From Santa Claus to Adolf Hitler: See full list of baby names banned in the US

If you're searching for a unique baby name that sets your child apart, the U.S. offers plenty of creative freedom, but not without limits. While the United States is generally more lenient than many countries regarding naming conventions, certain restrictions still apply. State laws may vary depending on where you live, with some enforcing stricter rules than others.
Also Read: TikToker Khabane 'Khaby' Lame arrested by ICE, being held at Henderson Detention Center: Report
The restrictions on baby names can vary from state to state. For example, according to the law in California, the birth certificates in the state can only include names with letters from the 26 alphabet. This means names that include accents, tildes, and umlauts will not be accepted. In December 2024, State Assemblywoman Blanca Pacheco introduced legislation aimed at tightening naming policies on birth certificates.
Across the U.S., some jurisdictions already restrict certain names deemed inappropriate or problematic. According to U.S. Birth Certificates, a private service that helps applicants obtain official documents, several names have been ruled illegal in various states. These include:-
King
Queen
Jesus Christ
III
Santa Claus
Majesty
Adolf Hitler
Messiah
@
1069
Also Read: Big Lots is back: Is your local store among 219 reopened this year? See list
According to The Guardian, Japan recently introduced a ban on keeping 'shiny' or 'glittery' baby names, which means names that have an unusual pronunciation. According to CNN, these names can include anything from Pikachu to Nike.
Other countries have taken similar steps to regulate unusual baby names. According to USbirthcertificates.com, New Zealand has banned names like 'Sex Fruit,' while Mexico has prohibited names such as 'Robocop' to protect children from potential ridicule or harm.
Other names banned in various countries across the world include:
Sarah (Morocco)
Osama bin Laden (Germany)
Metallica (Sweden)
Cyanide (United Kingdom)
007 (Malaysia)
BRFXXCCXXMNPCCCCLLLMMNPRXVCLMNCKSSQLBB11116 (Sweden)
Prince William (France)
Quran (China)
Judas (Switzerland)
Devil (Japan)
Blue (Italy)

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Mint

10 hours ago

• Mint

AI meets adult content: THIS platform is a ‘lovechild between OnlyFans and OpenAI'

Ever since OpenAI introduced the general world to the many possibilities of artificial intelligence (AI), developers have been experimenting with ways the technology can change the overall user experience. In one such experiment, a start-up with over 2,00,000 users in the United States, brought together the endlessness of AI and fame, and merged it with the "spicy fantasies" of OnlyFans users. OhChat, a platform its creator described as the 'lovechild between OnlyFans and OpenAI,' uses artificial intelligence to build lifelike digital duplicates of public figures. These AI avatars of adult content celebrities don't eat, sleep or breathe, but 'remember you, desire you and never log off'. In an interview with CNN, OhChat CEO Nic Young said goes a step further than platforms such as OnlyFans, where users pay to gain access to adult content from content creators. Once activated, the avatars run autonomously, offering 'infinite personalised content' for subscribers. OhChat 'is an incredibly powerful tool, and tools can be used however the human behind it wants to be used,' he said. 'We could use this in a really scary way, but we're using it in a really, I think, good, exciting way.' Young told CNN that OhChat works on a tiered subscription model wherein a user pays $4.99 ( ₹ 430) per month for unlimited texts on demand, $9.99 ( ₹ 865) for capped access to voice notes and images, or $29.99 ( ₹ 2,600) for unlimited VIP interaction. According to Young, platform creators receive an 80 per cent cut from the revenue their AI avatar generates. OhChat keeps the remaining 20 per cent. 'You have literally unlimited passive income without having to do anything again,' Young told CNN. Since launching OhChat in October 2024, the company has signed 20 creators, including 'Baywatch' actress Carmen Electra, and former British glamour model Katie Price – Jordan. Some of the creators are already earning thousands of dollars per month, Young said. Nic Young said that to build a digital twin, OhChat asks its creators to submit 30 images of themselves and speak to a bot for 30 minutes. The platform can then generate the digital replica 'within hours' using Meta's large language model. For example, the AI avatar of Jordan is trained to mimic her voice, appearance and mannerisms. She can 'sext' users, send voice notes and images, and provide on-demand intimacy at scale – all without her lifting a finger. The platform was categorised with their AI avatars on an internal scale to rank the intensity and explicitness of their interactions. Creators contributing to the platform decide which level their avatar will be.

Indian Express

15 hours ago

• Indian Express

‘Jaws' turns 50: How the film fuelled ‘decimation of shark population'

'[A] tiger shark's like a garbage can, it'll eat anything.' '[T]he thing about a shark, he's got… lifeless eyes, black eyes, like a doll's eyes. When he comes at ya, doesn't seem to be livin'… until he bites ya… then you hear that terrible high-pitch screamin', the ocean turns red, and spite of all the poundin' and the hollerin', they all come in and they… rip you to pieces.' It was descriptions like these in Steven Spielberg's Jaws, released 50 years ago on June 20, 1975, which had an enduring influence on the public perception of sharks, especially great whites. The portrayal of these creatures as bloodthirsty, man-eating monsters petrified audiences for decades, the movie's tagline — 'Don't go in the water' — etched in people's psyche. While Jaws, based on the eponymous book by Peter Benchley, was credited for ushering in the era of summer blockbusters, it has contributed to a sharp decline in the population of sharks. The movie's popularity led to an increase in hunting of the animal, both formally and informally. The number of shark-fishing and shark-killing tournaments also increased dramatically, especially on the east coast of the United States. Jennifer Martin, an environmental historian at the University of California, told CNN, 'I'm struggling to think of a parallel example of a film that so powerfully shaped our understanding of another creature… They were killing machines. They were not really creatures. They weren't playing an ecological role.' Are sharks really man-eaters? How many people die due to shark attacks annually? What is the ecological role of sharks? Are these animals under threat? The unfounded paranoia about shark attacks Jaws shows an epic battle between three men and a 'rogue shark' who has developed a taste for human flesh. The animal attacks its victims with purpose, and munches on some body parts while leaving a head or arm as a warning to anyone who swims in its waters. Experts say this is not how sharks behave in reality. David Shiffman, an interdisciplinary marine conservation biologist, told the BBC, 'They don't stalk humans, and the idea of 'rogue sharks' that develop a taste for humans is pseudoscientific nonsense.' Although there are records of sharks attacking humans, the animal did not evolve to feed on humans. Sharks have existed on the planet for at least 400 million years, and predate dinosaurs by several hundred million years. The animal only encountered people just a few thousand years ago when humans started to explore the sea. Many experts believe that most shark attacks are cases of mistaken identity, meaning a shark may confuse a person for prey. That is why sharks usually take a bite out of people, and then move on. On average, 63 people are bitten by sharks across the world annually, of whom five or six die. 'More people are bitten by other people in New York City each year than are bitten by sharks in the whole world… It's extremely rare that someone is killed [by sharks],' said Shiffman. Sharks, not humans, are under threat While Jaws did contribute to an increase in the hunting of sharks, the animals were being targeted by humans much before the release of the movie. For example, white shark populations began to decline in the mid-1950s. One of the primary reasons for this is the rise of commercial overfishing. Sharks are intensively fished for meat and other products such as shark-fin soup, served as an expensive delicacy, particularly in China, Taiwan and parts of Southeast Asia. Other factors that are driving the dip in the shark population include climate change, pollution, pollution and habitat destruction. A 2024 study, published in the journal Science, found that annual shark mortality was at around 100 million — a number that rose during the last decade. Another study, published in the journal Nature in 2021, revealed that the global abundance of oceanic sharks and rays had declined by 71% since 1970. Currently, nearly a third of shark species are threatened with extinction, according to a 2021 analysis published in the journal Current Biology. But why does this all matter? Put simply, sharks play a crucial role in maintaining the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. For instance, as apex predators, they consume plant-eating fish which tend to excessively eat ocean vegetation such as seagrass meadows and kelp forests that absorb carbon through photosynthesis. This predatory behaviour of sharks helps maintain the marine carbon cycle. These animals also disperse grazing fish and curb their foraging efforts. As a result, sharks help reduce the chances for any loss of stored carbon which can be disturbed by foraging behaviour and activity by fish. Sharks are known to shape the behaviour and distribution of marine animals throughout the ocean as well. As they create a 'landscape of fear', these animals influence where prey species move. This ensures that no one species dominates an area, thus allowing multiple species to coexist which reduces the risk of habitat destruction. As sharks swim throughout the different ocean layers, they mix nutrient- and oxygen-rich deep water with nutrient-poor surface waters which ultimately benefits creatures living in the ocean's surface water such as phytoplankton. These are the reasons why experts and activists in recent years have been trying to conserve the population of sharks. Even Spielberg and Benchley publicly acknowledged the role of the movie and the book in stoking fear of sharks. In 2022, Spielberg said, 'I truly and to this day regret the decimation of the shark population because of the book and the film. I really, truly regret that.'

News18

20 hours ago

• News18

Nike Faces Backlash In India Over Collab Allegedly Featuring Bangladeshi Influencer: EXPLAINED; N18G

Nike's latest India-inspired collection with Delhi label NorBlack NorWhite has sparked outrage online. The backlash erupted after claims surfaced that the brand featured a Bangladeshi influencer who had allegedly made anti-India remarks. Hashtag trended as users criticised the brand's cultural insensitivity. Nike has not issued a statement yet as public anger continues to grow. Watch the video to know more. lifestyle news | health updates | travel stories | lifestyle | news18 | n18oc_lifestyleLiked the video? Please press the thumbs up icon and leave a comment. Subscribe to Showsha YouTube channel and never miss a video: Showsha on Instagram: Showsha on Facebook: Showsha on X: Showsha on Snapchat: entertainment and lifestyle news and updates on: