British artist claims he has created paint in ‘new' colour announced by scientists

A British artist claims to have replicated in paint a colour that scientists say they discovered by having laser pulses fired into their eyes.
Stuart Semple created his own version of the blue-green colour based on the US research published in Science Advances, which he is selling on his website for £10,000 per 150ml jar – or £29.99 if you state you are an artist.
In the experiment conducted at University of California, Berkeley, a laser was used to stimulate individual cells in the retinas of five researchers, pushing their perception of colour beyond its natural limits.
Semple, who has previously made what he claims to be the world's blackest and pinkest paints, synthesised his version of the colour in a more low-tech manner.
The artist mixed pigments, adding fluorescent optical brighteners that absorb ultraviolet light and re-emit it as visible blue light, making materials appear whiter or brighter. Using a spectrometer, which separates light into its constituent colours, he then analysed their intensity to best match his paint samples to the target hue.
'I've always thought that colour should be available to everybody,' said the artist, who also produced his own version of Yves Klein's famous ultramarine blue paint. 'I've fought for years to liberate these colours that are either corporately owned or scientists have staked a claim to, or have been licensed to an individual person.'
The scientists named the colour olo. Semple, who called his version yolo, has form for irreverently reproducing colours only available to an exclusive few.
When the artist Anish Kapoor bought the exclusive rights to the world's blackest paint, Semple made what he said was a blacker one and banned the Turner prizewinner from using it.
Humans perceive the colours of the world when light falls on colour-sensitive cells called cones in the retina. There are three types of cones that are sensitive to long (L), medium (M) and short (S) wavelengths of light.
Red light primarily stimulates L cones, while blue light chiefly activates S cones. But M cones sit in the middle and there is no natural light that excites these alone.
The Berkley experiment produced a colour beyond the natural range of the naked eye because the M cones are stimulated almost exclusively. Its name olo comes from the binary 010, indicating that of the L, M and S cones, only the M cones are switched on.
Semple said: 'I think they've triggered an experience in people that they're approximating to a colour. What I've done is tried to make an actual colour of that experience.'
Austin Roorda, a vision scientist on the Berkley team, said he would buy a bottle of the paint, but not for £10,000. 'I might even commission my cousin who's an artist to do some work with this paint,' he said.
'It's impossible to recreate a colour that matches olo,' he added. 'Any colour that you can reproduce would just pale by comparison. It doesn't matter whether it's a paint or a swatch of colour or something or even a monochromatic laser, which generate the most saturated natural human colour experiences.'
The scientist said he had also tried to recreate the colour by meticulously mixing two liqueurs: the slightly sweet melon-flavoured Midori and Blue Curacau, made from the dried peel of the bitter orange.
'It's a bit foul, Roorda said of the concoction's taste. 'But the more I drink, the more it looks like olo.'

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

The Independent

11 hours ago

• The Independent

Cannabis users more likely to die of heart disease, study reveals

Marijuana users are up to twice as likely to have a stroke, heart attack, or die from heart disease, research has revealed. University of California scientists found there was a 29 per cent higher risk of conditions like heart attack, a 20 per cent higher risk for stroke and double the risk of dying from heart disease among cannabis users. The study, published in Heart, reviewed 24 studies involving 200 million people to investigate the relationship between the drug and the diseases. The researchers warned that the study 'raises serious questions about the assumption that cannabis imposes little cardiovascular risk'. The reviewed studies, which ranged from 2016 to 2023, included people aged between 19 and 59 years old. The research did not specify if the marijuana exposure was from smoking the drug or other forms of consumption. In 2023, the American College of Cardiology revealed that people who smoke marijuana or eat weed-laced edibles daily are a third more likely to develop coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is the most common form of heart disease – cholesterol narrows the arteries supplying blood to the organ, causing chest pain, shortness of breath and fatigue. The significant link remained regardless of whether users smoked tobacco, drank alcohol, had major cardiovascular risk factors, and no matter their age or sex. Whether users took cannabis by smoking the drug, eating edibles, or other methods also made no difference. The American College of Cardiology researchers said people should let their doctors know if they use the drug, so clinicians can start monitoring heart health. Dr Ishan Paranjpe, resident physician at Stanford University and the study's lead author, said: 'We found that cannabis use is linked to CAD, and there seems to be a dose-response relationship in that more frequent cannabis use is associated with a higher risk of CAD. 'In terms of the public health message, it shows that there are probably certain harms of cannabis use that weren't recognised before, and people should take that into account. 'From a scientific standpoint, these findings are exciting because they suggest there might be new drug targets and mechanisms we can explore to take control of this pathway going forward.'

Daily Record

16 hours ago

• Daily Record

Experts warn of hidden health risks of alcohol-free beverages

Many people who don't want to spend Sunday with a hangover choose alcohol-free beverages as they believe them to be the healthier choice. Many of us like to frequent a beer garden when the sun is in the sky and have a good old catch up with friends and family we haven't seen in a while. While some of us might choose to have a cheeky cocktail or pint in the warm weather, others choose to go with an alcohol-free alternative. While these drinks won't cause you to have a hangover the next day, many people choose to buy the beverage as they believe it to be the healthier choice. However, this may not be entirely true, especially if they are consumed without moderation. ‌ While sales of the booze-free alternatives are soaring, health experts are worried that many people are unaware of the harm these drinks can cause to our health. ‌ New research has uncovered that regularly drinking alcohol-free beer, especially those that are wheat-based or the 'mixed' varieties that are flavoured with fruit soda, could actually cause a significant increase to the risk of developing heart problems and type 2 diabetes, reports the Mirror. UK pubs in 2023 alone sold 120million pints of booze-free beer, which was a 14 per cent hike from the year before. In comparison to sales in 2019, this is a staggering 77.8 per cent increase. Scientists are wary of the alcohol-free beverages as, if drunk regularly, the sugar and calorie content can be damaging to your health. In a recent study, 44 healthy men were asked to consume either two bottles or water or alcohol-free beer each day for four weeks. Each of the men received blood tests throughout the trial to track any changes in their metabolic health. The results showed that those who drank the booze-free beer showed an increase in the levels of insulin in their blood, which can be linked to type 2 diabetes. Blood sugar levels were also seen to rise, as well as levels of triglycerides, which is a type of fat associated with cardiovascular disease. ‌ According to the group of international researchers - from the University of California, San Diego, Germany's Knappschaft Kliniken and the University of the Basque Country - the negative effects were seen to be largely driven by excess sugar and calories in some alcohol-beer beers. Reported in the Nutrients journal, the team said: "Non-alcoholic beers are gaining popularity as alternatives to alcoholic beverages, yet their metabolic and health effects compared to no consumption of these drinks remain unclear." ‌ The problem seems to come from the way that alcohol-free drinks are made. As removing the alcohol can take away the flavour, brewers will often add sugar and flavourings to improve the taste. However, in some cases these can contain more sugar than their boozy alternative. For example, a 330ml bottle of Erdinger Alkoholfrei contains nearly 12g of sugar, which is more than seven times the 1.65g in the brand's standard Weissbier. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ Drinkaware is advising consumers to check the labels of their drinks carefully. They said: "It's important to understand the calories in any drink don't just come from alcohol, so you only 'save' calories if the substitute drink is a 'low-calorie' one." However, Dr Richard Piper, chief executive of Alcohol Change, had stressed that not all of the booze-free drinks on the market are as bad, with many low-alcohol beers and wines containing less sugar than soft drinks. Speaking to The Times, he said: "The latest study compared the metabolic effects of low/no beers with water, but orange juice typically contains 13.8g and cola about 11g of sugar per 100ml, more than many no-alcohol beverages. "If you choose wisely you can have a low-alcohol drink with 135 times less sugar than the same volume of fruit juice."

Time Out

18 hours ago

• Time Out

The Half-Life of Marie Curie

On my seven-month-old baby's bookshelf sits a brightly illustrated children's book about Marie Curie. Its pages celebrate her love of science, her marriage to physicist Pierre Curie, and her status as the first woman to win a Nobel Prize. These are the facts most often recited, but women are rarely one-dimensional. Alongside moments of triumph, often lie moments of despair and self-doubt. It is one of those lesser-known chapters that Lauren Gunderson explores in The Half-Life of Marie Curie, a play that premiered off-Broadway at the Minetta Lane Theatre in 2019, and was later released as an audio drama on the Audible platform. The play now makes its Australian premiere at Sydney's Ensemble Theatre under the direction of Liesel Badorrek (The Glass Menagerie). Gunderson, frequently referred to as 'the most produced living playwright in America', has a signature formula across her 20-plus plays: identify a compelling duo, hone in on a pivotal historical moment, inject sharp, rhythmic dialogue, and keep it snappy – 90 minutes or less. The result is a biographical vignette interspersed with theatrical poetry. The plays often just recount history – however, at its best, her formula can thrillingly heighten a core emotional conflict. In this case, it's the friendship between Marie Curie and Hertha Ayrton, and the impact these women had on each other. Though often relegated to a footnote in Curie's story, here Ayrton commands center stage... The narrative begins at Curie's (Gabrielle Scawthorn) home in Paris, shortly after she wins her second Nobel Prize, amid personal scandal. Her affair with fellow scientist Paul Langevin has ignited a media frenzy, threatening to overshadow her legacy and forcing her into self-imposed house arrest. Enter Hertha Ayrton (Rebecca Massey), a mathematician and engineer, who quite literally bursts through the door of Curie's exile and whisks her off to the British seaside. There they frolic, quarrel, and find themselves in each other. Despite its title, The Half-Life of Marie Curie seems more captivated by the woman history barely remembers – Hertha Ayrton –than the woman it promises to center. Though often relegated to a footnote in Curie's story, here Ayrton commands center stage: sassy, witty, progressive, a suffragist, and the persistent voice on Curie's shoulder declaring how extraordinary she is. Massey has all the best lines, crafting a performance that's physical, sharp, and full of warmth and joy. She's the best friend everyone wants – the kind who shows up, speaks truth, and doesn't let you drown. Through Ayrton, Gunderson poses the play's most potent questions: What makes someone become themselves? And what makes them worth saving? These are big, existential inquiries – about art, science, nature – that, while thematically rich, don't always sit comfortably within Curie's historical context. As a result, Curie is too often sidelined, reduced to a figure of gloom. She is the catalyst for the audience to hear Ayrton's worldview, rather than the other way around. Gunderson's Marie feels like a faint sketch of the scientific titan that I came to revere during my university physics studies. Here, she is made small. On one hand, there's something refreshing about seeing a woman of such legendary stature portrayed as fallible – torn by heartbreak, plagued by self-doubt, unsure of how to move forward. But this portrayal lingers on it a bit too long. This take on Curie is stuck in a single emotional register: brooding, passive, and more consumed by rejection than inflamed by the institutional sexism that shut her out of her own lab. The result is a character who feels diminished to her worst summer. To her credit, Scawthorn brings depth where she can. She infuses Curie's desperation with stakes that feel novel, nuanced and grounded. But she's let down by this production. The staging relies on ethereal video projections cast onto sheer curtains, encircling a central dais (perhaps a nod to Ayrton's work on arc lamps). But the effect is more clinical than intimate. The bulky wooden platform limits movement and undercuts the unpolished banter of the relationship at the play's heart. Aside from a hilarious, engaging drunken reconciliation atop the dais, the physicality seems cumbersome, and there is very little visual variety to enhance the emotional arc. The lighting by Verity Hampson and video projections by Cameron Smith bring to life the theatrical poetry elements that effectively bridge the show's time jumps, and create visually captivating moments. Is this the first woman to win a Nobel Prize? Or a damsel in distress? The portrayal leans so hard into her mediocrity, it risks erasing her fire altogether. That said, perhaps Gunderson is intent on proving she was just as ordinary as you or I, so that we may feel that we can also do great things. Ultimately, it's Massey's Ayrton who anchors the play. She is the rambunctious spark – jibing, compassionate, insistent – and she transforms Curie's despair into something bigger. Even when the text falters or the staging feels distant, she keeps the light on and the laughs rolling.