Should We Be Worried About Bird Flu? Public Health Experts Say Yes
Battery hens sit in a chicken shed in Suffolk, England. (Photo by)
You don't need me to tell you Covid-19 changed the world. While the pandemic did help expose structural inequalities and disparities, especially in the food system, the loss of life and livelihood has been one of the greatest tragedies of our lifetimes.
I'm bringing this up because, if we ignore the lessons we should've learned from this pandemic, future disease outbreaks will be much, much worse. And I'm deeply concerned that, when it comes to avian flu—a.k.a. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (HPAI) H5N1—we're on a dangerously wrong path.
This virus typically affects birds, including poultry, and there's a current outbreak that has affected close to 150 million birds and devastated farms since 2022. Also concerningly, scientists have detected the virus in mammals in recent years—including dairy cows and humans—and learned it can spread between mammals, which significantly raises the outbreak risk. And since 2024, 102 cases of avian flu and 10 deaths have been reported in humans globally, a potentially staggering fatality rate.
Many of these global cases over the past year and a half—about 70—have been in the U.S., which means the world's eyes are watching. And so far, this country's response has been nearly the polar opposite of what scientists call for, which puts everyone around the world in greater danger.
'We have so many tools, but they're not being used optimally—and they're not being used optimally by choice,' says Dr. Amesh Adalja, a Senior Scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and an expert in global public health. 'We can change the trajectory of this if we actually take those best practices, take those tools, and use them optimally.'
To be perfectly clear, there is currently no known person-to-person spread of avian flu and experts say the current public health risk is low, per the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
What this means, though, is that the time to prevent and contain this virus is right now.
There's a very real possibility that avian flu could pose a greater threat in the future, and we can't be caught unprepared. The correct course of action involves vaccination, investments in public health, and global collaboration—all of which appear to be under threat given recent U.S. policy developments.
Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins' original plan to combat avian flu included US$100 million in research and vaccine development. But shortly after announcing it, she reversed course and told right-wing site Breitbart that vaccines were 'off the table.' Meanwhile, in May, the Trump-Vance Administration cancelled a massive contract with Moderna to develop a vaccination for humans against bird flu, and this month, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all 17 members of the advisory committee that helps develop vaccine policy and recommendations for the CDC.
'I'm optimistic that they will continue to support the development of these vaccines. It would be a crime right now to stop it,' said Scott Hensley, a virologist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia who worked on an avian flu vaccine for cattle.
Vaccines save lives. Just last month, early results from that experimental bird flu vaccine for cattle came back promising. The U.S. Department of Agriculture conditionally approved a vaccine for poultry this spring, and some countries, like China and France, already vaccinate poultry against H5N1. Even in humans, Finland last year became the first country to roll out bird flu vaccines among its population.
Alternative courses of action, rather than vaccines, are devastating: In March, Kennedy suggested farmers 'should consider maybe the possibility of letting it run through the flock so that we can identify the birds and preserve the birds that are immune to it.' This, as former Kansas state veterinarian Dr. Gail Hansen put it, is a 'terrible idea' and a 'recipe for disaster.'
Dr. Adalja did not mince words. If the past year has been a trial run for how the government might respond to the actual emergence of an avian flu pandemic, he says, 'we've failed this trial run.'
Optimistically, on a global level, the World Health Organization (WHO) has been taking positive steps toward international collaboration: WHO's Global Influenza Surveillance and Response System closely monitors avian and other animal influenza viruses, and in May, member states approved an agreement to better prevent, prepare for, and respond to outbreaks and learn from mistakes made at the height of the Covid pandemic.
But remember, the Trump-Vance Administration pulled the U.S. out of the WHO effective in 2026, and has revoked a variety of investments in global and domestic health programs. These decisions are not abstract, Dr. Adalja says: they 'make these types of events much harder to prepare for and much harder to control.'
As Covid-19 made abundantly clear, viruses don't stop at national borders. Keeping the public healthy and preparing for pandemic risks simply must be more important than politicking. And when we're heading in the wrong direction, there is a moral obligation to sound the alarm—and to illuminate a better path forward.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kate Middleton Shares New Message After Dropping Out of Royal Ascot Appearance
Kate Middleton has written a poignant message to children's hospices, saying it was an "immense privilege" to see their work The Princess of Wales, 43, praised them for lifting the spirits of children and families "through life, death and beyond" Her June 20 message, as Children's Hospice Week draws to an end, came six months after she took on the role of patron to a hospice in South WalesKate Middleton is showing her support for kids' hospices in a poignant week. In a new message issued on Friday, June 20, the Princess of Wales praised how hospices 'lift the spirits' and support seriously ill children and their families through 'life, death and beyond.' She said it was an 'immense privilege' seeing the work up close of two hospices, with East Anglia's Children's Hospices and Tŷ Hafan Children's Hospice, during her visits as their patron. It came in a week when Princess Kate, 43, dropped out of an expected visit to the Royal Ascot race meeting on Wednesday. Kate is still managing her return to public-facing duties amid her recovery from cancer treatment. In her message on June 20, Kate wrote, 'No parent expects to hear that their child has a serious health condition that could shorten their life. Sadly, this is the reality faced by thousands of families across the country, leaving them heartbroken, fearful of the future and often desperately isolated." 'Being able to access the support of one of the U.K.'s 54 children's hospices means they don't have to face that future alone," she added. 'As Patron of East Anglia's Children's Hospices and Tŷ Hafan Children's Hospice in South Wales, I have the immense privilege of seeing for myself the extraordinary work of our children's hospices," she said. "Lifting spirits through laughter, fun and play, as well as listening, holding, caring and sharing, they support children and families through life, death and beyond." "This Children's Hospice Week, I hope you will join me in celebrating the life-changing work they do and thanking them for the vital care they provide to children and families experiencing the most challenging times," Kate concluded. Support for children's hospices has been an ever-present part of Princess Kate's public work since she started in public life soon after marrying Prince William in 2011. She has also visited hospices around the world during her overseas tours. During Children's Hospice Week, which ends on June 22, the charity Together for Short Lives brings together the vital services to celebrate the incredible work they do for seriously ill children and their families. Kate made her first visit to Tŷ Hafan in January, spending more time than she was scheduled, crouching down, talking to youngsters and their families and joining in with the games. Tŷ Hafan — which means "Haven House" in Welsh — is located in Sully, South Wales, and was built with the support of Prince William's late mother, Princess Diana. Tracy Jones, the director of family well-being services who showed Kate around, said on the day of the visit in January, 'She immediately gravitated to the children and families — she spent quality time talking to every child and their parents.' 'It's been the most inspiring visit,' Jones added. 'She crouched down and was straightaway on the level of the children. If they were in a wheelchair, she crouched at that level. If they were on the floor, she would be at the level,' she continues. 'We were seriously impressed with how she could stay in a crouch, as it's not that comfortable!" "She instinctively seemed to know where to touch a child that was going to provide the connection, but not cause any distress or startle a child. She was looking at the children, even if she was talking to the parent. It's what we do, as we're used to working with children who are nonverbal," she added. Nick Carroll, CEO of Together for Short Lives, praised Kate's "ongoing support for Children's Hospice Week over many years [that] has helped to raise much-needed awareness of the life-changing work children's hospices do, every day of the year." "Their extraordinary lifeline care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses enables families to make the most of their lives together, whether that's for years, months or only hours," he said. 'Together with all the children's hospices, we thank the Princess of Wales for her invaluable contribution.' Irfon Rees, Chief Executive of Tŷ Hafan Children's Hospice, said in a statement on June 20, 'Her Royal Highness is clearly profoundly committed to the needs of children and young people, and in January, during her first visit to our hospice as our patron, her kindness and empathy were evident." 'Having HRH's support during Children's Hospice Week means that not only can we take time to celebrate the difference that children's hospices, including Tŷ Hafan, have made to the lives of so many families, but that we can also remind people of the importance of supporting their local children's hospice so that no family has to live their child's short life alone.' Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more! Kevin Clements, Chief Executive of EACH, based in the area close to the Wales family's country home, Anmer Hall, in Norfolk, added, 'We're so incredibly grateful for The Princess' invaluable contribution as our dedicated Royal Patron. Her ongoing support and vast profile have projected our charity onto the global stage, and this latest message is a perfect way to mark Children's Hospice Week." 'It's a great opportunity to shine a light on the work of children's hospices generally, as well as giving us an opportunity to raise awareness and remind everyone of the need for public support, given we rely on donations for the majority of our income.' Read the original article on People
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Cancer Concerns Spark Caution Over Weight Loss Injections
Cancer patients should seek medical advice before using weight loss injections, a leading UK charity has said. Macmillan Cancer Support urged patients not to view these drugs as 'quick fixes', following a rise in helpline queries over whether they should take them. Obesity is a well-established risk factor for several cancer types and is linked to worse outcomes in patients who already have a cancer diagnosis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have seen rapid uptake for weight loss. Their popularity has helped fuel speculation that they could reduce the risk of cancer or improve outcomes in people with obesity-related cancers. Mixed Findings on Cancer Risk and Benefits A study published in The Lancet eClinical Medicine in May compared outcomes in patients treated with GLP-1 RAs versus bariatric surgery. The research involved 3178 age- and BMI-matched pairs in Israel. Despite surgery achieving greater weight loss, both groups had similar rates of obesity-related cancers. The researchers suggested that there could be additional pathways beyond weight loss through which GLP-1RAs might lower cancer risk, for example by reducing inflammation. Other experts have proposed additional pathways, including enhanced immune responses, improved insulin sensitivity, hormonal modulation, and changes to gut microbiome. As a result of the study, clinical trials of GLP-1RAs as potential anti-cancer agents are planned. Potential Risks: Thyroid and Pancreatic Cancer Some studies have suggested that GLP-1RAs carry a minor increase in the risk of thyroid cancer, which is one of the 13 cancers known to be linked with obesity. Some GLP-1RAs now carry warnings about this potential link, although the evidence is conflicting. One meta-analysis of 64 studies by Italian researchers, published in March 2024, found a significant increase overall thyroid cancer risk. However, the data did not show a significant rise in papillary or medullary thyroid cancer when analysed separately. The researchers concluded that GLP-1RA treatment could be associated with a moderate increase in the relative risk of thyroid cancer, though the absolute risk remained small. They called for longer-term studies to clarify the link. In contrast, a Scandinavian cohort study published in April found no substantial increase in thyroid cancer risk over an average follow-up of 3.9 years. The authors said the findings did not rule out a slight increase but suggested no more than a 31% relative risk rise. Similar concerns have been raised about a theoretical risk of pancreatic cancer, but no conclusive evidence has been found. Macmillan Helpline Sees Spike in Inquiries Following recent media coverage, Macmillan Cancer Support reported a surge in calls and messages about weight loss medications, including the potential risk to people with thyroid cancer. Dr Owen Carter, Macmillan's national clinical adviser, said in a press release that there had been "a noticeable increase" in calls to the charity's free support line, alongside "a flurry of messages" on its peer-to-peer online community platform. In response, the charity has published updated information about weight loss injections and cancer on its website. Carter said that some callers were concerned about taking weight loss drugs while undergoing cancer treatments such as chemotherapy or hormone therapy. While there is currently not enough evidence, "we do know that these drugs may affect how other drugs are absorbed by your body," he said. "This may include some anti-cancer drugs." Weight Loss Before Surgery and Pre-habilitation Other patients have asked whether weight loss medication is safe to take before surgery for cancer. "Understandably, people are keen to do what they can to get ready for cancer treatment," Carter said. Healthcare professionals often recommend pre-habilitation to help patients prepare for treatment by improving their fitness and overall health. However, Carter warned against unprescribed use of weight loss injections as 'quick fixes'. 'We simply do not know enough about the long-term impact of these weight loss medications to recommend them if they're not prescribed by a specialist,' he said. Carter also emphasised the importance of making lifestyle changes alongside use of medications. "We know that eating well and staying as active as possible are proven to help people feel better, increase their energy levels, and strengthen their immune systems, which can help them to manage their weight and cope better with cancer treatment", he said. Risks of Unregulated Online Purchases Macmillan also raised concerns about people buying GLP-1 RAs online from unregulated sources. Some patients are reported to have experienced severe side effects from counterfeit medicines. The charity urged people to speak to their GP before taking weight loss drugs. Macmillan noted that potential side-effects of GLP-1RAs include nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhoea or constipation, and fatigue. They can also reduce the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. There have been reports of unplanned pregnancies occurring while taking these drugs, which may be particularly hazardous in cancer patients, as some cancer treatments are teratogenic.
News24
2 hours ago
- News24
UK MPs vote in favour of assisted dying bill in historic step
Britain's MPs approved initial assisted dying legislation for terminally ill adults, advancing it to the House of Lords. Supporters argue for dignity and choice, while critics fear coercion and call for enhanced palliative care. Public support grows, but the bill faces opposition and challenges before potential implementation in four years. Britain's parliament took a historic step towards allowing euthanasia on Friday when MPs backed contentious legislation that would introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people. Lawmakers in the lower House of Commons chamber voted 314 in favour to 291 to send the proposal to the upper House of Lords for further scrutiny following four hours of emotional debate. The outcome sparked celebrations among supporters gathered outside parliament who say legalised euthanasia will give people with an incurable illness dignity and choice at the end of their lives. But opponents attending a neighbouring counter-protest said they feared vulnerable people could be coerced into dying and urged lawmakers to focus on improving palliative care instead. The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill would allow assisted suicide in England and Wales for adults who have been given less than six months to live. They would have to be able to administer the life-ending substance themselves, and any patient's wish to die would have to be signed off by two doctors and a panel of experts. A change in the law would see Britain emulate several other countries in Europe and elsewhere that allow some form of assisted dying, including Belgium and the Netherlands. 'Heartbreaking stories' Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, who proposed the legislation, told Friday's so-called third reading debate that a law change would 'offer a compassionate and safe choice' for terminally ill people. She said maintaining the status quo would mean more 'heartbreaking stories' of 'pain and trauma, suicide attempts, PTSD, lonely trips to Switzerland, (and) police investigations'. However, Vicky Foxcroft, also of Labour, said the proposal did not include adequate safeguards for disabled people. She pleaded: We have to protect those people who are susceptible to coercion, who already feel like society doesn't value them, who often feel like a burden to the state, society and their family. Outside parliament, protesters waved placards with slogans including 'Let us choose' and 'Don't make doctors killers'. David Walker, 82, said he supported changing the law because he saw his wife of 60 years suffer for three years at the end of her life. 'That's why I'm here because I can't help her anymore, but I can help other people who are going through the same thing because if you have no quality of life, you have nothing,' he told AFP. But Elizabeth Burden, a 52-year-old doctor, said she feared the legislation would open a 'slippery slope' where those eligible for assisted dying expands. 'Once we allow this. Everything will slip down because dementia patients, all patients... are vulnerable,' she told AFP. Public support MPs in the 650-seat parliament backed an earlier version of the proposed legislation by 330 to 275 votes at an initial vote in parliament last November, a larger majority than Friday's 23. Since then, the bill has undergone several changes, including applying a ban on adverts for assisted dying and allowing all health workers to opt out of helping someone end their life. MPs added a safeguard which would prevent a person from being eligible 'solely as a result of voluntarily stopping eating or drinking', ruling out people with anorexia. Britain's medical community and Prime Minister Keir Starmer's top ministerial team are split on the proposed law change. Starmer voted in favour, while his health and justice secretaries opposed it. However, in a YouGov poll of 2,003 adults surveyed last month and published Thursday, 73% of respondents backed an assisted dying law. 'Change is coming,' hailed Sarah Wootton, chief executive of the Dignity in Dying campaign group. But Catherine Robinson of Right To Life UK insisted the bill 'still faces an uphill battle' to get through the Lords, and her opposition campaign group 'will be fighting it at every stage' to prevent it from becoming law. READ | UK politician says Bangladesh arrest warrant is 'politically motivated smear' The House of Lords now needs to approve the legislation before the end of the current parliamentary year, likely in the autumn, or the bill will fail. If it passes and receives royal assent, it would still be four years before an assisted dying service was implemented. A government impact assessment published this month estimated that approximately 160 to 640 assisted deaths could take place in the first year, rising to a possible 4,500 in a decade. Assisted suicide currently carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Separate legislation is going through the devolved Scottish parliament. At the end of March, the Isle of Man became the first British territory to pass an assisted dying bill.
