Scientists discover super-Earth exoplanets are more common in the universe than we thought
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Astronomers have discovered that "super-Earth" planets may exist on wider orbits than previously thought — and this implies these rocky, or "terrestrial," worlds are far more common than was suspected. Super-Earths, in short, are planets with masses up to 10 times that of our planet, but still less than the masses of gas giant planets.
The discovery came after a small extrasolar planet, or "exoplanet," in a wide orbit around its star was discovered, courtesy of a gravitational "microlensing" event designated OGLE-2016-BLG-0007. This event indicated the exoplanet had a planet-to-star mass ratio that roughly doubles the Earth-sun mass ratio.
"We found a small planet in an orbit similar to Saturn's. This planet is part of a larger sample that shows super-Earth planets between the orbits of Earth and Saturn are abundant," team member Jennifer Yee of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian told Space.com. "The abundance of super-Earths was a surprise."
Yee explained that scientists previously knew from data delivered by the Kepler space telescope mission that super-Earths are common around other stars, but only within a distance from their respective stars equivalent to the distance between Earth and the sun. That expected distance is represented by one astronomical unit (au). This new work, however, shows that super-Earths are also common at larger distances from their host stars, in this case around 10 au (or 10 times the distance between our planet and the sun).
"Previously, there were only upper limits on the numbers of super-Earths [in wide orbits], and there was a suggestion that they might not exist at all," Yee continued.
When factoring in this super-Earth data, the team calculated that there should be around 0.35 super-Earth planets per star on wide Jupiter-like orbits. Yee explained that the overall distribution of planetary mass ratios could reflect the specifics of planet formation processes. "Specifically, the distribution suggests that the planets can be separated into two populations, one of super-Earths and Neptunes and one of more massive gas giant planets," Yee added. The team suspects this division in populations reflects the differences in formation processes between terrestrial planets and massive gas giant worlds.Discovering a larger population of super-Earths in Jupiter-like and Saturn-like orbits could also have implications for our understanding of so-called "habitable zones" around other stars.
Habitable zones are defined as regions around stars that are temperate enough to allow liquid water to exist at the surfaces of terrestrial planets within the area. Any closer to a star than its habitable zone band, and a planet's liquid water evaporates. Further away, it freezes.
This is why habitable zones are also called "Goldilocks zones" (like the perfect bear's porridge, liquid water is neither too hot nor too cold in these zones).
Though Jupiter and Saturn are outside the solar system's habitable zone, super-Earths in similar orbits around hotter stars could fit within such regions — if they are extended.
"The habitable zone region where we expect to find life in other planetary systems is extremely narrow. Our expectations regarding this zone have been driven by our own planet because that is the only place where we have definitively detected life, so far," Yee said. "Nature continuously surprises us."Yee added that the best way to understand the habitable zone region around stars in general is to measure the properties of the larger planet population.
"This gives more room for the unexpected," Yee said. "This measurement of the super-Earth population provides a new piece of the habitable zone picture, which will ultimately contribute to our characterization of the population of Earth-like planets."
Yee and colleagues made this discovery using the Korea Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet), consisting of three sites in Chile, South Africa and Australia. The three telescopes in three different time zones mean KMTNet can allow astronomers to monitor the night sky uninterrupted over the southern hemisphere.
"This discovery of this planet wasn't a surprise because KMTNet was designed to do this, but it is extremely exciting because it proves KMTNet is capable of routinely finding smaller planets, which is a requirement for understanding planet populations," Yee explained.KMTNet hunts exoplanets using a phenomenon first predicted by Albert Einstein in his 1915 theory of gravity, general relativity.
General relativity suggests objects with mass cause the fabric of space and time to "warp," with gravity arising from this curvature. When light passes by this curvature, its light gets curved, too. That means when a body of mass comes between Earth and a background light source, the image of that source is warped, magnified, or even multiplied upon reaching our instruments. A planetary system acting as a gravitational lens and coming between Earth and a background source can cause a tiny distortion in that source, a situation called "microlensing."
"It is a funny coincidence of physics," Yee said. "Microlensing is good at finding planets near the Einstein radius [the characteristic angle for gravitational lensing]."This radius is set by the mass of the lensing planetary system, including its star, the distance from Earth to that lens system, and the distance from Earth to the background source whose light is distorted. "In fact, it was the realization of this coincidence in the early 1990s that led to the first microlensing planet searches," Yee added.
Related Stories:
— Scientists discover bizarre double-star system with exoplanet on a sideways orbit (video)
— Does exoplanet K2-18b host alien life or not? Here's why the debate continues
— Earth-size planet discovered around cool red dwarf star shares its name with a biscuit
The team will now continue to use KMTNet and gravitational lensing to hunt for lensing planetary systems in an attempt to discover more super-Earths in wide orbits.
"We are working on increasing the size of the planet sample by including more seasons of KMTNet data in the analysis," Yee concluded. "We are also working on improving the quality of the data reductions to allow us to find weaker planetary signals."The team's research was published on Thursday (April 24) in the journal Science.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk promises more risky launches after sixth Starship failure
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. This was the ninth test flight for the rocket, and the third catastrophic failure in a row, just this year. Is this what we should expect from the very ship some are counting on to take humans further than we've ever been in the solar system? Or does this failure point to deeper concerns within the broader program? A decade of development The Starship program from Elon Musk's space technology company, SpaceX, has been in development for more than a decade now and has undergone many iterations in its overall design and goals. The Starship concept is based upon the SpaceX Raptor engines to be used in a multistage system. In a multistage rocket system, there are often two or three separate blocks with their own engine and fuel reserves. These are particularly important for leaving Earth's orbit and travelling to the Moon, Mars and beyond. With Starship, the key factor is the ability to land and reuse vast amounts of the rocket stages again and again. The company's Falcon 9 vehicles, which used this model, were fantastically successful. Initial tests of Starship began in 2018 with two low-altitude flights showing early success. Subsequent flights have faced numerous challenges with now four complete failures, two partial failures and three successes overall. Just two days ago, during the latest failed attempt, I watched alongside more than 200 other space industry experts at the Australian Space Summit in Sydney. Broadcast live on a giant screen, the launch generated an excited buzz – which soon turned to reserved murmurs. Of course, designing and launching rockets is hard, and failures are to be expected. However, a third catastrophic failure within six months demands a pause for reflection. On this particular test flight, as Starship positioned itself for atmospheric re-entry, one of its 13 engines failed to ignite. Shortly after, a booster appeared to explode, leading to a complete loss of control. The rocket ultimately broke apart over the Indian Ocean, which tonnes of debris will now call home. Polluting Earth in pursuit of space We don't know the exact financial cost of each test flight. But Musk has previously said it is about US$50–100 million. The exact environmental cost of the Starship program – and its repeated failures – is even harder to quantify. For example, a failed test flight in 2023 left the town of Port Isabel, Texas, which is located beside the launch site, shaking and covered in a thick cloud of dirt. Debris from the exploded rocket smashed cars. Residents told the New York Times they were terrified. They also had to clean up the mess from the flight. Then, in September 2024, SpaceX was fined by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for 14 separate incidents since 2022 where the launch facilities discharged polluted water into Texas waterways. Musk denied these claims. That same month, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposed a fine of US$633,009 in civil penalties should be issued to SpaceX. This was on the grounds of using an unapproved launch control room and other violations during 2023. Musk denied these claims too and threatened to countersue the FAA for 'regulatory overreach'. It's unclear if this suit was ever filed. Two other failed launches in January and March this year also rained rocket debris over the Caribbean, and disrupted hundreds of commercial flights, including 80 which needed to be diverted and more than 400 requiring delayed takeoff to ensure they were entering safe air space. Success of different space programs Until last year, the FAA allowed SpaceX to try up to five Starship launches a year. This month, the figure was increased to 25. A lot can go wrong during a launch of a vehicle to space. And there is a long way to go until we can properly judge whether Starship successfully meets its mission goals. We can, however, look at past programs to understand typical success rates seen across different rocketry programs. The Saturn V rocket, the workhorse of the Apollo era, had a total of 13 launches, with only one partial failure. It underwent three full ground tests before flight. SpaceX's own Falcon 9 rocket, has had more than 478 successful launches, only two in flight failures, one partial failure and one pre-flight destruction. The Antares rocket, by Orbital Sciences Corporation (later Orbital ATK and Northrop Grumman) launched a total of 18 times, with one failure. The Soyuz rocket, originally a Soviet expendable carrier rocket designed in the 1960s, launched a total of 32 times, with two failures. RELATED STORIES — 'Starship in space': See amazing photos from SpaceX megarocket's Flight 9 test mission —FAA requires SpaceX to investigate Starship Flight 9 mishap — SpaceX reveals why its Starship Flight 8 Ship exploded, failure traced to 'flash' in rocket's engines No sign of caution Of course, we can't fairly compare all other rockets with the Starship. Its goals are certainly novel as a reusable heavy-class rocket. But this latest failure does raise some questions. Will the Starship program ever see success – and if so when? And what are the limits of our tolerance as a society to the pollution of Earth in the pursuit of the goal to space? For a rocketry program that's moving so fast, developing novel and complex technology, and experiencing several repeated failures, many people might expect caution from now on. Musk, however, has other plans. Shortly after the most recent Starship failure, he announced on X (formerly Twitter), that the next test flights would occur at a faster pace: one every three to four weeks. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
There's a hidden rule that all life on Earth must follow, research claims
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. Life on Earth is complex and hard to understand, but new research may have finally given us a much-needed glimpse into the patterns that life follows as it spreads across our planet. According to a new study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, researchers believe life has a hidden rule that it has to follow, and the signs of that rule can be found in every bioregion across our planet. This rule, the researchers claim in their new paper, could help us explain why no matter how different every environment on our planet is, every bioregion seems to follow the same design. It could also help us better understand how the ecosystems around the world respond to environmental changes like global warming. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 Just looking at life on Earth as a whole, it's easy to see the oceans and other natural barriers as end points for the patterns that drive life. However, researchers say they have found evidence of life's hidden rule in multiple regions, no matter how far apart they are. No matter what the region is, or what the environment is, they say that life always follows the same pattern. For starters, life seems to radiate from a single core area in each bioregion. Then, other parts of life like animals or plants will spread out from that core. Some thrive while others don't. It seems, the researchers write, that these core areas provide the optimal conditions needed for species to survive and diversify. From there, the rest of the region's biodiversity radiates outward. This new research supports previous findings that small areas play a disproportionate ecological role in sustaining the biodiversity found in different bioregions. It also could help us with conservation efforts, which often require finding the best place to put a species so it can thrive under human protection. Additionally, this evidence seems to show that life's hidden rule is indeed true. It plays into a previous theory that there are plausible mechanisms that drive the patterns life follows. While we might not know exactly how life on Earth started, we're slowly learning more about how it grew to be the massive, global phenomenon that it is today. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
DNA could be preventing you from shedding pounds: Study
Add genetic makeup to the reasons you can't lose weight. New research from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Ben Gurion University in Israel revealed that one-third of people who followed a healthy diet didn't lose any weight, although they did experience health benefits. The study's participants exhibited 'significant improvements' in cardio-metabolic markers, such as cholesterol, lower levels of hunger hormone leptin and less visceral fat, which is found 'deep inside' the abdominal cavity, according to a news release, per the New York Post. The research findings were published in the European Journal of Preventative Cardiology. The study analyzed changes in weight and health for 761 individuals in Israel who had abdominal obesity. During three trials, participants were assigned to specific healthy diets, including low-fat, low-carb, Mediterranean and green-Mediterranean diets, for 18 to 24 months. Across all the clinical trials, 36% of participants achieved 'clinically significant' weight loss, while 36% achieved moderate weight loss. Meanwhile, 28% lost no weight or even gained weight. Those who were resistant to weight loss, mostly older individuals and women, showed the same health improvements as the participants who lost weight. 'We have been conditioned to equate weight loss with health, and weight-loss-resistant individuals are often labeled as failures,' lead study author Anat Yaskolka Meir, postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Epidemiology at Harvard Chan School, wrote in a statement. The study, which was funded by the German Research Foundation, did have some limitations. Most participants were men, researchers said, adding that similar studies should focus on women in the future. Dr. Philip Rabito, an endocrinologist and weight-loss specialist in New York City, told Fox News Digital in an interview that the study findings support what he's experienced in his own practice. 'There are likely genetic factors that affect an individual's ability to lose weight,' said Rabito, who wasn't involved in the study. 'Simply stated, despite similar efforts, caloric restriction and lifestyle interventions, some patients lose more weight than others.' Some individuals will not respond 'as robustly' to interventions like others, although this can be overcome with correct guidance, Rabito said. 'With proper counselling, dedication and adherence to a lifestyle program, all patients should be able to appreciate weight loss,' he said. 'Even if there is minimal or no weight loss, the study shows that there are still improvements in health parameters just from participating in a weight-loss program.' For those who don't lose weight with traditional weight-loss programs, prescription medications may be an option, he added. Manoel Galvao Neto, M.D., director of bariatric research at Orlando Health Weight Loss and Bariatric Surgery Institute, agreed that DNA can influence weight loss. 'It is a true combination of genetic factors, and it affects the metabolism, appetite, fat storage and response to diet and exercise,' he said in a separate interview with Fox News Digital. Based on emerging research, Neto said that obesity treatment can be more easily personalized, allowing those with genetic setbacks to achieve their fitness goals. 'If you have the marker for 'hungry brain,' and you take the GLP-1, you maximize your weight loss by up to 20%,' the doctor said. 'Obesity is a disease that is chronic, it is progressive, and so far, we don't have a cure, but we are getting more and more information to help control it in a personalized way.' Women 45 and older could have better weight-loss success: Study Carbonated water could be beneficial to weight-loss efforts: Study
