Bill Maher says he would 'of course' interview Trump on his show

HBO host Bill Maher said he would definitely interview President Donald Trump during a conversation on his podcast weeks after meeting the president at the White House.
Maher spoke to author Lewis Howes during his "Club Random" podcast on Sunday, as the comedian discussed his experiences with other presidents following his meeting with Trump at the White House.
Howes asked Maher, a longtime critic of the president, if he would interview the president on TV. Maher responded, "Yeah, of course, he's the president of the United States. Are you crazy?"
Maher said former President Barack Obama, who is his favorite president, didn't do his show for almost his whole presidency and he had to "shame him into it" during his eighth year in office.
Bill Maher Favors Cutting Public Broadcasting Funding, Rejects Npr Ceo's Testimony That Outlet Is Unbiased
"He finally did, but you know it was at the White House, it was in the interview room. It wasn't fun," Maher said. "It wasn't in front of an audience. I mean it could have been fun and funny if he came and did my show in the studio like he did many other shows."
Read On The Fox News App
"As far as just feeling free to speak exactly how I feel, yes, I felt freer to do that with Trump than Obama and Clinton," Maher added.
"Trump is a kind of, I'm sorry, but in person he's definitely the kind of guy, you know, you just feel like he can say anything and you don't have to like censor it and I didn't, I didn't," Maher said.
Bill Maher Explains Why He's Rejecting Calls To Join The Political Right
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
Maher was critical of Trump's first 100 days in office, which he described as a "s--- show" in a comment to the Free Press.
Maher stated that the 100 "things to legitimately hate" about Trump's first 100 days are him "disappearing people, the inefficiency of DOGE, ignoring the Supreme Court, killing people overseas with drastic aid cuts, firing the guy in charge of his election-integrity office because he won't say 2020 was rigged, tariff-related market collapse, America no longer being seen as a safe place, the third-term talk, suing the media, Andrew Tate... I mean, I could just keep going."
Fox News' Gabriel Hays contributed to this report.Original article source: Bill Maher says he would 'of course' interview Trump on his show

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

19 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Pakistan condemns Trump for bombing Iran a day after recommending him for a Nobel Peace Prize

ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan condemned U.S. President Donald Trump for bombing Iran, less than 24 hours after saying he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize for defusing a recent crisis with India. Relations between the two South Asian countries plummeted after a massacre of tourists in Indian-controlled Kashmir in April. The nuclear-armed rivals stepped closer to war in the weeks that followed, attacking each other until intense diplomatic efforts, led by the U.S., resulted in a truce for which Trump took credit. It was this 'decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership' that Pakistan praised in an effusive message Saturday night on the X platform when it announced its formal recommendation for him to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. Less than 24 hours later, however, it condemned the U.S. for attacking Iran, saying the strikes 'constituted a serious violation of international law' and the statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, in a phone call Sunday with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed his concern that the bombings had targeted facilities that were under the safeguards of the IAEA. Pakistan has close ties with Iran and supports its attacks on Israel, saying it has the right to self-defense. There was no immediate comment on Monday from Islamabad about the Trump Nobel recommendation, which also followed a high-profile White House lunch meeting between the president and Pakistan's powerful army chief, Asim Munir. Thursday's meeting, which lasted more than two hours, was also attended by the Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Steve Witkoff, the U.S. Special Representative for Middle Eastern Affairs. According to a Pakistani military statement, a detailed exchange of views took place on the 'prevailing tensions between Iran and Israel, with both leaders emphasizing the importance of the resolution of the conflict.' While Pakistan was quick to thank Trump for his intervention in its crisis with India, New Delhi played it down and said there was no need for external mediation on the Kashmir issue. The Himalayan region of Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India but claimed by both in its entirety. India accuses Pakistan of backing militant groups in the region, which Pakistan denies.

Hypebeast

21 minutes ago

• Hypebeast

Ryan Coogler's 'Sinners' Receives Max Streaming Premiere Date

Summary Ryan Coogler'sSinnersofficially received aMaxstreaming date for at-home viewers. TheMichael B. Jordan-led feature hits the streamer on July 4, followed by anHBOpremiere on July 5 and physical copies on July 8. Sinners sees Jordan portray a set of identical twins, Stack and Smoke, who return to their hometown of Clarksdale, Missisipi after a tenure for the Chicago Outfit. They, along with their cousin and preacher's son Sammie, open a juke joint for the local Black community, but are haunted by the supernatural on opening night. Joining Jordan in the cast are Hailee Steinfeld, Miles Caton, Jack O'Connell, Wunmi Mosaku, Li Jun Li, Yao, Jayme Lawson, Omar Miller and Delroy Lindo. Sinnershas since grossed a total of $363.8 million USD in the global box office since its release and was met with critical and commercial acclaim. Sinnershits Max July 4, and premieres on HBO on July 5.

Bloomberg

33 minutes ago

• Bloomberg

What Does the US Strike on Iran Mean for Israel?

Live on Bloomberg TV CC-Transcript 00:00Walk us through how the Israeli public has responded to the US military intervention over the weekend. Good morning, Joumanna. Yes, well, this was a dramatic weekend, one of historic proportions in Israel as elsewhere in the region and in the world, especially countries that have a stake in this part of the world. And Israelis, I would say this is to judge by everything from television panelists to the people I've shared bomb shelters with during the Iranian retaliatory missile attacks appear to be relieved, jubilant, astonished at the fact that the world's great power, the United States, did intervene finally, and using its firepower for what appears to have been a knockout blow, at least as described by President Trump and by his staff to the Iranian nuclear program. Of course, the question is whether it was a knockout blow. And I think what you're going to see today is the discourse shifting to one of BDA. That's the refrain you'll be hearing a lot of battle damage assessments, whether indeed it was a knockout blow, whether indeed the damage was enough to end any credible work at those sites and effectively allow Israel to pack up and say that the war is over. The main threat, what it's described as the main threat to its existence going back decades has now been dealt with conclusively. I thought it was interesting. The Israeli prime minister gave a televised address yesterday where he said Israel is very close to reaching goals in Iran but will also avoid a war of attrition. How should we be reading those comments, Dan? Well, it's worth keeping in mind that the two countries are separated by something like a thousand miles of territory. I think three international borders, Iran is something like 70 times the size of Israel. There really is an asymmetry here in terms of disposition, geography, military standing. So for all the virtuosity of Israeli forces here, I don't think they could afford to sustain fighting in the long run, something akin to what we've seen in the last 20 months in Gaza, in Lebanon, in Syria, which are neighboring countries or neighboring territories. So the Israelis are looking logistically at this. I think they're also signaling to the American public, those Americans who are wondering whether this is a repeat of 2003 in Iraq, that this was a one time deal for Israel and for the United States, that perhaps the US role has begun and ended with this airstrike and that Israel, the country most involved in this, the U.S. ally, is really also trying to wrap things up as soon as it believes that its goals have been achieved and those goals may be achieved very soon.