Moody's downgrade and U.S. fiscal reality
Amid the chaos set in by churning events and spurring global uncertainty, there is an interesting financial trend that mainstream analysts are perhaps missing. It is well known in economic history how certain shifts don't arrive with the roar of crisis or the panic of a crash, but with the quiet authority of inevitability — which does have a crisis bearing, a fact that often emerges post the aftermath of a shock.
When Moody's Investors Service finally downgraded the credit rating of the Unites States on May 16, there was no dramatic nosedive in the markets, no frantic emergency meetings, no calamitous plunge in investor confidence.
Outwardly, the world barely flinched. Yet beneath that projected calm, a silent but monumental shift occurred — one, we argue, may be remembered not for the noise it made, but for silently indicating the end of a long era of unchallenged U.S. fiscal supremacy.
Foreshadowed for years
What made this moment so striking was not that it happened suddenly, but that it had been forecast in whispers and footnotes of financial discourse for years. For many, this was a long-delayed acknowledgement that the financial world had been indulging in a fiction for far too long.
For most of the post-war period, the U.S. held a rarefied status in the global economy. Its treasury bonds were the closest thing the financial system had to a sacred object, utterly liquid, unfailingly safe, and supported by the full faith and credit of the world's largest and most dynamic economy. This privileged position was not merely a reflection of economic size or military might; it was about trust.
Trust in America's institutions, its political system, its capacity for self-correction, and its willingness, however flawed, to eventually rein in excess.
But the numbers have grown impossible to ignore.
From discipline to dependence
A national debt that once stood at manageable levels has ballooned into a structural liability, breaching 120% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and with U.S. President Donald Trump's latest 'Big New Bill', it's showing no signs of retreat. Policymakers now speak about fiscal sustainability in theoretical terms, while pushing actual solutions further down an ever-narrowing road.
This erosion has been gradual but persistent.
The post-2008 era ushered in a new norm of emergency spending, first to rescue banks, then to stimulate recovery, and later to shield households from the pandemic's chaos.
Each intervention may have been justified in its own moment, but together they forged a long-term addiction of monetarists to deficit finance.
Unlike the post-World War II generation that slashed debt aggressively through a combination of growth and fiscal discipline, today's political class appears paralysed by polarisation and unable to even pass budgets without the threat of shutdown.
The confidence that also once underpinned U.S. borrowing, rooted as much in political stability as in economic fundamentals, has taken a series of subtle but significant blows, culminating in Moody's reluctant decision to strip away its final vote of unquestioning faith.
Global recalibration
But this downgrade, though symbolic, carries implications that ripple far beyond Wall Street. It comes at a time when global financial allegiances are shifting, when the dollar's centrality in international reserves is already under quiet attack, and when major economies are exploring alternatives to a U.S.-centric system.
Central banks that once loaded up on treasuries with near-religious regularity are now hedging with gold. The euro and other digital currencies are not a distant idea. And while the markets have taken this moment in stride, history teaches us that great financial unravelings rarely begin with panic — they begin with a shrug. The cost becomes visible only later.
It is in this context that the Moody's downgrade must be understood, not as a trigger of immediate collapse, but as a marker of long-building pressure finally piercing the illusion of permanence.
The world has not yet turned away from the dollar, but it has begun to look around. And that moment of looking, that quiet recalibration of confidence, may ultimately prove more consequential than any single rating change.
As the curtain lifts on a new era of fiscal realism, it is worth asking what this development means not just for the U.S., but for countries that have built their own economic strategies around American reliability. The implications for India and the rest of the world are only just beginning to come into focus.
India's fiscal mirror
For India, this moment is less about what happens in Washington and more about what it reveals back home: about our financial vulnerabilities, habits, and unwillingness to learn until the consequences knock louder and harder in a crisis like emergency-response mode.
The Indian economy is not immune to global fiscal contractions.
With general government gross debt hovering near 80% of GDP (IMF 2025), our buffers are limited, especially in an environment of rising global interest rates. As U.S. Treasury yields climb to accommodate perceived risk, investors begin to reprice emerging market debt, and India, despite its growth story, remains vulnerable. This isn't just speculation.
We saw it vividly during the 2013 taper tantrum, when capital outflows pummelled the rupee and exposed our dependence on external financing. A similar shift today would pressure the Reserve Bank of India, complicate deficit management, and test India's ability to shield growth without stoking inflation.
Deeper fiscal malaise
But beyond macro shocks lies a deeper malaise, which is our domestic fiscal culture.
While India dreams big, it continues to drag a ball and chain of fiscal populism.
Successive governments have treated pre-election seasons as open tabs of irrational fiscal exuberance, which come with serious budgetary and fiscal health warnings.
The recent Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha elections also saw parties tripping over themselves with giveaways, and if Bihar's upcoming polls are anything to go by, we should probably brace for another round of headline-grabbing promises. One suspects the only limit left is creativity.
This fiscal approach comes with compounding ripple effects. High deficits crowd out private investment, distort credit flows, and leave little room for developmental capital. Structural inefficiencies, such as low tax compliance and judicial delays in insolvency cases, to underperforming logistics and lagging education outcomes, further create friction that slows down our momentum when we most need agility. The result is a disconnect.
Globally, the downgrade of the U.S. credit ratings serves as a mirror and a point of deeper financial, fiscal strategic introspection.
Emerging markets with heavy debt burdens and borrowing positions accompanied by low-growth cycles, like Brazil and South Africa too are already facing rising borrowing costs. Even developed economies, including Germany (debt-to-GDP at 62.5%) and Canada (at 110.8%), now operate under closer scrutiny. The message is clear: credibility is no longer inherited; it must be earned and maintained.
For India, this is surely not a moment to panic, but a moment to pause, reflect, and enact fiscal caution and financial discipline. Not because we are in the line of fire, but because the conditions that brought the fire elsewhere are not unfamiliar. The discipline we often defer cannot be delayed forever.
If fiscal credibility is being repriced globally, India must ask whether it wants to wait for markets to demand change or lead that change on its own terms.
Caution and prudence for India
Fiscal caution and prudence are no longer virtues for crisis moments, they are the foundation for resilience in this age of the new normal. Caution for India does not mean a widespread adoption of austerity measures; rather, it means there is more clarity needed in strategy, both in the short, medium-and-long term. It means investing not in headlines, but in core economic foundations: job-creating infrastructure, future-ready skills, and systems that outlast election cycles. It means resisting the seduction of easy populism.
Loan waivers and free power may win votes, but they do little to build the trust that both global capital and citizens themselves seek in a modern state. Structural reforms must move beyond committee reports. Trade resilience must be rooted not in slogans but in strategic diversification.
Above all, Indian policymakers need to recognise that in the age of capital mobility, the loss of credibility is rarely noisy, but always consequentially expensive. While the U.S. has reminded the world that prestige is not protection, India should take the hint early.
(Deepanshu Mohan is Professor and Dean, O.P. Jindal Global University. He is currently a Visiting Professor at London School of Economics and Visiting Research Fellow, University of Oxford. Ankur Singh contributed to this column as a research analyst)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Donald Trump's approval rating crashes in 15 key states that US President won in 2024
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump's approval ratings were down significantly in 15 states out of thirty-one that Republican won in 2024 Presidential elections. Trump's approval dropped in battleground states of Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, and Michigan. Trump is also witnessing for a decease in popularity rating in Ohio, Utah, Texas, Iowa, Florida, Kansas, Indiana, and Missouri, as per rating were abysmal in traditional Democratic strongholds such as D.C, New York, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont, Newsweek reported quoting The Economist.- Fox News poll sends Trump into meltdown mode as approval tanks and loyalty from his base waversHowever, in a relief, Trump still enjoys positive approval ratings in South Karolina, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, and tracker shows Trump approval rating is down to 47 per cent. Morning Consult poll shows Trump's approval rating was down to 46 per cent. Trump's rating was down in survey conducted by J.L. Partners, and HarrisX/ Trump's public approval rating held steady over the last month, but Americans are becoming less supportive of his approach to immigration as his administration cracks down, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed last week on six-day poll showed 42 per cent of U.S. adults approved of the job the Republican is doing as president, unchanged from a prior Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted May 16-18. Trump's ratings have been largely stable since February and are only down modestly from the 47 per cent approval score he got immediately after returning to the White House in January. His support on immigration, however, softened to 44 per cent from 47 per cent in the economy, 52 per cent disapproved compared to 39 per cent who liked what Trump was doing. Americans also gave him generally poor marks on foreign policy, as per a report on Reuters/Ipsos survey, conducted online, gathered responses from 4,258 U.S. adults and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points, Reuters/Ipsos poll Donald Trump still enjoys positive approval ratings in South Karolina, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, and Kentucky.A2. D.C, New York, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont are traditionally Democratic Party leaning states.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's approval rating crashes in 15 key states that US President won in 2024
US President Donald Trump's approval ratings were down significantly in 15 states out of thirty-one that Republican won in 2024 Presidential elections. Trump's approval dropped in battleground states of Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada, North Carolina, and Michigan. Trump is also witnessing for a decease in popularity rating in Ohio, Utah, Texas, Iowa, Florida, Kansas, Indiana, and Missouri, as per reports. Trump's rating were abysmal in traditional Democratic strongholds such as D.C, New York, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont, Newsweek reported quoting The Economist. Also Read - Fox News poll sends Trump into meltdown mode as approval tanks and loyalty from his base wavers by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo However, in a relief, Trump still enjoys positive approval ratings in South Karolina, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Newsweek's tracker shows Trump approval rating is down to 47 per cent. Morning Consult poll shows Trump's approval rating was down to 46 per cent. Trump's rating was down in survey conducted by J.L. Partners, and HarrisX/Harvard. Live Events President Trump's public approval rating held steady over the last month, but Americans are becoming less supportive of his approach to immigration as his administration cracks down, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll that closed last week on Monday. The six-day poll showed 42 per cent of U.S. adults approved of the job the Republican is doing as president, unchanged from a prior Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted May 16-18. Trump's ratings have been largely stable since February and are only down modestly from the 47 per cent approval score he got immediately after returning to the White House in January. His support on immigration, however, softened to 44 per cent from 47 per cent in mid-May. On the economy, 52 per cent disapproved compared to 39 per cent who liked what Trump was doing. Americans also gave him generally poor marks on foreign policy, as per a report on Reuters/Ipsos poll. The survey, conducted online, gathered responses from 4,258 U.S. adults and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points, Reuters/Ipsos poll reported. FAQs Q1. Which states have positive approval rating for Donald Trump? A1. Donald Trump still enjoys positive approval ratings in South Karolina, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, and Kentucky. Q2. Which are Democratic Party-leaning states? A2. D.C, New York, California, Washington, Massachusetts, Maryland, Rhode Island, and Vermont are traditionally Democratic Party leaning states.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Commercial Real Estate Distress Is Spreading: Credit Weekly
(Bloomberg) -- The pain in US commercial real estate credit continues to bubble to the surface after a surge in borrowing costs and the rise of work from home left lenders vulnerable to losses. Delinquencies continue to increase, though the rate has moderated, researcher Green Street said this past week. Distress is also climbing, rising 23% to more than $116 billion at the end of March from a year earlier, data compiled by MSCI Real Capital Analytics show. That's the highest in more than a decade. Investors including Victor Khosla of Strategic Value Partners LLC have warned that debt maturities will lead to a 'tsunami' of problems for US offices in particular. There are signs that's spreading. The past-due and nonaccrual rate for commercial real estate portfolios reached the highest since 2014 earlier this year, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. wrote in a report last month, citing multifamily as an increasing source of pain. Past-due and nonaccrual loans are so far past due that banks have stopped booking interest owed because they doubt they'll ever receive it. Policy uncertainty, meanwhile, is also holding back activity in the underlying market as businesses delay decisions across districts, the Federal Reserve noted in its May Beige Book survey. For example, some of the reserve banks stated that demand for warehouses was affected by the potential impact of tariffs. Click here to listen to a podcast on the dangers facing private debt funds when the cycle turns The proposed Section 899 'revenge tax' in President Donald Trump's tax-and-spending bill could also 'trigger wider foreign investor pullbacks, impacting all US real estate lenders,' said Harsh Hemnani, a senior analyst at Green Street. German commercial property lender Deutsche Pfandbriefbank AG announced this past week that it's quitting the US market and will wind down, securitize or sell its €4.1 billion ($4.7 billion) portfolio there, warning it could make a loss this year due to the expected cost of the decision. Still, 'the timing of the exit likely indicates a belief that current market conditions offer a favorable window for divestment' amid improved liquidity and competition in the debt market, Hemnani said. That's in part because direct lenders have been raising more capital to invest in CRE, a trend that's causing some wariness. On Thursday, the Financial Stability Board cautioned that shadow lending to the industry globally 'may amplify and transmit shocks to banks.' Some traditional lenders continue to kick the can down the road in the US rather than take impairments. The wall of CRE debt continues to rise, in part because some credit providers have extended the duration of loans, the Mortgage Bankers Association said on Tuesday. Another headwind for traditional lenders is large unrealized losses on securities portfolios that they're holding to maturity or seeking to offload, with the FDIC saying last month that the losses stand at more than $410 billion. CRE is likely to be a similar source of pain. Loss rates on commercial and residential mortgage-backed securities suggest the unrealized losses on banks' mortgage books are likely to be as large or larger than in securities, academics including Lawrence White of New York University's Stern School of Business wrote last week. --With assistance from John Gittelsohn and Patrick Clark. More stories like this are available on
