Epic Memorial Day gaming monitor deals start now — save up to $800 on Samsung, Alienware and more

Memorial Day sales are kicking off, and there's no better to take your PC gaming setup up a notch by landing some massive savings on a gaming monitor — and I'm talking about 240Hz OLED displays offering glorious visuals.
With massive discounts such as this 49-inch Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 that's now $800 off at Best Buy and pocket-friendly deals including this 24-inch Acer Nitro KG241Y for just $109 at Amazon, there are plenty of gamer-ready displays I'd put in my basket.
As someone who tests monitors for a living, these are some of the best gaming monitors you can grab. From ultrawide beasts to panels with high refresh rates, give your gaming setup an upgrade and save while you're at it with these Memorial Day deals.
Oh, and if you're looking to match that monitor with a gaming rig, don't miss out on these gaming laptop deals.
This Acer Nitro KG241Y monitor is already a top pick for those looking to game on a budget, but this deal now brings it down to just $109. There's great value here for competitive gamers, including its 165Hz refresh rate, 1ms response rate and AMD FreeSync support. And with extremely thin bezels, this 24-inch (1920 x 1080) display is quite the looker. It isn't the most premium, but for just over $100, this is a fantastic, affordable option.
Samsung's Odyssey G4 is an excellent pick for high-level competitive play, and that's thanks to its 240Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time. It boasts a 27-inch (1920 x 1080) IPS panel with Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync support, along with two HDMI 2.0 and one DisplayPort 1.4. It's better for PC gamers, as current-gen console owners will want HDMI 2.1. However, with its $90 discount, it's hard to go wrong for high refresh rate action.
Looking for the next step up? That's where the Samsung Odyssey G5 comes in. Now $120 off the price, you can expect a 27-inch QHD (2560 x 1440) IPS display with a 180Hz refresh rate and 1ms response rate. That's ideal for competitive and stunning single-player titles alike, and you can expect the same Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync support to stop screen tearing.
A 43-inch 4K (3840 x 2160) display with a 144Hz refresh rate and 1ms response rate, now for just under $500? This Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 offers just that, featuring AMD FreeSync support and HDR10+. If you've got the space and enjoy big-screen gaming, this mighty fine panel will do the trick.
We're big fans of the LG UltraGear OLED 27, and now that it's $350 off, this is an easy recommendation. This 27-inch QHD (2560 x 1440) OLED panel delivers 240Hz refresh rates and 0.03ms response times, Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync support, DIsplay HDR400 Ture Black certification and excellent visuals. Beware, it doesn't get too bright, and if you lose its remote, then some features won't be available (so keep it close!).
If it's Alienware, you know it'll come with great gaming potential, at a high price. With this Alienware AW3225QF gaming monitor, though, it's now $300 off, and well worth checking out. It features a 32-inch 4K (3840 x 2160) OLED display with a 240Hz refresh rate and 0.03ms response rate, along with Nvidia G-Sync support. In our 4.5-star Alienware AW3225QF review, we adored its high-sped refresh rates and stunning visuals, and at this price, you will, too.
This extremely ultrawide Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 is still one of the best gaming monitors we've tested, with its crazy 49-inch dual-QHD (5120 x 1440) curved OLED display with a 32:9 aspect ratio, 240Hz refresh rate, 1800R curvature and 0.03ms response times. It's all you could want in a gaming monitor but make sure you have room on your desk to set it up. Along with its AMD FreeSync support, this gaming monitor is a dream, and it's now set at $999.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

USA Today

an hour ago

• USA Today

This TikTok-famous retro pink toothpaste is 15% off ahead of Prime Day

Get a brighter, fresher smile with the cult-favorite whitening toothpaste on sale at Amazon. If you've ever scrolled through TikTok lately, chances are you've seen the iconic pink tube of Euthymol Whitening Toothpaste. With its vintage-inspired packaging, bold minty flavor and cult following, this British-born toothpaste is making waves stateside. Right now, you can grab the Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste for up to 15% off on Amazon as part of the retailer's early Prime Day deals. Whether you're restocking your bathroom cabinet or want to try a new whitening toothpaste for summer 2025, this is the perfect opportunity to upgrade your oral care routine on a budget. Early Prime Day deal: Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste The Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste is trending on TikTok and 15% off ahead of Amazon Prime Day 2025. Save at Amazon today What makes the Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste so special? Euthymol isn't your average toothpaste. With a unique pink shade, it is immediately a more playful and fun toothpaste. But, it is backed by very serious results like offering visibly brighter teeth and fresher breath. Here are some highlights: Plus, it comes in a recyclable aluminum tube that is a great perk for eco-conscious shoppers. With over 120 years of oral care heritage, Euthymol has earned a loyal fanbase for its no-nonsense formula and retro charm. It's especially loved by those with sensitive gums, thanks to its gentle yet effective ingredients. What are the early Prime Day deals? Save up to 15% at Amazon The Prime Day sale starts on Tuesday, July 8 and will run through the end of day on Friday, July 11.

Chicago Tribune

an hour ago

• Chicago Tribune

How Senate Republicans want to change the tax breaks in Trump's big bill

WASHINGTON — House and Senate Republicans are taking slightly different approaches when it comes to the tax cuts that lawmakers are looking to include in their massive tax and spending cuts bill. Republicans in the two chambers don't agree on the size of a deduction for state and local taxes. And they are at odds on such things as allowing people to use their health savings accounts to help pay for their gym membership, or whether electric vehicle and hybrid owners should have to pay an annual fee. The House passed its version shortly before Memorial Day. Now the Senate is looking to pass its version. While the two bills are similar on the major tax provisions, how they work out their differences in the coming weeks will determine how quickly they can get a final product over the finish line. President Donald Trump is pushing to have the legislation on his desk by July 4th. Here's a look at some of the key differences between the two bills: The child tax credit currently stands at $2,000 per child. The House bill temporarily boosts the child tax credit to $2,500 for the 2025 through 2028 tax years, roughly the length of President Donald Trump's second term. It also indexes the credit amount for inflation beginning in 2027. The Senate bill provides a smaller, initial bump-up to $2,200, but the bump is permanent, with the credit amount indexed for inflation beginning next year. Trump promised on the campaign trail that he would seek to end income taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security benefits. Also, he would give car buyers a new tax break by allowing them to deduct the interest paid on auto loans. The House and Senate bills incorporate those promises with temporary deductions lasting from the 2025 through 2028 tax years, but with some differences. The House bill creates a deduction on tips for those working in jobs that have customarily received tips. The House also provides for a deduction for overtime that's equal to the amount of OT a worker has earned. The Senate bill comes with more restrictions. The deduction for tips is limited to $25,000 per taxpayer and the deduction for overtime is limited to $12,500 per taxpayer. The House and Senate bills both provide a deduction of up to $10,000 for interest paid on loans for vehicles made in the United States. And on Social Security, the bills don't directly touch the program. Instead, they grant a larger tax deduction for Americans age 65 and older. The House sets the deduction at $4,000. The Senate sets it at $6,000. Both chambers include income limits over which the new deductions begin to phase out. The caps on state and local tax deductions, known in Washington as the SALT cap, now stand at $10,000. The House bill, in a bid to win over Republicans from New York, California and New Jersey, lifts the cap to $40,000 per household with incomes of less than $500,000. The credit phases down for households earning more than $500,000. The Senate bill keeps the cap at $10,000. That's a non-starter in the House, but Republicans in the two chambers will look to negotiate a final number over the coming weeks that both sides can accept. The House bill prohibits states from establishing new provider taxes or increasing existing taxes. These are taxes that Medicaid providers, such as hospitals, pay to help states finance their share of Medicaid costs. In turn, the taxes allow states to receive increased federal matching funds while generally holding providers harmless through higher reimbursements that offset the taxes paid. Such taxes now are effectively capped at 6%. The Senate looks to gradually lower that threshold for states that have expanded their Medicaid populations under the Affordable Care Act, or 'Obamacare,' until it reaches 3.5% in 2031, with exceptions for nursing homes and intermediate care facilities. Industry groups have warned that limiting the ability of states to tax providers may lead to some states making significant cuts to their Medicaid programs as they make up for the lost revenue in other ways. The Medicaid provision could be a flashpoint in the coming House and Senate negotiations. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., was highly critical of the proposed Senate changes. 'This needs a lot of work. It's really concerning and I'm really surprised by it,' he said. 'Rural hospitals are going to be in bad shape.' The House bill would allow companies for five years to fully deduct equipment purchases and domestic research and development expenses. The Senate bill includes no sunset, making the tax breaks permanent, which was a key priority of powerful trade groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. Republicans in both chambers are looking to scale back the clean energy tax credits enacted through then-President Joe Biden's climate law. It aimed to boost the nation's transition away from planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions toward renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Under the Senate bill, the tax credits for clean energy and home energy efficiency would still be phased out, but less quickly than under the House bill. Still, advocacy groups fear that the final measure will threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs and drive up household energy costs. The House bill would allow millions of Americans to use their health savings accounts to pay for gym memberships, with a cap of $500 for single taxpayers and $1,000 for joint filers. The Senate bill doesn't include such a provision. The House reinstates a charitable deduction for non-itemizers of $150 per taxpayer. The Senate bill increases that deduction for donations to $1,000 per taxpayer. Republicans in the House bill included a new annual fee of $250 for EV owners and $100 for hybrid owners that would be collected by state motor vehicle departments. The Senate bill excludes the proposed fees.

Yahoo

2 hours ago

• Yahoo

Bosses want you to know AI is coming for your job

SAN FRANCISCO - Top executives at some of the largest American companies have a warning for their workers: Artificial intelligence is a threat to your job. CEOs from Amazon to IBM, Salesforce and JPMorgan Chase are telling their employees to prepare for disruption as AI either transforms or eliminates their jobs in the future. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. AI will 'improve inventory placement, demand forecasting and the efficiency of our robots,' Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said in a Tuesday public memo that predicted his company's corporate workforce will shrink 'in the next few years.' He joins a string of other top executives that have recently sounded the alarm about AI's impact in the workplace. Economists say there aren't yet strong signs that AI is driving widespread layoffs across industries. But there is evidence that workers across the United States are increasingly using AI in their jobs and the technology is starting to transform some roles such as computer programming, marketing and customer service. At the same time, CEOs are under pressure to show they are embracing new technology and getting results - incentivizing attention-grabbing predictions that can create additional uncertainty for workers. 'It's a message to shareholders and board members as much as it is to employees,' Molly Kinder, a Brookings Institution fellow who studies the impact of AI, said of the CEO announcements, noting that when one company makes a bold AI statement, others typically follow. 'You're projecting that you're out in the future, that you're embracing and adopting this so much that the footprint [of your company] will look different.' Some CEOs fear they could be ousted from their job within two years if they don't deliver measurable AI-driven business gains, a Harris Poll survey conducted for software company Dataiku showed. Tech leaders have sounded some of the loudest warnings - in line with their interest in promoting AI's power. At the same time, the industry has been shedding workers the last few years after big hiring sprees during the height of the coronavirus pandemic and interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve. At Amazon, Jassy told the company's workers that AI would in 'the next few years' reduce some corporate roles like customer service representatives and software developers, but also change work for those in the company's warehouses. IBM, which recently announced job cuts, said it replaced a couple hundred human resource workers with AI 'agents' for repetitive tasks such as onboarding and scheduling interviews. In January, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg suggested on Joe Rogan's podcast that the company is building AI that might be able to do what some human workers do by the end of the year. 'We, at Meta as well as the other companies working on this, are going to have an AI that can effectively be sort of a mid-level engineer at your company,' Zuckerberg said. 'Over time we'll get to the point where a lot of the code in our apps … is actually going to be built by AI engineers instead of people engineers.' Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, maker of the chatbot Claude, boldly predicted last month that half of all white-collar entry-level jobs may be eliminated by AI within five years. Leaders in other sectors have also chimed in. Marianne Lake, JPMorgan's CEO of consumer and community banking, told an investor meeting last month that AI could help the bank cut headcount in operations and account services by 10 percent. The CEO of BT Group Allison Kirkby suggested that advances in AI would mean deeper cuts at the British telecom company. Even CEOs who reject the idea of AI replacing humans on a massive scale are warning workers to prepare for disruption. Jensen Huang, CEO of AI chip designer Nvidia said last month, 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.' Google CEO Sundar Pichai said at Bloomberg's tech conference this month that AI will help engineers be more productive but that his company would still add more human engineers to its team. Meanwhile, Microsoft is planning more layoffs amid heavy investment in AI, Bloomberg reported this week. Other tech leaders at Shopify, Duolingo and Box have told workers they are now required to use AI at their jobs, and some will monitor usage as part of performance reviews. Some companies have indicated that AI could slow hiring. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff recently called Amodei's prognosis 'alarmist' on an earnings call, but on the same call chief operating and financial officer Robin Washington said that an AI agent has helped to reduce hiring needs and bring $50 million in savings. Despite corporate leaders' warnings, economists don't yet see broad signs that AI is driving humans out of work. 'We have little evidence of layoffs so far,' said Columbia Business School professor Laura Veldkamp, whose research explores how companies' use of AI affects the economy. 'What I'd look for are new entrants with an AI-intensive business model, entering and putting the existing firms out of business.' Some researchers suggest there is evidence AI is playing a role in the drop in openings for some specific jobs, like computer programming, where AI tools that generate code have become standard. Google's Pichai said last year that more than a quarter of new code at the company was initially suggested by AI. Many other workers are increasingly turning to AI tools, for everything from creating marketing campaigns to helping with research - with or without company guidance. The percentage of American employees who use AI daily has doubled in the last year to 8 percent, according to a Gallup poll released this week. Those using it at least a few times a week jumped from 12 percent to 19 percent. Some AI researchers say the poll may not actually reflect the total number of workers using AI as many may use it without disclosing it. 'I would suspect the numbers are actually higher,' said Ethan Mollick, co-director of Wharton School of Business' generative AI Labs, because some workers avoid disclosing AI usage, worried they would be seen as less capable or breaching corporate policy. Only 30 percent of respondents to the Gallup survey said that their company had general guidelines or formal policies for using AI. OpenAI's ChatGPT, one of the most popular chatbots, has more than 500 million weekly users around the globe, the company has said. It is still unclear what benefits companies are reaping from employees' use of AI, said Arvind Karunakaran, a faculty member of Stanford University's Center for Work, Technology, and Organization. 'Usage does not necessarily translate into value,' he said. 'Is it just increasing productivity in terms of people doing the same task quicker or are people now doing more high value tasks as a result?' Lynda Gratton, a professor at London Business School, said predictions of huge productivity gains from AI remain unproven. 'Right now, the technology companies are predicting there will be a 30% productivity gain. We haven't yet experienced that, and it's not clear if that gain would come from cost reduction … or because humans are more productive.' The pace of AI adoption is expected to accelerate even further if more companies use advanced tools such as AI agents and they deliver on their promise of automating work, Mollick said. AI labs are hoping to prove their agents are reliable within the next year or so, which will be a bigger disrupter to jobs, he said. While the debate continues over whether AI will eliminate or create jobs, Mollick said 'the truth is probably somewhere in between.' 'A wave of disruption is going to happen,' he said. Related Content 3-pound puppy left in trash is rescued, now thriving How to meet street cats around the world 'Jaws' made people fear sharks. 50 years later, can it help save them?