IDF recovers bodies of US-Israeli couple taken on Oct 7
Israel has recovered the bodies of a couple with US citizenship who were murdered on Oct 7 and taken into Gaza.
The remains of Judith Weinstein Haggai, 70, and Gad Haggai, 72, were recovered in an operation conducted overnight by the IDF and the Shin Bet internal security agency in the southern Gazan city of Khan Younis.
Their bodies have been brought back to Israel for forensic identification.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, said: 'Together with all the citizens of Israel, my wife and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the dear families. Our hearts ache for the most terrible loss. May their memory be blessed.
'I would like to thank, and express appreciation to, the fighters and commanders for this determined and successful operation. We will not rest, nor will we be silent, until we return home all of our hostages – the living and the deceased.'
The couple's deaths in the Nir Oz kibbutz during the Hamas-led massacre had previously been confirmed in December 2023.
They used to take a walk around the kibbutz each morning, and it was then that they ran into the terrorists converging on the community, according to an IDF official.
The official said the couple were murdered by Kitab al-Mujahidin terrorists, the same group that held Shiri, Kfir and Ariel Bibas, who were murdered in captivity, Israel has said.
Both were dual US-Israeli citizens, but Mrs Haggai also had Canadian citizenship.
In the early hours of the morning on Oct 7, Mrs Haggai was able to call emergency services and let them know that both she and her husband had been shot, and send a message to her family.
She was born in New York and taught English to children with special needs at the Nir Oz kibbutz, a small community near the Gaza border.
The kibbutz said she also taught meditation techniques to children and teenagers who suffered from anxiety as a result of rocket fire from Gaza. Mr Haggai was a retired chef and jazz musician.
Iris Haggai Liniado, their daughter, wrote in a Facebook post: 'My beautiful parents have been freed. We have certainty.'
She thanked the Israeli military, the FBI and the Israeli and US governments and called for the release of all the remaining hostages.
The couple are survived by two sons, two daughters and seven grandchildren, the kibbutz said.
The Times of Israel reported an unnamed official as saying it was the interrogation of a terrorist captured in Gaza that led to the operation to recover their bodies.
There are now 56 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Israel said its expanded offensive in the Strip, named Operation Gideon's Chariot, will increase the chances of returning the missing.
However, many of the hostage families have expressed alarm at the new tactic of seizing and holding territory, which follows heavy bombardment, and are urging Mr Netanyahu to make a deal with Hamas.
Hamas has rejected proposed ceasefire and hostage release deals that do not guarantee a full Israel withdrawal from the Strip and an end to the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why Trump bombed Iran
The US has joined Israel in its attacks on Iranian nuclear sites. Michael Safi hears from reporter Hugo Lowell and world affairs correspondent Andrew Roth on what happens now
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
The Americans want the attack on Iran's nuclear sites to be a 'one-and-done'
The Pentagon briefing was big on what happened but short on detail of what happens next. Neither defence secretary Pete Hegseth nor General Dan "Raisin" Caine, chair of the joint chiefs of staff, can answer that. Mr Hegseth called the bombing an "incredible and overwhelming success" with "focused and clear" instructions from President Trump. The focus now is on what follows and that's not so clear. The briefing laid out the details of the military deception plan behind Operation Midnight Hammer. B-2 stealth aircraft were flown west towards the Pacific on Saturday as a decoy, while the B-2s with bunker-busting bombs on board flew east towards Iran. 1:15 Mr Hegseth called it a plan that took months and weeks of positioning and came down, in the end, to "precision, misdirection and operational security". Gen Caine, Mr Trump's top military man, offered a measured assessment. While Mr Trump had spoken of Iran's nuclear sites being "obliterated", Gen Caine revised that downwards when he spoke of "extremely severe damage". Full battle damage assessment will reveal the complete picture - only then can the mission's success be measured in full, mindful that Iran had shifted at least some of its enriched uranium in the days before the strike. On the politics of it, Mr Hegseth said this wasn't about regime change in Iran. It might offer precious little reassurance to Tehran, particularly as he also said part of the operation was to defend Israel and the ongoing defence of Israel. 2:38 If the US is tethered to Israel's interests to the extent of an unprecedented attack on Iran, where does its influence end? Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared almost giddy in response to the US attack. He is a PM strengthened by Mr Trump's spectacular response to his rhetoric around Iran. Suspicions weren't softened around Netanyahu's influence over Mr Trump when Mr Hegseth was asked about the basis for the attack. He has long lobbied the US president on Iran being close to building a nuclear bomb, contrary to American intelligence which indicates otherwise. Mr Hegseth was asked what was the new intelligence, was it American or from other countries? He avoided a direct answer, saying only that Mr Trump had looked at all the intelligence information and concluded Iran was a threat. There were a number of questions about what comes next, with an assortment of non-answers in response from Mr Hegseth. 4:00 A consistent line was that the US wanted Iran to negotiate peace, coupled with the threat of further aggression if it doesn't. The US defence secretary said Washington was in touch with Tehran privately and publicly, giving it every opportunity to come to the table, every opportunity for peace. He made the point that America hadn't targeted Iranian troops or civilians - clearly, a measure by the US to limit response and leave open a door. The Americans want this attack to have been a "one-and-done". The scenario it's left with, however, is an Iran talking of a diplomatic door closed and sending its foreign minister travelling to Moscow to meet Vladimir Putin. Iran is wounded, no doubt. Combined attacks have left it degraded and, without a network of support in the Middle East, its ability to strike back is limited. For now, if not necessarily forever. Donald Trump clearly enjoyed the sugar rush of military success but he will be wary of the come-down and all of its uncertainties.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US strikes on Iran leave hopes for nuclear diplomacy in tatters
PARIS/ISTANBUL, June 22 (Reuters) - In a bid to defuse the conflict over Iran's nuclear program, foreign ministers from Europe's top three powers hurried to meet their Iranian counterpart on Friday in Geneva. Those hopes collapsed on Saturday when U.S. President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran's three main nuclear sites, in support of Israel's military campaign. "It's irrelevant to ask Iran to return to diplomacy," Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araqchi, visibly angry, told reporters in Istanbul on Sunday, promising a "response" to the U.S. strikes. "It's not time for diplomacy now." Trump, who said the U.S. airstrikes "obliterated" the sites, warned in a televised speech on Saturday the U.S. could attack other targets in Iran if no peace deal was reached and urged Tehran to return to the negotiating table. Reuters spoke to seven Western diplomats and analysts who said the prospect of negotiations was negligeable for now, with an unbridgeable gap between Washington's demand for zero enrichment by Iran and Tehran's refusal to abandon its nuclear program. "I think the prospects of effective diplomacy at this point are slim to none," said James Acton, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think tank headquartered in Washington. "I'm much more worried about escalation, both in the short and the long term." According to European diplomats, the three European allies - Britain, France and Germany - were not made aware of Trump's decision to strike Iran ahead of time. French President Emmanuel Macron had promised on Saturday - just before the U.S. strikes - to accelerate the nuclear talks, following a call with his Iranian counterpart. One European diplomat, who asked not to be identified, acknowledged there was now no way of holding a planned second meeting with Iran in the coming week. In the wake of the U.S. military action, any European diplomatic role appears likely to be secondary. Trump on Friday dismissed Europe's efforts towards resolving the crisis, saying Iran only wanted to speak to the United States. Three diplomats and analysts said any future talks between Iran and Washington would likely be through regional intermediaries Oman and Qatar, once Tehran decides how to respond to the U.S. airstrikes on its nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The attacks leave Iran with few palatable options on the table. Since Israel began its military campaign against Iran on June 13, some in Tehran have raised the prospect of withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) to signal Iran's determination to accelerate enrichment, but experts say that would represent a considerable escalation and likely draw a forceful response from Washington. Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said Iran's most obvious means for retaliation is its short-range ballistic missiles, that could be used to target U.S. forces and assets in the region. But any military response by Iran carried the risk of miscalculation, he said. "On the one hand, they want a strong enough response that they feel the U.S. has actually paid a price. On the other hand, they don't want to encourage further escalation," he said. Even before the U.S. strikes, Friday's talks in Geneva showed little sign of progress amid a chasm between the two sides and in the end no detailed proposals were put forward, three diplomats said. Mixed messaging may have also undermined their own efforts, diplomats said. European positions on key issues like Iran's enrichment program have hardened in the past 10 days with the Israeli strikes and the looming threat of U.S. bombing. The three European powers, known as the E3, were parties to a 2015 nuclear deal that Trump abandoned three years later during his first term. Both the Europeans and Tehran believed they had a better understanding of how to get a realistic deal given the E3 have been dealing with Iran's nuclear programme since 2003. But the Europeans have had a difficult relationship with Iran in recent months as they sought to pressure it over its ballistic missiles programme, support for Russia and detention of European citizens. France, which was the keenest to pursue negotiations, has in the last few days suggested Iran should move towards zero enrichment, which until now was not an E3 demand given Iran's red line on the issue, two European diplomats said. Britain has also adopted a tougher stance more in tune with Washington and that was expressed in Geneva, the diplomats said. And Germany's new government appeared to go in the same direction, although it was more nuanced. "Iran has to accept zero enrichment eventually," said one EU official. A senior Iranian official on Saturday showed disappointment at the Europeans' new stance, saying their demands were "unrealistic", without providing further details. In a brief joint statement on Sunday, which acknowledged the U.S. strikes, the European countries said they would continue their diplomatic efforts. "We call upon Iran to engage in negotiations leading to an agreement that addresses all concerns associated with its nuclear program," it said, adding the Europeans stood ready to contribute "in coordination with all parties". David Khalfa, co-founder of the Atlantic Middle East Forum, a Paris-based think tank, said Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's government had taken advantage of the Europeans for years to gain time as it developed its nuclear program and ballistic missile capabilities. "The European attempt ended in failure," he said. However, the Europeans still have one important card to play. They are the only ones who, as party to the nuclear accord, can launch its so-called "snapback mechanism", which would reimpose all previous UN sanctions on Iran if it is found to be in violation of the agreement's terms. Diplomats said, prior to the U.S. strikes, the three countries had discussed an end-August deadline to activate it as part of a 'maximum pressure' campaign on Tehran. In total, the U.S. launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including more than two dozen Tomahawk missiles, and more than 125 military aircraft in the operation against the three nuclear sites, U.S. officials said. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday warned Iran against retaliation and said both public and private messages had been sent to Iran "in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the table." Five previous rounds of indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran collapsed after a U.S. proposal at the end of May called for Iran to abandon uranium enrichment. It was rejected by Tehran, leading to Israel launching its attack on Iran after Trump's 60-day deadline for talks had expired. Iran has repeatedly said from then on that it would not negotiate while at war. Even after Israel struck, Washington reached out to Iran to resume negotiations, including offering a meeting between the Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in Istanbul, according to two European diplomats and an Iranian official. That was rebuffed by Iran, but Araqchi did continue direct contacts with US Special envoy Steve Witkoff, three diplomats told Reuters. One of the challenges in engaging with Iran, experts say, is that no-one can be sure of the extent of the damage to its nuclear program. With the IAEA severely restricted in its access to Iranian sites, it is unclear whether Tehran has hidden enrichment facilities. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the highly enriched uranium at Fordow, the site producing the bulk of Iran's uranium refined to up to 60%, had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack there. Acton, of the Carnegie Endowment, said that - putting aside from the damage to its physical installations - Iran had thousands of scientists and technicians involved in the enrichment program, most of whom had survived the U.S. and Israeli attacks. "You can't bomb knowledge," said Acton.
