Maha's mega energy move: 38 GW green capacity, 7 lakh jobs

Mumbai: Maharashtra is spearheading India's clean energy revolution under Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis' leadership with an ambitious plan to add 38 GW of renewable capacity by 2030.
The Chief Minister's office in a post on X on Monday said, "Backed by ₹3.3 lakh crore in investments and 7 lakh new jobs, the state is blending affordability with sustainability. This is more than a transition, it's a blueprint for inclusive, green growth!"
The CMO quoted the article written by the Energy Department's Additional Chief Secretary Abha Shukla.
"India's electricity demand is rising rapidly. By 2030, driven by economic growth, industrialisation, and population pressure, the country's power consumption is expected to touch unprecedented levels. In this context, Maharashtra's approach stands out as a powerful example of how forward-thinking policy and long-term vision can turn a challenge into an opportunity," read the article.
It added that as India's largest industrial and power-consuming state, Maharashtra is expected to witness a 6.5 per cent annual increase in power demand. That translates to a requirement of more than 280 billion units of electricity by 2030, with peak demand jumping from the current 29 GW to 45 GW - a scale comparable to that of major European nations.
To meet this challenge, Maharashtra has formulated a practical, future-ready
energy transition plan
. Its goal is clear: affordable electricity, clean energy, and sustainable growth.
At the heart of this transition is a strong push for 38 GW of renewable energy (16 GW distributed RE for agriculture) with storage (pump storage and distributed battery storage ), solar and wind hybrid energy, with tariff commitments as low as ₹2.54 per unit for solar energy. This is not just a clean energy initiative - it is also a cost-saving move.
Lower production costs mean cheaper power for industries, which in turn enhances their global competitiveness. It is a smart economic strategy cloaked in environmental foresight.
The broader transition plan is expected to attract investments worth ₹3.3 lakh crore by 2030. Significantly, 75 per cent of this investment will be within Maharashtra and will be largely driven by the private sector. This scale of capital infusion promises to reshape the energy ecosystem and, in turn, the economy, it said.
For India to remain competitive in the global energy and manufacturing markets, it must deliver power that is not just clean but also affordable and reliable.
Maharashtra recognises this. By focusing on lower input costs through clean energy, the state is creating an environment where both MSMEs and large industries can thrive.
In addition, the state's investments in transmission networks and energy storage infrastructure are aimed at reducing wastage and ensuring that every unit of generated renewable power is efficiently utilised. These steps are critical to making the grid stable, attracting private participation, and preventing the kind of power curtailment issues seen in some developed markets like Germany, it said.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Hindu

an hour ago

• The Hindu

Grievance redress gets boost with tech, community camps: CM Rekha Gupta

Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Sunday (June 22, 2025) said the Delhi Government is adopting hi-tech systems and increasing direct engagement with citizens to address public grievances more effectively. Asserting that resolving citizens' complaints was her administration's 'core commitment', Ms. Gupta said the Delhi government was implementing Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'vision of transparent, time-bound governance'. 'To resolve issues efficiently, problems are being addressed in public hearing centers under the leadership of the District Magistrates (DMs) on weekends. A 24x7 Public Grievance Monitoring System (PGMS) is also operational,' the Chief Minister stated. Public outreach According to the Chief Minister's Office (CMO), on her directions, jan sunwayi (public hearing) camps are now being held every weekend across all 11 revenue districts. These camps are chaired by DMs and attended by senior officials from various departments, including the Municipal Corporation and Delhi Police. 'To make the process more citizen-friendly, these hearings are being held in community spaces such as schools, local chaupals, and banquet halls rather than restricting them to government offices,' the CMO said. In these camps, officials attempt to resolve grievances on the spot. Unresolved matters are referred to the departments concerned for timely follow-up. The hearings also see the participation of local MLAs, municipal councillors, Resident Welfare Associations, and residents. 'Over 600 citizens attended the most recent weekend camps. Earlier, 1,260 people participated on May 17 and over 1,350 on May 24. These are more than grievance redressal events. They reflect a commitment towards listening and acting promptly,' said the CMO in a statement. Last month, the Chief Minister instructed the installation of 'complaint and suggestion' boxes at the offices of DMs, Sub-District Magistrates, and Sub-Registrars. The CMO will monitor the input received. She also asked officials to draft a plan for receiving complaints via WhatsApp, mobile apps, and toll-free numbers, especially after reports that the existing portal for filing service-related complaints had become unreliable. Last month, Ms. Gupta directed officials to attend District Development Committee (DDC) meetings, chaired by MLAs, and ensure their presence at the jan sunwayi camps. Chief Minister Gupta said she also makes it a point to meet citizens personally at her residence to address their issues directly. 'Public trust is our greatest strength. Our government is alert, compassionate, and committed to resolving every issue. We are enacting Prime Minister Modi's belief that governance should be about service, not control. We are fully committed to serving the people with accountability,' she said. Responding to the CM's remarks, the Aam Aadmi Party said in a statement, 'The people of Delhi are fed up. From skyrocketing school fees to jhuggi demolitions, power cuts, water shortages, and waterlogging, Delhiites are hitting the streets in protest.' The party claimed that the people of Delhi are fondly recalling the previous Arvind Kejriwal-led government's effective governance. 'In contrast, the BJP is running a clueless administration. What's the point of the BJP's jan sunwai drama when not a single problem is actually being solved on the ground?' it said.

Indian Express

an hour ago

• Indian Express

India wary about Iran's nuclear project: Voted against in 2005, abstained in 2024

Almost 20 years after India voted against Iran's nuclear programme for the first time, Delhi's careful balancing act — between Israel and the US on one side and Iran on the other side — has come into play. While India has always tried to walk the diplomatic tightrope walk, its discomfort over Iran with a nuclear weapon was apparent then. On September 24, 2005, India voted with 21 other countries on the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) resolution (GOV/2005/77) which found Iran in non-compliance with its safeguards agreement. This was seen as a departure from the past, as India had voted with the US and the western bloc against Iran, which was in its extended neighbourhood and with whom it has a historical and civilisational relationship. This was the time when India had just started negotiating its agreement with the US on its civilian nuclear programme, and Washington was able to lean on Delhi to vote against Tehran. Delhi, which was keen to portray its responsible behaviour as a nuclear power, went along with the idea that voting against Iran's nuclear programme would burnish its reputation. However, the resolution did not refer the matter immediately to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), and India was one of the countries which urged the western bloc of European countries — UK, France and Germany (EU-3) — to keep the issue at the IAEA. According to Indian officials, India voted for the resolution at that time, against the majority of NAM members who abstained, because it felt obligated to do so after having pressured the EU-3 to omit reference to immediate referral to the UNSC. Months later, on February 4, 2006, India again sided with the US when the IAEA Board of Governors voted to refer Iran's non-compliance to the UNSC. 'As a signatory to the NPT, Iran has the legal right to develop peaceful uses of nuclear energy consistent with its international commitments and obligations… (But) it is incumbent upon Iran to exercise these rights in the context of safeguards that it has voluntarily accepted upon its nuclear programme under the IAEA,' then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told Parliament on February 17, 2006. Over the years, as India negotiated the nuclear deal with the US, Delhi came out of the pressure to vote against Tehran as the issue went to the UNSC. Sources said that once the matter went to the UNSC, India did not have to take any position on Iran's nuclear programme between 2007 and 2024. In between, the US administration under President Barack Obama negotiated the JCPOA (joint comprehensive plan of action) with Iran in 2015 — which was a deal between P-5+1 and Iran. US President Donald Trump walked out of the JCPOA in 2017, and Iran's nuclear programme once again came under scrutiny. India was forced to stop oil imports from Iran, although its Chabahar port project development was going on. While it did not have to take any firm position against Iran's nuclear programme, that changed last year when the US brought in a resolution against Iran. In June 2024, India abstained from a vote at the IAEA regarding Iran. The vote, initiated by the US, aimed to censure Iran for its nuclear programme. While the resolution passed, with 19 out of 35 board members voting to censure Iran, India was among the 16 countries that abstained. This decision reflected India's balancing act between its deep defence and security relationship with Israel and its historical ties with Iran. In September 2024, India again abstained from voting on a resolution at the IAEA Board of Governors that censured Iran for its lack of cooperation with the agency's investigations into its nuclear programme. The resolution, brought by France, the UK, and Germany (E3) along with the US, followed an IAEA report noting Iran's increased uranium enrichment. In June this year too, India abstained on the IAEA Board of Governors' resolution strongly criticising Iran's nuclear programme and declaring it in breach of its 1974 Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. This time, India's decision to abstain from the vote reflected its balanced stance — recognising Iran's right to pursue a peaceful nuclear energy programme while calling upon Tehran to adhere to its non-proliferation commitments. While the change, from voting against to abstention, marks Delhi's shifting positions as geopolitical alignments changed, India's concern about the Iranian nuclear programme was evident. Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor at The Indian Express, has been a journalist for more than 25 years now. Roy joined The Indian Express in October 2003 and has been reporting on foreign affairs for more than 17 years now. Based in Delhi, he has also led the National government and political bureau at The Indian Express in Delhi — a team of reporters who cover the national government and politics for the newspaper. He has got the Ramnath Goenka Journalism award for Excellence in Journalism '2016. He got this award for his coverage of the Holey Bakery attack in Dhaka and its aftermath. He also got the IIMCAA Award for the Journalist of the Year, 2022, (Jury's special mention) for his coverage of the fall of Kabul in August 2021 — he was one of the few Indian journalists in Kabul and the only mainstream newspaper to have covered the Taliban's capture of power in mid-August, 2021. ... Read More

Indian Express

2 hours ago

• Indian Express

Hervé Delphin at Idea Exchange: ‘EU-India is not just a relationship, it's become a tangible commodity'

Hervé Delphin, EU Ambassador to India, on how the EU-India partnership has made global ties more compelling and where Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Iran conflicts are headed. The session was moderated by Shubhajit Roy, Diplomatic Editor, The Indian Express. Shubhajit Roy: In the context of India-EU relationship, how do you see the journey of two-and-a-half decades? The EU and India have had a long journey. We established relations in 1962 and in 2004, we formally established a strategic partnership. At the time, the world was rather flat, now it's a different environment. We are today the largest trading bloc and partner of India. It's close to $200 billion in goods and services. We've been converging in our assessment of security, as well. The Indo-Pacific and the Indian Ocean are cases in point. We also have been converging people to people. Last year, there were about over 1 million visa applications of Indians to Europe, with an approval rate of 85 per cent. You also have an expanded footprint of European companies in India, about 6,000. Likewise, you've got more Indian companies investing in Europe. So what I see is this multi-layered relationship. The EU College of Commissioners visit in February helped to break the last hesitations that may have been there on both sides. Can we really trust each other? You know that in politics, even though you advance your relations, trust is the rarest commodity. So, we are now in what I would call a year cycle. If you consider that the College visit was the starting point, the end point will be the EU-India Summit in Delhi in about a year. The EU and India together represent 25 per cent of world GDP and 25 per cent of world population. It sends out a message to the rest of the world that we are two partners invested in looking at the world through the lens of cooperative engagement and cooperative multipolarism. It's not just a relationship, it's become a tangible commodity. Shubhajit Roy: One of the key elements that the two sides decided to work on was defence and security partnerships. What are the next steps going forward? The key pillars of this new strategic agenda are trade and economy, security and defence, technology, mobility and global partnerships, including connectivity. Arguably, security and defence were not so much in the landscape a few years ago. But, now we are a continent at war. There is an aggressor that decided to launch a war of choice on a sovereign country which is really a European neighbour. And that sent shockwaves through our system. In security and defence, the EU collectively has increased its expenditures by 30 per cent, between 2021 and 2024. Now it's about $350 billion. Looking at strategic and defence partnerships, the authorisation to have one with India is on the table of the Council and we are confident that will be authorised. This is what I call the political pathway. Shubhajit Roy: The Trade and Technology Council (TTC) is a new mechanism between India and the EU. Is there a possibility of technological transfer or partnership? If FTA (free trade agreement) is the game changer in terms of creating the environment, TTC is the upscaler. What the College visit to India has meant is a sharper focus on certain key supply chains, semiconductors, AI, space and biotech. Arguably, some of them are dual use. But what we are working on with India is really on the civilian part. The EU has a 300 billion plan called Invest AI and we are keen to develop cooperation. The human-centred approach of AI resonates quite well with the EU approach. We have differences, but I think there is a norm. Shubhajit Roy: What are the differences? It has to do with the ecosystem. It's the way you sort of leverage your own champions, the way you develop your ecosystem. We probably have a similar concern that big tech defines the rules of the game. But harnessing the different elements of our respective ecosystems and understanding the kind of protocols we are developing is interesting. Shubhajit Roy: On the FTA, how close or far are India and EU from concluding this particular agreement? This is the only way to bring the two economic constituencies together. It would, probably, be the largest-ever FTA India will conclude. For the EU, it's more or less the same. Since we are at different levels of development, the complexity of the negotiation is significant. There is so much determination on both sides to have it done. Just look at the pace of negotiating rounds. The next one is on July 7 in Brussels. Shubhajit Roy: The UK has beaten the EU on the FTA with India. The US is saying it will conclude it within the next month or so, before July 9. Is the EU lagging behind? Is it a race? Honestly, I prefer to be slower but bring larger goodies than being fast and having a small bag. What is important is not about being fast and furious, but resolute and substantial, for both constituencies. Europeans are not necessarily the sexiest or the most fun, but we are steady. We are reliable, we are predictable, and these days, these kinds of qualities have a higher value than before. So indeed, we may be a bit slower, we are a bit bureaucratic, we are not shining, but at the end of the day, we deliver. And all the FTAs we have signed have delivered positively for both sides. We are not in a zero-sum game, we are in a positive-sum game. And that is characteristic of our FTAs. On Israel-Iran conflict | Israel has a right to protect itself. That they have taken this rather dramatic action is serious. The only way to bring us away from the brink is the diplomatic track. But the onus is on Iran Shubhajit Roy: How confident are you that the US negotiations will lead to an agreement between Russia and Ukraine to end the war? The EU has made its position very clear. We support President (Donald) Trump's efforts for a ceasefire. But what has become abundantly clear is that Russia is stalling and is not engaging seriously and earnestly in any peace arrangement. They want to stay. For us, this is in blatant violation of the UN charter and it represents a threat to our security interests. So, if there is a serious peace process that is in place, we will engage. And, of course, we want the Ukrainians to be part. This is where the initiative of President Trump has created a space. But what we've seen in the last month is that Russia doesn't come to the table or comes to the table with deflecting arguments. We will continue to support peace efforts and Ukraine's right to defend itself. There's 135 billion Euro worth of assistance that have been channelled towards Ukraine, micro-financial assistance, humanitarian aid, military assistance. We will continue to try to degrade the war economy of Russia. We had the 18th package that has just been presented. And we believe that these sanctions are biting. Rakesh Sinha: You are well-versed in Middle Eastern affairs. Where is the Iran-Israel conflict headed? The sober lesson for anyone working with the Middle East is: It's always the same, but every time it's getting worse. This is really bringing us to the brink. The EU is also part of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), an agreement that offered a framework to address the single-most concerning issue of Iran developing a nuclear programme for military purposes. Sadly, Iran has not used that framework to ensure its compliance with the International Atomic Energy Agency, with the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and has shown no respect for the benchmarks that have been set. It's Iran who closed the door on diplomacy and put itself in this situation. Now, clearly, the window for diplomacy has narrowed. It doesn't mean that this should not be tried. The EU statement, at G7, was clear that Iran has to get back to the negotiating table. Israel took action. This is a fact. We have stated very clearly that Israel has a right to protect itself. That they have taken this rather dramatic action is serious. The only way to bring us away from the brink is the diplomatic track. But the onus is on Iran. Ravi Dutta Mishra: Under the EU's 18th sanctions package on Russia, Europe has decided to stop importing refined Russian petroleum via third countries. India exported over $20 billion worth of refined petroleum to the EU in FY24. What is your take on India-EU relations in light of these sanctions? When the EU decided to take action against Russia through sanctions, they were designed to minimise the impact on fuel, fertilisers, and food. We wanted the sanctions to affect Russia, not others. That's why we imposed a price cap on oil rather than a ban. India is a net importer of oil, and we never blamed India for importing Russian crude. However, when it comes to refined products derived from Russian crude oil, perhaps, economic operators acted opportunistically. But from the EU's perspective, our policy has always been clear: we will not import Russian oil, whether crude or refined. These sanctions are not directed against India; they are part of a blanket policy. Those who made money during these years — good for them — but this opportunity will no longer exist. Ravi Dutta Mishra: Europe and Indian negotiators are talking about carbon tax. Will there be a middle ground? I have come to discover that Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is one of the most-known acronyms in India. First, CBAM is not a trade measure. It is not part of trade and FTA. It's about compliance with our climate agenda to accelerate decarbonisation. It applies to our European economic actors. This is a societal and political choice of the EU. If you want to do business in Europe, you cannot import carbon. On Russia-Ukraine conflict | We support President Trump's efforts for a ceasefire. But what is clear is that Russia is stalling and is not engaging seriously and earnestly in any peace arrangement. They want to stay We reached out to Indian businesses last year, to medium and small enterprises. They will now have what they called a mass volume. Instead of going through every single transaction, it'll be treated in bulk. You have a sort of mass, 50 tons of carbon, when you are below that, you don't do anything. We also heard that Indian businesses see decarbonisation as the way forward. No one wants to be stuck in a high-carbon content industry because it's a story of the past, it's not the story of the future. What you see in India is actually a very bullish approach with technological solutions that will help decarbonisation. Nikhil Ghanekar: A few weeks ago, Commerce minister (Piyush) Goyal spoke about a retaliatory tariff to this non-barrier tariff. Would you like to weigh in on what he said on CBAM, that he won't accept it and there will be retaliation? The EU will not carry out exceptions for anyone. On one end, we have the FTA and on the other end, we have CBAM, an instrument of acceleration of decarbonisation. We are truly impressed by what India is doing in decarbonising its economy and its industry. Not any people realise the kind of challenges India is facing in ramping up and developing its economy while at the same time decarbonising. The leader of a big cement company in India was explaining to me how he's developing or importing a technology to ensure that his cement will have 60 per cent less carbon content. I'm quite confident that India will embrace the path of decarbonisation and it will do great. Rinku Ghosh: You are looking to expand your trade volume with India and make it an alternative supply chain. China is one of your biggest trade partners, so are their anxieties about the India-China dynamic? China is one of our largest trade partners. But it's a trade which runs with over $300 billion deficit. And that is a cause of concern for the EU, the same way India has over $100 billion trade deficit with China. So we're engaging and expecting concrete deeds from China to rebalance the market distortion. The second talking point with China is its support to Russia in the war. We are telling them that it cannot be business as usual if these two things are not addressed. In parallel, we are in the business of increasing diversification because every shock we have faced in the past has shown that whether Covid or wars or China, it is not a good policy to be over-dependent on one single provider. This is also a positive element in the EU-India equation. If India can ramp up the production of photovoltaic panels, of legacy microchips at competitive prices, the world will be better for everyone. Saptarshi Basak: Why does the West not hold Netanyahu to the same standard as Vladimir Putin? As Ambassador, I can only stand by the statements that have been made by the EU. We have not condoned or encouraged these strikes. The fact that Israel, on its own, has decided to strike Iran and precisely because of the consequential nature of these strikes, makes the case for diplomacy even more compelling. This is the single-most important objective today. It's not about qualifying the actions of one or the other, it's really to bring diplomacy on track. On India-EU FTA I prefer to be slower but bring larger goodies than being fast and having a small bag. All the FTAs we have signed have delivered positively for both sides. We are in a positive-sum game Arjun Sengupta: What do you think of the situation in Gaza? Is Europe in some way complicit with Israel's actions? The concerns expressed by the EU regarding the plight of the Palestinian population in the Gaza Strip, is clear, which is repeatedly engaging with Israel, directly discussing with the US to ask Israel to be compliant with international humanitarian law. There is a Foreign Affairs Council shortly, where there will be a review on whether Israel has been compliant with international law. At this point in time, what I can say for sure is that the dramatic developments in Gaza have been fully registered, and for the first time, the question of the suspension of the association agreement between the EU and Israel is on the table, but the first step is the review of evidence. Shubhajit Roy: On the India-Pakistan tensions last month, how concerned were you then and now about any possible sort of escalation in future? On the EU side, there is an understanding of Operation Sindoor as a consequence to the act of terror, of abject attack on civilians. And the way this terror attack was conducted, it was not just to take lives but to inflict pain and create ground for polarisation. The EU recognises India's right to defend itself and are engaging to bring the parties to a ceasefire. We are not in the business of mediation. We are passing on the message that the risk of escalation has to be considered. Now it's for the two parties to engage, to find ways to bring the situation to a level of stability that can benefit not only the two countries but also the region. We have relations with India which are profound, dense, strategic and forward-looking. We also have relations with Pakistan which are certainly not on the same level. We just had a dialogue with Pakistan on non-proliferation, on security and are engaging with them in the fight against terrorism.