Mayor asks for help from City Council to address budget gap
WESTFIELD — Mayor Michael McCabe asked the City Council on April 17 for help in addressing a $16 million gap in the fiscal year 2026 budget over last year.
McCabe, who referred to a spreadsheet he had sent the councilors, said some of the cost drivers are outside of the control of the City Council or of the city itself. 'Health care costs are 36% higher, which includes costs to the city side of $5.8 million, and inflation rate costs are roughly at $5 million.'
He said in the School Department, contractual obligations have increased by $1.8 million to Units A, B, D and E. There is a transportation increase of $1.3 million and a special education increase of $1.1 million, both of which he said are mandated and 'not funded as they are supposed to be.'
On the city side, trash collection and recycling are up by $300,000, and he also expects a utility cost increase of 15 percent or $100,000 across the board, McCabe said.
'The school budget came in at $80 million, with a real budget of $74 million — we cut back $5.2 million. There are 43 positions in those cuts from the School Department,' he said.
McCabe asked for the councilors help for anticipated city budget cuts of $3 million, including $1.5 million in free cash from the engineering department.
'In FY26 there is $1 million work to do on sidewalks — we have a bunch that aren't in good shape. We lose the sidewalk contract in October, which means their rates are set from now to October,' he said, adding that as soon as October hits, the costs are expected to move from $175 per square yard to $460 per square yard. He said the other half a million in engineering was to complete the work on the Little River Levee.
McCabe then called Proposition 2 ½ 'a sticky wicket.'
'It's always good to lower taxes from the point of view of a politician, but you can actually lower taxes so much it hurts you. Over the last three years of my administration, we have never raised taxes. Last year, we had a net decrease — $3.5 million not used in the budget,' he said.
'Year after year for a decade, we were told the closer the gap to the levy ceiling, the more dangerous. Over the past three years, we've seen that gap increase from $4 million to $12.5 million.'
McCabe said the problem with increasing the gap between the levy limit and the levy ceiling to $12.5 million is when he goes to the Statehouse or asks the Legislature for help him understand why Westfield doesn't get more money in Chapter 90, Chapter 70 and Chapter 74, 'They say to me, 'What's your gap?' They're telling me, you have a $12.5 million gap — that means spend your money — because you have more of your own money that you should have been spending all along.'
'I am suggesting in this budget that we tax 2.5% — that's $2.2M. I am also suggesting that we spend another 2.5% and reach into that gap, which brings it down to $9.5 million. Then we can ask [the state] for more money,' McCabe said, adding that it drives School Committee member Bo Sullivan 'crazy' that Pittsfield, a similar-sized community, gets so much more money than Westfield does.
McCabe also talked about the shortage in revenue for trash services, which he said has been undercharging customers for years. '12,000 residences, all paying $85 a year — nowhere close to the expenses,' he said, which are closer to $265 a year.
He recommended several fixes, including having the department establish an enterprise fund for trash services, making it a revenue account. He said $65 a quarter matches the actual costs. 'I don't think we should keep paying them through taxes.' The City Council recently voted to continue to set the rate for trash services two meetings ago, voting against sending that responsibility to the DPW.
McCabe said local receipts are forecasted to bring in $900,000 in the next fiscal year, and new growth, only $500,000.
McCabe said he will present his budget to the City Council on May 5, after which they will have 45 days to review it. In the meantime, he said he is open to ideas.
After the meeting, Ralph Figy, who chairs the Finance Committee that will be in charge of the budget review for the City Council, said the mayor came to the council to explain how he is going to finance the budget.
'The mayor is open to solutions right now. Once he finalizes the budget, the council cannot add anything to the budget, we can only take away,' Figy said.
'We're really in a tough spot, and it's been coming. Every year, we've been using free cash to balance the budget, and it catches up on you. Last year, we used $4 million [in free cash] to balance the budget, and another $1 million to set the shift.'
'Taxes have to go up,' Figy said, adding that new growth, anticipated to be $500,000 next year, keeps going down. 'He is in a very difficult position. This fiscal crisis has been building over the years. Every time a new business that wants to come into town is not permitted — If you don't have the commercial basis, it's going to fall on the taxpayers.'
Figy said the mayor is proposing a 5% increase in taxes, the 2.5% allowed by Proposition 2 ½, and an additional 2.5% from the levy limit, for a total of $4.4 million 'We are allowed to tax up to our levy limit,' he said, adding that is how he is proposing to close the gap between income and expenses.
'The state's not going to help us because of potential revenue we're not accessing,' Figy said.
'If we don't want to do the [2.5%], we're going to have to come up with $2.2 million worth of cuts on top of the cuts that have already been made. That would mean positions. That means people. We're already cutting 43 out of the School Department, and I have no idea how much we're cutting on the city side.'
Figy said the mayor is trying to get away from using free cash in the budget, which is what creates the problem. 'We're all in this together. We've got to put our heads together and come up with solutions. This isn't going to go away easily,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
7 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland, a city desperate for improvement, looks to charter reform for help
Steve Falk has been talking to people all over Oakland about his plan to make the city's government work better. Perhaps no one crystallized Oakland's problems to him better than the unidentified City Council member who said: 'In Oakland, the buck stops nowhere.' Falk has lived that dynamic. The UC Berkeley Graduate School of Public Policy lecturer has worked for 39 years as a city manager in six California cities, including two stints each in Richmond and Oakland. 'This city is more dysfunctional than any other city I worked for,' Falk said earlier this year. 'It's because of the charter.' And now he wants to fix it as a leader of the Oakland Charter Reform Project, which sounds like the nerdiest, most boring thing imaginable, but it could be one of the best fixes that new Mayor Barbara Lee and the City Council could adopt. Much of the work being discussed was explored in a 2021 report on Oakland 's government by the policy think tank SPUR. Oakland's government is structured like the federal government's tripartite system of checks and balances, which is OK for a nation of 340 million, but not for a medium-size city of 436,000 that's trying to move quickly to fix potholes and provide public safety. Under the current system, the mayor only appoints the city administrator, holds no veto power and does not supervise, evaluate or set goals for city departments. The city attorney is an elected position, which the SPUR report said blurs who they are supposed to represent. The City Council, meanwhile, doesn't select, direct, oversee or evaluate the city administrator or any department heads, leaving members and their constituents frustrated when city workers don't carry out their policy directions. Plus, as Falk wrote recently on the Oakland Charter Reform Project's Substack, 'it has resulted in high turnover of the professional city administrator (six in the last five years!), which, in turn, negatively impacts the city's budget, workplace culture, and operations.' Oakland residents aren't happy, either. Last October, 75% said the city was on the 'wrong track,' up 10 points from 2022, according to the annual survey. Council Member Janani Ramachandran told me that when her constituents ask her, 'Why can't you fill my pothole, council member?' she replies, 'Well, I'm prohibited by the charter from directing staff, and I have no authority over city administrator. I don't even have the power to fire him in my role on council.' 'Right now,' Ramachandran said, 'the buck is being passed from one part of the city to another, to another on every other issue.' Ramachadran said the need for charter reform 'speaks to the dysfunction that a lot of Oakland residents are seeing right now, and why they feel like they can't have a voice in the process.' Lee is on board with improving the charter, too, though she wants to hear from the community first. Part of her plan for her first 100 days in office includes appointing 'a task force of League of Women Voters, ethics and good government experts to modernize Oakland's Charter and strengthen government accountability.' Ramachandran told me that in the next week or two, she will introduce a resolution to create that task force, which will spend months gathering community input all over Oakland and creating a reform plan to put on the June 2026 ballot. Lee, Ramachadran, City Council President Kevin Jenkins and Falk's team met last week to discuss changing the charter. Getting voters on board will not be easy, as this can be dense, wonky stuff. City leaders will need to spend a lot of time educating Oaklanders over the next year about how changing the way city government is structured could make it work better. (It helps that this is happening during the Ezra Klein-supercharged 'Abundance' moment of the political zeitgeist, which is challenging Democratic-led cities to show that they can accomplish something beyond virtue signaling.) Ramachadran, who frequently explains legislation on Tiktok and Instagram posts, conceded that charter reform will test the limits of her explanatory abilities. Hell, talking about charter reform might melt TikTok. 'Often the problem with these kinds of citywide initiatives and ballot measures that don't necessarily reflect what the average voter knows or understands is we're not speaking their language,' Ramachandran said. 'Usually, politicians and people that write these ballot measures are talking to people already involved in politics. You know, the people involved in the League of Women Voters and the neighborhood council leadership, not the 21-year-old from down the street or 55-year-old who only votes every four years.' Ramachadran said she is keeping an open mind about what system would be the best for Oakland and will let public input be her guide. She and Falk agree that the answer isn't the current system. Oakland's system is an outlier in California. Falk said 97% of cities have a council-manager form of government. Under this system, the council sets policy and supervises an appointed city manager who oversees daily operations. The mayor is selected from among the council members and serves as its president, leads meetings and holds a vote equal to other members. The city attorney is appointed by the council, not elected, and represents one client: the municipal government. Cities including San Jose, Long Beach and Riverside employ a similar system. Falk proposes tweaking this system slightly. He calls it a 'unitary strong mayor plan' — to give the mayor some form of a veto, which likely would be one of the most contentious provisions debated over the next year. But he believes it would make the mayor and council more responsive to residents and more nimble. 'That new power to vote — if paired with veto power — would make (the mayor's position) the most powerful mayor Oakland has seen in over a century,' Falk and his team wrote on Substack. Empowering a mayor like that comes with a potential downside, Falk acknowledged: 'A mayoral veto centralizes tremendous civic power in one individual. A mayor with a veto could diminish the city council's role in policymaking and, in so doing, generate resentment among council members and community groups who feel their influence is reduced. A veto could also be abused by the mayor to block popular legislation for personal or political reasons.' But mayors in six of California's top 17 cities have veto power. That will get worked out over the next year. What is indisputable is that change is needed. As Ramachandran said, 'There's no one magic (move) here that's going to solve Oakland's dysfunction. But I really believe this is going to be a major piece to starting to break down that dysfunction.'
New York Times
14 hours ago
- New York Times
Far-Right Party Tries to Expand Its Appeal in Germany's West
It was a warm spring day in Duisburg, a rusty industrial hub in Western Germany, and Alan Imamura, a member of the City Council, was chatting with constituents in a shop-lined pedestrian mall on the city's impoverished north side. Until recently, Mr. Imamura said, he was not welcome in places like this. That is because he is a leading local figure in the Alternative for Germany, known as the AfD, a far-right party whose national organization was recently declared an extremist group by the country's domestic intelligence service. Much of the AfD's support comes from the former East Germany. But in recent years, it has developed a beachhead in parts of Western Germany. During February's federal elections, several neighborhoods in Mr. Imamura's district gave the AfD some of its best results in the country, coming close to 40 percent of the vote. 'It's so different,' he said. 'You would not imagine, five years ago — when I put up some posters, people spat on me. And today the people, they say, 'Finally.'' The AfD emerged over a decade ago around skepticism against the euro, but it soon morphed into a party built on the denigration of immigrants and refugees, one of the reasons it was designated as extremist. A confidential, 1,018-page report by the domestic intelligence service, which was not released but was reviewed by Der Spiegel magazine, documents what it called 'an entrenched xenophobic mind-set' within the 'top leadership structures of the AfD.' For example, Bjorn Höcke, who leads the AfD in the Eastern state of Thuringia, has repeated Nazi-era slogans and called for 'large-scale' deportations with 'well-tempered cruelties.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
City of St. John's changes policy on naming new streets to avoid 'problematic legacies'
The City of St. John's is changing its street naming policy to no longer allow new streets in the city to be named after people. It's an effort to protect itself from potential problems in the future, according to Coun. Ron Ellsworth. "Naming streets after people carries a number of risks," Ellsworth said during Tuesday's council meeting. "[There could be] problematic legacies, political polarization, disparity in representation and cultural marginalization." To reduce those risks, Ellsworth continued, the city's policy has been updated to remove the option to submit a person's name to the city's reserve street names inventory. On Friday, Ellsworth told CBC News that applications that were already under review ahead of the policy change — of which there are four — will continue moving through the process. Current streets also won't be renamed, Ellsworth said, and the city will still allow the use of surnames because they aren't directly tied to a person. For example, a road could be named Breen Street, but not Danny Breen Street in honour of the current mayor. Ellsworth said there wasn't a single issue that prompted the change, but noted other municipalities have faced challenges in recent years. "If you don't pay attention to your history, you're doomed to repeat your history and repeat the same mistakes. So this is a clarity issue, an identity piece that will, hopefully as we move forward, will create less issues for future councils and the public," he said. "This is not about renaming anything, this is just about as we move forward. New streets, new subdivisions, this is the process we will be using." Coun. Tom Davis said he sees the change as a harm reduction measure. "People can have, you know, history that comes out after the fact. So in particular, I brought up the point about child abuse.… A lot of times, we don't know these people's history because a lot of times they never get brought to justice," Davis said Friday. "There was also, you know, the reflection upon, you know, colonialism and potentially the use of some names. But the main driver was new names that might be brought forward that could end up having criminal or some sort of negative connotation that would end up being a mistake." Ellsworth said there's nothing stopping the city from reviewing street names in the future, should the need arise. Coun. Ophelia Ravencroft also voiced support for the change during Tuesday's meeting. Ravencroft encouraged finding new street names with an Indigenous-first lens. Download our to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our . Click .
