Panama cuts internet, cell phones in restive province
Panamanian authorities on Saturday partially suspended internet and mobile phone service in a western province where a state of emergency was in effect after two months of anti-government unrest.
Right-wing President Jose Raul Mulino declared the emergency on Friday, suspending freedom of assembly and movement in Bocas del Toro province, where protesters have set up roadblocks and damaged the airport, businesses and offices.
The National Authority for Public Services said on X that based on the emergency decree, "the temporary suspension of mobile phone and residential internet service has been coordinated in the province of Bocas del Toro until June 25."
Internet service would remain available for health care, businesses and government entities, the agency said.
Anti-government protests began almost two months ago in the major banana-producing region of Bocas del Toro.
They turned violent Thursday in the city of Changuinola when groups of hooded individuals looted businesses and partially set fire to a baseball stadium with police officers inside, authorities said.
The unrest has seen one dead, more than 100 arrested, and dozens injured, including 13 police officers, according to authorities.
Mulino has been facing protests on several fronts in recent months.
Workers with US banana giant Chiquita in Bocas del Toro went on strike in late April over pension reforms adopted by Congress, which critics say will force them to work longer.
Chiquita sacked thousands of workers over the strike.
The banana growers' unions called off their protest last week in a bid to reverse the layoffs but other groups have remained at the barricades.
Besides the pension reforms, Panamanians have also been in the streets over a deal Mulino struck with US President Donald Trump in April allowing US troops to deploy to Panamanian bases along the Panama Canal.
The US Embassy in Panama issued a security alert Friday prohibiting American government staffers from traveling to Bocas del Toro "until further notice."
cmm/mis/dg/cls/dth/acb/bjt
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Fear and Quiet Resistance Amid a Los Angeles in Turmoil
On Friday, June 6, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers raided a Downtown Los Angeles warehouse and a Home Depot parking lot. As news of the raids spread, protesters tried to block the arrests, clashing with police officers in the streets. Within a few days, rage bubbled into all-out demonstrations. The National Guard was called in miles from my home, and soon my news feeds were filled with images of protesters and law enforcement personnel squaring off on the 101 Freeway. But only a few miles away, the neighborhoods where many undocumented Angelenos live were experiencing these raids differently. In Boyle Heights, a predominantly Latino neighborhood in East Los Angeles, the streets were unusually quiet. In the early afternoon, a time when the neighborhood is typically bustling with activity, the sidewalks and stores were empty. I met Ceasar Sanchez, standing at the entrance of a barbershop on Cesar Chavez Avenue, one of the area's main thoroughfares. Inside, every chair sat empty. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Vance to visit Los Angeles on Friday amid tension over ICE raids
Vice President JD Vance is set to travel to Los Angeles on Friday amid tensions in the city over the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. Vance will 'tour a multi-agency Federal Joint Operations Center, a Federal Mobile Command Center, meet with leadership and Marines, and deliver brief remarks,' according to a readout of the vice president's travel plans. The trip comes after Los Angeles had been rocked with significant anti-ICE protests — which President Donald Trump deployed National Guard troops and Marines to subdue — drawing condemnation from Democrats as the city has become a microcosm of the nationwide struggle over the administration's immigration policy. Democrats and activists have clashed with administration officials and federal law enforcement over the issue in recent weeks, leading to inflamed tensions and even direct altercations with law enforcement agents. In an unusual act of force against a sitting lawmaker, federal law enforcement officers forcibly removed and handcuffed California Sen. Alex Padilla while he attempted to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a press briefing last week, prompting outrage from others within the Democratic Party. 'If they can handcuff a U.S. Senator for asking a question, imagine what they will do to you," Newsom said of the incident at the time. Noem and other Republicans defended the actions, with the DHS secretary saying Padilla 'wanted the scene,' and House Speaker Mike Johnson calling on him to be censured. Earlier in the month, the president of the labor union SEIU California, David Huerta, was knocked to the ground and arrested at a protest against immigration sweeps in Los Angeles, causing injuries that lead to his brief hospitalization. Huerta was released from federal custody three days later on a $50,000 bond. The protests and unrest have since quieted — Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass lifted a curfew earlier this week — but the troops have remained. And so has ICE. The Los Angeles Dodgers on Thursday said ICE agents had appeared at Dodger Stadium and 'requested permission to access the parking lots,' but were denied entry by the organization. But ICE claimed it was 'never there' in a reply to the baseball team's post on X. In a separate reply, the official Department of Homeland Security account said the presence of federal agents 'had nothing to do with the Dodgers,' and claimed 'CBP vehicles were in the stadium parking lot very briefly, unrelated to any operation or enforcement.' Later on Thursday, a federal appeals court indefinitely blocked an effort by California Gov. Gavin Newsom to retain control of the state's National Guard troops after Trump mobilized them to quell protests in Los Angeles, landing the Trump administration a win. The president touted the victory in a Truth Social post, claiming it as a 'BIG WIN' and slamming Newsom as 'incompetent and ill prepared.' 'The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done,' Trump wrote. 'This is a Great Decision for our Country, and we will continue to protect and defend Law abiding Americans.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
In Plain Sight, Donald Trump Continues His Takeover Of The U.S. Military
WASHINGTON — The scariest moment in the second installment of President Donald Trump's America thus far is a question that was asked in the U.S. Senate and went unanswered. Five months ago, Fox News-host-turned-Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked how he would respond if his soon-to-be boss told him to shoot American protesters on American streets. Hegseth, after dancing around the question, refused to answer that day. He refused to answer again when asked two weeks ago. And on Thursday, he once more refused when asked yet again while appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee. We were made for this moment. HuffPost will aggressively, fairly and honestly cover the Trump administration. But we need your help. . It was, unfortunately, not an outlandish hypothetical even when Democratic senators posed the question back during Hegseth's confirmation hearing in January. Trump's first-term Pentagon chief Mark Esper, over the months that saw protests across the country following the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officers, was asked to do exactly that. Esper refused. Today, it is even less of a hypothetical. Hegseth, at Trump's demand, has deployed both the California National Guard (over the objection of the state's governor) and active-duty Marines to Los Angeles as a backup force for immigration officers conducting deportation raids. If people don't understand why this is so dangerous, they might want to review what happened 55 years ago in Kent, Ohio. In early May 1970, Guard troops were sent to the state university there — in that instance, by the governor at the time — to disperse protests against President Richard Nixon's just announced expansion of the Vietnam War into Cambodia. Protesters started advancing on the soldiers. Some of the soldiers panicked and fired into the crowd. Four students died and nine were injured. One of the photos from that day still serves as a searing reminder of that time. The better part of a century later, we're likely in an even more fraught place. The American military has long maintained a nonpartisan, apolitical tradition — one that Trump is clearly trying to end. He went to West Point's graduation and gave an unabashedly political speech. He went to Fort Bragg in North Carolina earlier this month and treated it like a campaign rally, even encouraging the troops there to boo his Democratic critics. He commandeered a planned celebration of the Army's 250th anniversary and turned it into a parade for himself. Months ago he sent troops to the southern border in a potential violation of standing federal law. What he is doing in California is all of this piece — transforming the nation's military into his military. Trump, it seems clear, is not really trying to maintain calm and order, but rather is spoiling for a fight. If protesters get violent or provide some other provocation, no one should be surprised if soldiers do the things that soldiers are trained to do. Which is why Hegseth's continued refusal to answer what he will do if and when Trump orders him to shoot protesters should be terrifying. Again, this is all so outside the American experience that it's perhaps understandable that people refuse to accept what's going on right in front of our eyes, in broad daylight. Trump is bringing in the military to do things that, in America, the military has no business doing, from guarding the border to immigration enforcement far inland. Note carefully that the order he signed when he first sent 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles mentions neither California nor limits the number to 2,000. The order is open-ended and in force across the country. How far a jump is it from enforcing immigration law to enforcing other criminal laws? And, with both the FBI and the Department of Justice under the control of Trump-first loyalists eager to carry out his every whim, how far a jump is it from that to arresting people who, in Trump's view, pose a threat to civil order? Any scholar of autocracies will tell you that lawyers and judges willing to stand up to a would-be autocrat is all well and good, but an even more important thing is control of the men and women with the guns. And that, thanks to 77 million Americans, is in the hands of a man who revels in his lack of regard for laws and the Constitution and has repeatedly stated his view that opposing him is tantamount to treason. What Hegseth's multiple visits to the Capitol these past months, with multiple opportunities to answer the same question and multiple variations of the same non-answer, have made clear is that he will be the defense secretary that Trump wants, the defense secretary that Mark Esper and, before him, Jim Mattis refused to be. All of which means that the survival of American democracy may be in the hands of career military officers — officers like Dan Caine, the Air Force general who is now Trump's chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Caine's name has been a fixture in Trump's rally speeches over the past six years, as the 'central casting' general who told Trump that his nickname was Raisin' Caine, and who then went on to promise that he could eliminate ISIS in weeks and then, in Trump's telling, quickly delivered. Given that story, it was easy to assume that Caine was a big fan of Trump and would do whatever Trump wants. This may well be what Trump assumed. Whatever image that might have conjured, Caine presents quite differently. Soft-spoken, deferential to both Republican and Democratic members of Congress on the dais and — perhaps surprisingly — a defender of the pre-Trump ethos of keeping the military out of politics. Basically the exact opposite of the man who has sat beside him through these many hearings and behaved as if he were still on that Fox News weekend set. When Caine was asked about Trump's speeches at West Point and then at Fort Bragg, where Trump political merchandise was being sold, Caine answered in a calming, normal, non-Trump, non-Hegseth way. 'By even my engaging in answering this question, that is making my job involved in politics,' he told the House Armed Services Committee earlier this month. 'I think the chairman and the force should stay out of politics.' For Trump to grab control of the armed forces for his personal ends, he would need to win over career officers like Caine, who spent decades in uniform under presidents of both parties and who share the basic precept that they serve the Constitution, not any single individual. It's possible Caine said what he did only because that's what the questioner wanted to hear and he is actually fully on board with Trump's rush to autocracy. On the other hand, it may be that, like former Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley, who along with Esper thwarted Trump's attempts to use the military for his own ends in the final months of his first term, Caine and other uniformed officers will maintain an allegiance to the nation, and not Trump, and that democracy will live to fight another day. At least we can hope.
