Emily Rogers death: Nicholas Matzen guilty of reckless homicide

The Brief
Nicholas Matzen has been convicted of reckless homicide in the death of Emily Rogers.
The jury also found him guilty of hiding a corpse.
Sentencing is scheduled for April 17.
MILWAUKEE - Nicholas Matzen, the Milwaukee man accused of killing his ex-girlfriend, Emily Rogers, has been found guilty of 1st-degree reckless homicide by a jury on Friday, March 7. Sentencing for Matzen is scheduled for April 17.
The backstory
An ordeal that began in May 2022 is finally coming to a close.
Terry Rogers and Ammie Lyde drove from North Texas when they learned their daughter, 23-year-old Emily Rogers, was missing along with her infant daughter. The little girl was later found safe.
Rogers was last seen alive by her on-and-of again boyfriend, Nicholas Matzen, on April 27, 2022. That same day, Matzen was released from jail. Rogers planned to break up with Matzen.
Rogers' body was found behind a St. Francis business days later.
What we know
The Milwaukee County jury took a little more than two hours to reach the guilty verdicts against Matzen on Friday, March 7. He was also found guilty of hiding a corpse.
FREE DOWNLOAD: Get breaking news alerts in the FOX LOCAL Mobile app for iOS or Android
It has been 1,045 days since Rogers died. With thousands of road miles logged from North Texas to Milwaukee, Rogers' family feels closer to putting painful memories to rest.
What they're saying
"A sense of relief. I'm so happy. Justice is finally – it's been a long time coming. I didn't think this day would ever be here," said Ammie Lyde, Rogers' mother. "These are tears of joy."
"We knew it was coming – it just took longer than we wanted," said Terry Rogers, Emily's father.
SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News
"There's no more wondering. It's over. I can move on with my life and close this chapter," Lyde said.
What's next
Again, sentencing for Matzen is scheduled for April 17.
The Source
FOX6 News was in attendance at the trial and used prior coverage.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

a day ago

• Yahoo

JD Vance attacks Newsom and LA mayor while misnaming senator arrested by the FBI

JD Vance, the US vice-president, accused California governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass of encouraging violent immigration protests as he used an in Los Angeles to rebut criticism from state and local officials that the Trump administration fueled the unrest by sending in federal officers. The centerpiece of Vance's Friday visit was a 14-minute news conference, during which he delivered remarks and took questions from correspondents selected by the White House. Local reporters were barred from attending, according to Elex Michaelson, the host of Fox LA's local evening news report. 'It's disappointing' Michaelson wrote on X, that the vice-president 'did not allow local reporters inside his Los Angeles press event. At this inflection point in L.A. history, they only took questions from national reporters.' When a correspondent for the far-right Daily Wire, who was selected by the White House to be the official pool reporter traveling with Vance, asked about a series of Democrats who have been placed in handcuffs recently by federal officers, Vance attempted to joke about California senator Alex Padilla who was forcibly detained by the FBI in the same location last week. Vance, however, called him 'Jose Padilla', using the name of an American citizen who was accused of planning to detonate a radioactive dirty bomb on behalf of al-Qaida in 2002. 'I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question,' Vance said. 'I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't a theater. And that's all it is.' Katie Porter, a former Democratic member of congress who is running for governor of California, called Vance's remark: 'Despicable-something you'd expect from an internet troll.' A spokesperson for Padilla, Tess Oswald, noted in a social media post that Padilla and Vance were formerly colleagues in the Senate and said that Vance should know better. 'He should be more focused on demilitarizing our city than taking cheap shots,' Oswald said. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. Responding to the outrage, Taylor Van Kirk, a spokesperson for Vance, said of the vice-president: 'He must have mixed up two people who have broken the law.' Vance's visit to Los Angeles to tour a multi-agency federal joint operations center and a mobile command center came as demonstrations calmed down in the city and a curfew was lifted this week. That followed over a week of clashes between protesters and police and outbreaks of vandalism and looting that followed immigration raids across southern California. Trump's dispatching of his top emissary to Los Angeles at a time of turmoil surrounding the Israel-Iran war and the US's future role in it signals the political importance Trump places on his hard-line immigration policies. Vance echoed the president's harsh rhetoric toward California Democrats as he sought to blame them for the protests in the city. 'Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass, by treating the city as a sanctuary city, have basically said that this is open season on federal law enforcement,' Vance said after he toured federal immigration enforcement offices. 'What happened here was a tragedy,' he added. 'You had people who were doing the simple job of enforcing the law and they had rioters egged on by the governor and the mayor, making it harder for them to do their job. That is disgraceful. And it is why the president has responded so forcefully.' Newsom's spokesperson Izzy Gardon said in a statement: 'The vice-president's claim is categorically false. The governor has consistently condemned violence and has made his stance clear.' The friction in Los Angeles began on 6 June, when federal agents conducted a series of immigration sweeps in the region that have continued since. Amid the protests and over the objections of state and local officials, Trump ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 national guard troops and 700 marines to the second-largest US city, home to 3.8 million people. Trump has said that without the military's involvement, Los Angeles 'would be a crime scene like we haven't seen in years'. A review of Vance's movements on Friday suggests that he had very little time to evaluate the situation in the city. His flight from Washington touched down at Los Angeles International airport at 1:35 pm local time. Vance's motorcade arrived at the federal building in Westwood that is being guarded by active-duty marines at 2pm. He started his news conference at 3:11pm. It is not clear exactly how much of the intervening 71 minutes Vance spent meeting marines, federal agents and local police officers, but he devoted at least part of that time doing an interview with the Fox News national correspondent Bill Melugin. At 3:30 pm, Vance departed the federal building for a Republican National Committee event. By 6:05pm, he was back on Air Force Two at LAX and ready for departure just four and a half hours after he had arrived.

Buzz Feed

5 days ago

• Buzz Feed

Consequences Of Bringing Your Phone To A Protest

This past weekend, Hina Sabatine protested President Donald Trump 's administration in Los Angeles, and they didn't bring their usual phone. 'We're protesting the administration, which is a lot scarier [than previous protests I've attended], because we've seen how Trump can lash out,' Sabatine said. For this past protest, 'I [brought] a burner phone which doesn't have my Touch ID or my face scan.' Sabatine is one of many who rallied against Trump at thousands of 'No Kings' protests across the nation this past weekend to reject authoritarianism and to counter Trump's military birthday parade celebration Saturday, according to the movement's website. These marches followed ongoing protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids targeting immigrants. Sabatine, who has marched for a free Palestine and Black Lives Matter over the last decade, said they are now adding additional layers of phone security in response to Trump deploying the National Guard to Southern California. In addition to using an old Android phone with just a memory card for taking videos, Sabatine also put that phone in a special pouch, known as a Faraday bag, that can block cell and Wi-Fi signals. 'Given that I am an immigrant, I'm just going to just do all the extra steps,' they said. Should you do the same? Many of us rely on our phones to travel and find our friends in crowds, but they can also reveal more about us than we would want ― especially to authorities. That's why one of the big questions you need to ask yourself is whether you should bring your phone to a protest. 'We get this question a lot, and I think it really depends,' said Anu Joshi, an American Civil Liberties Union staffer who has led multiple 'Know Your Rights' trainings for the 'No Kings' marches. 'What we encourage people to do is just to consider the potential risks.' Your phone can track your real-time location, and you might not want federal authorities or law enforcement to be able to look up that you were at a protest through a potential subpoena. 'Even if it's in airplane mode, there's a chance that your movements can be tracked,' Joshi said. 'The only way to ensure that you aren't being tracked through your phone is not bringing it at all." That's because 'when you move, your phone is connecting to various cell phone towers. The most surefire way of preventing that from happening is turning your phone off,' said Alejandro Ruizesparza, one of the co-directors at Lucy Parsons Labs, a Chicago-based group of technologists and activists that runs digital security training classes. Ruizesparza said when they protest, they turn their phone off before they even leave their home, so it's less easy for cellular data to help determine where they were going that day. The other downside to bringing your phone is if it gets confiscated by officers, the data within it may get used against you. 'If you are detained or arrested, then your phone could be taken from you. And law enforcement has wide use of a number of forensic extraction devices,' said Bill Budington, an Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff technologist. Forensic extraction devices can reveal private information, such as whether you attended a protest, your communications with sources, and social media posts on sensitive topics, for example. 'And so those devices, especially if they're being used on an older device or a device that hasn't had operating system security updates in a while, will be able to more readily extract all sorts of information,' Budington said. If you don't want to leave your phone at home, you can leave it in your car, so that it 'becomes harder to pinpoint your whereabouts at any point,' Joshi suggested. Or leave it off during the protest. 'This should ideally prevent some level of tracking and the creation of data linking you to these protests,' Ruizesparza said. If you do bring a phone, at least turn off Touch ID and Face ID. Although not bringing a phone at all makes it harder for surveillance, 'realistically, most of us want to have some form of communication and find it difficult to leave a phone behind,' Ruizesparza said. In these cases, privacy experts strongly recommend disabling biometrics like fingerprint recognition and Face ID if you bring your phone to a protest. That's because, in general, a memorized passcode has stronger legal protections against a court order compelling you to unlock or decrypt your phone. But when you enable biometrics logins, you may compromise your Fifth Amendment privilege against being compelled to incriminate yourself. 'As a practical matter, the protection is better too,' added Budington. 'Because if you are in a situation where you're detained, then regardless of a situation legally, an officer might be able to unlock your device without your consent just by taking your fingerprint and pressing it against the Touch ID or showing it to your face.' Disabling biometrics can vary by device, but for Android 12 and later devices, you can enable Lockdown mode to temporarily disable fingerprint and facial recognition. For iPhones, you can go to Settings, find 'Face ID & Passcode,' and turn 'iPhone Unlock' off. 'We really encourage people to disable those [biometrics] and instead to use a strong numeric or alphanumeric password to unlock your phone, to ensure that no one can unlock your phone without your consent,' Joshi said. As for tracking concerns, airplane mode is 'pretty good,' and can mitigate dangers of having your real-time location tracked by ads, Budington said. You can also buy additional tech to help you block your location signal, but there are pros and cons. Faraday bags can help block signals 'a little bit more than airplane mode,' Budington said, especially if you forget to turn off certain settings. But he cautioned that by bringing one, 'you will reduce your ability to plausibly deny that you're part of the protest.' These are basic phone security considerations, but there are longer primers that can help you strategize how to secure your phone before and after protests. For example, 'if you take pictures at protests, you should take some extra time to blur out faces and possibly remove metadata. Signal actually has a blurring feature built in,' Ruizesparza noted. Above all, don't wing it. Creating a gameplan before a protest takes time and sometimes difficult conversations but 'ultimately, secure practices don't just keep the individual safe, but also keep the collective network around the individual secure as well,' Ruizesparza said. 'Practical safety and security is a simple act of solidarity.' And it gives you and your friends the reassurance that if 'it hits the fan, there's something we can do,' Ruizesparza said. So before you ask the question of whether or not you should bring your phone, ask, 'Am I going with someone? And will people know what to do if something happens?' Ruizesparza said. Take it from Sabatine. They planned to be the only one in their protest group who would have a burner phone, so that their friends could go phone-less. Beyond writing phone numbers of each other and of lawyers on their arms, Sabatine also told their parents and friends about their location for the protest, so someone knew where they would be. If it wasn't for the increased military presence in Los Angeles, 'I don't know if I would have gone the extra mile for security or safety,' Sabatine said. 'But because the forces are now different, I think that's what's making people pivot their action plans a little bit more and erring on the side of safety.'

Yahoo

6 days ago

• Yahoo

Sally Nugent forced to halt BBC show live to deliver 'breaking news'

BBC Breakfast was halted live on air as Sally Nugent issued a breaking news update to viewers. It came following a fatal shooting of democratic state politician Melissa Hortman and her husband in Minnesota over the weekend. Sally shared with viewers that a man had been arrested following the incident. Vance Luther Boelter, aged 57, was captured on Sunday (June 15) night after an extensive two-day search operation for the killings that occurred the day before, YorkshireLive reports. READ MORE: Drug dealer who hid cocaine in Vaseline tubs jailed Speaking on the show, Sally said: "Police in the US state of Minnesota have arrested a man suspected of killing a democratic politician and her husband." Viewers were then shown an image of the man alongside a breaking news banner. Sally continued: "Officers released this photograph of the suspect, who was captured in what the Minnesota Governor Tim Walz described as a complex and dangerous manhunt. "Melissa Hortman and her partner were shot on Saturday after the attacker posed as a police officer." It has also been reported that the apprehended individual is accused of shooting and injuring another democratic legislator, state Senator John Hoffman, and his wife, Yvette, at their residence nearby. Following the arrest news, Minnesota Mayor Jacob Frey took to Facebook, commending the exceptional "skill and bravery" displayed by multiple law enforcement agencies in catching the suspect. "I'm grateful that our law enforcement partners in Minnesota acted with urgency to arrest the shooter and bring him to justice," he wrote. "Political violence is abhorrent, it cuts against the most basic moral fabric of our democracy. It's critical that those who commit these acts be held accountable under the law. I'm glad that will happen here." You can get all your favourite content from BirminghamLive on WhatsApp. Click here to sign up for breaking updates about the biggest stories in the region. If you prefer reading our stories on your phone, consider downloading the BirminghamLive app. You can get it from Apple here and for Android here. And finally, if there is a story you think our journalists should be looking into, we want to hear from you. Email us on newsdesk@