What hope?

Listen to article
I love protests and chaotic gatherings. They represent the naivety, innocence and beauty that humans carry within themselves. At the same time, they prove that we all thrive amidst commotion. It makes for a good picture moment and adds to one's portfolio. But does it do any good? Does it bring about change?
Historically, protests have definitely brought about change and even ignited revolutions. The secret there was consistency where you became a thorn in the path of those who were doing wrong and promoting foul.
In our country today though, we have to accept the fact that the writ of the state cannot be challenged. No matter what.
We saw this during the passing of the 26th amendment to the Constitution and we saw it recently when the JCP convened and elevated judges to the apex court. Lawyers and activists (albeit in a small number) tried to get their point across by protesting in Islamabad but the capital police had blocked off roads to the red zone. Of course, it's a separate debate as to why the protesting lawyers were manhandled by the police.
The point here is that we need to accept the fact that the 26th amendment is here to stay. The state will continue to take decisions that it deems fit for its welfare despite us not agreeing with those decisions. We have no choice but to accept the fact that the current government will continue to do what it wants to do and on the face of it, whatever they are doing and have been doing isn't illegal either.
It might be immoral and unethical but Niccolo Machiavelli once said that ethics have nothing to do with politics, the state can exercise whatever power, however it chooses to in order to remain in power. Fear works better and is more effective than affection.
It might be safe to say that the days of igniting a revolution might be over. Gone are the days when you could bully the government into succumbing to your demands. Be it legal or illegal, we operate within a system where democracy is merely a façade and the ones who rule us care only about their next meal, not about what the people will eat.
No matter how educated, experienced and correct one may be, they will have to bow down to nepotism and corruption. That explains why more than a million skilled youth have left this country and continue to depart every day.
It is alarming how many skilled people, that I knew personally, have left this country for better opportunities abroad and are now doing much better than they were here. From not being able to afford renting a house, to purchasing cars and owning homes, it is evident that we aren't doing something right here. We aren't doing anything right! This is just one of the alarming trends. But everything is fine as long as we continue to give away laptops and arrange questionable scholarship schemes.
Skilled youth is leaving and we aren't doing anything to stop them unless of course we can legislate and make that a crime too. That day isn't far away. Run while you still can.
Every other youngster I meet either in court or in any other setting is either working towards leaving or has his flight booked. If that doesn't alarm you, I don't know what will. Those who can't afford to leave, continue to dwell in uncertainty and look forward to eventually leaving.
Why can't we have nice roads, basic infrastructure and a parliament that actually works for the welfare of its people?
I wouldn't stay we still have time. I think the time has gone. People are leaving because they've lost hope in things ever improving. They've lost hope in the system and in the rulers. There's no turning back from here. Save what you have and either be honest and poor or be corrupt and rich. There's no other way.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Business Recorder

an hour ago

• Business Recorder

Opposition walkouts amid passage of resolution commemorating BB's birthday

KARACHI: The Sindh Assembly on Saturday witnessed a dramatic turn during its budget session as the House passed a resolution commemorating the 72nd birth anniversary of late Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto — the first woman Prime Minister of the Islamic world — amid loud opposition protests and a walkout. The resolution, presented by veteran parliamentarian and PPP Sindh President Nisar Ahmed Khuhro, was moved out of turn with special permission from the Deputy Speaker, Anthony Naveed. This procedural bypass infuriated opposition lawmakers, who erupted in protest, raised slogans, and eventually staged a walkout from the Assembly floor. In response to the uproar, Nisar Khuhro addressed the opposition members directly, saying, 'Even you should feel proud of Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto. By protesting during this resolution, you are only tarnishing your image in the eyes of the people of Sindh. This resolution has been prepared in consultation with Syed Qaim Ali Shah and Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah.' Despite the opposition's absence, the resolution paying tribute to Benazir Bhutto on her birthday was adopted by the House. Later, speaking to the media outside the Assembly, Leader of the Opposition Ali Khursheedi condemned the government's move, calling it a violation of Assembly norms and the Constitution. 'We were told on budget day that no resolutions could be tabled during the budget session. When we tried to bring a resolution in support of Iran, we were denied. But today, the same rules were bent for a political tribute. This selective application of the Constitution is unacceptable,' he said. Khursheedi further remarked, 'Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto is indeed a respected figure for all, but no one — regardless of stature — should be paid homage at the cost of violating the House's procedures during a budget session.' Taking a pointed jab, he added, 'I'm merely reminding history — Nisar Khuhro once distributed sweets upon the martyrdom of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.' In a symbolic show of reverence, the Assembly later hosted a ceremonial celebration for the slain PPP leader's birthday. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Business Recorder

an hour ago

• Business Recorder

Selection of judges for CB: Justice Mansoor urges JCP to develop formal criteria

ISLAMABAD: Justice Mansoor Ali Shah urged the Judicial Commission of Pakistan that formal criteria must be developed for selection of judges to the Constitutional Bench. 'The ad-hocism has already cast a long shadow on the legitimacy of the Constitutional Bench, and continued exclusion of senior judges without reason only worsens that perception,' said a letter written by Justice Mansoor to the Secretary JCP and sent its copy to all Commission's members. In his June 16, 2025 letter, three days before the JCP meeting, the senior puisne judge expressed his inability to attend the meeting saying, 'I will not be available in Pakistan.' He expected that keeping with past practice, the meeting would be deferred due to non-availability of one of its members. At the same time complained; 'It appears that the meeting in continuing as scheduled – perhaps due to the judiciary's minority position in the Commission.' The JCP on June 19 extended the term of the Constitutional Benches of the Supreme Court till 30th November, and the Sindh High Court for six months w.e.f. 23rd July 2025. The JCP chairperson constituted a broad-based committee for the Judicial Performance Evaluation of Judges of all High Courts, comprising members from the Judiciary, Parliament, Executive, and the legal fraternity, to prepare draft rules for the Annual Judicial Performance Evaluation of High Court Judges. The strength of the judiciary rests on its credibility, its internal coherence, and its fidelity to constitutional principle – not on expediency or executive preference. Appointment of Justice Mansoor as CJP: No official notification issued: ministry If the Commission is to retain its institutional legitimacy, it must lead with integrity, transparency, and collective wisdom. It had asked the Commission that all the judges of the Supreme Court must be nominated to the constitutional bench in the interim. Any selective inclusion without a transparent process or identifiable criteria is patently discriminatory and damaging to the institutional harmony. Justice Mansoor December 6, 2024 had also written a letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi, who is also the Chairman of the Commission, to postpone the JCP meeting until the fate of 26th Constitutional Amendment is decided by the Full Court of the Supreme Court. In his latest letter, the senior puisne judge, reiterated the same stance that the JCP should wait on extending the term of judges on the constitutional bench till the constitutionality of the 26th Constitutional Amendment was decided by the SC. 'Proceeding with extensions or re-appointments to a constitutional bench whose very legal foundations is under serious constitutional challenge further deepens the institutional crisis and weakens the court's legitimacy,' he stated. Justice Mansoor emphasised that the JCP must realise that continued delay in this matter was 'visibly eroding the credibility of the court and shaking public confidence in its neutrality'. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Express Tribune

19 hours ago

• Express Tribune

SHC orders opening of Governor House for acting governor

The Constitutional Bench of the Sindh High Court (SHC), comprising Justice K.K. Agha and Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, heard Acting Governor Owais Qadir Shah's petition challenging the locking of Governor House offices. The court ordered the immediate reopening of these offices and directed the principal secretary to submit a compliance report by June 23. During the urgent hearing, the bench granted acting governor immediate access to the Sindh Governor's official residence. The court specifically ordered the unlocking of all offices (excluding private residential quarters) and restrained the principal secretary from obstructing the acting governor's access. The court also directed that a copy of the judicial order be transmitted to the President of Pakistan and the Principal Secretary of the Governor's House, Sindh. In the petition, it was averred that since assuming charge, the Acting Governor, Owais Qadir Shah, has been denied entry to the Governor's House for official duties which is a violation of Article 104 of the Constitution. Governor Kamran Tessori has been abroad since June 2. Acting Governor of Sindh, Owais Qadir Shah, informed the court that a meeting on law and order in the was scheduled for today, specifically to discuss matters related to Muharram. The home minister, secretary, IG Sindh, and other officials reached for the meeting. However, the principal secretary stated that the governor had taken the office keys with him. Owais Qadir Shah stated that this was an act of considering the Governor's House as their personal lounge. He cited the Constitution, which clearly states that in the absence of the governor, the acting governor can perform duties. Owais Qadir Shah said, he would write to the chief minister, highlighting that this was a mockery of the Constitution.