
A mass hunger strike transformed solitary confinement in California prisons. This documentary captures the fight
In 2013, nearly 4,000 California inmates in long-term solitary confinement (for decades, in some cases) went on what would become a months-long hunger strike. The collective action was designed to get the attention of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and protest the conditions of those in extended solitary confinement. At the negotiating table, the corrections department was met by a united front of inmates who, understanding the injustice of their dire circumstances, decided they would try to change the very policies that had left them 'buried' in concrete cells.
'The Strike,' which premiered on PBS' 'Independent Lens' on Monday and is currently available on PBS.org, the PBS app and PBS' YouTube channel, chronicles that feat of activist organizing. In the hands of filmmakers JoeBill Muñoz and Lucas Guilkey, the documentary shines a spotlight on the men who helped organize and mobilize their fellow inmates. But it is also a living record of the recent history of the carceral system in the U.S. in general and in California in particular.
'We wanted to trace the arc of the rise of mass incarceration on a deeply personal, intimate level,' said Guilkey. But also, this is not an individual story. It's a story of collective solidarity. And it's a story of organizing across racial lines.'
As title cards inform viewers at the start of the film, Pelican Bay State Prison's Security Housing Unit once held hundreds of inmates for more than a decade. Now, it's nearly empty. The film tells the story of how the 2013 hunger strike helped make that happen.
Former inmates such as Jack L. Morris (a Chicano man who served 40 years in prison, with more than 30 spent in solitary confinement) and Michael Saavedra (who served close to 20 years, many of them in solitary) share their painful experiences on camera.
Through them, 'The Strike' offers unprecedented insight into what led these California inmates to organize the largest prison hunger strike in U.S. history. With limited access to their families, the outside world and even one another, Morris, Saavedra and other Pelican Bay inmates found increasingly creative ways to connect with those they couldn't see face to face. Those included notes in library books and conversations had over toilets and vents.
'We all actively, collectively, did what we did,' Morris says. 'But in reality, we were siloed from others. We didn't know what was taking place. I just had to believe that what I was doing, others were doing. And seeing it on the film, it inspired me. But it disappointed me, too. Because I couldn't do as much as I saw many others do.'
For his wife, Dolores Canales, co-founder of the California Families Against Solitary Confinement, the film offers a chance to address the rhetoric pushing for solitary confinement in the first place.
'The narrative was: These are the worst of the worst,' she says. ''We are keeping you safe. We're keeping the guards safe. Everybody's safe because we're doing this.' But I feel this film contradicts that narrative and reaches the very depth of humanity.'
Morris and Saavedra share how dehumanizing it felt to hear the rhetoric while imprisoned. They were among the men (many of them quite young when they first entered the carceral system) branded as violent gang members. That was often enough to strip them of the scant freedoms they were afforded in prison, decisions that were made not by judges but by corrections administrators, and that were all too difficult to undo.
'I hope that the film will help the general audience — the people outside — to really see that people can change and grow,' Saavedra, who has been pursuing a law degree since his release, says. 'I'm hoping it gives audiences a different outlook upon us. And not just us people. But then also looking deeper at the system. This is what your system does. This is what the California Department of Corrections does to people.'
The Pelican Bay State Prison, which opened in 1989, served as a limit case for the practice of solitary confinement. As the documentary outlines, the building of that 'state-of-the-art" penitentiary in the middle of the redwood forest in the northernmost part of California helped dehumanize those housed within its walls. They were kept away from their loved ones, but also from public scrutiny.
'This is mostly men — Latino, Chicano, men from Los Angeles, mostly — who are on the Oregon border in this windowless, concrete fortress cell, in this massive institution designed to hold over a thousand people in solitary confinement,' Guilkey explains.
Such context makes the hunger strike all the more remarkable. And it's what made producing 'The Strike' so challenging in the first place.
'It's a protest that happens inside the most high-security prison you can imagine,' Muñoz says. 'How do you visually piece this together? How do you tell this story?'
Mostly, it required getting recently released inmates such as Saavedra and Morris to share their experiences, and then piecing their stories together with archival footage for historical context. But viewers of 'The Strike' also get to witness a tense meeting between the corrections department and the coalition of leaders organizing the hunger strike. Guilkey and Muñoz wouldn't disclose how they got that secretly-shot footage, but it's an explosive moment when those inmates present their requests calmly. They explain they have little to lose: What else would the corrections department do?
'When we think of the prison system, we usually think of power belonging to the administrators,' Muñoz adds. 'To the wardens. To the folks who decide the policies. To the jailers. And what was extraordinary about these protests, but especially this footage, was that it was all flipped on its head. Now, this collection of incarcerated guys have come together and represented a collective of power. The whole system was on its head.'
The documentary may be squarely centered on the fight to abolish solitary confinement as it exists and is enforced right now. But for its filmmakers, 'The Strike' offers a broader road map for how to face the current political landscape.
'This is multiracial, working-class, collective solidarity,' as Guilkey puts it. 'This is social movement organizing and what it takes to do collective direct action to effect material change in your lives. This shows how to fight authoritarian power.'
And as 'The Strike' shows, that takes work; one person at a time.
'Activism is not necessarily having a thousand people with you immediately,' Morris says, summing up the film's message. 'It's taking the steps by yourself and bringing people as you move along.'
Get our Latinx Files newsletter for stories that capture the complexity of our communities.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
No-nonsense Texas judge scolds man for wearing ‘World's Best Farter' shirt in courtroom: ‘I can see what it says'
A no-nonsense Texas judge scolded a man who brazenly wore a t-shirt that said 'World's Best Farter' to his felony court appearance. Jefferson County Judge Raquel West was less than pleased with defendant Sammy Morris' fashion choice when he appeared in front of her inside her courtroom last week, footage posted to the 252nd District Court's YouTube page shows. 'What made you think that was a good shirt to wear to court this morning?' West asked. 3 A Texas judge in Jefferson County called out a man for wearing a shirt that said 'World's Best Farter' for his felony court appearance. 252nd District Court / YouTube Morris mumbled that he picked the shirt — which said 'World's Best Farter,' then had 'I mean father' scribbled underneath — because it was the only shirt he could find to wear. 'That was the only shirt you had to wear in your closet?' she questioned. Morris tried arguing that the playful shirt said 'father,' but the Texas judge wasn't buying the excuse for his outfit choice. 'No, it says… I can read it. I see what it says at the bottom,' West said. West then reprimanded the man for not dressing appropriately under the circumstances as to why he was present in her courtroom. 3 Jefferson County Judge Raquel West was less than pleased with defendant Sammy Morris' fashion choice. 252nd District Court / YouTube 'You're in felony court. You need to dress appropriately for felony court, and that's not appropriate,' she said. West then let out a loud sigh and continued with the court proceedings. Courtroom participants — such as attorneys, parties and their representatives — are expected to wear 'appropriate business attire in the courtroom' and 'exercise common sense,' according to Texas courts. The courts list a business suit or a sports coat with dress slacks, a collared dress shirt, and a tie as 'appropriate business attire.' 3 Morris tried arguing that the playful shirt said 'father,' but the Texas judge wasn't buying the excuse for his outfit choice. 252nd District Court / YouTube The judge wasn't through with Morris as she continued to scold him for not having hired an attorney to represent him during his appearance. He claimed that he had called three lawyers before appearing in court, but he hadn't heard back from any of them in time. 'You need to get someone hired, or you need to actually talk to three lawyers,' she said. 'You can't actually hire someone unless you really try.' West then reset his case for 30 days and told him to get a lawyer. 'If you have to call 20 [lawyers] to get that done, then call 20,' the no-nonsense judge told him. She then told him that if he appeared in court again without a lawyer, his bond would be 'revoked,' and he would be sent back to jail. It's unclear what felony charge Morris is appearing in court for.

Indianapolis Star
5 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
The death penalty is always inhumane. Keep Indiana doctors out of it.
Every execution in Indiana since 1996, including those most recently of Joseph Corcoran and Benjamin Ritchie, has been carefully designed to make the viewer feel good about themselves. They might even mistake the process for a medical procedure, if dropped into the execution room with no context. Lethal injection, which involves an overdose of a sedative drug, was invented to be a 'humane' alternative to hanging, the electric chair, the firing squad and gas chambers, at least for the viewer. Lethal injection also requires participation by doctors, who are protected by a privacy curtain in the execution chamber and the anonymity afforded to them by state law. However, allowing doctors to violate their oath to 'do no harm' and American Medical Association guidelines in this case needs to stop. It creates a far worse precedent than purportedly less humane methods of execution, and paves the way for exceptions to the rule of 'do no harm' in the case of abortion and assisted suicide. Gov. Mike Braun recently pointed out it cost $900,000 for enough of the drug used for lethal injection to execute the last two state death row inmates. 'The same drug they're using to execute people — you can get it for less than $10 from a veterinarian,' State Rep. Bob Morris, R-Fort Wayne, told me in an interview. Morris is a Catholic who led a charge to abolish the death penalty in Indiana earlier this year. 'One of the biggest disturbing things is — if we really do respect life — is we don't even know where this drug even came from,' Morris said. If the high price tag of the 'humane alternative' — which also happens to be used to kill animals — is not convincing enough that either another method or a moratorium needs to take effect, the fact that lethal injection is still botched more than any other form of execution, despite physician participation, should be. This method of execution is unfair to both the doctor and the public, who are presented with a false view of death. Killing another human can never be humane. It is nothing if not a brutal form of justice at its core, something appreciated by the victims of those put to death. The recent nitrogen hypoxia execution of Kenneth Smith in Alabama came much closer to matching this reality. Studies have shown that the death penalty is not an effective form of deterrence, and it certainly doesn't serve any rehabilitative purpose. Physician-assisted suicide is a great example of what happens when this false view of death becomes ingrained in the culture. Eleven states allow physicians to participate in this practice, called 'death with dignity' by supporters. Death can never be dignified. When a man or woman feels like their life has no value, and there is no other release than death, it is a signal that they have been failed by society. There is no greater failure in such a case than the medical professionals who push a sanitized view of death on the most vulnerable. As a state that claims to be resolutely committed to the pro-life cause and defending unborn life, we also need to consider how we can condemn abortionists and demand transparency for violating their oath to do no harm if we not only accept physicians playing the role of prison executioner, but also grant them anonymity in doing so. Abortionists at least can claim to be caring for the pregnant woman when they put to death the innocent child in her womb. Physicians participating in the death penalty cannot claim to be putting the needs of one of their patients above another, because they have no obligation to execute justice on behalf of the state. Briggs: Indiana hides executions. Firing squads would be more honest. During my two years working as a patient care assistant at IU Health University Hospital, I helped care for, and saw doctors and nurses care for, scores of prisoners. Despite the fact many were likely convicted of terrible crimes, they were given the same attention as any other patient. It was an excellent testimony of moral duty and something that stuck with my spirit long after I decided the medical profession was not where I belonged. In a day and age where both political parties seem to endorse a culture of death in some form or another, a better answer to the problems we face is a consistently pro-life mentality. It is clear that the two executions Indiana has carried out in the past six months has led people on both sides of the aisle to recognize a problem. If our state is truly committed to ending its culture of death, physician involvement in the death penalty needs to end.


Tom's Guide
7 days ago
- Tom's Guide
How to watch ‘Grantchester' season 10 online for FREE – stream the period crime drama from anywhere
As we all know, from "Miss Marple" to "Midsomer Murders" the British countryside is one of the most dangerous places on Earth with a week-on-week body count to rival Mexico in the middle of a cartel dispute and 'Grantchester' season 10 is no different... Traveling outside the U.S.? Don't miss the show back home. Simply download a VPN to stream the show from anywhere. We recommend NordVPN. "Grantchester" season 10 premieres on Sunday, June 15 at 9 p.m. ET on PBS. Season 9 is currently streaming on PBS Passport. • U.S. FREE STREAM — Watch anywhere — Try NordVPN 30-day trial Set in a seemingly tranquil 1950s Cambridgeshire village, this season brings bodies in an orphanage and a university plus sundry other places and the death of a rock star but if that isn't enough intrigue pause to raise a quizzical eyebrow regarding the Rev. Alphy (played by Rishi Nair). D.I. Keating (Robson Green) is the same as ever but while he and Alphy have bonded, there seems to be something going on in the vicar's background that makes him push away those that want to be close to him. One case this season delivers romantic possibilities but will he be amenable? (Hint: check out the trailer below) Read our guide below for how to watch "Grantchester" season 10 online now, live and on-demand through "Grantchester" season 10 premieres on Masterpiece via PBS and the PBS app on Sunday, June 15 at 9 p.m. ET/ 8 p.m. CT.. Don't have cable? Stream your local PBS channel through the PBS website and app. Not in the U.S. when "Grantchester" season 10 airs on PBS? Don't worry — as we explain below, you can watch it live or on-demand when you download a VPN. We recommend NordVPN. Away from home at the moment and blocked from watching "Grantchester" season 10 on PBS? Luckily, you can still watch the show online thanks to the wonders of a VPN (Virtual Private Network). The software allows your devices to appear to be back in your home country regardless of where you are in the world. So it's ideal for viewers who may travel a lot and don't want to miss their favorite shows. Our favourite is NordVPN. It's the best on the market – and you can find out why in our NordVPN review. There's a good reason you've heard of NordVPN. We specialize in testing and reviewing VPN services and NordVPN is the one we rate best. It's outstanding at unblocking streaming services, it's fast and it has top-level security features too. With over 7,000 servers, across 110+ countries, and at a great price too, it's easy to recommend. Get 70% off NordVPN with this deal and a FREE Amazon gift card when you purchase a two-year plan (Exclusive deal for Canadian and U.S. residents) Using a VPN is incredibly simple. 1. Install the VPN of your choice. As we've said, NordVPN is our favorite. 2. Choose the location you wish to connect to in the VPN app. For instance if you're in the U.K. and want to view your usual U.S. service, you'd select U.S. from the list. 3. Sit back and enjoy the show. Head to and stream "Grantchester" season 10 online on Masterpiece. In Canada, "Grantchester" season 10 will be available on PBS Masterpiece Amazon Channel from Sunday, June 15th at 9 p.m. ET. For extended access to PBS content, consider getting PBS Passport. That'll provide access to a range of the network's channels, like PBS Life and PBS Masterpiece. Membership costs a suggested donation of CA$5 per month, although prices will alter depending on your local station. Currently away from Canada? Download a VPN and connect to the services you enjoy free-of-charge back home, without having to register for any additional subscriptions. We recommend NordVPN. The U.K. release date for "Grantchester" season 10 is early 2026 on ITVX. All previous nine seasons are also available to catch here. However, if you're an American or Canadian citizen in the U.K. right now and just can't wait that long, a VPN will allow you to stream "Grantchester" season 10 online by unblocking the free PBS website. We recommend NordVPN. "Grantchester" season 10 premieres on ABCiView in Australia on Saturday, June 28 - this will be after PBS in the USA. Out of the country? Connect to your home streaming services when you download a VPN and watch TV shows, films and documentaries no matter where you are in the world. We recommend NordVPN. Season 10 Episode 01: A suspicious death interrupts the Grantchester Easter celebrations. Alphy attempts to use the case as a distraction from his personal life. (Wednesday, June 15) S10 E02: A death at the university plunges Geordie and Alphy into a world of academic adversaries, while Alphy faces a romantic complication. (Weds, June 18) S10 E03: Alphy's attempt to cook a romantic dinner is interrupted when a familiar face arrives unannounced. (Weds, June 25) S10 E04: Alphy and Geordie investigate witchcraft at a home for orphaned and disadvantaged chidren, but everything changes when a body is found. (Weds, July 2) S10 E05: Leonard's drinking leads to a prison cell, and the consequences escalate from there. (Weds, July 9) S10 E06: Alphy and Geordie investigate the murder of a rock band member, and Alphy struggles with some family history. (Weds, July 16) S10 E07: Cathy and Mrs. Chapman's new business venture faces a challenge, and Geordie tries to intervene in Alphy's personal life unbeknownst to Alphy. (Weds, July 23) S10 E08: Alphy and Geordie keep an eye on rising tensions as a controversial figure is invited to speak at the university. When a murder is committed, however, they disagree on how to approach the case. (Weds, July 30) Yes, there is a real village named Grantchester in the U.K. near Cambridge in Cambridgeshire, England. No, not right now. You can stream the drama for free in the U.S. on Masterpiece via PBS. Remember — use NordVPN to access your usual streaming service if you're outside the U.S.. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.