Little Rock radio stations weighing programming future amid Trump's cuts to public broadcasting like NPR, PBS
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – Under President Donald Trump's executive order that was signed last Thursday it restricts federal funding from going to the national organizations of National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System.
For local public radio stations here in Little Rock like KUAR and KLRE, their funding could be impacted by the grants that are issued from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
'Most stations use that grant to pay for programming and the bulk of our programming comes from NPR,' Little Rock Public Radio General Manager Jonathan Seaborn said.
Arkansas PBS executive director leaving position in May
Restrictions on funding handed down by the Trump administration, Seaborn said, would mean they would still receive money from the CPB, but it would not be used to pay for programming.
'We would have to figure out in our budget what to use those funds from CPB for,' Seaborn said. 'Because there are still restrictions.'
Seaborn said a certain percentage of those funds would have to be used for national programming, potentially leaving the door open for the station to pay for programming from American Public Media or Public Radio Exchange, but they could not be used for NPR programming directly.
The bulk of the station's budget, for the most part, comes from small dollar donations from their members. Making up 50 to 60 percent of the money they take in.
GOP push for cuts to NPR, PBS gains steam but some are skeptical
Seaborn said they receive around $160,000 in federal funding annually which makes up 10 percent of their budget. He also said the station has already received their money for the fiscal year and they wouldn't be impacted until the next fiscal year.
'Whether we could or couldn't spend that money,' Seaborn said. 'We've seen impoundment with other organizations and if something like that happens with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting that would impact when we would get those funds and how we spend them.'
If things 'got tight' and the station struggled to collect donations to support programming the decisions on programming cuts, services and affiliations would all be on the table, Seaborn said.
'They all have degrees of pain, some of them very painful, some not as much but it is currently a season of planning,' Seaborn said.
Trump-backed GOP effort targets federal funding for NPR, PBS
Seaborn said if a funding cut was handed down, the station would be left to decide which shows audiences respond the best to as to which they could not afford to cut, outside of their anchor core shows.
The complications for stations like KUAR, Seaborn said, is then filling the time on-air for a show that they would no longer be able to support without the federal grant funding.
'I guess we could run repeats, but then there's a lot less of a value to our listener if you're hearing the same programming,' Seaborn said.
Trump executive order directs Corporation for Public Broadcasting to cut funding to NPR, PBS
As the station strategizes for any potential shortfalls in funding, over the short and long term and to keep the 'quality and frequency' of programming Seaborn said they're going to need to 'look to our members to make up that gap.'
'Beyond that we would be looking into any opportunities for corporate support, whether that's underwriting, show sponsorship whatever it may be,' Seaborn said.
Seaborn said roughly 20 percent of NPR stations across the nation serve a community where they are the only local new stations available. So if, or when, these cuts go through some communities, he said, would be left with no local public radio news.
'Corporation for Public Broadcasting funds are weighted,' Seaborn said. 'While we may receive ten percent of our budget from CPB, those rural small stations are receiving 20 to 30 percent of their budget through CPB.'
With public broadcasters pressured by the Trump administration, PBS shuts down its diversity office
Seaborn said donations from the public will be critical this next year, and he encourages anyone interested in joining their push to stay on air to Protect My Public Media. An organization that provides tools, resources and an outlet for advocacy for public media broadcasting stations.
'NPR exists to be free to all and to serve that public, but it needs donations to survive and I'm aware there are people who can give large amounts and there's people who are giving five dollars and it's just as meaningful and just as helpful,' Seaborn said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TACO Trump Punts Decision on Bombing Iran in Wild New Twist
President Donald Trump will decide whether to attack Iran within the next two weeks, and has issued a plea to stave off the backlash in his MAGA base: Trust in Trump. As a MAGA civil war over military intervention threatens to tear his party apart, the president has left the door open to a diplomatic off-ramp. 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' he said, in a direct message issued through his White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt. The unexpected twist is reminiscent of the two week window Trump regularly gives Russia to start negotiating a genuine ceasefire with Ukraine. It comes after the president left the nation on edge for days about the possibility that he would help Israel destroy a deeply buried nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow, in northeast Iran, using a 30,000 pound bomb known as a 'bunker buster'. Trump gave numerous mixed messages, insisting the strikes could be imminent and saying it was 'too late' to talk while also insisting that there was scope for negotiations. On Wednesday, he even boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran. Tensions escalated this week when he abruptly departed the G7—despite having meetings locked with global allies including Australia and India—to rush to Washington to deal with the issue. For the next three days, he then huddled with his national security advisers to decide whether the U.S. military helps Israel's bombing campaign. But such a move would risk any remaining chance of the nuclear disarmament deal Trump has been pursuing and threatened to tear apart the very base that got him elected. The MAGA civil war over the Iran put conservatives such as pro-Israel war hawks Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk, Steve Bannon and Jack Posobiec on the other. 'We can't have another Iraq,' Bannon warned at a breakfast with reporters hosted Wednesday by The Christian Science Monitor. Earlier today, he was spotted at the White House but Leavitt declined to say what he was doing there. The issue also spilled out onto screens this week, with conservative pundit Tucker Carlson—who accused the president of being 'complicit' in the Middle East conflict—skewering Texas Senator Ted Cruz over his support for regime change. Asked what the president would say to those who voted for his 'America First' doctrine and didn't want the nation involved in another foreign war, Leavitt replied: 'Trust in President Trump.' 'President Trump kept America and the world safe in his first term as president, implementing a 'peace through strength' foreign policy agenda,' she said. 'With respect to Iran, nobody should be surprised by the President's position that Iran absolutely cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. He's been absolutely unequivocal about this.' Trump's announcement was immediately mocked online. One critic on social media described it as 'beyond parody' while another joked: 'He's going to announce it during Infrastructure Week when the healthcare plan comes out.' Leavitt was also quizzed about the issue in the briefing room, with one reporter noting that Trump had regularly given Russia two week deadlines on Ukraine, with no outcome. However, she blamed the Biden administration, saying both were complicated global conflicts that the president had inherited.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Boasts ‘Nobody Knows What I'm Doing' as MAGA Civil War Rages
President Donald Trump has boasted that 'nobody knows what I'm doing' when it comes to Iran as a MAGA civil war rages over the prospect of a U.S. military attack. Speaking with reporters for the first time since meeting with his national security council on Tuesday, the president refused to say whether the U.S. is moving closer to helping Israel strike Iranian nuclear facilities. 'You don't seriously think I'm going to answer that question,' Trump said, mockingly. 'Will you strike the Iranian nuclear component, and what time exactly? Sir, sir, would you strike it? Will you please inform us so we can be there and watch? 'I mean, you don't know that I'm going to even do it. You don't know. I may do it; I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' Trump's comments come as a MAGA civil war has been brewing for days between pro-Israel war hawks such as Laura Loomer and Mark Levin on one side, and America First firebrands such as Charlie Kirk and Jack Posobiec on the other. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson also entered the fray last week, calling Trump complicit and suggesting that the administration 'drop Israel [and] let them fight their own wars.' Carlson also clashed with Texas Senator Ted Cruz this week, lashing out over Cruz's support for military intervention in Iran despite his apparent lack of knowledge about the country. While a U.S. attack on Iran could have serious consequences for the region, Trump's rhetoric has shifted considerably in recent days, with the president admitting that his patience is wearing thin on finding a diplomatic solution to stop Iran from building its nuclear arsenal. On Wednesday, Iran Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hit back at the president for his 'absurd rhetoric' after Trump demanded Iran's 'complete surrender' and issued an ominous warning on X: 'The US entering this matter (war) is 100% to its own detriment. The damage will be far greater than any harm that Iran may encounter.' But Trump doubled down on his push for Iran to surrender, telling reporters that Tehran should have negotiated weeks ago. Only now were they rethinking their strategy, he said. 'They even suggested coming to the White House,' he claimed. A U.S. defense official told the Daily Beast it was moving the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group to the Middle East to protect U.S. forces in the region. Vice President JD Vance also posted on X that after showing 'remarkable restraint,' Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment.' As the president weighed options, some Democrats on Capitol Hill called for Congress to act. Senator Tim Kaine introduced a resolution to prevent the U.S. from using military force against Iran without congressional approval while several others backed Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders' bill to prevent the use of funds for military force against Iran without congressional authorization. But Democrats were deeply divided over the response to Iran. Senator John Fetterman, who has often bucked his party to fiercely defend Israel, said he would vote against Kaine's resolution. He told reporters he was a 'hell yes' on the U.S. making preemptive strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. Senate Majority Leader John Thune rejected that the president would need authorization from Congress to strike Iran. 'I think right now the president's within his authorities,' Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. 'He obviously has a lot of authorities as Commander in Chief to respond to incidents that happen around the world.' Thune said if it goes on for a period of time, there would be discussions on what the role of Congress should be and whether it needed to take action. 'I think right now, let's hope and pray for the best outcome,' he said. Senate Foreign Committee Chair Jim Risch emphasized on Tuesday 'this is not our war' and praised the president for threading the needle when it came to Iran. While the House is not in session this week, in a rare moment of bipartisanship, Republican Rep. Thomas Massie was joined by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna to introduce a resolution to prohibit the U.S. from getting involved in the conflict. 'This is not our war,' Massie wrote in a post. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.'
Bloomberg
32 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Pakistan Backs Trump for Nobel Peace Prize He's Long Craved
Pakistan said it will nominate US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, a move that may have as much to do with annoying rival India as it does with building stronger ties to Washington. The recommendation is being made for Trump's 'decisive intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis,' according to a social media post on Saturday by Pakistan's government.
