Cops quiz Pahang MCA Youth chief over video on mobile data sharing

Pahang MCA Youth chief Wong Siew Mun speaking to reporters after being questioned at Bukit Aman today. (Facebook pic)
PETALING JAYA : Pahang MCA Youth chief Wong Siew Mun was questioned by police today over a video in which she raised concerns about a request from the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission to telcos to collect mobile phone data.
MCA president Wee Ka Siong said Wong informed him that she had given her statement to Bukit Aman police this afternoon.
'She contacted me at 2pm to inform me that she had just finished giving her statement at Bukit Aman,' he said in a Facebook post.
Wee said Wong was accompanied by her lawyer, Kamarudin Ahmad, and was questioned from 11.15am to 1.15pm.
'I was informed that she is being investigated under Section 505(b) of the Penal Code and Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. Her mobile phone was also confiscated,' he said.
The investigation centres on a video in which Wong referenced a South China Morning Post report and questioned the motive behind MCMC's request to mobile network operators to submit user data.
MCMC has since clarified that the data collection initiative did not involve the access, processing or disclosure of any personally identifiable information.
Commissioner Derek John Fernandez said the mobile phone data would be used strictly to generate official statistics to support evidence-based policymaking in the information and communications technology sector and the tourism sector.

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Learn with AIFact CheckingText to SpeechAI Summary

Related Articles

Free Malaysia Today

an hour ago

• Free Malaysia Today

Rafizi takes a swipe at education ministry, defends early resignation

Rafizi Ramli said he felt it was better to resign than be a 'lame duck' minister after his party election loss, as he had lost the support of the prime minister. PETALING JAYA : Former economy minister Rafizi Ramli has taken a swipe at the education ministry after coming under criticism for his early resignation from the Cabinet, saying he refused to become a 'lame duck' minister or a 'yes man' after being defeated as PKR deputy president. He said he had resigned because it was clear he had lost the prime minister's confidence, making it impossible to carry out reforms effectively. In the debut episode of his Yang Berhenti Menteri podcast, Rafizi defended his work as a minister, saying 'about 80% of what I planned was approved by the Cabinet. These are all done'. Referring to criticism of his resignation, he said: 'I get annoyed sometimes. The economy ministry gets all the questions. Go ask the education ministry — it's been two and a half years. Where's the major policy framework? Nothing. 'But they're busy talking about someone who resigned.' Rafizi said he had completed most of his key initiatives during his tenure, including the 13th Malaysia Plan, energy transition, labour market reforms, progressive wage policy, fiscal reforms, targeted subsidies, and digital government initiatives. Better to resign than be ineffective Rafizi, who lost to Nurul Izzah Anwar for the deputy PKR president's post last month, said it was better to resign than become a 'lame duck' minister. Rafizi said he stepped down not because he was throwing a fit, but because it was clear he had lost the prime minister's confidence, making it impossible to carry out reforms effectively. He said staying on would have meant either becoming a powerless figurehead or facing constant rejection of his policies. 'When Nurul Izzah contested against me, it was clear she had Anwar's blessing. That sends a signal to the civil service that I no longer have the prime minister's support,' he said. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim is the PKR president and Nurul Izzah's father. 'If the prime minister no longer believes in your leadership, it's better to step down. If I had stayed on, I would have been a lame duck minister. If I tried to continue working effectively, I would have dragged the ministry down.' 'Unless I was willing to just clock in and out every day, but that's not who I am.' Rafizi said politics was about the responsible distribution of resources and values, and doing it efficiently and ethically. 'I get the most satisfaction from making real change, not from holding office without the ability to act.' Not a team player? Responding to criticism that he wasn't a team player during his time in the Cabinet, Rafizi pointed to his track record in Petronas and his work in leading thousands of volunteers to help PKR win over 40 seats in the 2018 general election He argued that being a team player doesn't mean saying 'yes' to everything. 'A good leader surrounds themselves with people who have the courage to disagree and who work based on competence and integrity — not just 'yes men'.' Rafizi also dismissed speculation that he plans to start a new political party, stating that it would only lead to instability within the country. However, he acknowledged that many long-time PKR supporters were disillusioned, adding that he plans to work closely with them. 'We don't need new drama. We need to focus on what matters,' he said.

New Straits Times

5 hours ago

• New Straits Times

[UPDATED] NSTP shines with 13 wins at MPI-Petronas Journalism Awards

KUALA LUMPUR: The New Straits Times Press (NSTP) group took home 13 accolades across various categories at the MPI-Petronas Malaysian Journalism Awards 2024 tonight. The wins were split among NSTP's titles, with four awards going to the New Straits Times (NST), six to Harian Metro (HM), and three to Berita Harian (BH). Harian Metro was the night's highlight, clinching the country's most coveted journalism honour, the Kajai Award. NST's Leslie Andres secured silver in the Best Column Writing category for pieces including 'UN veto power is main obstacle to world peace', 'Mindset shift must accompany any rule change', and 'Western singers skipping Malaysia due to those kicking up a fuss'. In the Best Investigative Journalism category, Aliza Shah from NST won the silver award for her impactful report titled 'Children forced into local pornographic content'. The report highlighted the disturbing rise of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online, which fuelled the underground industry. Sexual predators were not just grooming children online, they were also found to have abducted their victims, recorded and sold such content. The authorities conducted large-scale operations code-named Op Pedo Bersepadu PDRM-MCMC, which led to the arrest of 13 suspects and seizure of 40,000 CSAM and pornographic content. In video journalism, NST received bronze in both the Best Video Documentary and Best Video Talk Show categories. The documentary was produced by Aliza Shah, Iylia Marsya Iskandar, Khairus Ramli, and Amalina Kamal, while the talk show was helmed by Siti Nur Amalina Kamal, Hazween Syarina Md Hassan, Farrah Ain Jasmine Jasman, and Shahrul Redzuan Zulkifli. The ceremony saw over a thousand guests from across the media industry, including editors, reporters and corporate representatives, gather to celebrate excellence in Malaysian journalism. This year's awards attracted 549 entries from 58 media organisations, with honours handed out across 23 categories. The night also marked the launch of MPI's first-ever journalism e-journal by Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir.

Free Malaysia Today

5 hours ago

• Free Malaysia Today

6 judges honoured with rare elevation ceremony in Penang

The six judges with presiding senior Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff after the elevation ceremony at the High Court in George Town. GEORGE TOWN : Six High Court judges were honoured at a rare judicial elevation ceremony here today, reviving a long-standing tradition with roots dating back over two centuries. Today's ceremony presided over by senior judge Justice Rozana Ali Yusoff was the first to honour six judges at once. They were: Quay Chew Soon, Anand Ponnudurai, Azizan Arshad, Kenneth Yoong Ken Chinson St James, Fathiyah Idris and Rofiah Mohamad. Penang Bar chair Gowri Subbaiyah said the elevation ceremony usually takes place only when judicial commissioners are confirmed as High Court judges, 'which usually takes two to three years'. However, some among the six judges had been confirmed over the past three years but had not been formally recognised. 'Since they are still serving here, we felt it was only right to include them,' she said. It is understood that the elevation ceremony was last held in 2017, when Justice Lim Chong Fong, now a judge at the Court of Appeal, was elevated to the High Court. After today's ceremony, Justice St James described his confirmation as both humbling and liberating. 'I'm beholden to no one now. Only to God, my oath, the Constitution, and the rule of law,' he said. Justice Quay said his time in Penang had been both challenging and rewarding. 'I've enjoyed the cases, especially the complex ones, as they test the mind. And I've enjoyed the food and the people even more,' he said, adding that Penang was 'the best station a judge could hope for'. Justice Fathiyah paid tribute to the senior lawyers who helped her grow when she was a sessions court judge in Ipoh. Justice Anand, best known for his work in employment law, said the variety of cases in Penang had pushed him to grow. 'I've had to learn Acts of Parliament I never knew existed. And it's been worth it,' he said. 'My guiding rule is simple. I must be honest with myself. If I sign a judgment, it's because I believe it's the right decision.' The elevation ceremony is believed to have its beginnings in 1808 when the colonial settlement received its charter of justice, which led to the founding of the first formal court. Elevation ceremonies used to include a procession where judges would walk in full regalia from St George's Church to the court building. Although public processions are no longer held, the 'ceremonial spirit lives on', according to lawyer T Tharumarajah, who said the ceremony is aimed at introducing new judges to the public. It also serves as a bridge between the bar and the bench. He said: 'Judges and lawyers are meant to engage (with one another), not keep apart. But after the scandals that rocked the judiciary in the early 2000s, that bond weakened. It shouldn't be that way.'