Yes, more and more celebrities are entering the phone business. Here's why

NEW YORK (AP) — More and more celebrities are looking to attach their names to your phone. Or rather, wireless services that could power it.
From cosmetics to snacks and signature spirits, brands launched or co-owned by high-profile figures are just about everywhere you look today. But several big names are also venturing into the market for mobile virtual network operators — or MVNOs, an industry term for businesses that provide cell coverage by leasing infrastructure from bigger, more established carriers.
U.S. President Donald Trump's family was the most recent to join the list with the launch of Trump Mobile this week. Here's what to know.
Which big names have entered the phone business?
On Monday, The Trump Organization (currently run by the president's sons Eric and Donald Jr.) unveiled Trump Mobile. The company says this new business will offer cell service, through an apparent licensing deal with 'all three major cellular carriers' in the U.S., and sell gold phones by August.
Trump Mobile marks the latest in a string of new Trump-branded offerings — which already span from golden sneakers to 'God Bless the USA' bibles — despite mounting ethical concerns that the president is profiting off his position and could distort public policy for personal gain.
'This raises a real question about a conflict of interest,' said Ben Bentzin, an associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin's McCombs School of Business. As the sitting president, Trump appoints leadership for the Federal Communications Commission — and the family's new phone venture exists under this regulatory authority.
All of this sets Trump Mobile apart from other big names that have recently ventured into the wireless business. Still, its launch arrives as a growing number of celebrities tap into this space.
Just last week, actors Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes and Will Arnett launched SmartLess Mobile, a name that mirrors the trio's 'SmartLess' podcast. Now live across the contiguous U.S. and Puerto Rico, SmartLess Mobile runs on T-Mobile's 5G Network.
Another wireless provider with ties to fame is Mint Mobile. While not launched by celebrities, Ryan Reynolds purchased an ownership stake in Mint in 2019. Mint's parent, the Ka'ena Corporation, was later acquired by T-Mobile in a deal worth up to $1.35 billion.
Beyond names of famous people, well-known brands that weren't traditionally in the phone business have also got in on the action over the years — particuarly outside of the U.S., Forrester Research senior analyst Octavio Garcia Granados notes. He points to Walmart's 'Bait' mobile plan in Mexico, for example, as well as Italian soccer club AC Milan launching its own mobile SIM cards for fans.
'The MVNO market is not new,' said Garcia Granados. 'What's new is the development on how it's consumed and the (ease) for brands to launch such plans.'
MVNOs have also emerged outside of high-profile brands or launch teams. Bentzin points to Straight Talk and Cricket — which are now owned by Verizon and AT&T, respectively. Still, traditional celebrity endorsements are common across the board. And in recent years, 'influencer marketing' has been 'the fastest growing area of advertising and promotion,' he notes.
What are these cell services offering? Why were they launched?
For Trump Mobile, the pitch seems to be all about having an 'all-American service' while also tapping into the fan base of the president.
The company noted Monday that it chose to unveil Trump Mobile on the 10th anniversary of Trump launching 'his historic presidential campaign.' The name given to its flagship offer, The 47 Plan, and the $47.45 monthly fee make reference to the president's two terms. And a mock-up of the planned gold phone on the company's website shows Trump's 'Make America Great' slogan on the front screen.
According to the company, Trump Mobile's 47 Plan will include unlimited calls, texts and data through partner carriers, as well as free roadside assistance and telehealth services. It also says the new phone, called the 'T1 Phone,' will be available for $499 in August — but notes that this device won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile. Still, the company emphasized that these phones will be built in the U.S.
Experts have since shared skepticism about that being possible in two months. And beyond the future T1 Phone, others stress that a monthly cell service fee of just under $50 is pricey compared to other MVNO options today.
'It's not actual lower pricing. It's really trading on the fan base, if you will, of Trump,' said Bentzin.
SmartLess Mobile and Mint Mobile, of course, don't carry these same political ties. And the wireless plans offered by both boast less expensive offerings.
T-Mobile-owned Mint advertises 'flexible, buy-in-bulk' plans that range from $15 to $30 a month. Each option includes unlimited talk and text nationwide, but vary depending on plan length and data amount. Mint, founded in 2016, says it started 'because we'd had enough of the wireless industry's games' — and promises to help consumers avoid hidden fees.
SmartLess Mobile's plans also start at $15 a month. Depending on the data amount purchased, that base fee can rise to $30 — but all of its plans similarly offer unlimited talk and text using T-Mobile's network. When launching last week, SmartLess underlined that its goal is to help people stop paying for the data they don't use, noting that the majority of data used by consumers today happens over Wi-Fi.
'Seriously, if your phone bill knew how often you're on Wi-Fi, it would be embarrassed,' Hayes said in a statement for SmartLess Mobile's June 10 launch.
What's the demand?
MVNOs have proven to be attractive acquisitions to big wireless carriers over the years. But whether or not the star factor promises significant demand has yet to be seen for the market's most recent entrants.
For the more established Mint Mobile, Reynolds' investment is a success story. The 25% stake that the actor reportedly owned in 2023, when the company announced that it would be acquired by T-Mobile, was estimated to give him a personal windfall of over $300 million in cash and stock. And since that deal closed, Reynolds has remained in his creative role for Mint and as the face of many campaigns — helping the brand continue to attract new customers.
It's no surprise that the potential of such business returns might attract other celebrities to make similar investments, Bentzin notes. Still, newer ventures are untested. And 'as the market becomes more crowded, it could be harder and harder to pick off individual consumers,' he added.
Beyond a high-profile name, quality of service and what consumers can afford is also critical.
'The competition battleground here is brand and price,' Bentzin said.
Still, if the marketing is right and product meets consumer needs, experts like Garcia Granados note that MVNOs can be a profitable business, for both the brands that start them and the telecommunications giants — like T-Mobile, Verizon and AT&T — offering this 'wholesale' access to their infrastructure.
As a result, he said, such high-profile ventures become 'a catalyst for others to follow.'
______
AP Business Writer Bernard Condon contributed to this report from New York.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Yahoo

23 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Don't regulate us like radio, music streamer Spotify tells CRTC

OTTAWA — Music streamer Spotify says Canada's federal broadcast regulator shouldn't impose rules meant for radio on streaming services. Appearing before a CRTC hearing today, company representatives compared regulating Spotify like a radio station to treating Uber like a horse and buggy. In its written submission, Spotify argued the CRTC doesn't have the jurisdiction to extend rules governing commercial negotiations and disputes in the broadcast sector to online players. The CRTC is holding a hearing on market dynamics as part of its work to implement the Online Streaming Act, which updated broadcasting laws to capture online platforms. During previous hearings, large cable and broadcasting companies like Bell and Rogers called on the CRTC to loosen existing rules for traditional players. They're taking aim at regulations governing how cable channels must be packaged and disputes about carriage of cable channels. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 20, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press

Yahoo

28 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) Faces $7 Billion Lawsuit While Partnering With Innovative Biotech

Eli Lilly has been in the spotlight recently with a 3.96% share price increase over the past month. The selection of RyboDyn Inc. to join Lilly Gateway Labs stands out among recent developments, signaling strengthened research capabilities in precision immunotherapies and potentially bolstering investor confidence. Additionally, the company's legal entanglement with the lawsuit concerning Actos, following a class certification affirmation, highlights ongoing challenges in the pharmaceutical sector. The company's ongoing talks to acquire Verve Therapeutics also show its commitment to growing its gene-editing capabilities. These events have added weight to the broader market's trends. We've identified 2 warning signs for Eli Lilly (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of. The best AI stocks today may lie beyond giants like Nvidia and Microsoft. Find the next big opportunity with these 27 smaller AI-focused companies with strong growth potential through early-stage innovation in machine learning, automation, and data intelligence that could fund your retirement. Recent developments at Eli Lilly, such as the RyboDyn Inc. collaboration, have potential implications for its strategic growth, particularly in precision immunotherapies. This aligns with the company's narrative of expanding capabilities in oncology and immunology, indicating possible enhancements in revenue and earnings forecasts over the long term. Additionally, as Eli Lilly progresses with Phase III trials, including those for orforglipron, the anticipated product approvals could bolster revenue avenues by tapping into high-demand markets like diabetes and obesity treatments. Over the past five years, Eli Lilly's total shareholder return was a very large 430.14%, demonstrating substantial long-term growth despite recent underperformance against the US Pharmaceuticals industry, which saw a 8.9% drop over the past year. This impressive five-year return provides context to the company's current position, underscoring a history of robust shareholder value creation. Given the ongoing acquisition talks with Verve Therapeutics and Eli Lilly's significant investment in both manufacturing and R&D, the outlook for future revenue and earnings remains optimistic. However, potential regulatory hurdles and pricing pressures, particularly in the U.S. market, highlight possible challenges. The shares, with a current price of US$775.12, are 21.0% below the analyst consensus target of US$981.63. This discount suggests room for growth, should the company meet or exceed the analyst expectations on revenue and earnings. Learn about Eli Lilly's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:LLY. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo

29 minutes ago

• Yahoo

Stellantis Evaluates Maserati's Future, Including Potential Sale -- Reuters

Stellantis (STLA, Financials) is weighing a possible sale of its luxury brand Maserati as part of a broader strategic review, according to a Reuters report citing two unnamed sources familiar with the matter. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 11 Warning Signs with STLA. The discussions reportedly began before newly appointed CEO Antonio Filosa officially takes the helm. Maserati's future is under review as Stellantis navigates a shrinking U.S. market, Chinese competition, and steep tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on foreign-made cars and parts. Despite the internal review, a Stellantis spokesperson told Reuters that Maserati is not for sale. McKinsey declined to comment. Maserati's sales fell by over 50% last year to 11,300 units, with no new models currently scheduled for launch. A new business plan is expected once Filosa begins his tenure. Stellantis' board remains split on the brand's futuresome directors reportedly view Maserati as a reputational asset, while others believe it lacks viability for a sustainable relaunch. Analysts say streamlining Stellantis' 14-brand portfolio could improve profit margins. The company's shares have lost roughly two-thirds of their value since March 2024. Chinese automakers such as Chery could emerge as potential buyers, echoing earlier moves like Geely's acquisition of Volvo or SAIC's purchase of MG. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data