European talks with Iran yield no obvious breakthrough
Military operations could slow Iran's nuclear program, but in no way could they eliminate it, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said. 'We know well – after having seen what happened in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya – how illusory and dangerous it is to want to impose regime change from outside.'
Loading
Barrot also said that European nations 'invited the Iranian minister to envisage negotiations with all parties including the United States, and without waiting for the end of the strikes'.
He said Araghchi agreed 'to put all the issues on the table, including some that weren't there before' and 'showed his disposition to continuing the conversation that we started today, and for the Europeans to help facilitate, including with the United States.'
EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said, 'we agreed that we will discuss nuclear but also broader issues that we have, and keep the discussions open'.
Araghchi also addressed reporters outside the meeting venue after the talks ended. He expressed support for 'a continuation of discussions with the E3 and the EU and expressed his readiness to meet again in the near future'. He also denounced Israel's attacks against nuclear facilities in Iran and expressed 'grave concern' on what he called 'non-condemnation' by European nations.
US considering how to proceed
Lammy travelled to Geneva after meeting in Washington with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US President Donald Trump's Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff.
Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordow uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America's 'bunker-buster' bombs. He said on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) that he'd decide within two weeks whether the US military would get directly involved in the war, given the 'substantial chance' for renewed negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program.
He said on Friday he might support a ceasefire 'depending on the circumstances', adding that Europe would not be able to help much in the conflict.
'Iran doesn't want to speak to Europe. They want to speak to us. Europe is not going to be able to help in this one,' Trump said.
Loading
Israel says it launched its airstrike campaign to stop Iran from getting closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon. Iran and the United States had been negotiating over the possibility of a new diplomatic deal over Tehran's program, though Trump has said Israel's campaign came after a 60-day window he set for the talks.
Barrot said that 'we wanted to open a discussion with the Iranian foreign minister because we believe that there is no definitive solution by military means to the Iranian nuclear problem – military operations may delay it, but they can't eliminate it'.
'We are not seeking negotiations'
Iran's supreme leader rejected US calls for surrender on Wednesday and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them'.
Before Friday's talks, Araghchi said in an interview aired by Iranian state television that 'in the current situation, as the Zionist regime's attacks continue, we are not seeking negotiations with anyone'.
He said that 'we have nothing to discuss with the United States, which is a partner in these crimes', and Tehran rejected negotiations with the Americans.
'As for others, if they seek dialogue, not negotiations, which don't make sense right now, we have no problem with that,' he added. He said the discussion overnight would focus 'solely on the nuclear issue and regional matters', and Iran would not hold talks on its missiles with anyone.
Threats to reinstate sanctions
Just before meeting the European diplomats, Araghchi made a brief appearance before the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva. He said that Israel's 'attacks on nuclear facilities are grave war crimes', and insisted that 'we are entitled … and determined to defend our territorial integrity, national sovereignty and security with all force'.
Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, though it was the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60 per cent, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90 per cent.
The three European countries played an important role in the negotiations over the original 2015 nuclear deal between Iran and world powers. But they have repeatedly threatened to reinstate sanctions that were lifted under the deal if Iran does not improve its co-operation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
37 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
No injuries reported in Israel during Israel-Iran's ninth day of war
Attacks between Iran and Israel have entered their ninth day. Earlier, residents in Tel Aviv were ordered to seek shelter as a fresh wave of Iranian missiles headed into the city. Local paramedics have said there were no injuries during the latest Iranian strike.
9 News
39 minutes ago
- 9 News
The US can end Iran conflict with one call, Iranian official says
Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Diplomacy with Iran can "easily" be started again if US President Donald Trump orders Israel's leadership to stop its strikes on Iran, Majid Farahani, an official with the Iranian presidency, told CNN on Friday. "Iran believes in civilian dialogue," he said. "Directly or indirectly is not important." "President Trump can easily stop the war by only one telephone (call) to (the) Israelis," he said, repeating the Iranian position that talks were impossible while Israeli bombs were striking Iran. Majid Farahani speaks during an interview in Tehran, Iran, on Friday. (CNN) Farahani said that Iran would not countenance halting nuclear enrichment – which Tehran insists is for peaceful purposes - but added that concessions were possible. "Maybe it can be lower but we don't stop it," he said. In recent days, European powers have joined American and Israeli calls for a ban on enrichment, hardening their positions on the key issue, with France putting forward "a clear position on zero enrichment," France's foreign ministry spokesperson Christophe Lemoine told CNN Friday. Iran says it needs enriched uranium for peaceful purposes, while also manufacturing large quantities of near-weapons-grade material. Trump's decision to open a two-week negotiating window before deciding on striking Iran has offered a slim – if improbable – path to a peace deal between Iran and Israel. Demonstrators in Tehran, Iran, on Friday. (CNN) Talks took place in Geneva on Friday between the foreign ministers from Iran, Britain, France, and Germany, along with the European Union's foreign policy chief, the first confirmed face-to-face meeting of its kind since the conflict began. After days of increasingly aggressive messages from the Trump administration, it has opened the possibility that military action can be averted. Indeed, Trump's own camp appears to be starkly divided on whether to pursue direct strikes against Iran. "If America gets involved in the war," Farahani said, "there are so many options and all (of) those options are on the table." Pro-government protests on Friday on the streets of Tehran saw an outpouring of anger at both Israel and the United States. A CNN team in Tehran witnessed massive crowds, with protesters waving Iranian, Hezbollah and Palestinian flags and burning US and Israeli flags. Chants of "death to Israel, death to America" – a staple at such events – rang out, while Iranians spoke of their fury at the bombing campaign. "Trump, you are threatening my leader," one woman told CNN, "Don't you know that my nation believes death is sweeter than honey?" World Iran Israel Israel Iran Conflict USA Donald Trump CONTACT US
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Is Iran close to building a nuke? Trump says his intelligence community 'is wrong'
"My intelligence community is wrong." With those words, Donald Trump waved away the advice of the entire US spy infrastructure — from the CIA, to the Defence Intelligence Agency, to the intelligence arms of the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps, and Air Force — and its assessment that Iran was not trying to build a nuclear weapon. That assessment was presented to the US Congress in March by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's hand-picked director of National Intelligence. "The IC [intelligence community] continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon," Ms Gabbard said. "Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised a nuclear weapon program that he suspended in 2003." On Wednesday, Donald Trump said simply, "She's wrong." As is so often the case under Trump, what once would have been a breathtaking shattering of norms is just another day. Trump's rejection of the intelligence community's advice has deep resonance in the United States, and particularly among Trump's MAGA base in the Republican Party. Trump campaigned hard on keeping America out of foreign 'forever' wars like Iraq, based on faulty intelligence over Saddam Hussein's non-existent weapons of mass destruction. It's why key figures in Trump's MAGA, America First base of support are dead against any US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. But there are influential old-school Republican Iran hawks, like Senator Lindsey Graham, who are pushing the president for regime change in Iran. "Be all in, President Trump, in helping Israel eliminate the nuclear threat," Senator Graham said. "If we need to provide bombs to Israel, provide bombs. If we need to fly planes with Israel, do joint operations. "But here's the bigger question: Wouldn't the world be better off if the ayatollahs went away and were replaced by something better? Wouldn't Iran be better off?" The two sides met head-on in a fiery exchange between media figure Tucker Carlson and Senator Ted Cruz, both firm Trump supporters. "How many people live in Iran, by the way?" Carlson asked. "I don't know the population at all," Cruz replied. Carlson was incredulous. "You don't know the population you seek to topple?" The big question is — which side is getting in the president's ear as he waits to decide on whether the US will attack Iran? Tulsi Gabbard certainly appears to be on the outer. Today, she took to X to try to repair the relationship with Trump. "The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division," she wrote. "America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalise the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree." The "missing" context was that Iran's enriched uranium stockpile was "at its highest levels, and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons". She also testified that nuclear weapons advocates in the Iranian leadership were feeling "emboldened". The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) also recently found that Iran has not been complying with weapons inspectors since 2019 — its first such finding in two decades. In the end, none of that may matter. Donald Trump has said he will decide in two weeks about whether to choose the military or diplomatic option. He may be waiting to see which option is more likely to succeed — or which way the debate among his supporters goes.
