Could a tiny home village help solve homelessness in Peoria? Here are the arguments
During a sweeping policy discussion on how to tackle homelessness, the Peoria City Council moved forward Tuesday night on exploring a tiny home village in the city and providing another $64,000 to continue housing homeless people at a local motel.
The council took made no official votes during its special policy meeting, but it did signal approval to allow city staff to continue exploring a plan to build a tiny home village somewhere in Peoria that would house some of the city's homeless population.
Those tiny homes — which would be operated by the Dream Center Peoria — would be roughly 70-square-feet and have heating, air conditioning and on-site laundry, showers and bathrooms. The homes would primarily be for single adults and targeted at individuals who are not suited for a congregate shelter setting.
It would cost an estimated $900,000 to build a tiny home village of 32 homes in Peoria and another $300,000 annually to operate the village, Dream Center Executive Director Andy King told the council.
More: Juneteenth event replaces fireworks as new summer celebration at Glen Oak Park
No official decision has been made on the tiny home village, and at this stage the City Council has only given a signal of approval to city staff to move forward with exploring options for tiny homes and find potential codes and ordinances that would need to be rewritten.
Where a village would be built — if the proposal is ever given a full stamp of approval by the council — figures to be one of the more contentious questions the city will have to weigh.
The Dream Center told the council it hopes to create a hub for homelessness services, and, ideally, the tiny home village would be near its main facility in Downtown Peoria.
Mayor Rita Ali, while supportive of the tiny home concept, said she was adamantly opposed to seeing the tiny home village built in Downtown Peoria.
Ali said that Downtown Peoria, which already features a litany of homeless shelters and housing, cannot become the "destination" for all of the city's homelessness services, saying the tiny home village could hurt the "safety conditions and perceptions" of downtown.
Councilmembers John Kelly and Mike Vespa agreed with Ali's sentiment that a tiny home village would not be best suited for Downtown Peoria.
Vespa said he supported the concept of a tiny home village in Peoria, making note it should be on a bus line, saying it gave people a "door to lock behind them."
Councilmember Tim Riggenbach was the first on the council to champion tiny homes, and on Tuesday night, he applauded the progress Peoria has made in reducing homelessness but said it was "critical" that the council give staff direction to move forward with exploring the concept of tiny homes.
Riggenbach urged caution, however, when it came to the council ruling out locations for the tiny home village this early in conversations.
No one on the council seemed to be generally opposed to the concept of a tiny home village, but at-large councilmember Denis Cyr raised concerns about how and where the city would find funding for the village.
City leaders on Tuesday night also heard progress updates from many of the region's homelessness providers, including the United Way's Continuum of Care, the Dream Center Peoria and Carle Health's Trillium. Those presenters painted a picture of a city that has made progress in reducing homelessness but still faced key barriers in shelter capacity and availability of housing.
Housing projects like Phoenix Manor in Downtown Peoria, which will provide 55 units of permanent housing for families experiencing homelessness, and the expansion of the Salvation Army's Downtown Peoria shelter, are viewed as success stories in expanding shelter and housing options in Peoria.
But more is still needed as homeless numbers continue to rise in Peoria and the nation, Continuum of Care's Kate Green told the council.
In a January 2024 census, the United Way — which serves Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford and Fulton counties — counted 635 people experiencing homelessness. That number is up from 201 people in 2021 and 451 in 2015.
Green told the council that there has been a "serious escalation in homelessness" since the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, data presented by Green showed that those experiencing homelessness have reported a rise in mental health issues and substance abuse problems.
The City Council took no formal vote to provide the homelessness outreach group LULA with another $64,000 in funding for its revolutionary hotel project, in which they've housed dozens of homeless individuals in a local hotel.
But all council members who spoke about the project on Tuesday night applauded its successes in not just allowing the city to clear the controversial and prominent homeless encampments in the city but also in connecting homeless individuals with services.
The kicker of the program's success, however, is it relies on city funding. If no new funding is approved by the city, the program will end, and its participants could end up back on the streets.
More: Heartbreak to resilience: Untold perspectives of Caterpillar's HQ move from Peoria
In March, the City Council moved to provide LULA with roughly $204,000 in funding that would allow for it to operate its hotel program through the end of June. The end of June is closing in, and at its meeting on June 24 the council will weigh a measure to give LULA another $64,000 to keep the program operational.
More than 100 people have participated in the hotel program. Fifty-one have been put into permanent housing programs, while 29 others have housing applications or appointments in place.
Further complicating matters as Peoria tries to find permanent solutions to homelessness are expected cuts coming to the federal budget that city officials fear will cause more housing insecurity in Peoria.
Propsed cuts to the federal budget, which is still being worked on by the U.S. Senate, will impact the number of Section 8 housing vouchers available those who need financial subsidies in order to afford housing. Continuum of Care funding would also be moved to states under the cuts. Emergency solutions grants, community block grant development funds and HOME grants would also be cut under the budget.
Peoria Community Development Director Joe Dulin told the council these cuts could lead to an additional 1,000 people in Peoria to experience housing insecurity, calling the cuts to the Section 8 voucher system "pretty significant."
Dulin told the council that the city would either have to use general fund dollars to support those programs or potentially go without some of those services.
Ali said councilmembers and everyone else in the area should contact their congressional representative and encourage them to not vote for a federal budget that includes these moves. Ali said the cuts would be "detrimental" to the work the city has done in combatting homelessness.
This article originally appeared on Journal Star: Peoria looks at tiny home village as possible homelessness solution
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
27 minutes ago
- The Verge
Tesla's first robotaxi rides will have a ‘safety monitor' in the passenger seat
Tesla has begun sending out invitations for its highly anticipated robotaxi service, but there's one significant caveat: it's installing a 'safety monitor' in the front passenger seat, as previously reported by Electrek. The invites, which were sent to Tesla influencers and investors, say the human monitor will 'accompany you on your trip' when rides begin on June 22nd — a move that's at odds with Elon Musk's promise of fully unsupervised rides. Details about Tesla's robotaxi service have been slim in the weeks leading up to its launch, but Musk said in January that the company would launch its 'unsupervised' robotaxi service with 'no one in the car' this summer. Musk expanded on this in an April earnings call, saying the 10 to 20 Model Y vehicles would be remotely operated in the event of an emergency. Tesla's invitation outlines some requirements for robotaxi rides, including that riders must request service between 6AM and 12AM within a geofenced area, 'excluding airports.' It adds that 'service may be limited or unavailable in inclement weather,' which is often a challenge for autonomous vehicles. Invitees can bring one additional guest 18 or older. Over the past couple of months, Tesla has faced pressure from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which has asked the EV-maker for more information about 'the ability of Tesla's system to react appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions.' Texas lawmakers have requested that Tesla delay its robotaxi launch until a revision to the state's autonomous driving law takes effect in September. It will require robotaxi services to get authorization from the Department of Motor Vehicles before operating without a human driver.
Wall Street Journal
28 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Fed's Waller Suggests Support for a July Cut
Federal Reserve governor Christopher Waller said the central bank could be positioned to cut interest rates at its next meeting in July, notwithstanding potential inflation pressures caused by new tariffs. In a Friday morning interview with CNBC, Waller said the Fed should 'look through' one-time price increases from tariffs and instead respond to the underlying trend in inflation, which has been cooling.
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
The High Price Of Leadership (And Ways To Bring It Down)
Joe Altieri is the CIO at RiteScreen and the Inventor of FlexScreen, the cutting-edge innovation revolutionizing the window industry. Leadership isn't glamorous. Motivational speeches, grateful teams and energizing collaborations are a part of it— sometimes. But more often than not, leadership is like that Rolex watch—so appealing but so incredibly expensive. University of Georgia head football coach Kirby Smart shared three very wise and insightful points about leadership that I think seasoned leaders don't talk about enough and young or aspiring leaders ignore to their peril. Here's how I interpreted them: When you're in a leadership position, you're entrusted with making decisions that serve the greater good—even if that means hurting someone you genuinely like or care about. Leaders who take the easy path and let a bad situation continue because they don't want to make any waves can expect an eventual tsunami of resentment. You can get away with tipping the scales for a difficult or incompetent (but very loyal) person a few times, but it won't take long for the grumbling to start among the faithful, hardworking employees who see the injustice with striking clarity. Action Step: Stay steadfast in your decisions. Do what you can to lessen the blow for the people who will be negatively affected, but don't neglect or put off doing the right thing. The short-term discomfort is far better than the likely long-term pain of shirking your leadership responsibilities. We all want to be effective AND liked, but the reality is that someone will always be unhappy or disapprove of your decision or direction. That is unavoidable. The goal must be to base our decisions on effectiveness—not popularity. And that's harder than it seems. When I was building a company, I made choices that prioritized innovation and long-term growth. Sometimes, that meant saying "no" to things others thought would be beneficial or necessary. Some people didn't like it. Some still don't. But leadership isn't a popularity contest, and the last thing you want is a room full of "yes" people. If everyone always agrees with you, it's time to check yourself. That red flag almost always means one of two things: They're afraid to voice an opinion or have relegated themselves to the reality that it wouldn't matter anyway. In either case, the leader is missing the mark entirely. So what can you do? Surround yourself with people who understand your heart, even if they don't always agree with your decisions. Communicate clearly and often. Allow yourself to be vulnerable. People may not like your choices, but they'll most likely respect you for being consistent, honest and mission-driven. The sooner you accept that you will be misunderstood—a lot—the better your leadership journey will be. Every leader will find themselves in the hot seat regularly. The first instinct is usually to defend and protect yourself, but that's a losing long-term strategy. The people who aren't you have no idea what it actually takes to be you, and no amount of explaining will help. Of course, if you can set the record straight, do it. But don't obsess over it. Unless the misunderstanding threatens to lead to long-term team or corporate damage, let your trusted inner circle handle it while you stay focused on the main objectives. The vast majority of the dust-ups will die down quickly with very little consequence, and if you have surrounded yourself with the right people, they will let you know if your intervention is necessary. What's the action step here? Rise above the fray. Resist the urge to strike back, keep moving forward with the company agenda and remember that it is always wise to overcommunicate, especially when tensions run high. Success, progress and wins tend to naturally quiet the discord. The common saying about war and sports perfectly applies to business, too; the best defense is a good offense. Leadership costs something. It costs comfort, ease, and sometimes relationships. But remember that you're not just building "something." You're investing in and building people. You're shaping culture and moving things forward. Sure, the weight of leadership can feel like a massive burden at times, but that's when perspective is critical. So, think of it like this. We get to do something that can be life-changing for so many. We get to empower and lift others up and lead people toward their full potential. We get to make a difference and, hopefully, make the world a better place. And that, my fellow leaders, is a rare privilege that is definitely worth the cost. Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
