Trump's megabill hits more trouble as Senate conservatives demand changes
The Senate version of legislation to enact President Trump's agenda is hitting new turbulence as conservatives led by Sens. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) are demanding deeper spending cuts to address the nation's $2.2 trillion annual deficit.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has focused this week on addressing the concerns of Senate GOP colleagues such as Sens. Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who raised alarms about cuts to federal Medicaid spending.
But Thune has to worry about his right flank as Johnson and his allies are threatening to hold up the bill unless GOP leaders agree to deeper cuts to federal Medicaid spending and a faster rollback of the renewable energy tax credits enacted under former President Biden.
Johnson, Lee and Scott are threatening to vote as a bloc against the bill next week unless it undergoes significant changes.
Thune plans to bring the bill to the floor Wednesday or Thursday next week, but he may not have enough votes to proceed on the legislation, say Republican senators.
'There's no way I vote for this thing next week,' Johnson told reporters.
'I don't want to go the Nancy Pelosi route, 'You got to pass this bill to know what's in it,'' he added, referring to the Democratic Speaker emerita who represents California.
Johnson noted that senators are taking a closer look at a proposal offered by Scott to significantly reduce the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), or the federal government's share of Medicaid spending, in states that expanded the program under former President Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Lee is pushing for a fuller phaseout of the renewable energy subsidies enacted by Democrats in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA).
'Mike is handling the IRA provisions of this, Rick Scott is handling the Medicaid. You need to satisfy those two, too. All three of us have to be yes or none of us are yes,' Johnson said.
Scott, who founded the Columbia Hospital Corp. and went on to run Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., one of the world's largest health care companies, wants to dramatically cut the 90 percent federal match for states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA.
'The focus should be on how do we take care of what Medicaid's original purpose was? It's children and the chronically ill,' he said.
Scott argues that able-bodied low-income adults are drawing far too much of Medicaid spending in states that expanded the program, such as California and New York.
'Half the people, half the adults that are on Medicaid under the expanded FMAP are not working,' he said, adding that these people are not disabled. 'We're running $2 trillion deficits.'
Scott says Medicaid shouldn't pay out more than Medicare and that states should not be eligible for expanded federal Medicaid payments for new enrollees after two years.
He also wants to further crack down on states' use of health care provider taxes to increase their share of federal Medicaid spending.
That sets up a fight next week with Senate Republican colleagues who have balked at the cuts to Medicaid spending unveiled Monday by Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho).
The current Senate bill would reduce the maximum permitted provider tax rate from 6 percent to 3.5 percent by 2031.
The Florida senator said colleagues such as Hawley and Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), who are worried about limiting health care provider taxes, have a 'legitimate concern' about the fate of rural hospitals. But he argued that the high rate of Medicaid spending won't solve their problems.
Collins has proposed a 'provider-relief fund' to the bill to help offset Medicaid cuts for rural hospitals, nursing homes and community health centers.
Lee, the Utah Republican, meanwhile is calling for a more rapid and complete phaseout of renewable energy subsidies in the bill and for tougher language to keep tax benefits from going to immigrants who entered the country illegally.
'Green New Deal subsidies that don't terminate by 2028 will effectively become permanent. If you don't want them to be permanent, tell your senators!' Lee posted on social platform X.
Language released Monday by the Senate Finance Committee would extend tax credits for hydropower, nuclear and geothermal energy into the 2030s.
A faster and broader phaseout of clean energy subsidies would be opposed by Republican senators such as Murkowski, Jerry Moran (Kan.), John Curtis (Utah) and Thom Tillis (N.C.), who warn that a sudden termination of federal support would disrupt the renewable fuel industry, cost jobs and strand billions of dollars in investment.
Yet Senate conservatives are ready for a showdown, arguing the deficit poses a major threat to the U.S. economy.
'The deficit will eat us alive if we don't get it under control. If not us, who? If not now, when?' Lee posted Thursday on X.
Johnson said Trump promised to balance the budget but argued 'the bill before us does not do it' and will instead worsen deficits over the next decade.
He said while the spending cuts in the legislation are 'the most spending reduction we've had ever,' the 'spending increase is unprecedented, 10 times more.'
'Look at the numbers,' he said.
The Congressional Budget Office unveiled a new projection that the House-passed bill to enact Trump's agenda would add $3.4 trillion to the debt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump ignites debate on presidential authority with Iran strikes and wins praise from Republicans
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump's bombardment of three sites in Iran quickly sparked debate in Congress over his authority to launch the strikes, with Republicans praising Trump for decisive action even as many Democrats warned he should have sought congressional approval. 'Well done, President Trump,' Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina posted on X. Alabama Sen. Katie Britt called the bombings 'strong and surgical.' The Senate Armed Services Committee chairman, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, said Trump 'has made a deliberate — and correct — decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.' The instant divisions in the U.S. Congress reflected an already swirling debate over the president's ability to conduct such a consequential action without authorization from the House and Senate on the use of military force. While Trump is hardly the first U.S. president to go it alone, his expansive use of presidential power raised immediate questions about what comes next, and whether he is exceeding the limits of his authority. 'This was a massive gamble by President Trump, and nobody knows yet whether it will pay off,' said Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Democrats, and a few Republicans, said the strikes were unconstitutional, and demanded more information in a classified setting. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said that he received only a 'perfunctory notification' without any details, according to a spokesperson. 'No president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy,' Schumer said in a statement. 'Confronting Iran's ruthless campaign of terror, nuclear ambitions, and regional aggression demands strength, resolve, and strategic clarity.' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said that Trump 'misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorization for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East.' The quick GOP endorsements of stepped up U.S. involvement in Iran came after Trump publicly considered the strikes for days and many congressional Republicans had cautiously said they thought he would make the right decision. The party's schism over Iran could complicate the GOP's efforts to boost Pentagon spending as part of a $350 billion national security package in Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax breaks bill, which is speeding toward votes next week. 'We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies,' Wicker posted on X. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune both were briefed ahead of the strikes on Saturday, according to people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. Thune said Saturday evening that 'as we take action tonight to ensure a nuclear weapon remains out of reach for Iran, I stand with President Trump and pray for the American troops and personnel in harm's way.' Johnson said in a statement that the military operations 'should serve as a clear reminder to our adversaries and allies that President Trump means what he says.' House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., said he had also been in touch with the White House and 'I am grateful to the U.S. servicemembers who carried out these precise and successful strikes." Breaking from many of his Democratic colleagues, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, an outspoken supporter of Israel, also praised the attacks on Iran. 'As I've long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS,' he posted. 'Iran is the world's leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities.' Both parties have seen splits in recent days over the prospect of striking Iran, including some of Trump's most ardent supporters who share his criticism of America's 'forever wars.' Republican Rep. Warren Davidson of Ohio posted that 'while President Trump's decision may prove just, it's hard to conceive a rationale that's Constitutional." Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a longtime opponent of U.S. involvement in foreign wars, also posted on X that 'This is not Constitutional.' 'This is not our fight,' said Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia. Most Democrats have maintained that Congress should have a say, even as presidents in both parties have ignored the legislative branch's constitutional authority. The Senate was scheduled to vote soon on a resolution from Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine that would require congressional approval before the U.S. declares war on Iran or takes specific military action. 'I will push for all senators to vote on whether they are for this third idiotic Middle East war,' Kaine said. Democratic Rep. Greg Casar, the chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, also called on Congress to immediately pass a war powers resolution. He said politicians had always promised that 'new wars in the Middle East would be quick and easy.' 'Then they sent other people's children to fight and die endlessly,' Casar said. "Enough.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Republicans express concern about lack of Trump trade deals
A number of Republicans are becoming increasingly frustrated with the lack of tariff deals from President Trump two weeks away from a July 8 deadline that could lead to the reinstating of heavy tariffs on imports from around the world. The administration has announced deals with China and the United Kingdom, and it insists it is working hard on others. Officials have also suggested there could be some wiggle room on the deadline. 'I think they're working very hard on them — I know that for a fact,' said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). 'I think the approach that was taken in the first place creates a lot of complications because it does produce this enormous workload and need for negotiation with an enormous number of countries.' Asked whether she is concerned the administration's negotiators are stretched thin, Collins was blunt. 'Yes,' she said. 'Very.' Trump announced wide-ranging tariffs in April, saying heavy duties would be placed on imports from countries around the world. The announcement contributed to a stock sell-off, and the president quickly shifted his tune, saying the larger tariffs would be put off for 90 days to provide time for negotiations. That has helped markets rebound, though they have not reached their highs from before the tariffs. The short time period and the lack of deals so far are raising nerves on Capitol Hill. 'Members want the president to make quick trade deals because we need clarity and certainty from a business perspective,' said one senior Senate GOP aide. 'Obviously, the president has rightfully lofty goals about economic growth, and that's not going to happen if we have prolonged uncertainty in the marketplace,' the aide added, noting that numerous companies have not only hit the pause button on growth opportunities, but also are losing money and being forced to divert business overseas because of the uncertainty surrounding the Trump tariff agenda. The source also noted there's confusion as to who the point person in the Trump administration is on tariffs. 'It's not only that they're stretched thin, but there's also confusion on who's the lead here,' the aide said, noting that at various points, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have taken the wheel. 'I just don't think any of that's helpful either.' Members want to see more trade deals as soon as possible to provide more certainty for businesses. 'There's definitely a lot of uncertainty,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito ( said. 'Everybody, and I know the administration's working toward this, would like to see … more numerous solid wins.' 'There's just a lot of anxiety in terms of deployment of capital because people are uncertain, and I think some good, solid wins as we move into July are going to allay that,' she continued. 'I think in the beginning that helped. They had a couple of wins and then it's gone a little silent.' The tariffs have fallen in attention as markets rebounded and the focus on Capitol Hill turned to Trump's legislative agenda. The Senate this week will try to move his budget reconciliation package, which would extend and expand the 2017 tax cuts. It hopes to complete work on the bill by July 4, though that deadline is in danger of slipping. The tax bill is also meant to provide certainty to business, so many senators see the two issues as going hand-in-hand. 'This is all about certainty, and we have a lot of uncertainty with [the bill], plus this. It's just compounding [problems for businesses] right now,' the Senate aide said. Bessent stayed at the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada after Trump left early Monday night. While the Treasury Department didn't announce any concrete progress from Bessent at the G7 on trade, Bessent suggested to lawmakers earlier this month that the July 8 deadline could have some wiggle room for certain countries. 'It is highly likely that for those countries that are negotiating — or trading blocs, in the case of the EU — who are negotiating in good faith, we will roll the date forward to continue the good-faith negotiation,' Bessent said. 'If someone is not negotiating, then we will not.'
Wall Street Journal
4 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Hasn't Briefed ‘Gang of Eight' on Iran
Trump said he hadn't yet notified the so-called Gang of Eight senators and members of the House about his plans on Iran. 'We'll be talking to them. It's not necessary,' he told reporters on Air Force One. The Gang of Eight includes the majority and minority leaders of both parties and the chairmen and ranking members of the House and Senate intelligence committees. U.S. law requires the president to keep the committees informed of U.S. intelligence activities, including significant anticipated actions, but reporting can be limited under extraordinary circumstances
