
What's objectionable in ‘Manushi', HC asks CBFC
CHENNAI: Questioning the rationale behind the Central Board for Film Certification (CBFC) keeping 'Manushi' movie on hold without specifying the objectionable parts required to be removed, the Madras High Court on Wednesday directed the board to submit its response to the petition filed by producer of the movie Vetrimaaran in a week.
Justice N Anand Venkatesh issued the direction while hearing the petition which prayed for a direction to the Regional Officer of the CBFC to constitute an expert committee to review the movie and intimate clearly on the portions required to be edited.
He recorded that the CBFC's denial of certification, as mentioned in the refusal order, was based on the reasons that the movie is against the integrity of the state, it is contemptuous of certain community, defames the policies of the government and also stereotypes people from certain places displaying the north-south divide.
The judge said the conclusion of the committee must have been arrived at based on 'objective and discernible' scenes of the movie, but those are not spelt out in the refusal order. Therefore, the board has to inform the producers about the objectionable portions so that they can be edited, he said in the order.
'The movie makers will be groping in the dark without knowing about which scenes and dialogues have to be edited,' Justice Anand Venkatesh remarked.
Observing that the movie is also a sort of freedom of expression, the judge, suggesting the board to watch the movie with the producers, said the board has to clearly spell out the scenes and dialogues that are objectionable so that the producers could modify or edit the particular scenes. He posted the matter to June 11 for passing orders.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Diljit Dosanjh skips India release of Sardaar Ji 3 starring Pak actor Hania Aamir
Actor Diljit Dosanjh's upcoming film, 'Sardaar Ji 3', starring Pakistani actor Hania Aamir, will release only overseas. The film will not be screened in India amid India-Pakistan tensions. On Sunday, Diljit shared the film's trailer on social media and announced the film's release the trailer on his official Instagram page, Diljit wrote, "Sardaar Ji 3 Releasing 27th June OVERSEAS Only/ FADH LAO BHOOND DIAN LATTAN (sic)." The film will not release in the country due to the film industry's ban on Pakistani actors after the ghastly Pahalgam attack and Operation the trailer: View this post on Instagram A post shared by DILJIT DOSANJH (@diljitdosanjh) The YouTube link of the 'Sardaar Ji 3' trailer has been geo-blocked in India. "The uploader has not made this video available in your contry," read the message on the platform. However, the teaser and songs are available to watch in the post: 'Sardaar Ji 3' is a horror comedy featuring Diljit Dosanjh, Hania Aamir and Neeru Bajwa. The trailer shows Hania playing a ghost hunter, who, along with Diljit, is entrusted with the job of removing a spirit from a mansion in the United film is a satire on ghostbusting and is expected to be a laughter Punjabi comedy film was slated to release in theatres on June 27 across the globe. However, it was embroiled in a controversy over the casting. The Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) has raised objections, requesting the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to deny certification to the film. The objection was over the film's casting of Pakistani actors, including Hania Aamir, Nasir Chinyoti, Daniel Khawar, and Saleem a letter to the CBFC, Prasoon Joshi, FWICE chief, said, "In light of recent directives issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (I&B Ministry), prohibiting Pakistani-origin content and collaboration with Pakistani artistes in Indian productions, and the parallel stance adopted by FWICE, we urge CBFC to align with these directives and national interest considerations before proceeding with certification. We appreciate CBFC's impartial and rigorous certification process and trust that you will give due consideration to this request (sic)."After the Pahalgam attack, which claimed the lives of 26 people, the film bodies, in accordance with the government's directive, announced the prohibition of collaboration with Pakistani actors and technicians. The Pahalgam attack triggered tensions between India and 'Sardaar Ji 3', the FWICE enforced a blanket ban on 'Abir Gulaal, a Hindi film, which marked Pakistani actor Fawad Khan's return to Indian cinema.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Furore as censor board blocks J.S.K's release
KOCHI: The Central Board of Film Certification's denial of certification to the film 'Janaki V/s State of Kerala' (J.S.K) has created a flutter in Kerala with Malayalam film representatives voicing their angst and the producer deciding to move court. The courtroom thriller, directed by Pravin Narayanan and starring Union Minister Suresh Gopi and Anupama Parameswaran in lead roles, is about the legal battle of a woman who goes through a traumatic event. The CBFC allegedly objected to the use of 'Janaki' – another name for Goddess Sita – as the name of the title character. Following this, the film's release, scheduled for June 27, has been postponed.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Censors block Union minister's film after objections to 'Janaki' in title
KOCHI: A censorship row has broken out after CBFC blocked the release of Malayalam film 'Janaki V/S State of Kerala', reportedly due to objections over the title character 'Janaki', another name of Goddess Sita. Starring Union minister Suresh Gopi and Anupama Parameswaran, the film was scheduled for release on June 27 but was denied screening clearance at the last minute. Directed by Pravin Narayanan, the courtroom drama centres around a lead named Janaki. He confirmed the film would not be released as planned. Film Employees Federation of Kerala general secretary B Unnikrishnan said the organisation would not hesitate to launch a protest against the CBFC's decision. "The story is about the legal fight carried out by an assaulted woman against the state. It is said (by the Board) that Goddess Sita's name cannot be given to the woman character who suffered assault," he said. (With agency inputs)