Dollar strength, geopolitics & yields – the triple threat roiling Indian markets: Anirudh Garg

Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
As Indian markets navigate a phase marked by heightened volatility, investors are grappling with a triple threat—dollar strength, geopolitical tensions, and rising U.S. bond yields.These global headwinds, combined with domestic uncertainties, are reshaping capital flows and risk appetite. In this edition of, we speak with Anirudh Garg, Partner & Head of Research at INVasset PMS, who breaks down the key macro triggers unsettling Dalal Street.From tactical shifts in portfolio strategy to his take on IPOs, SME exuberance, and sector-specific opportunities like defence and real estate, Garg offers a data-driven perspective on how investors can navigate the storm and uncover long-term value. Edited Excerpts –A) Volatility on D-Street today is driven by multiple overlapping factors rather than a single cause. While fears around the U.S.-China tariff war persist, their intensity has eased somewhat after a U.S. court struck down Trump's reciprocal tax policy, removing one source of uncertainty. However, the broader strategic competition remains, with ongoing tensions around trade, technology access, and Taiwan keeping investor sentiment fragile. Mixed signals from policymakers—balancing trade talks and tariff threats—fuel swings in risk appetite.Additionally, the recent India-Pakistan conflict, though not a full-scale war and swiftly contained by India's decisive response, added short-term volatility. Meanwhile, global monetary tightening, especially by the U.S. Federal Reserve, is tightening liquidity and raising borrowing costs, putting pressure on risk assets worldwide.The stronger U.S. dollar also plays a key role by increasing the cost of capital for emerging markets, prompting capital flows away from equities toward safer dollar-denominated assets, further amplifying market fluctuations. For India, these external shocks coincide with domestic challenges including inflation trends, RBI policy stance, and corporate earnings uncertainties, layering complexity onto market dynamics.At INVasset, our quant-driven, algorithmic approach continuously monitors sectoral and stock-level shifts to adjust portfolio exposure dynamically, capturing opportunities amid volatility while managing downside risks. Such fluctuations are a natural part of the evolving global risk framework investors must navigate today.A) The recent rise in U.S. bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury touching 4.43% and the 20-year nearing 4.94%, signals a shift in global capital flows and investor sentiment. Higher yields make U.S. debt more attractive, prompting potential capital outflows from emerging markets like India.This creates pressure on the Indian rupee, which tends to weaken against a stronger dollar, raising import costs—particularly crude oil—and fueling imported inflation. The RBI faces a delicate balancing act, as elevated global yields limit its flexibility to ease domestic interest rates without triggering capital flight.For Indian equities, this environment tends to increase volatility. Sectors reliant on imports or capital-intensive businesses may face margin pressures, while export-driven industries could benefit from a weaker rupee, gaining competitiveness internationally.At INVasset, we actively monitor these dynamics through a dynamic asset allocation framework, rotating into sectors likely to benefit from currency shifts and higher yields.A)Managing volatility is a core tenet of our strategy at INVasset, especially amid today's complex market environment. We rely on a data-driven, algorithmic approach that continuously scans over 1,500 stocks using 170+ parameters, enabling nimble portfolio adjustments grounded in real-time relative changes and sector rotations.Recently, we increased exposure to the textiles sector, anticipating benefits from the advancing India-UK Free Trade Agreement, which promises tariff reductions and export growth. This move diversifies risk and taps into a structural growth theme amid global trade shifts.Simultaneously, we've strengthened allocations in financial intermediaries and stock brokers, sectors benefiting from rising retail participation and digitization. These companies offer recurring revenues that help dampen volatility.Geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan have also prompted a tactical increase in select defence stocks, aligning with national priorities and providing defensive portfolio ballast during uncertain times.Additionally, market-driven valuation dips have created entry points in quality financial firms with strong fundamentals, further balancing risk and reward.Our proprietary quant algorithm ensures these tactical shifts are unemotional and disciplined, capturing alpha while controlling downside. This systematic agility allows us to navigate volatility proactively, positioning portfolios to benefit from both macro trends and emerging opportunities.A) The March quarter results for India Inc. painted a nuanced picture, reflecting sector-specific trends and broader macroeconomic conditions.The Defence sector stood out with a strong performance, driven by heightened government focus on modernization and renewed geopolitical tensions, which bolstered order books and profitability.The Financial Services sector demonstrated robust resilience, buoyed by strong banking results, asset management growth, and increasing retail participation, contributing to healthy gains. Metals benefited from a global recovery in demand and sustained infrastructure spending, translating into volume growth and margin expansion.Meanwhile, Oil & Gas firms capitalized on favorable crude prices and domestic demand growth, which improved refining margins and petrochemical sales.On the flip side, sectors like Healthcare and Automobiles faced challenges. The healthcare industry grappled with rising input costs and regulatory pressures, impacting margins and earnings growth.The automobile sector experienced subdued demand both domestically and in export markets, leading to flat or declining sales and pressured profitability.These mixed results reinforce the importance of a diversified and selective investment strategy that emphasizes sectors benefiting from structural tailwinds—such as defence modernization, financialization, and global commodity cycles—while cautiously navigating those facing cyclical or regulatory headwinds.For long-term investors, focusing on themes backed by strong government support, evolving consumer trends, and global demand recovery offers the best risk-adjusted opportunities in the current environment.A) The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has adopted a cautiously accommodative stance as it balances its twin mandate of controlling inflation and supporting growth. In April 2025, retail inflation has moderated to 3.16%—its lowest since mid-2019—thanks to easing food prices and subdued demand pressures.Simultaneously, the Indian economy is on a robust footing, with FY25 Q4 growth expected near 6.9%, driven by agriculture and strong consumer demand. The current account deficit remains manageable at 1.1% of GDP for 3Q FY25, underpinned by stable services exports and remittances.Reflecting these conditions, the RBI cut the repo rate by 25 basis points to 6.25% on 7th February, marking the first easing move in five years. Market expectations, supported by Reuters polls, point to a likely further 25 basis points cut in June, with potential additional easing later in the year, all data-dependent.The key variables guiding future rate decisions will be inflation trajectory, sustained economic growth, and external sector stability. If inflation remains benign and growth steady, RBI's room to ease rates further is significant.However, global uncertainties and potential external shocks will warrant cautious monitoring. Overall, India's monetary policy outlook is poised to support growth while maintaining vigilance on inflation and macro stability.A) India's IPO market has seen a notable resurgence recently, driven by renewed investor interest and companies seeking growth capital. While many IPOs have posted spectacular listing-day gains, often fueled by retail enthusiasm and market momentum, we at INVasset maintain a cautious stance.IPOs represent a distinct asset class, and initial exuberance frequently leads to price volatility and corrections as companies take time to prove their operational and financial credentials.Our approach emphasizes patience, allowing these firms to 'get cooked' over several quarters before considering investment, thereby aligning valuations with sustainable fundamentals.Examples like Ather Energy and select SME IPOs demonstrate the typical pattern of sharp listing gains followed by periods of earnings digestion and volatility. Given that many IPO valuations already price in strong growth expectations, premature entry risks capital erosion if execution falters.By waiting for consistent revenue growth, profitability, and cash flow visibility, we reduce downside risks and identify quality companies at reasonable valuations.In essence, while IPOs offer exciting opportunities, disciplined, fundamentals-driven investing remains paramount, reflecting our broader philosophy of measured, data-driven portfolio construction geared toward long-term value creation.A) The SME IPO segment has gained traction in 2025, but at INVasset, we remain cautious due to liquidity constraints and valuation concerns. Many SME stocks suffer from thin trading volumes post-listing, limiting exit options and increasing volatility risks.Additionally, valuations often reflect speculative exuberance rather than fundamental strength, leading to inflated listing gains that are unsustainable. While some SMEs have solid business models, the market's hype obscures true financials.Regulatory efforts aim to improve transparency, but structural challenges persist. Hence, we prefer mainboard stocks with robust liquidity and earnings visibility for disciplined, long-term investing.A) Beyond high-growth sectors, the old economy industries—such as manufacturing, railways, power, and defense—are now presenting compelling value opportunities following recent market corrections. These sectors stand to benefit from sustained government capital expenditure focused on infrastructure modernization, strategic self-reliance, and enhanced connectivity.The correction has improved valuation comfort, making these fundamentally strong areas attractive for long-term investors seeking quality at reasonable prices.Interest rate–sensitive sectors like real estate also offer promising entry points amid easing monetary policy and improving demand dynamics.Supported by urbanization and affordable housing initiatives, real estate remains a vital component of India's growth story. Together, these sectors blend secular growth with cyclical recovery, providing a balanced portfolio approach.Investors who focus on financially sound companies within these old economy themes can capture the upside potential of India's ongoing investment wave, while effectively managing economic and policy risks.A) The recent geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan have once again highlighted the strategic importance of India's defence sector. At INVasset, we remain bullish on defence as a core portfolio theme, driven by robust government spending and a clear focus on self-reliance under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative.The government is aggressively expanding the Indian Navy and modernizing missile systems, which bodes well for domestic defence manufacturers. This renewed urgency ensures strong order pipelines and revenue visibility for companies in this space.Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers (GRSE) stands out as a prime example. Despite a market cap of around ₹30,000 crore, GRSE currently holds an order book of ₹25,000 crore and recently secured an additional ₹25,000 crore in new contracts.The company is also eyeing another ₹40,000 crore in prospective orders. This large and growing backlog reflects India's focus on building a strong indigenous naval fleet and makes GRSE a key beneficiary of the defence modernization drive, with stable long-term cash flows.On the missile front, Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) has delivered critical capability with its Akash surface-to-air missile system, successfully countering drones and missiles during recent skirmishes. This proven technology has also attracted interest from Southeast Asian countries facing regional security challenges, opening promising export opportunities.As India emerges as a reliable defence exporter, companies like BDL are well positioned to benefit from both domestic demand and growing international markets. Defence is not just a sector; it is a strategic growth story with strong fundamentals.(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

News18

20 minutes ago

• News18

Not So ‘Nobel'? Why Pakistan's Push For Trump Reeks Of A Strategic Gamble

Last Updated: Official sources in India said Pakistan's move is aimed at strengthening ties with US, securing economic and technological support, and gaining American backing on Kashmir In a diplomatic move, Pakistan has formally nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Official sources within Pakistan's government have confirmed that the nomination stems from their belief that Trump played a pivotal role in defusing the tensions during the India-Pakistan crisis of May 2025. However, official sources in India told CNN-News18 that Pakistan's move is aimed at strengthening ties with the United States, securing economic and technological support, and gaining American backing for its position on the Kashmir dispute. Pakistan's Desperate Push The Nobel nomination comes after what Islamabad describes as Trump's 'decisive diplomatic intervention" in de-escalating the May 2025 crisis between India and Pakistan. Pakistani officials have credited Trump for averting what could have been a catastrophic nuclear conflict. 'This move is about acknowledging President Trump's key role in ensuring peace during a period of intense crisis," one official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'We believe that Trump's mediation was instrumental in averting escalation, and we are seeking international recognition of his contribution." However, this narrative has been categorically rejected by India. Indian government sources have expressed strong opposition to Pakistan's claims, dismissing them as factually incorrect and misleading. In an official statement, India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri rejected the suggestion that Trump mediated the crisis, stating, 'India did not seek or accept any third-party mediation during the crisis, and Pakistan's attempts to rewrite the history of the events are not based in reality." Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his public remarks, further dismissed Pakistan's narrative, refusing to engage with any external mediation efforts, including those from Trump. 'India has always managed its security concerns on its own and does not require the intervention of any third party," he said. This week, PM Modi also declined Trump's invite to visit the United States on his return journey from Canada, citing his pre-existing schedule. The development came as PM Modi spoke with Trump and set the record straight that India's 'Operation Sindoor' was 'paused" following a request from Pakistan and not due to mediation or offer of a trade deal by the US. According to official sources within the Indian government, the Indian leadership maintained full control over the crisis and managed it without any foreign involvement. Indian Defence Secretary RK Singh provided further details, telling a news agency: 'All communications during the crisis were thoroughly documented, including logs and records that make it clear that India initiated the calls. Any claims of third-party mediation are unfounded." Singh's comments were aimed at countering Pakistan's narrative, which has been widely disseminated in international forums and media. The Kashmir Angle Pakistan's push to nominate Trump is also linked to its long-standing goal of internationalising the Kashmir issue. Islamabad has consistently sought global support for its position on Kashmir, which India maintains is a bilateral issue to be resolved solely between the two countries. Indian government officials have made it clear that any third-party involvement in the Kashmir dispute is unacceptable. 'The Kashmir issue is a bilateral matter, and India will not tolerate any external interference," said a senior Ministry of External Affairs official, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'Pakistan's attempt to gain international support through this Nobel nomination is part of its ongoing campaign to internationalise Kashmir, which India has firmly rejected." In contrast, Pakistan has highlighted Trump's previous offers to mediate the Kashmir dispute as evidence of his willingness to involve himself in the issue. According to Pakistani diplomatic sources, this endorsement of Trump is aimed at pushing the United States to take a more active role in the region. Munir's Ambition The diplomatic push for the Nobel nomination has raised eyebrows in both Pakistan and India. There are reports that General Asim Munir, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, is positioning himself as a potential co-recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, alongside Trump. While this remains unconfirmed, Indian intelligence sources suggest that Munir's growing role in shaping Pakistan's foreign policy may be influencing the country's decision to publicly support Trump. 'Munir is an ambitious leader," said an Indian security analyst, 'and while the Nobel campaign may seem like a strategic move to secure Pakistani interests, it could also be a personal gambit to raise his own stature on the international stage." Interestingly, the nomination demand came after a rare White House meeting between Trump and Munir in which geo-political issues ranging from the Israel-Iran conflict, and Kashmir to defence purchasing were discussed. The Bigger Picture For Pakistan, the move is seen as a way to potentially gain economic concessions, technological transfers, and a softer US stance on its nuclear programme. In particular, Pakistan hopes that by aligning itself with Trump's leadership, it can secure American backing for its position on Kashmir, despite India's firm objections. top videos View all For India, however, the matter is a reminder that, despite Pakistan's claims, the Kashmir issue remains firmly within India's domain and will not be internationalised through external mediation. The coming months will reveal whether Pakistan's strategic gamble will pay off or whether it will simply be seen as a fleeting diplomatic gesture in the complex web of South Asian geopolitics. tags : Asim Munir donald trump Kashmir Nobel Prize pakistan United states Location : Islamabad, Pakistan First Published: June 21, 2025, 11:36 IST News world Not So 'Nobel'? Why Pakistan's Push For Trump Reeks Of A Strategic Gamble | Exclusive

Indian Express

30 minutes ago

• Indian Express

World's biggest banks increased fossil fuel financing by $162 billion in 2024: Report

The world's largest 65 banks committed $869 billion in 2024 to companies in the fossil fuels sector, up from $707 billion in 2023, with State Bank of India (SBI) one of nearly 50 large banks that increased their financing for the same compared to the previous year. 'This growth in fossil fuel finance is troubling because new fossil fuel infrastructure locks in more decades of fossil fuel dependence. As the IEA's (International Energy Agency) 2024 Energy Investment Outlook report states, '(a)chieving net zero emissions globally by 2050 would mean annual investment in oil, gas, and coal falls by more than half' by 2030,' said the Fossil Fuel Finance Report 2025 by a group of eight environment organisations together called Banking on Climate Chaos Coalition. To be sure, SBI accounted for only a fraction of the total fossil fuel financing in 2024 and only saw a small increase last year compared to other lenders. As per the report, SBI was the only Indian bank in the top 65 with a $65 million increase in fossil fuel financing in 2024 from 2023 to $2.62 billion, putting it at the 47th spot out of the 65 banks, up from 49 in 2023. In comparison, JPMorgan Chase retained its top spot in the list as it gave $53.5 billion to fossil fuel companies last year, $15 billion more than it did in 2023. This is more than SBI's total fossil fuel financing of $10.6 billion from 2021 to 2024. Earlier this year in February, SBI Chairman CS Setty said the bank is targeting to be net zero in terms of emissions by 2055. Before that, the bank is aiming to have at least 7.5 per cent of its domestic gross advances to be green advances by 2030. As at the end of the quarter ended March, SBI's domestic advances stood at Rs 36.02 lakh crore. It had sanctioned a combined fund and non-fund-based limit of Rs 20,558 crore for sustainable finance activities. According to Bengaluru-based think-tank Climate Risk Horizons, coal financing is a 'huge blind spot' for Indian banks. 'Among the top 1000 BSE-listed banks as of March 2024, only Federal Bank and RBL Bank have adopted explicit coal exclusion or phase-out policies… The economics are clear: coal is no longer the cheap energy source it once was. Renewable energy and storage can now provide electricity at or below the cost of coal, with continued cost declines likely,' the think-tank's analysts said in a post in March 2025 warning that Indian banks were falling behind in the sustainable finance race. The report found that fossil fuel financing by the world's largest banks rose in 2024 after declining in 2023 came amid watering down of exclusion policies and policy rollbacks. '…what was once largely a North American trend is now going global. European banks –often seen as more progressive on climate due to the quality of their sector policies – also began backtracking,' it said. In March, American lender Wells Fargo scrapped plans to become net zero by 2050, weeks after US President Donald Trump signed an executive order announcing the country's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. The US' withdrawal — which will take effect in early 2026 and see the world's largest economy join Iran, Libya, and Yemen as those not party to the Paris Agreement — has been part of a series of steps taken by the Trump administration to promote fossil fuels even in the face of 2024 being the hottest year ever recorded. In January, the US Treasury Department withdrew its membership of the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System —a voluntary global coalition that looks to mobilise green finance and develop recommendations for climate-risk management in the financial sector — as part of the aforementioned executive order signed by Trump. And ahead of Trump's inauguration, the US' six largest banks left the UN-sponsored Net Zero Banking Alliance. A committee of the US Senate also approved draft legislation this week that would hit key tax incentives for clean energy. The increase in fossil fuel financing by banks in 2024 marked a reversal of decreasing lending to the segment. While nearly $3.3 trillion has been made available to fossil fuel businesses since 2021, the 65 banks in the 2025 report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since the Paris Agreement came into force in 2016. In 2024, financing for acquisitions increased by $19.2 billion to $82.9 billion. While mergers and acquisitions don't directly create new infrastructure, 'this consolidation — for which bank financing is critical — is often an attempt to grow the power and competitiveness of fossil fuel companies, at a time when the world actually needs to phase out fossil fuels', the report said. Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More

Hans India

32 minutes ago

• Hans India

BJP-JD(U) ruined Bihar's economy and social fabric in last 20 years: Congress

Patna: Congress on Saturday slammed the BJP-JD(U) alliance in Bihar over 'ruining' the state's economy and social fabric in the last 20 years of their rule. 'The BJP-JD(U) alliance has ruined Bihar's economy, governance, and social fabric during their 20-year rule. This has been clearly proven by the reports of the reputed global institutions. That's why we've launched a campaign to expose how Bihar has suffered under Nitish Kumar's leadership,' said Congress spokesperson Prem Chand Mishra while addressing a press conference in Patna. As part of the campaign, Mishra cited a recent report by CARE Ratings, a global agency, which ranked Bihar last among 17 large Indian states on key development indicators. 'Bihar received just 34.8 points in the Social and Economic Development Index, scoring the lowest across parameters such as education, health, infrastructure, fiscal management, and economic activity,' Mishra said. Based on the CARE Ratings Report, Mishra pointed out that Bihar ranks 17th out of 17 major states on social and economic development. He said that poor performance in education quality, maternal and infant mortality rates, employment generation, weak scores on women empowerment, infrastructure, per capita income, alarming fiscal indicators, including debt management, interest payment ratio, fiscal deficit, severe deficiencies in electricity access, railway density, healthcare services, and school teacher ratios. He also said that the weak judicial efficiency, e-governance, investment environment, and environmental metrics are also poor, including air quality and renewable energy adoption. 'Bihar is now behind even Rajasthan, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh — states it once competed with. The figures speak for themselves, and corruption and poor governance are to blame,' Mishra said. He alleged that the government's much-publicised development narrative is hollow and lacks substance on the ground. Mishra added that even the Union government data contradicts the NDA's claims of progress. 'Bihar is in deep crisis, socially, economically, and administratively. The only way out is a change in government and a policy revolution,' he concluded. This marks a major strategic move by the Congress to build a data-backed campaign against the NDA ahead of the Assembly elections. With just four months to go, the party appears poised to corner the ruling alliance on its development record, particularly using central and global institutional reports as ammunition.