports citing police testimony of an unidentified passenger in Mr. Miller's car provided additional intrigue,' the document says. Billy Witz, a New York Times Reporter, published an article headlined 'A Fourth Alabama Player Was at a Deadly Shooting, in a Car Hit by Bullets.' In this article, the federal document says Witz identified UA Basketball player Kai Spears as the 'unidentified passenger' in the vehicle with Miller.
At the bottom of the article, Witz reportedly attributed the information to a single, anonymous source. After the article was published and name-dropped Spears, the source told Witz that they were 'likely wrong' in identifying Spears as at the crime scene.
📲 to stay updated on the go. 📧 to have news sent to your inbox.
In May 2023, Spears filed a lawsuit against The New York Times Company claiming the article was defamatory as well as false light invasion of privacy. Documents say the New York Times failed to use 'reasonable care in publishing and disseminating untrue statements about his presence at a crime scene and publicizing highly offensive false statements despite harboring serious doubts as to the reliability of its source and/or the source's information.'
In the original lawsuit, Spears said on the night of the incident, Spears met up with two high school friends who went to Clemson University and were in town. The document said Spears lived in the athletes' dorm and his friends were going to sleep on the couch in the common area of the four-person suite.
The night of the murder, Spears and his friends went out to eat, went back to the athletes' dorms and prepared to go out on the Strip, the retail and nightlife district directly off UA's campus, the lawsuit says. It also details a time frame of Spears and his friends movements from the evening of Jan. 14 to the morning of Jan. 15:
JAN 14 – 11 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. – Spears and his friends bump into three other people who were going into Houndstooth Bar
JAN 15 – 12:30 a.m. – Spears and his friends met up with Miller outside the bar where they all left to go eat at Moe's Original BBQ
While there, Spears facetimed another UA basketball player. On this call, the other player and Miller asked Spears and his friends if they wanted to go out with them. 'Due to the lateness of the hour and [Spears' friends] planned trip back to Clemson University, [the three] declined the invitation with intentions to return immediately to Bryant Hall with no stops at any location.'
1:40 a.m. – Spears and his friends and Miller went their separate ways.
1:48 a.m. – In the parking lot of Bryant Hall, Spears facetimed Miller to see where they ended up going. In that process, Spears 'was informed that shots were fired at the windshield of Miller's vehicle.'
2 a.m. – Cooper Lee, UA basketball manager, called Spears to gather his thoughts at the dorm.
2:30 a.m.- 2:35 a.m. – Lee arrived at Spears room
4 a.m. – Spears went to the police station because the Tuscaloosa Police Department wanted to interview all the basketball players who were out that night
According to the lawsuit, on March 15 around 3 p.m., Witz approached Spears and asked him, 'The night of the shooting, when you were in Brandon Miller's car, were you scared when the shots were fired?' To this question, Spears responded 'No comment,' per instruction from the UA Department of Athletics guidance.
Florence Police K-9 catches man in crawl space
Around 8 p.m. on March 15, the article stating Spears was in Miller's vehicle the night of the murder was published. The lawsuit says on March 20, Spears made a written demand that the New York Times retract the published statements claiming he was at the scene of the murder. However, the lawsuit says on March 25, the statements were not retracted from the article.
On June 2, 2023, Lee emailed the New York Times to confirm that he was the previously unidentified passenger in Miller's vehicle at the time of the shooting. After this statement, the New York Times then updated the article, saying '[t]he original version of this article, published March 15, misidentified the person who was in the car with Brandon Miller when the shooting occurred,' according to federal court documents.
On July 28, 2023, the New York Times Company motioned to dismiss both charges Spears filed against it. This motion, in relevance to the defamatory claims, that 'Because Spears Did Not Plead Special Damages, His Complaint Fails as a Matter of Law Unless the Challenged Statements Constitute Defamation Per Se,' and 'It is Not Defamatory Per Se to State, Even Erroneously, that Someone was a Bystander to, or Victim of, a Crime.'
For the charge of False Light as to a matter of law, the New York Times Company said 'It is Not 'Highly Offensive' to Report Incorrectly that Spears Was in a Teammate's Car Shortly After He Actually Was in the Car,' and that 'The Complaint Does Not Plausibly Allege Actual Malice.'
Trial begins Monday for Madison woman charged with child sex abuse, sodomy & bestiality in 2023
After some thought, On Dec. 6, 2023, a federal district judge granted in part and denied in part the New York Times Company's motion to dismiss:
GRANTED IN PART: The motion was granted to dismiss the false light claim
DENIED IN PART: The motion was denied to dismiss the defamation claim
After some back and forth on whether the New York Times is obligated to reveal the source that falsely accused Spears as being at the scene, a federal judge told the Supreme Court of Alabama on May 22, 2025, that it had to decide whether the state's Shield Statute applies to a coorporation that publishes online and in a written publication.
Mr. Spears has moved to compel the production of documents, to lift redactions on documents produced in response to his request for production, and to compel information redacted or withheld in The New York Times's responses to interrogatories.
The New York Times opposes this motion based on its contention that Alabama's Shield Statute prohibits the 'compelled disclosure of newsgathering information.''
Federal court documents
The document says that the New York Times defined 'newsgathering information' as including the identity of a source who provides information that it publishes as well as the identity of the source who corroborates some part of the published information.'
Man accused of shooting, killing family member in altercation, police say
The company says the statute applies to them because it is a newspaper and therefore the identities of sources are 'privileged.'
In addition, the New York Times argues that Spears 'conceded that the information provided by its source(s) was ''published' within the meaning of Ala. Code § 12-21-142,' and therefore waived this issue.' However, the federal document says concessions of law are not binding on the court.
This all being said, 'the court respectfully requests the Supreme Court of Alabama decide the question of whether the identity of a source whose information is published online by a corporation that publishes a newspaper is protected from compelled disclosure by a court.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
Wisconsin and NIL collective sue Miami, allege tampering and NIL inducements to land football player
The University of Wisconsin and its NIL collective VC Connect filed a joint lawsuit on Friday against the University of Miami, alleging it knowingly induced one of the Badgers' football players to abandon a lucrative name, image and likeness contract to play for the Florida this upcoming season. Allegations of tampering rarely get to this level and the 23-page lawsuit, which was filed in state court in Wisconsin and obtained by The Associated Press, is unusual. Depending on its resolution, it could have a a wider impact on future NIL deals across college athletics. The player in question in the filing is referred to only as "Student-Athlete A." But the case summary describes facts that line up with the situation involving cornerback Xavier Lucas, who last December announced his plans to enter the transfer portal. Shortly afterward, Darren Heitner, who has been representing Lucas, indicated that Wisconsin was refusing to put Lucas' name in the portal and that it was hindering his ability to talk with other schools. In January, Heitner announced that Lucas would be playing for Miami this fall. The situation is fallout from the rapid changes engulfing college athletics, specifically a combination of two things: Athletes went to court and won the ability to transfer with much more freedom and the 2021 NCAA decision clearing the way for them to strike NIL endorsement deals now worth millions of dollars. That has changed the recruiting landscape and forced the issue of contracts and signed commitments to the fore. "Indeed, student-athletes' newfound NIL rights will be rendered meaningless if third parties are allowed to induce student-athletes to abandon their contractual commitments," a portion of the lawsuit reads. Miami and Lucas were in talks before transfer decision, Wisconsin says Wisconsin said in January that it had credible information that Miami and Lucas made impermissible contact with each other before the former Badgers cornerback decided to transfer. Wisconsin and VC Connect allege that the inducement for Lucas to attend Miami happened within days of him entering his NIL agreement to play for the Badgers, and that they incurred substantial monetary and reputational harm. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages and "a declaration that Miami's conduct directed towards Student-Athlete A constituted tampering." A message left with the University of Miami seeking comment was not immediately returned. In a text message Friday, Heitner declined to comment on the lawsuit but he said that Lucas still plans to attend Miami and play football. Wisconsin said it had the support of its leadership and the Big Ten Conference in filing the lawsuit, noting its commitment to "ensuring integrity and fundamental fairness in the evolving landscape of college athletics." "While we reluctantly bring this case, we stand by our position that respecting and enforcing contractual obligations is essential to maintaining a level playing field," the statement said. "In addition to our legal action, we will continue to be proactive to protect the interests of our student-athletes, our program and the broader collegiate athletics community. Lucas, who is from Pompano Beach, Florida, had 12 tackles, an interception and a sack as a freshman for Wisconsin last season. Heitner said that Lucas hasn't received any money from Wisconsin and therefore owes no money to the school. Heitner also argued that Wisconsin had violated an NCAA bylaw by not entering Lucas into the transfer database within two business days of the player's request. Wisconsin issued a statement at the time saying it hadn't put Lucas' name in the portal because he had entered a two-year binding NIL agreement. In April, the surprise transfers of brothers Nico and Madden Iamaleava from Tennessee to UCLA prompted fresh questions about contracts and buyouts. Nico Iamaleava, who led Tennessee to the College Football Playoff last season, walked away from a reported $2.4 million NIL contract. Arkansas freshman quarterback Madden Iamaleava entered the portal after spring practices wrapped up. Arkansas athletic director Hunter Yurachek released a statement indicating he would support efforts by the Razorbacks' NIL collective to enforce buyout clauses in athlete contracts. Iamaleava reportedly had a contract valued at $500,000 upon signing with Arkansas.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Husband of Colorado woman Suzanne Morphew re-arrested 3 years after charges were dropped in her 2020 death
The husband of a Colorado woman, Suzanne Morphew, whose remains were discovered over three years after she was reported missing on Mother's Day 2020, was arrested again Friday on suspicion of first-degree murder, authorities said. Barry Morphew was arrested Friday in Arizona after a Colorado grand jury returned an indictment Wednesday. His bond was set at $3 million, cash only, according to court documents. The district attorney's office said in a statement that it is seeking to bring him back to Colorado. Barry Morphew has maintained his innocence since his wife disappeared, and his attorney David Beller blasted the new indictment. 'Yet again, the government allows their predetermined conclusion to lead their search for evidence,' Beller said in a statement. 'Barry maintains his innocence. The case has not changed, and the outcome will not either.' He was first arrested in the death of his wife in May 2021 on suspicion of first-degree murder, tampering with a human body and other offenses. But prosecutors dropped their case against him the following year just as he was about to stand trial. A judge barred prosecutors from calling key witnesses for repeatedly failing to follow rules for turning over evidence in Barry Morphew's favor. That included DNA from an unknown male found in Suzanne Morphew's SUV. At the time, prosecutors said they wanted more time to find her body. Barry Morphew has repeatedly maintained his innocence and previously filed a $15 million lawsuit against county officials, accusing them of violating his constitutional rights. The mystery surrounding Suzanne Morphew began on May 10, 2020, when the 49-year-old mother of two daughters, who lived near the small town of Salida, was reported missing on Mother's Day. Suzanne Morphew's mountain bike and helmet were soon found in separate spots not far from her home but investigators suspected the bike had been purposefully thrown down into a ravine because there were no indications of a crash. A week after she went missing, Barry Morphew posted a video on Facebook pleading for her safe return. 'No questions asked, however much they want, I will do whatever it takes to get you back,' he said. When he was charged, the arrest affidavit laying out investigators' case against him said his wife insisted on leaving him. He later changed his statements as evidence in the case developed. Morphew, an avid hunter, did not initially tell investigators that he went out of his way as he left for work on Mother's Day, driving toward the place where his wife's bicycle helmet was eventually found. Later, he said he went that way because he had seen an elk cross the road, according to his arrest affidavit. After prosecutors dropped the charges against him, Barry Morphew's lawyers announced they had filed a complaint asking that the prosecutors be disciplined for allegedly intentionally withholding evidence in the case. However, the initial charges against Morphew were dismissed without prejudice, leaving the door open for prosecutors to pursue a case against him later. That happened after Colorado Bureau of Investigation agents stumbled upon Suzanne Morphew's skeletal remains in a shallow grave during an unrelated search near the small southern Colorado town of Moffat in September 2023, about 40 miles south of Barry and Suzanne Morphew's home. A 2024 autopsy report released said Suzanne Morphew died of 'undetermined means' but ruled it a homicide. A cocktail of drugs that are used to tranquilize wildlife was found in one of her bones but there was no indication of trauma, the report said. A tranquilizer gun and accessories were found in the Morphews' home, according to investigators.
CBS News
40 minutes ago
- CBS News
Access limited around Soo Locks for Engineers Day over public safety concerns
Man arrested after two Southgate police officers shot; heat wave in the forecast; other top stories Man arrested after two Southgate police officers shot; heat wave in the forecast; other top stories Man arrested after two Southgate police officers shot; heat wave in the forecast; other top stories The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says public access around the Soo Locks will be limited for Engineers Day on June 27. Access will be limited to the Canal Park "out of an abundance of caution, in light of uncontrollable circumstances," according to a news release. Officials say access in and around active Soo Locks operations will not be open to the public during the event. They say the decision was made in conjunction with local, state and federal public safety partners. As part of the limitations, the U.S. Coast Guard will be participating but will not hold an open house. "We acknowledge this is disappointing and acknowledge the importance of this event to the community, which is why we coordinated closely with our public safety partners to permit the event to still take place," said Soo Locks operations manager LeighAnn Ryckeghem in a statement. "All public activities and displays will be concentrated within Canal Park which includes the observation platform to view vessels and the visitor center." The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the event's federal, state, and local public safety partners are changing public access for this year's Engineers Day event on Wednesday, June 27, 2025. Out of an abundance of caution, in light of uncontrollable circumstances and in order to prioritize public safety, visitor access will be limited to Canal Park. Access in and around active Soo Locks operations will not be allowed. Carrie Fox (Courtesy of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) The event is in partnership with the city of Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It honors the engineers who built the Soo Locks and the people who maintain them. People can visit the Canal Park for Engineer Day from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on June 27. After the event, the viewing platform will be open until 10 p.m. The Soo Locks Visitor Center will be open from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m. "We are continuing the requirement for all bags coming into the Soo Locks to be clear," said Jason Wojnaroski, Soo Project Office assistant operations manager, in a statement. "Clear bags will allow park security to quickly inspect bags and assist with making this a fun and safe event for everyone." For more information on the event, visit Sault Ste. Marie's website.
