logo
Trump's FAA pick has claimed ‘commercial' pilot license he doesn't have

Trump's FAA pick has claimed ‘commercial' pilot license he doesn't have

Politico15-06-2025

President Donald Trump's nominee to head the Federal Aviation Administration long described himself in his official biography as being certified to fly aircraft commercially — but records examined by POLITICO show that he does not hold any commercial license.
Bryan Bedford's biography at Republic Airways, the regional airline where he has been CEO since 1999, said until Thursday that he 'holds commercial, multi-engine and instrument ratings.' (By Friday, after POLITICO's inquiries, the word 'commercial' had been removed.) The FAA registry that houses data on pilot's licenses does not list any such commercial credentials for Bedford.
Similar language asserting commercial credentials for Bedford appeared in his Republic bio since at least 2010, according to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.
Bedford is a licensed private pilot, the FAA records show, and has attained additional credentials allowing him to fly in a variety of specialized circumstances, including operating multi-engine planes and piloting at night or in bad weather. He has passed 'written and oral exams' for becoming a commercial airline pilot, the Transportation Department said in a statement, adding that Bedford had not 'personally nor publicly claimed to be a commercial airline pilot.'
Questions about Bedford's credentials do not appear to threaten his prospects for heading the FAA, an agency trying to recover from years of high-level leadership shake-ups, failures of key aviation technology, a spate of near-misses in the skies and January's 67-fatality crash near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
Bedford didn't respond to multiple attempts by POLITICO to request comment, nor did Republic. The White House referred questions to DOT.
DOT defended Bedford, who would be the latest in a string of licensed pilots confirmed to lead the aviation agency. The Senate Commerce Committee held a hearing on his nomination earlier this week.
'Bryan never misrepresented his credential; it was an administrative error that was immediately corrected,' DOT said in a statement. The agency did not respond to questions about what the 'error' was or how it had been fixed.
The aviation news publication The Air Current previously reported in April about questions regarding Bedford's pilot credentials.
The FAA issues various forms of commercial pilot ratings, including a 'commercial privileges' certificate that allows pilots to fly people or goods for hire, such as on cargo planes, small propeller aircraft or charter flights. Working as an airline pilot requires someone to hold a more rigorous commercial rating designating them as an 'air transport pilot,' which requires extensive flight hours, among other things.
Darren Pleasance, president and CEO of the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, a trade group for private airplane owners, said earning any pilot's license — including for commercial planes — requires written and oral exams and also a 'check ride' conducted by a licensed FAA examiner, who evaluates a person's skill at actually flying a plane.
Pleasance, who holds an 'air transport pilot' license and is a certificated flight instructor, said a pilot working toward their commercial privileges would additionally have to pass a more comprehensive flight test that includes successfully performing complicated maneuvers in midair and during landing or take-off.
'You cannot get a commercial rating without having gone through and taken those tests,' Pleasance said after being asked to comment on the pilot licensing process and testing criteria. He was not addressing any specific questions regarding Bedford's credentials.
Another aviation expert familiar with the licensing process, granted anonymity to speak candidly about a sensitive topic, said that 'if you haven't successfully gone through all of that, no one should claim to have a certain rating — because they don't have it.'
'It's like saying you are a medical doctor but you haven't finished medical school,' said the expert.
After viewing Bedford's publicly accessible licensure record, the person confirmed that it does not contain any commercial certifications. It lists Bedford as being licensed to fly single and multi-engine planes as well as having earned his 'instrument rating,' which means he can fly at night or in bad weather.
In a statement, DOT said that Bedford has never claimed to be a 'commercial airline pilot,' and added that he had passed 'written and oral exams' needed to be licensed to fly commercially.
DOT didn't address whether Bedford had completed a 'check ride' with an experienced pilot, which is necessary for a commercial certificate.
Besides the wording on his company's website, Bedford also gave a speech in 2019 at Liberty University where another speaker introduced him as holding 'commercial, multi-engine and instrument pilot ratings.'
During a question-and-answer portion of his appearance, Bedford said he had decided to pursue pilot training after going through an intense period of union negotiations, where labor insisted that he didn't understand what it meant to be an airline pilot.
'When I was in Minnesota between like, 1994, 1997, I went through private, instrument, multi-engine, commercial, and by the time we got to our next labor negotiation three years later, I had all my ratings, and l'd actually been flying some of our turbine airplanes around,' Bedford said.
At Bedford's confirmation hearing Wednesday, Republican senators repeatedly praised his fitness for the FAA job — including Sen. Todd Young of Indiana, who called him 'exactly the type of innovative leader' the agency needs. Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz of Texas added that 'as a pilot, Mr. Bedford understands how important it is for pilots to go through rigorous training.'
Democrats at the hearing pressed Bedford on other issues related to public safety, including whether he would scale back the FAA's requirement that people seeking to become airline pilots log at least 1,500 of flight time — a rule that Republic requested an exemption from in 2022. None of them brought up his pilot's credentials.
'I am less worried about that than I am more worried about the fact that in his previous role at Republic Air[ways], he pushed very hard to degrade the 1,500 hour rule,' Illinois Sen. Tammy Duckworth, the Commerce Committee's top Democrat, said when asked about the credentials issue during a call with reporters Tuesday.
The assertion that Bedford holds a commercial rating appears to have been scrubbed from two sections of Republic's website at different times within the past seven months.
According to a screen grab from the 'Executive Leadership' section of the airline's website from December 1, 2024, accessed via the Wayback Machine, Bedford's biography said at the time that he 'holds commercial, multi-engine and instrument pilot ratings.' By March 18, according to the Wayback Machine, the word 'commercial' had been removed from that sentence. One day before that, Trump announced Bedford as his pick on social media.
However, the claim that Bedford holds a 'commercial' rating still appeared as of Thursday on the Republic website's 'Board of Directors' page. By Friday the reference had been scrubbed.
As of Friday, similar language also remained in a biography section for Bedford at the Regional Airlines Association trade group website.
When asked about possible questions on Bedford's biography after Wednesday's hearing, Sen. Andy Kim (D-N.J.) told a reporter he'd 'heard about that' and that his team 'did flag that.'
'We are doing just sort of an extensive look, not just at his policies, but just sort of his background as well,' he said.
'So I haven't made a determination yet but it is something that' he is examining, Kim said.
— Chris Marquette and Sam Ogozalek contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US boosts emergency Middle East evacuations and travel warnings after Trump orders strikes in Iran
US boosts emergency Middle East evacuations and travel warnings after Trump orders strikes in Iran

Chicago Tribune

time36 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

US boosts emergency Middle East evacuations and travel warnings after Trump orders strikes in Iran

WASHINGTON — The State Department has doubled the number of emergency evacuation flights it is providing for American citizens wishing to leave Israel, ordered the departure of nonessential staff from the U.S. Embassy in Lebanon and is stepping up travel warnings around the Middle East amid concerns Iran will retaliate against U.S. interests in the region. In internal and public notices, the department over the weekend significantly ramped up its cautionary advice to Americans in the Mideast. In a notice on Sunday, after American strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, the department said it had ordered nonessential personnel and the families of staff at the U.S. Embassy in Beirut to leave Lebanon 'due to the volatile and unpredictable security situation in the region.' The notice made no mention of any potential evacuation flights or other assistance for private Americans wanting to leave Lebanon but said those who want to should try to use existing commercial services to depart. At the same time, the department issued warnings to U.S. citizens in Saudi Arabia and Turkey to take extra security precautions given the uncertainty. 'Given reports of regional hostilities, the U.S. Mission to Saudi Arabia has advised its personnel to exercise increased caution and limit non-essential travel to any military installations in the region,' the department said in its notice for Saudi Arabia. In Turkey, the department said U.S. personnel 'have been cautioned to maintain a low profile and instructed to avoid personal travel to the U.S. Consulate Adana consular district,' which includes the NATO airbase at Incirlik. 'Negative sentiment toward U.S. foreign policy may prompt actions against U.S. or Western interests in Turkey,' the statement said. Late Saturday, the department said it was stepping up evacuation flights for American citizens from Israel to Europe and continuing to draw down its staff at diplomatic missions in Iraq. But even before the U.S. airstrikes on Iran were made public by President Donald Trump on Saturday evening in Washington, the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem had announced the start of evacuation flights for private Americans from Israel. Sixty-seven American citizens left Israel on two government flights bound for Athens, Greece on Saturday and four more evacuation flights to Athens were planned for Sunday, according to internal State Department document seen by The Associated Press. A nongovernment charter flight is scheduled to depart Israel for Rome on Monday. In addition to the flights, a cruise ship carrying more than 1,000 American citizens, including several hundred Jewish youngsters who had been visiting Israel on an organized tour, arrived in Cyprus, according to the document. It also said the evacuation of non-essential personnel at the U.S. embassy in Baghdad and consulate in Erbil is continuing. Those staffers had been ordered to leave even before Israel began its military operation in Iran more than a week ago. 'As part of our ongoing effort to streamline operations, additional personnel departed Iraq on June 21 and 22,' the department said. 'These departures represent a continuation of the process started on June 12.' As of Saturday, more than 7,900 Americans had asked for assistance in leaving Israel and more than 1,000 had sought help in leaving Iran, where the U.S. has no diplomatic presence, the document said. There are roughly 700,000 Americans, many of them dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, in Israel and many thousands of Americans, most of them dual in Iran. It was not clear how many Americans had successfully made it out of Iran through overland routes, although the document said more than 200 had entered neighboring Azerbaijan as of Saturday since the conflict began. After the U.S. strikes in Iran, security officers at all U.S. embassies and consulates have been instructed to conduct reviews of their post's security posture and report back to the State Department by late Sunday.

DHS Issues Heightened Terror Threat for Americans
DHS Issues Heightened Terror Threat for Americans

Newsweek

time37 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

DHS Issues Heightened Terror Threat for Americans

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a threat summary in a National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin Sunday following Saturday's strikes on three key-nuclear facilities in Iran. "The ongoing Iran conflict is causing a heightened threat environment in the United States," the DHS statement said. DHS also said, "low-level cyber attacks against US networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against US networks." The warning came amid escalating tensions between the US, its allies, and Iran and its supporters. President Donald Trump authorized the strikes on nuclear weapons facilities because he felt that Iran was no longer negotiating in good faith and instead was waiting out the clock to continue to build up their nuclear power, Vice President JD Vance said during an interview on Meet The Press Sunday. The department has issued information on resources to stay safe, outlining who to call and how to report concerns. This is a breaking news story. Updates to come.

What is Iran's next move? US bracing for response to nuke strikes: Live updates
What is Iran's next move? US bracing for response to nuke strikes: Live updates

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

What is Iran's next move? US bracing for response to nuke strikes: Live updates

Concerns swirled Monday over possible payback by Tehran against the U.S. or its allies after a strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities amid fears of an all-out Mideast conflict. The U.S. remained on "high alert" with its 40,000 troops in the region two days after President Donald Trump ordered the bombing of Fordow, a uranium enrichment facility deep inside a remote mountain in Iran, and facilities at Natanz and Isfahan. The Department of Homeland Security issued a bulletin warning of a "heightened threat environment" in the U.S. The alert from the National Terrorism Advisory system said attacks from low-level cyber 'hacktivists' are likely, and larger attacks could follow if Iranian leaders issue a religious ruling 'calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the Homeland.' On Sunday, U.S. officials claimed an exhubertant victory with the pinpoint strikes, saying Iran's nuclear program had been decimated. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called the bombings an "incredible and overwhelming success." Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine warned Iranian retaliation "would be an incredibly poor choice. We will defend ourselves. The safety of our service members and civilians remains our highest priority." Concerns also mounted over the possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil and gas route. The Iranian parliament backed a measure to close the strait, but the final decision was up to Iran's Supreme National Security Council, Iranian TV said. Will Iran strike back at the US? Iran − and its hard-line supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – are almost certainly going to strike back in response to historic U.S. military strikes on three of its suspected nuclear facilities. But if history is any guide, that response could happen at any time − and anywhere, and in any form, former U.S. intelligence officials and diplomatic experts say. 'Missiles, militias and acts of hostage-taking – that's their go-to' range of options, the Biden administration coordinator for the Middle East, Brett McGurk, said on CNN June 21. 'I suspect Iran will have to do something.' Read more here. −Josh Meyer Visual look at the strikes: See how Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded Operation Midnight Hammer used 'bunker busters' The U.S. used more than a dozen multimillion-dollar, 30,000-pound "bunker busters" to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities in the strike, known as Operation Midnight Hammer, marking the weapon's first operational use, according to the Pentagon. U.S. bomber planes dropped 14 of the massive bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said. The bombs used in the strikes, called Massive Ordnance Penetrators, or MOPs, weigh 30,000 pounds each and cost millions to produce. MOPs, also known as the Guided Bomb Unit, or GBU-57, are GPS-guided weapons designed to burrow deep into underground targets, such as fortified tunnels or bunkers. The bombs are about 20 feet long and span 6 feet at their widest point. Read more here. − Cybele Mayes-Osterman What is the War Powers Act? Some lawmakers, including rigid conservatives and key progressives, are calling the U.S. strikes a breach of the Constitution,. "The President's disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, posted on X. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, responded to Trump's social media assessment of the attack with the statement: "This is not Constitutional." The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action. The law also limits the deployment of armed forces beyond 90 days in the absence of a formal declaration of war. − Savannah Kuchar Why did the US strike Iran's nuke sites? Trump ordered the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, effectively joining a war that Israel started on June 13 when it began bombing Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. Israel said it helped the U.S. coordinate and plan the strikes. Trump said all three sites were "totally obliterated." But an independent assessment has not yet been carried out. The International Atomic Energy Agency − the United Nation's nuclear watchdog − released a statement saying that so far it had not detected an increase in "off-site radiation levels," one of the feared consequences of the strikes. Vice President JD Vance insisted Sunday that the U.S. is not entering an open-ended conflict in the Middle East. 'We're not at war with Iran. We're at war with Iran's nuclear program.' Vance said on NBC.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store