Canada Needs 'Bold Ambition' To Poach Top US Researchers
Like Europe, Canada is looking to attract top US scientists who may want to evade President Donald Trump's crackdown on universities and research institutions.
But to succeed, Canada will need to summon something it has at times lacked, namely "bold ambition," the head of the country's largest hospital chain told AFP.
Trump's funding cuts for scientific research are freeing up talent and "creating a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity" to recruit, said Kevin Smith, the chief executive of Toronto's University Health Network (UHN).
To seize that opportunity, Canada has to ditch its traditional "incrementalist" approach, Smith added.
"Let's not say good enough is good enough. Let's say excellent is where we need to go."
Experts say Trump's policies could trigger a tectonic shift in the global competition for the world's brightest minds.
For decades, deep-pocketed US universities backed by federal support have scooped up talent, including in biomedical research.
But Trump's administration has already slashed billions of dollars in research grants affecting various institutions, including most notably Harvard University.
Programs affected by the National Institutes of Health's cuts include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer.
France and the European Union are already trying to woo disgruntled US researchers.
European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen said last month that the EU would launch a new incentives package worth 500 million euros ($577 million) to make the 27-nation bloc "a magnet for researchers".
Smith and UHN's vice president for science and research, Brad Wouters, argued that Canada -- and particularly its largest city, Toronto -- are well placed to compete for US talent.
English-speaking, culturally familiar, and geographically close to major US research centers in New England and New York, Toronto boasts a hospital network and research ecosystem regularly ranked among the world's best.
The city has already poached three high-profile academics from Yale University, although all work in the arts.
The group -- who study fascism -- announced last month in a stirring New York Times video that they were leaving the United States to take up positions in Toronto.
"I'm leaving to the University of Toronto because I want to do my work without the fear that I will be punished," one of the professors, Jason Stanley, said in the video.
Wouters told AFP that since Trump's election, UHN "started to see a talent pool that was a notch higher than what we normally see" for vacant positions, with leading US-based scientists initiating inquiries about opportunities in Toronto.
UHN has launched a plan to create 100 medical research positions through its own fundraising but wants institutions across Canada to attract 1,000 new scientists.
Reaching that target will require government support, and confronting an ingrained Canadian mindset that prioritizes sharing healthcare resources equally across the vast country.
The plan will face "a bit of a collision between the peanut butter spread of equality versus elitism," Smith said.
"That isn't always easy for governments or for elected officials...but we're pretty hopeful," he added.
Matthew Lebo, a political scientist at Ontario's Western University, agreed Trump's policies have created an unprecedented opportunity for brain gain in Canada.
But he voiced concern the country wouldn't mobilize.
"Canada has a history of being comfortable playing a supporting role," he told AFP. "There is just an inherent lack of ambition."
Lebo noted that while some US-based researchers may be concerned about crackdowns on their work, others might eye Canada for personal reasons, including the desire to live in a country where reproductive and LGBTQ rights are more firmly safeguarded.
While he hasn't yet seen signs of broad national action, he said "it wouldn't take deep thought to catch up."
"It takes some big number (of dollars) and a plan." The CN tower looms over the Toronto skyline AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
10 minutes ago
- DW
What to know after US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites – DW – 06/22/2025
The United States has entered the Israel-Iran war with a series of bombings on key Iranian nuclear enrichment sites. It marks a critical escalation in the Middle East. The United States has entered the Israel-Iran war, with President Donald Trump confirming US forces carried out attacks on three Iranian uranium enrichment sites. The attacks come days after Trump, who is also commander-in-chief of the US military, mused whether to enter the escalating conflict amid ongoing calls from Israel for his support and said he would make a decision within two weeks. The war began on June 13 with Israel launching a series of airstrikes against targets linked to Iran's nuclear program. Since then, attempts by other nations to broker a diplomatic solution to the fast escalating conflict have failed. On Saturday (US time), Trump announced US forces had attacked Iran's Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities. The Pentagon on Sunday confirmed seven B-2 Spirit bombers flew non-stop from a US Air Force base in Missouri to launch the attacks before returning home. Among the payload were 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) "bunker-busting" warheads, thought to be the only combination of aircraft and bombs capable of penetrating deep below the surface to strike at Iran's subterranean nuclear facility at Fordo. Trump claimed "the attacks were a spectacular military success" in a press conference following the three-site attack. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated," he said. While the attacks likely caused significant damage, the extent is yet to be independently verified. Germany believes "large parts" of Iran's nuclear program have been damaged by the strikes. However, some analysts believe enriched uranium may have been removed prior to the attack based on satellite images showing activity at the Fordo site. "Enriched uranium stock may therefore have been transferred to sites not monitored by the IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency]," French nuclear expert Heloise Fayet told the AFP news agency. Reports from Iran indicate there has been no increase in "off-site radiation levels" following the attacks. The IAEA, which will hold an emergency meeting on Monday, has warned that damage to uranium enrichment sites, like the ones attacked by the US, carries the risk of radiation leakage, which could affect the public. More concerning would be an attack on the Bushehr nuclear reactor — Iran's only such facility — which IAEA chair Rafael Grossi last week warned could lead to a large-scale release of radioactivity. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video During the election campaign, Trump promised a more peaceful world if he returned to the White House, well aware of public sentiment surrounding America's so-called "forever wars." At his inauguration, he said his administration would measure success "not only by the battles we win, but also by the wars that we end, and perhaps most importantly, the wars we never get into." His decision to enter the US into the conflict between two long-standing enemies in the Middle East is a notable turnabout from those January remarks. The US and other nations have long been concerned about Iran's desire to develop nuclear weapons despite statements from Iran that its nuclear program serves exclusively civilian purposes. Amid negotiations and Israel's start to the war, Trump, in a statement on Thursday, gave a two-week timetable to decide whether the US would directly enter the conflict. Within barely two days, US bombers had attacked three nuclear facilities. At the Pentagon on Sunday, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters the attack resulted from "a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and preparation" in anticipation of a call by Trump. "It took a great deal of precision," Hegseth said. "It involved misdirection and the highest of operational security." Israel, which views Iran's uranium enrichment as an existential security threat, began airstrikes against Iranian military and nuclear targets on June 13, killing hundreds. Retaliatory strikes by Iran killed dozens in Israel. After Israel launched its attack, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio initially stated the US was "not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region." The war began amid a complex diplomatic situation regarding Iran's nuclear program. A previous deal overseen by then US President Barack Obama, which included the signatures of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany, limited Iran's enrichment to energy-generation grades, forced it to both surrender 98% of its enriched uranium and open the door to IAEA inspectors in exchange for eased sanctions. Following his first election victory, Trump withdrew the US from the agreement and called on Iran to return to negotiations on his terms. In the years since that withdrawal, Iran has restricted IAEA monitoring and inspection activities, and increased its enrichment reportedly to 60% — well above what is required for civilian energy generation and approaching weapons-grade levels. Israel's June attacks on Iran followed five rounds of US-Iran negotiations over a new deal. Iran withdrew from a scheduled sixth round of talks after being attacked by Israel and launched its retaliatory strikes. Now that the US has entered the conflict, Trump is seeking a swift resolution. "There will be either peace of there will be tragedy for Iran," Trump said. "Far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Beyond praise from Israel and condemnation from Iran, there has been a mixed response to the US insertion into the war. Regional governments, including those of Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Qatar, Pakistan, India and Iraq, have all expressed concern. Many have explicitly called for de-escalation and a return to negotiations amid fears they too may be drawn into a wider conflict. Traditional US allies have urged a diplomatic solution, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the European Union among them. Through a spokesperson, German Chancellor Frederich Merz called on Iran to "immediately enter into negotiations with the US and Israel and find a diplomatic solution to the conflict." Those sentiments were echoed in public statements by Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and France and Italy's foreign ministers. US rivals China, Russia, both allies of Iran, condemned the US attacks. There are also splits over Trump's decision to involve the US closer to home. Many of Trump's Democratic Party opponents have condemned the decision not to seek the approval of Congress as unconstitutional. While many Republicans, led by Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have publicly supported the decision, others, such as Representatives Warren Davidson and Thomas Massie, have echoed Democrats over the sidelining of congress. Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the most vocal advocates for Trump's "America First" agenda, said the Israel-Iran conflict was "not our fight." Despite the US now involving itself in the Israel-Iran war, Hegseth told reporters on Sunday the Trump administration "does not seek war" with Iran. Nor, he said, was it about overthrowing the Iranian regime. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, concerns will turn to the potential for any further attacks by either side, and the potential for radiation leaks from the destruction of nuclear sites. Inside Israel, the news of the US attacks was followed by air raid sirens, prompting locals to take shelter. Some have welcomed Trump's intervention, despite the escalation possibly shifting the region into the unknown. The US has warned Iran against retaliatory strikes and again called for it to return to negotiations. Iran has responded to the attacks by warning of "everlasting consequences" for the US, and declaring its nuclear program would continue. Amid this, Iran's diplomats intend to meet with ally Russia, and its parliament has approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital global shipping channel, subject to confirmation by its national security council.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Strikes On Iran: What We Know
The United States has carried out strikes that caused "extremely severe damage" to three of Iran's nuclear facilities, the top US military officer, General Dan Caine, said on Sunday. President Donald Trump had spent weeks pursuing a diplomatic path to replace the nuclear deal with Tehran that he tore up during his first term in 2018. But he ultimately decided to take military action against Iran's nuclear program, which had already been bombarded in a more than week-long Israeli campaign that has also targeted Tehran's top military brass. Below, AFP examines what we know about the US strikes on Iran -- an operation dubbed "Midnight Hammer." Caine told journalists the strikes involved more than 125 US aircraft including B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, fighters, aerial refueling tankers, a guided missile submarine and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft. "This mission demonstrates the unmatched reach, coordination and capability of the United States military," the general said. "No other military in the world could have done this." Caine said it was "too early" to comment on what remains of Iran's nuclear program, but that "initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction." The US employed seven B-2s in the strikes -- aircraft that can fly 6,000 nautical miles (9,600 kilometers) without refueling and which are designed to "penetrate an enemy's most sophisticated defenses and threaten its most valued, and heavily defended, targets," according to the US military. "This was the largest B-2 operational strike in US history and the second-longest B-2 mission ever flown," according to Caine. Several B-2s proceeded west over the Pacific as a decoy while the bombers that would take part in the strikes headed east -- a "deception effort known only to an extremely small number of planners and key leaders," the general said. "Iran's fighters did not fly, and it appears that Iran's surface-to-air missile systems did not see us. Throughout the mission, we retained the element of surprise," Caine said. The United States used the B-2 in operations against Serbian forces in the 1990s, flying non-stop from Missouri to Kosovo and back, and the bombers were subsequently employed in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in the 2000s. Caine said the B-2s dropped 14 bombs known as the GBU-57 or Massive Ordnance Penetrator -- a powerful 30,000-pound (13,600-kilogram) bunker-busting weapon that made its combat debut in the Iran operation. The bombs -- which are designed to penetrate up to 200 feet (60 meters) underground before exploding -- were needed to hit deeply buried Iranian nuclear facilities. Testing of the weapons began in 2004 and Boeing was in 2009 awarded a contract to complete the integration of GBU-57 with aircraft. In addition to the bombers, a US guided missile submarine in the Middle East launched more than two dozen missiles at unspecified "surface infrastructure targets" at Isfahan, one of three nuclear sites struck in the operation, Caine said. The missiles are "designed to fly at extremely low altitudes at high subsonic speeds, and are piloted over an evasive route by several mission tailored guidance systems" and were first used in 1991 against Iraqi forces during Operation Desert Storm, according to the US military. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told journalists the strikes were launched to "neutralize the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defense of our troops and our allies." "This mission was not, has not been, about regime change," Hegseth told journalists. A number of key figures in Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement have vocally opposed US strikes on Iran, and his promise to extract the United States from its "forever wars" in the Middle East played a role in his 2016 and 2024 election wins. Trump has called on Iran to "agree to end this war," saying that "now is the time for peace." But it remains to be seen whether the strikes will push Tehran to deescalate the conflict, or to widen it further. If Iran chooses the latter option, it could do so by targeting American military personnel who are stationed around the Middle East, or seek to close the strategic Strait of Hormuz, which carries one-fifth of global oil output.
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump 'Deceived His Own Voters' by 'Submitting to the Wishes of a Wanted War Criminal': Iranian Foreign Minister Says in Trump-Netanyahu Rebuke
President Donald Trump "deceived his own voters by submitting to the wishes of a wanted war criminal" after he and his administration bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities early Sunday morning, an Iranian official declared. During a press conference in Istanbul on Sunday, amid ongoing peace talks between Iran, Germany, France, and the UK, Iran's Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araqchi condemned the Trump administration's escalation of the Israel-Iran war. "While President Trump was elected on a platform of putting an end to America's costly involvement of forever wars in our part of the world, he has betrayed not only Iran by abusing our commitment to diplomacy but also deceived his own voters by submitting to the wishes of a wanted war criminal who has grown accustomed to exploiting the lives and wealth of American citizens to further the Israeli regime's objectives," Abbas Araqchi stated, referencing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant for Netanyahu's arrest in November 2024, alleging the Israeli prime minister was responsible for multiple war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip, beginning Oct. 8, 2023. Abbas Araqchi added that the "warmongering and lawless" Trump administration is "solely and fully responsible for the dangerous consequences and far-reaching implications of its act of aggression." "The U.S. military attack on the territorial integrity and national sovereignty of a UN member state carried collusion with the genocidal Israeli machine has once again revealed the extent of the United States' hostility toward the peace-seeking people of Iran," he continued. The Iranian official reaffirmed that Iran will never compromise its independence or sovereignty, emphasizing the nation's unwavering commitment to protecting both its autonomy and its people. As the second-largest country in the region, Iran has a population nearing 91 million. Also on Sunday, the Iranian foreign minister wrote in an X post that the U.S. "committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the [Non-Proliferation Treaty]." He also called it an "outrageous" attack that "will have everlasting consequences." "Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless, and criminal behavior," Abbas Araqchi wrote. "In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people." The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran's peaceful nuclear installations. The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting…
