EFF NC leader vows to storm Orania
Northern Cape leader Shadrack Tlhaole has vowed to infiltrate the Afrikaner town of Orania, where he plans to take up residence.
Provincial representatives of the political party led a march to the offices of the Premier to hand over a memorandum for a legal review on the existence of the town, which is built on private property.
However, town leaders have vowed to fight back against the call to action.
Addressing EFF members who had marched to hand over a memorandum to Northern Cape Premier Zamani Saul, the party's Shadrack Tlhaole called out Orania as a 'Apartheid-era racial-enclaved operating community within a democratic South Africa'
He said: 'Orania is not merely a town…upheld under the false narrative of cultural autonomy. It undermines the value of non-racialism, equality, and unity that is in our constitution.
Orania is a town that excludes black South Africans by race, language, and culture under the pretense of Afrikaner cultural preservation. It denies the right of back people to live, work, or own properties in the area. This is not culture; it is a modern-day Apartheid to disguise institutional racism.
Thlaole then claimed that the EFF would infiltrate Orania.
He continued: 'I am going to be a resident of Orania, I am going with my collective, the leadership of the EFF. I am going to fight tooth and nail to be one society; we are going to be inclusive.
'The EFF is focusing on unifying all the people. Orania on itself, if not attended to very soon, there will be tension between black and white in South Africa, so we are fighting that we are going to win.'
Orania was founded by Carel Boshoff III in 1991. His son, Carel Boshoff IV, is the current leader of the whites-only town.
He is also the grandson of Hendrik Verwoerd, who infamously enforced the white supremacy regime of Apartheid.
Located in the Northern Cape, the community of just 3000 individuals was built on private property and is self-sufficient, with its own businesses, schools, hospitals, and even currency.
Over the years, various high-profile people have visited Orania, including Gayton McKenzie, Penuel Mlotshwa, and Siv Ngesi.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘We are not xenophobic': No justification to favour foreign academics over South Africans, says ANC MP
The Department of Higher Education's claim that it can't act against institutions has been criticised. Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, Tebogo Letsie, at the Good Hope Chamber in Cape Town on 23 June 2025. Picture: X / @ParliamentofRSA ANC MP Tebogo Letsie, chairperson of parliament's portfolio committee on Higher Education, says there is no justification for universities to favour hiring foreign academics over equally qualified South Africans. His remarks followed a recent controversy involving the Central University of Technology (CUT) in the Free State. The university faced backlash after appointing a foreign internal employee as dean over a black South African woman who reportedly holds a doctorate. A video of Patriotic Alliance (PA) MP Ashley Sauls questioning CUT vice-chancellor Pamela Zibuyile Dube in parliament about the matter circulated widely on social media in April. Watch the video below: Parliament on recruitment of foreign academics Speaking during a media briefing on Monday, Letsie highlighted that the Employment Services Act required employers to ensure no suitable South African candidates are available before hiring foreign nationals. 'We place it on record that we are not xenophobic because there are others who are going to say we are xenophobic for saying our laws must be adhered to,' he said. He further emphasised that hiring foreign nationals should not undermine job opportunities for equally qualified South African citizens, as outlined in the Policy Framework for the Internationalisation of Higher Education in South Africa. 'So the excuse by the Department of Higher Education that there is nothing they can do when institutions hire beyond the 10% foreign, international talent [threshold] … is just a fallacy.' ALSO READ: Almost 90% of foreign government employees in health and education sectors, says DPSA Letsie also highlighted that the framework affirms it is in South Africa's best interest to appoint the most suitable candidates to academic positions at tertiary institutions, including qualified foreign nationals. 'We do need our international brothers and sisters, but it must not be a detriment to South Africans.' He further stated that, according to the policy, tertiary institutions in the country have no valid grounds to favour foreign nationals. 'There can be no justification for any South African institution prioritising and preferring foreign nationals to South Africans who qualify equally for the same post.' Referring to CUT, Letsie said: 'There was an equally—if not more—qualified South African lady… was not given the job, and the excuse that we got from the leadership of the institution was that they prioritised an internal person.' He argued that such reasoning should not be seen as a legitimate advantage. Watch the media briefing below: Higher Education department criticised Letsie further said the committee was concerned about the attitude of departmental officials and their failure to take accountability regarding the 'illegal' employment of foreign nationals. 'We can't have a department that is soft and fails to hold the universities accountable.' He added that if officials were unsure how to address the matter, perhaps it was time to 'gracefully resign'. READ MORE: Mashaba slams tertiary institutions for hiring foreign academics The Department of Higher Education, according to Letsie, informed the committee during a meeting on 18 June that it would be engaging with university councils on the issue. 'While the committee fully supports attracting and retaining international talent, it does not support those done outside of the national legislation and policies.' Seta board appointments Letsie also revealed that the committee plans to recall Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane to answer questions regarding the appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (Seta) boards. Nkabane had faced criticism for refusing to disclose the identities of the independent panel members who recommended chairpersons for the Seta boards. The controversy emerged after it was revealed that several appointees had ties to the ANC, including Minerals Minister Gwede Mantashe's son Buyambo Mantashe, former KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube, and former ANC KZN deputy chairperson Mike Mabuyakhulu. Though the appointments were subsequently withdrawn, Nkabane came under fire in parliament for withholding the panel members' names. Under increasing pressure from MPs and President Cyril Ramaphosa, she finally released the list on 17 June, which included her advisors and departmental officials. READ MORE: 'Gum-chewing' minister goes viral, prompting conduct warning for South African MPs However, Advocate Terry Motau, cited as the panel's chairperson, denied involvement in the process. Letsie remarked that Motau's denial 'raised more questions' about the integrity of the appointment process. He said the committee has requested documentation from all panel members, including their correspondence with the minister, letters of acceptance, remuneration details, meeting minutes, and the final report that recommended the appointments. Letsie confirmed that Nkabane and the panel members have been invited to appear before the committee. 'We don't have a date yet because parliament is seized with a process of adopting the budget,' he said. 'We had identified a date which was this Friday, but because of the work of parliament, we could not get that particular date approved.'
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
DA anniversary: Can a ‘white party' govern SA again?
The DA is now part of the government of national unity alongside the ANC. Twenty five years since the DA was formed, the party is still trying to convince South Africans that they are not a whites-only party. The party was established on June 24 2000, following a merger between the Democratic Party (DP) and the New National Party (NPP). Over the years, the party has seen many prominent black leaders leave for various reasons, including Mmusi Maimane, Herman Mashaba, Lindiwe Mazibuko, Mbali Ntuli, and former Midvaal mayor Bongani Baloyi. Political analyst Sanet Solomon said the departures of these black leaders have left many South Africans wondering about the internal affairs of the DA. 'The DA has been subject to a lot of critique given its struggle to retain its prominent black leaders. This challenge has translated into its inability to extend its voting base. 'While some of its policies have the ability to positively impact society, voters are also influenced by perception,' Solomon said. Transformation in the top structures Solomon said black leaders do not seem to have strategic positions in the party, which could easily create an impression that the party only really serves one racial group. 'Voters may need to see better integration. This may require the Federal Chair to be one racial group, the Chief Whip of another group, and the leader of a completely different group. 'South Africa is diverse, and this needs to be reflected in their leadership positions. There are phenomenal and competent people across all the diverse groupings. This is what people want to see,' she said. Despite the DA being the second biggest party in the government of national unity (GNU), Solomon said it is unlikely the party will run the country by themselves anytime soon. 'Some of their policies would be suitable for a ruling party, but it is unlikely that they would be able to become a majority party as the current system of proportional representation would result in more coalition governments,' she said. ALSO READ: Zille to the rescue: Will she save Joburg as the city's mayor? DA's balancing act Another analyst, Professor Susan Booysen, said the DA has made progress since it was founded. 'They have managed to keep their electoral territory, opinion polls indicate that they have made slight advances.' Booysen said that even though the DA is not close to being a majority party in SA, it could use the current coalition politics to influence policy. 'If they continue this current but modest progress, then they will probably be a very likely or inevitable coalition partner for future governance,' she said. Booysen said the DA has been forced to tread carefully around issues of race in the party. 'They are doing an often torturous, delicate, intricate balancing trick between coming across as more inclusive and simultaneously playing to their own small, racially-defined constituencies. 'It is the dilemma it is going to run into: simultaneous and competing endorsements by its own small internal constituencies and the broader South African community that is looking for restitution.' DA for all DA spokesperson Willie Aucamp rubbished claims that the party only serves white interests. 'The DA is the most diverse party in South Africa, and we elect leaders on merit, not race. 'Yes, people come and go in politics, but we remain focused on building a capable, non-racial alternative that serves all South Africans.' Aucamp said the party has proven that it can lead where it governs, and is now ready to take over the Union Buildings. 'South Africans are ready for a government that gets things done. The DA has shown we can lead with competence and integrity, and more people are turning to us to rescue the country from decline, including in Gauteng,' he said. The party will celebrate its birthday with a blanket drive on Tuesday. NOW READ: 'I am finally home' – Liam Jacobs ditches DA for Patriotic Alliance
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Can Floyd Shivambu lead a new party? Critics say he's too ‘weak' to tackle South Africa's problems
Despite his bold push to launch a new political party, Floyd Shivambu faces criticism over his inability to solve pressing issues during his time with the EFF and MK Party. Image: Facebook / MK Party Although many critics believe former uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) secretary-general Floyd Shivambu is 'too weak' and does not have what it takes to lead a political party, one political analyst argues he should not be underestimated. Shivambu, who was recently removed from the MK Party's parliamentary list and demoted from his post as secretary-general, held a press briefing last week, outlining his plans for a nationwide consultation process. He said he intends to engage with church leaders and community stakeholders to determine whether there is support for establishing a new political party. IOL News previously reported that Shivambu's announcement followed a report indicating the MK Party had excluded him from its list of Members of Parliament. However, Shivambu publicly criticised the move. In a surprising twist, the MK Party cited Shivambu's unauthorised visit to Prophet Shepherd Bushiri in Malawi as a breach of party protocol, which they claimed led to his removal. However, Shivambu dismissed the explanation, alleging that he was sidelined for questioning the alleged embezzlement of R7 million in party funds. 'I was redeployed for daring to speak out against corruption within the party,' Shivambu said during the briefing. 'Despite this, I remain committed to serving the people and will not leave the MK Party. I am exploring the possibility of forming a new political entity that reflects our shared values.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He added that his motivation stems from a desire to promote transparency and accountability in South African politics. Critics argue that he lacks the political clout to lead a new movement, especially given his prior roles in the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) as the deputy president and secretary general in the MK Party, during which he was accused of failing to address the country's major challenges. 'I don't think Shivambu has what it takes to lead a political movement and address the challenges facing the country, because he failed to do so in the EFF and MK Party. He's not going to make it, he's too weak to lead a party, I think he should just join other parties instead…,' said Magret Mashita from Mokopane, in Limpopo. Meanwhile, political analyst Siyabonga Ntombela said Shivambu should not be underestimated. 'If Floyd has the funds to start and register a party with the IEC, just like Hlaudi Motsoeneng, Duduzane Zuma, and many others did - so can he,' Ntombela told IOL News. 'Floyd cannot be as weak as some claim. He's entering a space that many - strong and weak, have fallen into...' Shivambu recently posted on X (formerly known as Twitter) that 10,000 people had volunteered to be part of the consultation process for the potential formation of the new party. Asked if this signals genuine grassroots momentum or simply early-stage enthusiasm remains to be seen, Ntombela said, 'I would lean more toward premature excitement.' 'Ten thousand doesn't come close to the number of votes needed to secure a parliamentary seat. And of those 10,000, how many will stick around when Floyd makes a mistake? If the ANC, a legacy party, has just over 1.4 million members in a country of 63 million, that should tell you how hard it is to earn support.' According to Ntombela, there will always be a need for new parties in the country. 'The real question is: what's novel about the new party? What change is it offering? Can it distinguish itself from the ANC and DA?' He also warned against expecting transformation from familiar political figures. 'If the leader comes from the ANC or DA, it would be foolish to expect anything different.' Responding to criticism on whether Shivambu can realistically win public support, especially considering his track record with the EFF and MK Party, Ntombela expressed skepticism. 'He can be hopeful, but it will be difficult to find a unique political niche.' 'The ANC rides on legacy. The DA is seen as predominantly white. The EFF appeals to the youth. MK and the IFP are rooted in Zulu identity and their founding leaders. None of these parties command overwhelming cross-racial support. Floyd's options are limited.'
