Parliament is returning after nearly 6 months away — and will look different than usual
Parliament will return on Monday after more than six months and will feel a little different than usual thanks to some unusual circumstances.
Each parliamentary session typically opens with some routine proceedings, which include the election of a Speaker of the House of Commons and a throne speech.
But added political attention on the Speaker position and the arrival of King Charles on Monday will add some twists and flair to the proceedings.
Heightened attention on Speaker election
The Constitution states that electing a Speaker should be the first order of business when Parliament returns after an election. Technically, the House cannot sit until a Speaker is chosen.
The Speaker is an MP chosen by other MPs to preside over the business of the House of Commons, act as an impartial arbiter of House proceedings and maintain order during debates. A Speaker has the authority to demand that MPs apologize if they use unparliamentary language — and can even order an MP removed from the chamber.
The Speaker is elected by a secret ranked-ballot, meaning MPs list the candidates in order of preference. If nobody wins on the first ballot, the last-place candidate is dropped and their votes are redistributed until someone claims a majority.
The election is overseen by the "Dean of the House" — the MP with the longest unbroken sitting record who isn't a minister or party leader. Bloc Québécois MP Louis Plamondon, who was first elected in 1984, will be overseeing his seventh Speaker election.
While the Speaker is elected as a member of a party, the role is considered non-partisan — the Speaker does not sit in any party caucus.
Typically, the Speaker position doesn't garner much attention, and the MP chosen for the role generally remains in the chair until the House is dissolved.
But the Speaker's role has become more politicized during the last parliamentary session.
Former Speaker Anthony Rota resigned from the role in September 2023 after he invited a Ukrainian veteran who fought with a Nazi unit in the Second World War to sit in the House of Commons during Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's address to Parliament.
Rota's resignation prompted a rare mid-session Speaker election, which Liberal MP Greg Fergus won.
Fergus remained as Speaker until Parliament was dissolved in March but faced calls from opposition parties to step down over actions they believed were overly partisan for his role.
The re-election of a Speaker when Parliament returns is never guaranteed — former Speaker Geoff Regan lost the role to Rota in 2019 despite having been re-elected as an MP. And other MPs, besides Fergus, have expressed interest in running for the job in Monday's vote.
All MPs who are not a leader of a recognized party or a minister are automatically considered candidates for Speaker unless they notify the House clerk in writing.
At least three Liberal MPs have expressed interest in taking the Speaker's chair: P.E.I. MP Sean Casey, who put his name forward to replace Rota in 2023; Ontario's Rob Oliphant; Sherry Romanado and Francis Scarpaleggia from Quebec.
Opposition Speaker could make difference for Liberals on cusp of majority
The Liberals also might opt to back a Speaker from the Opposition given that they're just three seats shy of a majority.
The Speaker doesn't vote in the House unless there is a tie, in which case they traditionally vote with the government.
At least three MPs from other parties are planning to let their name stand for election.
Conservatives Chris d'Entremont and Tom Kmeic have sent letters to their fellow MPs pitching himself for the Speaker's role. D'Entremont has served as Deputy Speaker since 2021.
Green Party Leader Elizabeth May is also putting herself forward for the Speaker role. She previously vied for the job in 2019 and 2023. While May is technically a leader of her party, the Greens are not officially recognized in the House because they only have one seat; a party must have at least 12 to gain official status. So May is still eligible to be a candidate.
The House will convene for the day after the election and return just before the throne speech on Tuesday.
Monarch will read throne speech for just 3rd time in history
Every parliamentary session is generally opened by a speech from the throne.
The speech is usually read by the governor general in the Senate. But because King Charles will read the speech this time — only the third time a monarch has done so since Confederation — there will be more flair to the proceedings.
The King and Queen will travel to the Senate in Canada's state landau — the ceremonial horse-drawn carriage used for royal and viceregal transport in Ottawa — from outside the Bank of Canada on Wellington Street.
The carriage will be drawn by 28 horses of the RCMP musical ride, with 14 horses travelling in front of the carriage and the rest following behind.
At the Senate, the King will receive full military honours, including a 100-person guard of honour from the 3rd Battalion of the Royal Canadian Regiment, an inspection of the guard and the band, followed by a 21-gun salute.
Once the King arrives in the Senate, the Usher of the Black Rod will be sent to the House to summon MPs for the throne speech.
The Usher is the King's messenger in Parliament and is also responsible for Senate security and other ceremonial and administrative duties. The job originated in England in 1348. Former RCMP superintendent J. Greg Peters has served in the role since 2013.
The knock at the door
Traditionally, when the Usher arrives at the doors of the House chamber, he knocks three times and informs MPs that the governor general "desires" their presence for the throne speech.
But because the King is presenting this throne speech, Peters will tell MPs that "the King commands this Honourable House to attend His Majesty immediately in the chamber of the honourable the Senate."
WATCH | Carney sets up throne speech:
At Issue | Carney sets up throne speech
2 days ago
Duration 22:05
The Speaker will then present themselves to the King along with the MPs in attendance.
The throne speech is always read in the Senate due to the tradition that the monarch (or their representative) cannot enter the House of Commons — a tradition derived from the British Parliamentary system that dates back to 1642.
By the same token, MPs can attend the throne speech but cannot enter the Senate chamber past the brass bar at the entrance — a barrier meant to symbolize the independence of both houses of Parliament. The prime minister is the one exception to this rule and may enter the chamber for the speech.
More routine proceedings will return following the throne speech. Both the Senate and House will introduce "pro-forma" bills — a Latin term meaning "for the sake of form."
Bill C-1, "An Act respecting the Administration of Oaths of Office," will be given a first reading but won't proceed any further and won't be discussed again. A similar step will take place in the Senate with the introduction of Bill S-1. The introduction of these bills is a symbolic ritual meant to assert the independence of both houses from the Crown.
The House will then either begin debate on the throne speech or turn to administrative business, such as appointments to the Board of Internal Economy and the procedure and House affairs committee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Chrystia Freeland slams BC Ferries' decision to build ships in China
Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland responds to a question during question period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, June 12, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick Controversy over BC Ferries' decision to award a contract to a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build four new vessels has reached Ottawa. Federal Transportation Minister Chrystia Freeland had some strong words for her B.C. counterpart Mike Farnworth in a letter dated June 16 and obtained by CTV News Friday. Read more: Eby won't stop BC Ferries from building new ships in China, but says it's 'not ideal' 'It is with great consternation and disappointment that I learned of BC Ferries' recent announcement it has selected China Merchants Industry Weihai Shipyards,' the letter begins. Freeland pointed out China's tariffs on Canadian agriculture products—which include a 100 per cent levy on canola oil, meal and peas and 25 per cent on fish and pork—calling them unjustified. She also highlighted concerns regarding threats to cybersecurity from the country. 'I am dismayed that BC Ferries would select a Chinese state-owned shipyard to build new ferries in the current geopolitical context,' she wrote. Read more: BC Ferries union upset Chinese company was hired to build new vessels She asked to be informed of what measures BC Ferries is taking to address potential security threats. 'I would like your assurance that BC Ferries conducted a robust risk assessment, and I expect them to engage with the relevant provincial and federal security agencies and departments to mitigate any security risk,' the letter reads. When BC Ferries announced the deal on June 10, it said it would have its own team of experts on site during construction 'to provide oversight and quality assurance.' Read more: Business leader says BC Ferries' hiring of Chinese shipyard is 'informed decision' 'We are confident that CMI Weihai will be able to meet our high expectations for safety and quality, while delivering tremendous value for our customers and on-time delivery of the four vessels,' the company said in a statement at the time. Notably, no Canadian companies placed a bid on the project. When BC Ferries opened its call for proposals last September, major B.C. shipbuilder Seaspan said in a statement it would not be able to compete with countries that pay workers less and have lower environmental and safety standards. 'Given the value of the contract and the level of taxpayer funding that has been provided to support BC Ferries' operations, I am surprised that BC Ferries does not appear to have been mandated to require an appropriate level of Canadian content in the procurement or the involvement of the Canadian marine industry,' Freeland wrote. Read more: Minister flags concern over BC Ferries' deal with Chinese state-owned shipyard She listed some of the funding the federal government has given the province and BC Ferries over the years, including $308 million during the COVID-19 pandemic—and asked Farnworth to 'verify and confirm with utmost certainty that no federal funding will be diverted to support the acquisition of these new ferries.' B.C. leaders, namely Farnworth and Premier David Eby, have—using much softer language—expressed disapproval of BC Ferries' decision, but said they won't step in to kill the contract, despite calls from opposition critics and unions to do so.
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Business groups push back ahead of Vancouver ‘carbon tax' on commercial buildings
Vancouver City Hall is seen in Vancouver, on Saturday, Jan. 9, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck Carbon taxes are falling out of style, with the federal and provincial governments recently pulling back. But in Vancouver, stricter emissions rules are coming for commercial buildings starting next year. It's part of the city's efforts to cut carbon pollution in half by 2030. 'What the City of Vancouver is planning to implement here essentially amounts to a second carbon tax being implemented at the municipal level,' Ryan Mitton with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business told CTV News in an interview on Friday. 'And what this is going to be a charge of $350 per tonne of CO2 that each building emits over a certain level set by the City of Vancouver.' The new rules take effect in January and include a $500 permit fee. Business groups fear buildings in violation could be hit with fines in the range of $14,000. 'The landlord will then take that invariably and pass that on to the tenants,' Ian Tostenson with the BC Restaurant and Foodservices Association told CTV News. While restaurant emissions are exempt according to the city, if a large building is penalized for emitting too much, Tostenson fears landlords will pass that cost on to all tenants in the building, including restaurants. Given the federal and provincial governments recently eliminated carbon taxes, businesses are calling for Vancouver to follow suit and back away from this plan. 'I just really hope that Mayor Ken Sim and council look at this proposal and decide to walk it back,' Mitton said. The city believes 84 per cent of buildings will be in compliance, based on 2024 figures, and says financial penalties only kick in by 2027 – which it says will allow enough time for building owners to prepare for the new regulations. This is a phased program that was initially voted for in 2022, and given how much has changed economically, some of these business groups believe city council would be willing to press pause on this, but there is no formal indication at this point that will happen. The city stresses this plan is about reducing emissions, not about generating revenue, and says based on reporting to date, most large buildings will be in compliance when the rules kick in.
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Mark Carney promises to consult with Indigenous communities in choosing projects under controversial Bill C-5
OTTAWA — Facing concerns and warnings of Indigenous resistance against a key part of his governing agenda, Prime Minister Mark Carney acknowledged Friday that 'more fulsome conversations are needed' to choose the development projects his government wants to fast-track through controversial new legislation, Bill C-5. Speaking moments after the bill passed third reading in the House of Commons, Carney pledged to hold meetings in the coming weeks with First Nations, Inuit and Métis leaders and experts in a series of summits to 'launch the implementation of this legislation in the right way' in 'full partnership' with Indigenous communities.
