State triumphs as court rejects Section 174 application
The Pretoria High Court, sitting in the Benoni Magistrate's Court, dismissed a Section 174 application brought by accused one, former commanding officer Major Leon Louis Van Den Berg (75), and accused two, former sergeant Abraham Hercules Engelbrecht (61).
The pair sought to be discharged from the charges against them on the grounds that the State had no case.
The two, along with their co-accused, former sergeant Pieter Stander (60), face a murder charge for allegedly killing student activist and Congress of South African Students (COSAS) member Caiphus Nyoka.
It is alleged that on the evening of August 23, 1987, the three men — members of the SAPS Reaction Unit — met to plan Nyoka's killing.
Under the command of Major Van Den Berg, a plan was devised to raid Nyoka's home.
Also Read: 1987 Daveyton murder: Investigator details how he traced apartheid-era cops
In the early hours of August 24, 1987, at about 02:30, Stander, Engelbrecht, and other Reaction Unit members, who are also charged separately, arrived at Nyoka's homestead and stormed his room.
They found Nyoka and three friends asleep. After identifying him, they removed the others from the room and shot him nine times. He died on the scene from multiple gunshot wounds.
The State called five witnesses during the trial: Nyoka's sisters, Alegria and Mothasi Nyoka; Exodus Nyokane, one of Nyoka's friends present that night; Dr Rousseau, an expert witness and TRC researcher; and the investigating officer, Lieutenant Colonel Beukman.
Mahanjana said the court dismissed their application, and thereafter, Van Den Berg opted to remain silent and closed his case.
The matter was postponed to September 8–19 for the defence case of Engelbrecht and Stander.
The case against former Reaction Unit member Johan Marais (65), who pleaded guilty and was convicted of the same offence, will return to court for sentencing proceedings on June 5 and 6.
Mahanjana described the court's decision as encouraging, noting that the State had overcome a significant hurdle in the defence's attempt to halt the trial.
Also Read: Slain Caiphus Nyoka honoured at wreath-laying ceremony
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Ex-cop held over alleged political 'hit' fails in another bail bid
Bulelani Yosana is currently awaiting trial alongside accused hitman James Easton for the contract murder of Bloekombos teacher and ANC activist Vuyo Dana. Yosana's latest bail appeal bid failed in the Western Cape High Court. Image: File MURDER accused Bulelani Yosana has failed to convince the Western Cape that the State's case against him has considerably weakened after a Section 204 witness recanted on their statement. Yosana is currently awaiting trial alongside accused hitman James Easton for the contract murder of Bloekombos teacher and ANC activist Vuyo Dana. A trial date is yet to be set for the matter. After a previous unsuccessful attempt, Yosana, a former police officer and ANC branch secretary, filed a new bail bid appeal with the High Court, citing the recanted statement, that a trial date remains unset, and that his bank account is about to be closed for non-compliance with the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. Dana was shot and killed at his home in February 2022 while on his way to work at Bloekombos Senior Secondary School, in Kraaifontein, in what has been alleged to be a politically-motivated killing. Yosana brought the second bail application on the basis that new facts have arisen since the initial bail court (Regional Court) refused to admit him on bail, pending the finalisation of his trial. Yosana and Easton face a variety of charges including a contravention of Section 18 of the Riotous Assemblies Act, conspiracy to murder, and murder. Through his attorney, Yosana submitted that following the bail application hearing, and the appeal, they discovered a statement in which the Section 204 witness recanted what he stated in his Section 204 affidavit. According to Yosana's lawyer, there are no eyewitness accounts that place Yosana on the scene, and he claims that due to the recanting statement, there was insufficient evidence. 'According to Mr Booth (Yosana's attorney), this recanting statement was never discovered by the State, and as such, it alters the overall picture of the State's case. 'In this (newly) discovered statement, the Section 204 witness is recanting what he initially told the police about the involvement of the applicant (Yosana) in the commission of the offences the applicant is arraigned on. Booth advanced the argument that the State case is based primarily on the evidence of the Section 204 witness. 'Booth's argument postulates that if the Section 204 witness has recanted his original police affidavit, wherein he originally implicated the applicant in the crimes, the necessary corollary is that the State's case has since been considerably weakened. According to the applicant, this discovery presents an insurmountable hurdle for the State,' the court record read. The State did not dispute that the Section 204 witness has since recanted his first key pre-trial statement. 'According to the State's heads of argument, the Section 204 witness filed a recanting statement after the residence of the witness was visited by the applicant and after the applicant's arrest. To this end, the State specifically contends that the recanting statement is a product of interference with a State witness,' the judgment further read.
Eyewitness News
a day ago
- Eyewitness News
Investigating Directorate to submit fresh extradition application for Guptas
Cape TOWN - The Investigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC) says it will submit a fresh extradition application to the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for the Gupta brothers for additional State capture matters. This is despite the lack of success to date, in trying to get the brothers to face trial in South Africa in the Estina dairy farm and Nulane cases. On Wednesday, IDAC head Andrea Johnson told Parliament in the interest of justice and given the public interest in these matters, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) won't give up, even though diplomatic efforts to understand the shortcomings have been ignored. The failure of the State to successfully extradite Gupta brothers Atul and Rajesh has been a blight on the NPA's progress in prosecuting State capture matters. But Johnson told Parliament's Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) that despite not knowing where it's gone wrong in previous attempts, it will once again be submitting an extradition application. 'We have now, however, taken a decision to submit new applications with additional matters.' She says 12 diplomatic notes (notes verbales) to the UAE government to understand why previous applications have failed, have been met with silence. 'How do you resubmit, when you've submitted a full set of papers, properly checked by themselves? So, it does put you in somewhat of a predicament. Do you now send these papers to be a so-called failed attempt again?' NPA head Shamila Batohi says by and large the authority is successful in extradition applications in other countries, but the UAE has proven particularly difficult.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Pietermaritzburg High Court upholds life sentence for rapist of eight-year-old
life sentence has been upheld for rapist man by the Pietermaritzburg High Court Image: File The Pietermaritzburg High Court has dismissed an appeal on conviction and life imprisonment sentence for a man who raped an eight-year-old girl multiple times in 2010, gave her R1, and threatened to kill her. The appeal was heard before Judge Robin Mossop and Judge Mahendra Chetty. The rapist was described as the brother-in-law of the young girl's mother. During the trial, the State led evidence and relied on minor children. The Ulundi Regional Court found the evidence of the victim and other minor children corroborative. Hence; the rapist was sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim told the regional court that she was raped on five separate occasions in 2010. The first rape happened in daylight hours when she visited the homestead of the rapist accompanied by two other young children. She said they went to visit the rapist's child but instead found him. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said that at some stage, the man sent one of her companions to the shop to buy a loose cigarette for him. While the other child had gone to the shop, the man told the victim to brush her hair inside the house and he followed her in, locked the door and raped her. When she cried, he threatened to kill her. After that, he gave her R1 to buy ice lollies. When the companion came back from the shop, she testified that she had slightly pushed the door, but the man told her not to get in. She testified that she saw him on top of his victim naked. This was also corroborated by another child who had peed into the window of the room. Moreover, at night, the victim was raped again. One child who had peed through the window said he saw the man again. He said he entered the bedroom where all four children slept. He said that despite being dark, he saw him as he was wearing a white T-shirt. The child also stated that he was the only adult in the house. The victim did not report the incident until a year later, as she was fearful. She and other children were watching a digital versatile disc (DVD) movie where the issue of sex was alluded to. The children mentioned loudly that the victim knew something about sex, her mother overheard this, and inquired more. The victim was taken to Dr Salona Prahladh, who stated that the victim had been raped and the last sexual assault was more than a year ago. The High Court found that the magistrate who sentenced the man did not make any error in finding him guilty. Judge Mossop said there was no doubt that the magistrate applied the cautionary rule used when dealing with evidence of children. 'The person who she was entitled to believe that she would be safe with, the appellant (rapist), turned out to be a predator intent on abusing her,' he said.
